Reya wrote:

hello Chata, its my m4m for you. xd
General

Nothing

DEBUT

00:15:371 (1,2) - a bit cosmetic change, maybe you replace 00:15:371 (1) - a bit left? Its looks more better
00:19:959 (2) - my opinion is - this slider to high in editor is no problem. but, accept your advice
00:39:724 - you must start from this tick, becuase it have a really strong beat and new vocal section started here.i'm getting singularity in the 'usamin usamin' vocal part. it remains for the time being
00:41:136 - same ^same as. in the 'vvvvwa^q^' voice
00:52:430 - same ^ check all pls, It is the most important thing in this diff, because flow and objects looks great same as
00:54:901 (4) - a bit high please ( x144, y288 )
01:05:136 (3) - looks a bit wierd xd, just make it more beautiful http://makina.s-ul.eu/MWftsBiI nope!
diff looks great, but i think you have problem with ticks. for example - 01:31:254 (2) - finish on big tick sounds good on that section, but 00:15:724 (2) - not good.
Its only my opinion.

REGULAR

00:12:901 - 00:15:018 - why you not mappe this section? btw, unused greenlines 00:14:048 - 00:14:312 -00:13:254 - ummm...it so little easter egg https://youtu.be/Mp6xrDyMySw?t=23s. and unused greenlines is not unrankable issue. is not be a problem/color]
00:17:136 - same problem with big ticks in first song section
00:36:195 (3) - change form, http://makina.s-ul.eu/fbrwpEjS
00:43:959 - its not a good thing to skip strong beats. It needs objectthat becomes too difficult to this diff.. that's not big importance than vocal imo
00:55:254 - ^same as
00:55:430 (1) - looks good, but idk, regular means advanced diff? This slider have problem with "in what direction it moves". Fix it please, hard for newbiessaving this. i'm recognize that.
01:48:901 (1) - looks not very good xd I like this (*´﹃｀*) u-samin
This diff are good too.

PRO

00:16:430 (3) - maybe make its symmertical? its looks more kawaii~ xd ( 00:16:959 (4) - a bit left too ) http://makina.s-ul.eu/lQptFHey 00:16:959 (4) - move to left. but, do not make symmetry(´﹃｀)
00:31:959 (3) - whoa, this object too low, just up themnice
00:46:783 (1,2,3,4) - why you not used all beats? i hear 1\2 < 00:48:195 (1,2,3,4) - its have same rhythmbecause, that's boring =3= saving this
00:55:959 (2) - same problem in regularit is semi insane. is not problem to insane players. maybe
nice hard xd

PRO

00:23:842 (1) - cosmetic changes http://makina.s-ul.eu/CzRSYHz3
00:53:136 (3) - xd
00:58:077 (1,4) - xd
01:00:195 (4) - just create more beautiful sliders xd
01:38:312 (1) - |common all diff's make '?' form
01:47:136 (4) - cosmetic changes
01:58:783 (1,2) - idk, this section sounds like 1\6, but its not 1\6. Actually, its not 1\4. We need bn or qat to check that ok. i'll check that.

Map are really good. I love this song so much. Hope its get ranked <3 Good luck.
(ty for m4m)

Neoskylove wrote:

m4m.

[debut]
안쓰이는 녹색선 제거해주세요. 사실 볼륨이나 sv같은 특수한것 외의 미사용 타임라인은 언랭이 아닙니다
00:28:430 (3,4) - 이런 흐름은 정말 어려울 것 같다고 생각됩니다. 3번 슬라이더의 프름에 맞게 4번 글라이더를 배치해주세요. 보류. 특별히 어렵다고는 생각안되네요
00:40:077 - 여기에도 비트가 추가되었으면 좋겠습니다. 여기는 패스
00:55:254 - ^ 여기는 추가
02:00:371 (1,2) -사실상 이지난이도인데 1/2 슬라이더 2개 연속으로 붙이는건 조금 아니라고 생각됩니다.마지막 노트라 큰 상관없다 생각하는데 반발이 심할시 지울게요
[regular]
00:23:489 (3,1) - 갑자기 스택하니 이상한 느낌이 났습니다. 스택 빼주세요. 그리고 뒤에 1번도 뉴콤 지워주시는걸 권장합니다.이상하다고 느껴질 스택은 아니라 생각되네요. 뉴콤보는 지움
00:33:371 (3,5) - 오버랩 보기 안좋네요. 피해주세요.
01:56:312 (2,3,1) - 거리가 안맞는것 긑습니다. 확인해주세ㅛ.이상없음

[pro]
00:41:371 - 보컬 생각해서 비트 추가 해주세요. 1/8요?
01:49:606 (3,4,5,6,7) - 잘 가다가 갑자기 7번에서 흐름을 꺾어버리신 이유를 모르겠습니다. 흐름에 맞게 96.312 로 옮겨주세요.단조로움을 피하기 위한 꺾기입니다

[master]
01:07:783 (1) - 강조음이니깐 앞에 패턴처럼 거리 띄워ㅅ주시면 좋을 것 같아요

굳럭

ekafjr wrote:

m4m

[REGULER]
00:44:489 (2,3) - not perfect blanket
just it lol

[pro]
00:12:195 (3) - i think need nc at here for readability maybeI don't think so
00:55:959 (2) - hmm direction not clear make a confused
01:34:783 (1,2,1,2,3,4,1,2) - ahh so cute :V of course :3


[master]
00:12:901 (1) - need more emphasize at here
00:14:312 (1) - so long why instrument soft at here :v?

aahh i cant mod fine map
so bad mod lol
if my mod its so bad dont give me kudosu :v

Lami wrote:

pp

02:13 *-Chata- is listening to [https://osu.ppy.sh/b/1022070 Abe Nana(CV : Miyake Marie) - Marchen Debut!]
02:13 -Chata-: 모딩해주시면 뭐든할게여
02:13 Lami: ㅋㅋ 님..
02:13 Lami: 오프스크린부터
02:13 Lami: 고치시는건 어떨까요?
02:14 -Chata-: 그게 머징..
02:14 Lami: 님..
02:14 Lami: 하면 안되는거요..
02:14 -Chata-: 뉴비라 그런걸 몰라여..
02:14 -Chata-: 하나 있던거 고쳤는데 그거말고 또있나
02:15 Lami: 01:48:901 (1) - 곧 오프스크린
02:15 Lami: 한단계 낮은 난이도 00:59:136 (1) - ㄹㅇ 오프스크린
02:15 -Chata-: 올
02:16 -Chata-: 써주심 될듯
02:16 Lami: ㅋㅋ
02:16 Lami: 그냥 여다가 적고 irc로그올리면됨?
02:17 Lami: soft-hitfinish11.wav, soft-sliderslide.wav 안쓰는 힛사
02:19 Lami: 제가 칠때 자꾸 틀려서 짱남 00:38:665 (3,4,1) -
02:20 -Chata-: 흠
02:20 -Chata-: 왜틀리심
02:20 -Chata-: 근데 저도틀림
02:20 Lami: 님 일단
02:20 Lami: 저런 점프는..매우..
02:21 -Chata-: 00:49:959 (3,4,1) - 여긴 안틀리던데..
02:21 Lami: 아 저기는 더\틀림
02:21 Lami: 1/4간격을 중지로치는저에게는..
02:22 Lami: 00:35:489 (1,2,3) - 치는느낌이 좀 1/4간격같은데 1/2임..
02:23 Lami: 00:45:371 (1,2,3,4,1) - http://puu.sh/qmaqY.jpg
02:25 Lami: 00:29:136 (1,2) - 랑 01:52:430 (1,2,3,4) - 랑 같게?
02:25 Lami: 모딩할게없음
02:26 -Chata-: 00:35:489 (1,2,3) -
02:26 -Chata-: 여기는가 1/4 간격같다는게
02:27 Lami: 간격 존나 짧아서요
02:27 -Chata-: 훔.. 그렇게 짧은가
02:27 Lami: 앞에서 1/4슬라뒤에는 전부 1/4간격으로 다음노트가 왔었음.,.
02:28 -Chata-: 간격 늘렷고
02:28 -Chata-: 00:29:136 (1,2) - 이것도 연타로 하라구염?
02:29 Lami: 그냥
02:29 Lami: 뒤에랑 똑같은 파트인데
02:29 Lami: 뒤에는 점프연타인데 앞에는 그냥 1/4슬라 2개라서
02:29 Lami: 좀 차이 많이나는거같아서여
02:29 -Chata-: 뒤에파트가 은근 살짝 더 어려워서
02:29 -Chata-: 연타패턴을 넣긴햇는데..
02:30 Lami: 님 하고싶은대로 하심될듯
02:30 Lami: 00:57:371 (1,3) - NC스왑해야되지않나
02:31 -Chata-: 00:38:665 (3,4,1) - 우사밍 우사밍은
02:31 Lami: 모르겟다
02:31 -Chata-: 테스트 플레이어좀 찾아봄
02:31 -Chata-: 스왑함
02:32 Lami: 01:37:606 (1) - 이거 2 모양으로 고쳐야됨
02:33 -Chata-: nope
02:33 -Chata-: 나나는 17살임
02:34 Lami: 아니 진짜나이를 적어야죠..
02:34 -Chata-: 나나는 진짜로 17살인데..
02:36 Lami: 님 난이도 레이팅 왜끝에 어떤건 .77이고 어떤건 왜 .7이;ㅁ
02:36 -Chata-: 다 만들고보니 .7~인건 77로 끌어올려맞추고
02:36 -Chata-: .6~7인건 .7이 되었음..
02:37 -Chata-: pro는 상당한 역작입니다
02:38 Lami: 프로에 뭔짓하심?
02:38 -Chata-: 서클 177 슬라 177 난이도 3.77
02:39 Lami: ㅋㅋ님 몬스트라타냐구요...
02:39 -Chata-: 몬스트라타보다 더할듯한데
02:39 -Chata-: 몬스트라타는 밑난이도는 포기했으니까..
02:43 Lami: 모딩할게없음 걍 접겟음
02:43 Lami: ㅋㅋ..
02:43 Lami: 저도 밑난이도는 포기함
02:43 Lami: 모딩을..
02:44 -Chata-: ㅋㅋ
02:44 -Chata-: 충분한듯

Leaf wrote:

[PRO]

01:31:254 (3,4) - ctrl+g ㄲ?놉
01:52:077 (2) - ^놉. 하드에 좀 안맞는듯함

[MASTER]

01:22:783 (4,1) - 둘중하나 복사해서 ctrl+g,h 하면 더 좋을듯 의도된 슬라이더
01:39:371 (1) - x:196 y:24 쯤에 놔보는건 어떨까용? 두 점프패턴이 다르게끔 의도됨

[MASTER+]

00:53:136 (5,6) - 1/2에서 5점슬라는 전 별로같다 생각함 이건걍 무시하셔도됨모양 괜찮다 상각되서 이대로
01:17:665 (7,1) - 수평맞추기 ㄲ?　 맞춤


맵을 너무 잘만드셔서 구경만 하다갑니다...

rui wrote:

ミミミンミミミンウーサミン
[DEBUT]
00:21:371 (1) - ほんとくだらない事だけど1grid下げて1マス下げると下のスライダーと平行になるよ
00:40:077 (x) - ここ音欲しい。単発にするとSD上がるのは確認したから無理やり感あるけど00:40:077 (2,3) - を1/2スライダーにまとめてしまう?
[REGULAR]
00:11:136 (1) - 何も音がないところから始まるのは変な感じ。00:11:312 (1) - から始めてスライダーでつむぐ感じに音とっていい気がします http://puu.sh/qxtAO.jpg
01:16:783 (2,3) - 「うさみん」と「パワー」は違う単語だし、面白みにかけてしまうが1/2スライダー2つに分けたほうがいい
[PRO]
00:11:136 (1) - 音ないところから始まるの違和感あるので00:11:312 から始めたほうがいいと思う
00:56:665 (1,2) - 早めのスライダーからの狭い距離 + overlapでかなりやりにくいので、こだわりがなければ(139,168)あたりに移動することをお薦めする
[MASTER]
俺ができないだけかもしれないけどAR9.2は早くない?AR9.0で十分な配置な気がする9.0では遅すぎる気もするけど、まあいい
00:11:136 (1) - 同じ
[MASTER+]
00:11:136 (1) - 同じ

特にまともな指摘箇所もみつからなかったので星投げて消えます
グッドラック

Mei wrote:

sorry for being sooo late

[REGULAR]

1. 00:57:724 (4,5) - change to a slider will be better?

[PRO]

1. 00:13:254 you should map this part as wellummm.. it is just ester egg

[Master]

1. 00:20:842 (4) - this kick slider should start from 00:20:665 ?　no. 00:20:842 - this red line have surely a beat
2. 00:17:842 (1,2,3,4) - try this I don't like pattern like this
3. 00:22:783 (1) - ctrl+g?
4. 00:26:665 (3,4) - too far? it seems not imo
5. 01:57:548 (3) - NC here is better

[Master+]

1. 00:18:459 (4) - remove this note would sound better for me
2. 00:35:489 (1,2) - use a 1/2 slider here is totally fine imo
3. 00:36:459 (3) - remove this note?
   
   all not fixed. that's increase the objects are break the balance imo. mainly 'Goroawase'

(つд⊂) sorry for short mod, ☆ instead

DaPiePiece wrote:

m4m

GENERAL

Pretty good mapset. Overall what needs fixing is flow and overlaps, as well as the difficulty of MASTER+

DEBUT

01:14:312 (2,3) - overlap?
01:40:430 (3,4) - maybe unstack and make this flow better

REGULAR

00:12:548 (3,4) - make this flow better
00:15:371 (1,2) - overlap
01:15:371 (2,3) - stack these
01:18:901 (4,5,1) - stack these
01:19:959 (3,1,2) - make this flow better
01:25:959 (6,1) - overlap unneeded

This diff flows the best

PRO

00:29:489 (7,8,1) - pattern a bit too hard for that difficulty
01:23:842 (3,4) - overlap unneeded

Great diff. Flows really well, mapped really well.

MASTER

00:11:312 (1) - Move this to the left a bit for better spacing and flow. Maybe make it curve into the 2 after
00:15:724 (1) - ctrl+g this? Flows better.
00:17:136 (1,2,1,2) - This doesn't flow that well, I'd change the pattern a bit
00:20:489 (3,4) - space this better
00:21:371 (1,2) - move this more down and to the right
00:29:489 (3) - curve this into the next circle
00:42:371 (8,1) - overlap
00:42:548 (1,2,3,4,5) - fix the spacing
00:43:959 (7,1) - overlap
00:50:665 (3,1,2) - same
01:17:136 (5) - curve this
01:24:195 (4) - I'd curve this
01:32:489 (2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - make this look nicer
01:34:342 (6,1,2) - same

This diff is well mapped, the only problem is spacing and flow. Improve those 2 and the map will be great.

MASTER+

00:18:459 (4,1) - move this up for better flow
00:23:665 (2,1) - overlap
00:25:430 (4,5,1) - stack
00:28:254 (4,5,1) - same
00:41:489 (4,5,6,1) - this flow badly
00:49:959 (3,4,1) - imo, unplayable. Change this pattern
00:54:548 (1,2,3,4,1,2) - make this look nicer
01:42:548 (1,3) - overlap unneeded
01:44:489 (4,5,1) - there is no triple in the song at this point. Make it a low slider velocity slider if you want a cursor stop there
01:45:018 (3,1,4) - overlap
01:48:724 (4,5,1) - stack
01:51:548 (4,5,1) - same
01:52:430 (1,2,3,4,5) - nice idea, but plays not so well, just stack them
01:54:371 (4,5,1) - stack

I see that you wanted to make a harder difficulty. It's nicely mapped, but turns out to be unplayable and overmapped. This is, in comparison to the other diffs, is the worst difficulty. It's not bad, but it needs fixing. For example, patterns like these 01:54:371 (4,5,1) - tend to be unplayable, and are better of stacked at this difficulty. If you compare this diff to other 5.7 stars, you see a clear difference in difficulty. So as I said before, make the patterns more playable, and maybe reduce the spacing on some of the jumps or sliders.

GL on the rank. Also god damn the song is catchy!

Mamayu wrote:

(ΦωΦ)ﾌﾌﾌ…

DEBUT

1. 00:21:371 (1,2) - 音変わらんしサークルで統一したい スライダーにした。1.71になっていろいろ変えてたらこうなってた
2. 00:33:724 (2) - ここ00:34:077 - から00:34:254 - の間音無いしちょっと違和感を感じるかな 私ならこう取るんだけどどう？？
   
   SPOILER

   
3. 01:06:548 (5) - NC?
4. 01:40:430 (3) - 最易diffでここだけstackってのは流石に避けたい

REGULAR

1. 00:27:724 (3,4,5) - どうせなら「ミ」「ミ」「ミン」で叩かせたくない？
   
   SPOILER

   
2. 00:30:548 (3,4,5) - ^
3. 00:33:371 (3) - ここわざと？ ここで止める理由があんまりないっていうか・・・ あとここらへんREGULARだけボーカル合わせになってるの少し変に感じたからメロディーに合わせたいって思ったエラーだった
   
   SPOILER

   
4. 01:53:842 (3,4,5) - same as 00:27:724 (3,4,5) -
5. 01:57:371 (1,2,3) - ボーカルが云々っての合ってるんじゃない？

PRO

1. さすがにAR8.7はやり過ぎじゃない? AR7~8のdiffが1つもないのはちょっとまずい気がする・・・ 7.7にしない?するつもりはなかったけど、7.7に惹かれた
2. 00:44:665 (2,1) - ぶっちゃけどっちでもいいけどスペーシングもうちょっと欲しいなあって思った
3. 01:57:371 (1,2,3) - れぎゅらーとおなじれぎゅらーとおなじ

MASTER

1. 00:20:489 (3,4) - う～んなんか不自然 やっぱり00:20:665 - からリバーススライダー置きたい
   
   SPOILER

   
2. 01:02:842 (6) - Ctrl+Gしたほうが若干流れいい・・・?このままのほうが好き。
3. 01:20:577 (5) - もうちょっと(4)に寄せない?ちょっと叩き辛そう少しだけだぞ？
   
   SPOILER

   
4. 01:27:459 (2,1) - さすがに離れ過ぎかなあ ただでさえ青線から始まってるリバーススライダー使った特殊なリズムなわけだし01:27:018 (1,2,1) - のDSは同じかそれに近いものにしたい2012年にこのパターンを使い始めてこれでミスるひとや難しいと言ったひとはいなかった。むしろ単発感覚で叩いたほうが繋ぎやすい。このままで
   
   SPOILER

   
5. 01:39:018 (1,2) - Ctrl+G? ここらへん全部下から上のAIMにした方がやりやすいし綺麗だと思う
6. 01:47:136 (4) - 序盤の同じとこはNCついてるしここもつけていいかも
7. 01:58:430 (4) - ここ普通に1/4じゃない？ 01:58:430 (4,1) - が同じにしたくないにしても1/6じゃなくて1/8が妥当な気がする あと少しずつvolumeあげていくのもいいかも自分お耳では1/6ではない。でも01:58:783 (1) - こことは多分違うし差を置きたい。前に01:58:783 (1) - この後の部分が1/6じゃないかって言われたけど1/4で合ってるし、このままでいいと思う。volumeのことは少し失敗したけど（OSUのボリュウーム設定のせい）77％が気に入るし、ランクインに響かないかぎりこうしてよう

hitsoundまで1の位が7なのは草生えた探せばもっとあるぞ
MAS+はクリアできないからパス！
GL~

HabiHolic wrote:

ㅈㅅ...

[DEBUT]

00:11:312 (1) - 이거에 관해서 말씀드리고싶은데요 스피너로 표현하는것보단 슬라이더 길게 빼시는게 좋다고 생각해요. 지금은 이지에서 좀 어려움도 있고 해서요
00:59:489 (3) - 모양이 00:58:077 (1) - 이거랑 대조가 안되서 시각적으로 많이 안좋아보이는데 차라리 원형모양으로 다시만들어주시는게 좋을 듯 싶습니다.원형보단 지금 모양이 맘에들긴 한데, 모양을 조금 가다듬어서 위화감이 심하지 않게햇씁니다
01:17:136 (2,3,4) - 지금 리듬도 정확하긴 하지만 보컬이 더 강하게 들리는 느낌이 있네요 01:17:665 - 여기까지 슬라이더를 늘리셔서 보컬을 맞추는 형식으로 해주세요. 이 부분 말고 다른 파트 동일부분도 포함입니다. 확실히 그렇긴 한데 이지 난이도니 이대로 두겟습니다. 상당히 패턴이 치기 힘들어질것 같습니다
01:57:018 (2,3,4) - 보컬 플로우시면 1/1 정박 사용해주시는게 오히려 더 좋을듯 싶습니다. 아마 바꾸시는게 좋을거예요 리듬 자체도 단순화 시킬수 있고요..
빨간 부분에 강한 소리가 있어서 거길 따라갔는데 이것도 나쁘지 않겟다 생각해서 전파트랑 같이 바꿉니다
[REGULAR]

00:19:077 (2) - 정확히 스택해주세요
00:34:783 (3) - 의도는 모르겠습니다만 이건 1/1 박자가 아무래도 정확히 떨어지는 리듬같아서요.. 다음 노트 치는데 어색하기도 하고..보컬 플로우입니다. 미이이잉 부분이요
00:44:665 (3) - 이런거 잘 안잡는데. 블랭킷 해주세요.
00:51:724 (3,4) - 이거 4/3인데 괜찮을지 모르겠습니다. 아무래도 하위난이도다 보니까 좀 부담스러울듯요
01:58:077 (3) - 앞과 동일하게 1/1로 해주시길 바랍니다.동일하게 이대로 가겟습니다

[PRO]

00:38:842 (1,2,3) - 아무래도 3연타보다는 연타 슬라이더 쓰시는게 좋을듯 짧게 반복 한번으로요. 아무래도 연타-단타로 이어지면 약간 플레이가 힘들다고 느껴져서요 매우 걱정하는 부분이긴 합니다만, 난이도 고로아와세를 맞추는 가장 중요한 부분이여서 일단 놔두겟습니다
00:45:371 (1,2,3) - 다소 플레이 힘들거같은데 디스탠스라도 줄여주시길 바랍니다.
01:21:371 (1,2) - 동일 의견이요. 이건 너무 심하게 떨어진 느낌이예요
02:00:371 (1,2,3,4) - 이거 배치에 관한 문제입니다. 4번을 주목해주시면 디스탠스가 일정하지 않은게 보이실거예요

[MASTER]

02:00:901 (4) - 제안이지만 배치 옆쪽으로 늘려주시는것도 괜찮아보입니다.

SPOILER

GL!

1. 難易度名に関して、このままで大丈夫ですがわからない人もいると思うのでcreator's wordに"DEBUT - Normal"のように書いてあげるといいと思います。
   
   
2. "soft-hitnormal8"が100msないので伸ばしてください。
   
   SPOILER

   
3. "soft-hitclap3,5,6"の最初の15msくらいまでわずかながら音がありますがほぼ聞こえない状態なので削除しちゃってください

1. 00:55:959 - 音が目立つのでここの緑線はいらないと思います。
   
2. 01:06:548 (1) - 難易度に対して少し短く感じました。普通に配置したほうが難易度も下がりいいと思います。

1. 00:12:548 (1,2,1) - 前の00:12:195 (3) - この部分で1/4の音を取っているのでここの3つをスタックさせてしまうと混乱を招くと思います。1/4スライダーの折り返しか1/2スライダーを代わりに置いてみてはどうでしょう？
   
2. 00:46:783 (1,2) - ここは1/2の音を取るべきだと思います。後半の00:47:489 (3,4) - この部分はやや歌詞が伸びているので大丈夫です。
   
3. 01:07:959 - ここのブレイクを削除・・・？上2つの難易度には無かったので
   
   SPOILER

   
4. 01:22:077 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4) - このあたりのスペーシングが読みづらいです。特に01:22:430 (2,3,1,2) - このあたりが同じ間隔で違う音になっているので調節してみてください。

1. 01:41:136 - ここから1/8の音を取りませんか？01:40:959 (6) - この折り返しでまとめてしまっているので違和感があります。

1. 
   01:00:548 (1,1) - スライダーの向きとジャンプの大きさを考えるとあまり流れがよくないと思いました。01:00:901 (1) - ここのノートを縦ではなく横にジャンプさせてみてはどうでしょう？

alacat wrote:

hi!

General :

1. 難易度名に関して、このままで大丈夫ですがわからない人もいると思うのでcreator's wordに"DEBUT - Normal"のように書いてあげるといいと思います。
   
   
2. "soft-hitnormal8"が100msないので伸ばしてください。
   
   SPOILER

   
3. "soft-hitclap3,5,6"の最初の15msくらいまでわずかながら音がありますがほぼ聞こえない状態なので削除しちゃってください

REGULAR :

1. 00:55:959 - 音が目立つのでここの緑線はいらないと思います。
   
2. 01:06:548 (1) - 難易度に対して少し短く感じました。普通に配置したほうが難易度も下がりいいと思います。

PRO :

1. 00:12:548 (1,2,1) - 前の00:12:195 (3) - この部分で1/4の音を取っているのでここの3つをスタックさせてしまうと混乱を招くと思います。1/4スライダーの折り返しか1/2スライダーを代わりに置いてみてはどうでしょう？スタックが混乱を招くことは納得しましたが、スタックを外したほうがスライダーよりはいいと思いました。
   
2. 00:46:783 (1,2) - ここは1/2の音を取るべきだと思います。後半の00:47:489 (3,4) - この部分はやや歌詞が伸びているので大丈夫です。
   
3. 01:07:959 - ここのブレイクを削除・・・？上2つの難易度には無かったのでエラーが有ったようです。ブレイクを入れなおしました。
   
   SPOILER

   
4. 01:22:077 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4) - このあたりのスペーシングが読みづらいです。特に01:22:430 (2,3,1,2) - このあたりが同じ間隔で違う音になっているので調節してみてください。

MASTER :

1. 01:41:136 - ここから1/8の音を取りませんか？01:40:959 (6) - この折り返しでまとめてしまっているので違和感があります。1/4だと解釈して置きを変えました

MASTER+ :

1. 
   01:00:548 (1,1) - スライダーの向きとジャンプの大きさを考えるとあまり流れがよくないと思いました。01:00:901 (1) - ここのノートを縦ではなく横にジャンプさせてみてはどうでしょう？

ヒットサウンドの編集に関してもし必要な場合は呼んでください call me back~

1. About difficulty names, do you mind explaining them? they come from other video game? to be honest I'm really unsure about them.

1. 00:11:312 (1) - vocal is really off, so I don't think you should start your map there, to be safe just start it at 00:11:489 -
2. The Hp setting is really high at this difficulty, I'd use 7 instead.
3. 00:20:489 (4) - a circle and a 1/2 slider would sound a lot better, since there is a change in the music at 00:20:665 -
4. 00:30:724 (2) - this is touching the HP bar, it doesn't looks nice, since you are overlapping the game elements, which don't looks professional.
5. 00:35:489 (1,2) - this rhythm is really weird, it doesn't represent the song correctly, convert this 00:35:489 (1,2) - in a single 1/2 slider, that fit the instruments and vocals better.
6. 00:48:195 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3) - you're following the vocals really nice, except for 00:49:077 (2,4) - , I guess your rhythm would improve a lot if you convert 00:48:901 (1,2) - in a slider, also do the same here 00:49:254 (3,4) -
7. 00:51:195 (2) - same as 00:30:724 (2) -
8. 01:27:901 (2,3,4) - why the jump from 2 to 3 is shorter than the one between 3 and 4, 3 is stronger than 4 tbh.
9. 01:31:254 (3) - same as 00:30:724 (2) -
10. 01:33:724 (5) - NC? also in 01:34:430 (5) - , since you was adding a NC every 4 beats at the before streams, for example: 00:39:724 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) -
11. 01:35:489 (3) - this needs a NC as well.
12. 01:37:254 (4,1,2,3) - I don't think 1/4 slider jumps fit at the slow part of the song, since is getting slower you should use less spacing between objects.
13. 01:44:577 (5) - mapping this sound is weird, since you ignored all the other similar sounds at this section, mapping only one make little sense IMO.
14. 01:55:695 (5) - there is nothing in the music, remove this circle?

1. 00:11:312 (1) - same as MASTER+, this one sounds worst, because you are ignoring 00:11:489-
2. 00:31:254 (1,2) - you are overlapping this kind of patterns, but then you do a huge jump at 00:31:959 (4,5) - , this is really confuse to play, since there are no warnings just the spacing changed so suddenly.
3. 00:49:254 (6) - same as 00:30:724 (2) - in MASTER+ diff
4. 00:53:489 (4) - this slider is ending in the place that the music changes melody, also the vocals are starting there, I'd suggest to use a 1/2 slider instead at 00:53:489 (4) - and then add a circle in 00:53:842 -
5. 00:55:165 - you are missing a circle here, without it sounds super weird.
6. 01:37:254 (2,1,2,3,4,1) - again, using 1/4 jumps at the slow part of the song, they don't fit the music at all and feels so weird to play them.

1. same HP as master? why?
2. 00:11:312 (1) - Same as master diffs.
3. 00:13:254 - I don't understand why you didn't mapped this part, since is basically the same melody as the later part.
4. 00:22:430 (3) - this sounds super weird, can you just remove it? and do a similar rhythm as your hardest diff?

1. 00:11:312 (1) - Same as master diff.
2. 00:13:254 - I really think that you should map this part, since is basically the same melody as 00:15:371 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) -
3. btw this isn't a normal diff, spaced 1/2s at this bpm and other complicated patterns, I'd call this more an advanced diff (spread is fine, just I'm wonder why you think this is a normal diff)

1. 00:11:312 (1) - Same as master diff.

Natsu wrote:

Hi

General
[]

1. About difficulty names, do you mind explaining them? they come from other video game? to be honest I'm really unsure about them.
   it's come from a official of the in-games of the IDOLM@STER, and iDOLM@STER Cinderella Girls
   
   
   
   you deny a own personality and official data? So, why used 'EXHUST, INFINITE, GRAVIVY', 'Hyper, Another' 'Extreme' etc etc.
   it is from rhythm game too. is the personality of the IDOLM@STER. why you don't sure this? why?
   
   

MASTER+
[]

1. 00:11:312 (1) - vocal is really off, so I don't think you should start your map there, to be safe just start it at 00:11:489 -
2. The Hp setting is really high at this difficulty, I'd use 7 instead. not sure.
3. 00:20:489 (4) - a circle and a 1/2 slider would sound a lot better, since there is a change in the music at 00:20:665 -
4. 00:30:724 (2) - this is touching the HP bar, it doesn't looks nice, since you are overlapping the game elements, which don't looks professional.
5. 00:35:489 (1,2) - this rhythm is really weird, it doesn't represent the song correctly, convert this 00:35:489 (1,2) - in a single 1/2 slider, that fit the instruments and vocals better.
6. 00:48:195 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3) - you're following the vocals really nice, except for 00:49:077 (2,4) - , I guess your rhythm would improve a lot if you convert 00:48:901 (1,2) - in a slider, also do the same here 00:49:254 (3,4) -
7. 00:51:195 (2) - same as 00:30:724 (2) -
8. 01:27:901 (2,3,4) - why the jump from 2 to 3 is shorter than the one between 3 and 4, 3 is stronger than 4 tbh.
9. 01:31:254 (3) - same as 00:30:724 (2) -
10. 01:33:724 (5) - NC? also in 01:34:430 (5) - , since you was adding a NC every 4 beats at the before streams, for example: 00:39:724 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) -
11. 01:35:489 (3) - this needs a NC as well.
12. 01:37:254 (4,1,2,3) - I don't think 1/4 slider jumps fit at the slow part of the song, since is getting slower you should use less spacing between objects.
13. 01:44:577 (5) - mapping this sound is weird, since you ignored all the other similar sounds at this section, mapping only one make little sense IMO.
14. 01:55:695 (5) - there is nothing in the music, remove this circle?

MASTER
[]

1. 00:11:312 (1) - same as MASTER+, this one sounds worst, because you are ignoring 00:11:489-
2. 00:31:254 (1,2) - you are overlapping this kind of patterns, but then you do a huge jump at 00:31:959 (4,5) - , this is really confuse to play, since there are no warnings just the spacing changed so suddenly.
3. 00:49:254 (6) - same as 00:30:724 (2) - in MASTER+ diff
4. 00:53:489 (4) - this slider is ending in the place that the music changes melody, also the vocals are starting there, I'd suggest to use a 1/2 slider instead at 00:53:489 (4) - and then add a circle in 00:53:842 -
5. 00:55:165 - you are missing a circle here, without it sounds super weird.
6. 01:37:254 (2,1,2,3,4,1) - again, using 1/4 jumps at the slow part of the song, they don't fit the music at all and feels so weird to play them.

PRO
[]

1. same HP as master? why?
2. 00:11:312 (1) - Same as master diffs.
3. 00:13:254 - I don't understand why you didn't mapped this part, since is basically the same melody as the later part. i'm following the original map in the iDOLM@STER Cinderella Girls. if it's a problem i'll remove this part of the MASTER and MATER+
4. 00:22:430 (3) - this sounds super weird, can you just remove it? and do a similar rhythm as your hardest diff?

REGULAR
[]

1. 00:11:312 (1) - Same as master diff.
2. 00:13:254 - I really think that you should map this part, since is basically the same melody as 00:15:371 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) -
3. btw this isn't a normal diff, spaced 1/2s at this bpm and other complicated patterns, I'd call this more an advanced diff (spread is fine, just I'm wonder why you think this is a normal diff)same as PRO. but, if you said, reason why? my answer, I'm not think this is a normal diff. I'm following official game's map. it is unusualness. i'm admit this. if you say you should map this part for need for ranked, i'll do it

REGULAR
[]

1. 00:11:312 (1) - Same as master diff.

You can call alacat for rebubble

Sonnyc wrote:

Regular.
01:25:959 (6,1) - sv 변동이 있었습니다만 그와 더불어서 간격 변동이 다소 갑작스럽게 이루어진 감이 드네요. 간격 조금만 띄우는게 어때요? 지금은 좀 시각적으로 불안정해보여요.

Pro.
00:11:312 (1,2,3) - sv 변동의 영향이겠습니다만 아무튼 간격이 시각적으로 불일치해서 불안정해보이네요.
00:23:489 (2,1) - 1/4 점프가 살짝 과하지 않았나 싶네요. 00:57:724 (1,1)과 비교했을 때 간격 변동이 조금 컸던거 같아요.
01:22:077 (1,2,3) - 간격이 전부 유사한데 어느거는 1/2이고 어느거는 1/4이네요. ar로 읽을수야 있겠지만 시각적으로 디자인이 썩 탁월하지는 않습니다. nope
01:23:842 (3,4,5) - 앞의 1/4와 다르게 여기만 간격이 축소된 이유가 썩 이해가 가지 않네요. 일단 이렇게 디자인하고 싶으시면 (4)에 뉴콤 넣어서 시각적으로 구별이 더 잘 가게 하는게 낫지 않을까 싶습니다. nope. 모든 플레이어를 정해진 디스턴스에 딱딱 맞게 플레이 하는 기계로 생각하지 말아주세요. 인세인 난이도가 박자에 따른 스페이싱 조절이 불가능한 난이도는 아니였을텐데요?
01:41:136 (3,1) - (3) 리버스 부분이랑 (1) 머리랑 살짝 겹치는데 오버랩을 최소화하기 위해 (1)을 살짝 오른쪽으로 치우는게 어떨까요? 다른 유사 1/4 지점에서는 오버랩이 나타나지 않아서 어색했던거 같아요.고의적인 오버랩입니다
01:52:783 (7,8) - 1/4 점프가 살짝 과한 느낌이었는데 00:29:489 (7,8) 정도로 처리하는건 어떨까요?

Master.
00:34:077 (1,2,3) - 박자가 다른데 간격이 유사해서 조금 의아했습니다. 더 뚜렷한 설정이 가능하지 않을까요? 인세인 이상급 난이도에서 찾을만한 이유는 못된다 생각되네요
01:40:430 (1,2,3) - 힛사적으로 봤을 때 앞의 드럼들보다 약한 느낌이 있는데 정작 더 큰 간격이 사용되어서 이질적이었습니다. nope

Master+.
00:11:312 (1,2) - 음. 1/4 점프인데 (2)의 도입 박자가 파란틱이라,, 박자 잡기가 상당히 애매하네요. 다르게 처리해볼 의향이 있으신지,, natsu의 제안에 의해 수정되었습니다. 가사의 도입부와 달라져서 위화감이 장난아니지만요
00:26:048 (2) - 이거는 제거하는게 이후 박자가 더 잘 살것 같다는 느낌이 약간 들었습니다. 오히려 당기는 느낌을 준다 생각합니다.
00:35:489 (1,2) - 음,, 1/4 슬라들의 대부분의 사용들이 꼬리는 죽이는 식으로 되어있는데 정작 꼬리 박자가 중요한 여기서 이런 1/4 슬라 사용은 썩 적절하지 않아보이네요. natsu에 의해 수정
01:37:254 (4,1) - 약간 이 점프는 살짝 무리한 감이 없지 않았던거 같네요. 뒤에는 17?은 낫밷. nope.

음악과 관련된 난이도명이라고 보여집니다만 Master와 Master+가 혼재하는 건 살짝 아쉬운 느낌,, 더 나은 네이밍이 있었으면 어떘을까 싶네요.
음.. 마스터+ 난이도의 1&3 키아이의 1/4 도배는 살짝 오버매핑성이 강하지 않나 싶은 느낌이었습니다. 딱 마스터 수준이면 적당하지 않나하는 느낌,,
지금 상태로는 노미는 다른 븡 분들께 저는 맡겨야 될 것 같네요.

Sonnyc wrote:

아 master+도 원작 내에 들어있는 네이밍인가요?

다른 부분은 나중에 말씀드려볼게요

Natsu wrote:

About difficulty names, do you mind explaining them? they come from other video game? to be honest I'm really unsure about them.

to be honest I'm really unsure about them.

alacat wrote:

recheck

soft-hitfinish4の遅延が気になるので最初のほうの小さい音カットしちゃってください

MASTER+
01:13:077 (2) - ここの1/4の折り返しですが、歌詞をフォローしたほうがより叩きやすいと思います。

1. 01:40:430 (1,2) - stack error? o-o
2. 00:56:577 - silence the spinner end

1. rip ar 9.7
2. 01:23:842 (2,3,4) - the spacing of these 3/4 sliders is too big in my opinion, hard to read
3. 00:40:783 (5) - 00:52:077 (2) - can add new combo for speed change

Karen wrote:

can i heart this?

just pointing out a little things

MASTER

1. 01:40:430 (1,2) - stack error? o-o
2. 00:56:577 - silence the spinner end

MASTER+

1. rip ar 9.7 I'm very sad.. RIP
2. 01:23:842 (2,3,4) - the spacing of these 3/4 sliders is too big in my opinion, hard to read
3. 00:40:783 (5) - 00:52:077 (2) - can add new combo for speed change

77777