why are you trying to make a good looking 8* map are you insane
forum
Omoi - Snow Drive(01.23)
posted
Total Posts
441
>insert poem here<lmao
do u want another gd
Topic Starter
I appreciate the video ^^xDololow wrote:
03:09:266 (1) - Maybe should add something like this. http://puu.sh/pSkm1.mp4
I was gonna do a slider-art thingy there if I could but your idea also sounds good. For now it's a break until I'm more decisive.
Hype 8*
I want a diff too =( I've wanted to map this since I first heard it
fuck
Topic Starter
Wait till you see how much it's worth with HR
how to completely fucking ignore the music and vocals and map practically and functionally random cross-screen 1/2s that change momentum and rotation at unpredictable points and in general is a bloody mess to look at. and that's just the kiai.
i hope you're banking on more than bullshit meme power to get this ranked, otherwise you might as well give up while you're ahead. The jump sections (all 20+ of them) need a complete do-over. I'm rather bored of seeing people map literally randomly placed jumps. At least have some basic concept of momentum or cursor positioning. And get a sense of rhythm, while you're at it.
i hope you're banking on more than bullshit meme power to get this ranked, otherwise you might as well give up while you're ahead. The jump sections (all 20+ of them) need a complete do-over. I'm rather bored of seeing people map literally randomly placed jumps. At least have some basic concept of momentum or cursor positioning. And get a sense of rhythm, while you're at it.
you think i can slide in a gd? maybe for a 5.5-5.9 extra?
Aww come on :c
Id like to CtB one
Id like to CtB one
If Mazzerin's death stream practice maps are getting ranked why shouldn't Kroytz' jump practice map also get ranked 
it had 4 weird jumps, but had problems at reading the last two troublesome. cool overdone map
and of course, Raikozen's Extra sounds too lame so you had no choice but to add "Tragic Love" /facepalm.
I'm a big fan of your streamy maps but I can't get behind this one. Many patterns seem to have inconsistent flow, different kinds of flows for no reason. Beginning has NCs which don't really deserve to be there. Almost no sense of rhythm in jumps (that aren't in the chorus). Very poor choices of flow for sliders and spacing. Slider structure is inconsistent also. Jump patterns have ok sense of flow but you keep changing flow and it doesn't feel good to play at all (and is sloppily mapped)
You poor soul, you must have thought "if monstrata can qualify his alien I could probably get away with this"...
which you probably will knowing current standards... RIP osu beatmaps
You poor soul, you must have thought "if monstrata can qualify his alien I could probably get away with this"...
which you probably will knowing current standards... RIP osu beatmaps
After seeing you map this on stream I felt like a quick mod might be helpful!
Sorry if the mod isn't of highest quality! I'm fairly new to it
SPOILER
2.nc on 00:47:034 (2) - instead of 00:46:766 (1) - to make it more consistent?
3. 01:10:873 (5) - NC and stack on top of 01:11:007 (6) -
4. 01:11:141 (7) - stacked on top of 01:11:275 (8) -
5. 01:11:945 (5,6,7,8) - same as above
6. 01:44:087 (3) - nc?
7. (IMO) 01:52:391 (3) - nc 01:52:659 (5) - nc 01:52:927 (7,8) - ctrl+g and nc on 01:52:927 (7) - makes this feel better to play
8. 02:04:712 (1) - keep in the same combo as 02:04:445 (5) -
9. same thing as before for 02:07:659 (5,6,7,8) - 02:08:730 (5,6,7,8) - 02:09:802 (5,6,7,8) - and 02:11:945 (5,6,7,8) -
10. not necessary but nc on 02:15:293 (7) - and put 02:15:695 (1) - in the same combo for consistency
11. 02:43:016 (3) - nc
12. 03:51:587 (3) - nc
13. stack 02:43:016 (3) - 02:44:891 (5,6) - 02:45:695 (5,6) - and 02:46:498 (5,6) -
That's all for that diff!
2. not necessary but nc on 00:49:596 (4) - for consistency
3. 00:59:373 (1,1,2,3) - keep in one combo
4. 01:18:123 (3) - nc or keep 01:18:391 (1,2,1,2) - in one combo for consistency
5. 01:39:820 (5) - nc?
6. 02:09:820 (5) - nc?
7. keep 02:39:015 (1,2,1,2,3) - in one combo?
8. 03:31:650 (6,1,2,3,4) - in one combo for consistency
9. 03:32:855 (1,2,3,1,2) - same as above
10. 03:56:427 (1,2) - same as above
11. 04:00:713 (2) - nc?
- Everlasting Memories
2.nc on 00:47:034 (2) - instead of 00:46:766 (1) - to make it more consistent?
3. 01:10:873 (5) - NC and stack on top of 01:11:007 (6) -
4. 01:11:141 (7) - stacked on top of 01:11:275 (8) -
5. 01:11:945 (5,6,7,8) - same as above
6. 01:44:087 (3) - nc?
7. (IMO) 01:52:391 (3) - nc 01:52:659 (5) - nc 01:52:927 (7,8) - ctrl+g and nc on 01:52:927 (7) - makes this feel better to play
8. 02:04:712 (1) - keep in the same combo as 02:04:445 (5) -
9. same thing as before for 02:07:659 (5,6,7,8) - 02:08:730 (5,6,7,8) - 02:09:802 (5,6,7,8) - and 02:11:945 (5,6,7,8) -
10. not necessary but nc on 02:15:293 (7) - and put 02:15:695 (1) - in the same combo for consistency
11. 02:43:016 (3) - nc
12. 03:51:587 (3) - nc
13. stack 02:43:016 (3) - 02:44:891 (5,6) - 02:45:695 (5,6) - and 02:46:498 (5,6) -
That's all for that diff!
- Raikozen's Tragic Love Extra
2. not necessary but nc on 00:49:596 (4) - for consistency
3. 00:59:373 (1,1,2,3) - keep in one combo
4. 01:18:123 (3) - nc or keep 01:18:391 (1,2,1,2) - in one combo for consistency
5. 01:39:820 (5) - nc?
6. 02:09:820 (5) - nc?
7. keep 02:39:015 (1,2,1,2,3) - in one combo?
8. 03:31:650 (6,1,2,3,4) - in one combo for consistency
9. 03:32:855 (1,2,3,1,2) - same as above
10. 03:56:427 (1,2) - same as above
11. 04:00:713 (2) - nc?
Sorry if the mod isn't of highest quality! I'm fairly new to it
I honestly don't see how you'll make it through this one. The random constant cross-screen 1/2 doesn't make for a good, non-jump practice map, and doesn't compliment the music at all. Ascension was a beautiful, difficult map that made sense with the song, but this can be put behind any 224 BPM hyped up song and fit fine with adjustments in form. (Don't get me started on the random 3/4 either I just don't get that)
Raikozen diff is just right, i love his maps so much and this one for rank is perfect overall. I think everlasting memories diff is nice but needs to be better at some point, however stream parts are brilliant and satysfying to watch. Just my first feelings when i saw this difficulties first in editor. GL (:
So far before i attempt at a NM for this....
Take a star <3
Noob opinions
The only thing I would say is to increase Raikozen's HP drain. If it's by .5 or 1 point, it will make it much harder of a map. At least I believe at this point it's easy enough to spam through the streams and hit only half the jumps to stay alive. It was ez pass ;(
Also for Everlasting Memories (why not eternal reminiscence D;), the map is difficult, yes, and that's how it should be. The first 3 Kiai's are spaced out equally in difficulties as 7.07*, then 7.12*, then 7.36*. While the last kiai is 7.92*. The song suggests this should be as it is, and that's fine. By personal opinion I think the 3rd Kiai should be a little bit more difficult, somewhere around 7.45*, so the buildup is a bit more even (I guess? idk). Another thing to note is that the 3rd Kiai has 10 less circles than the first two, but similar Slider count, maybe that can be used to increase the difficulty?
Again just opinions I'll probably mod this when some more maps get added.
Also for Everlasting Memories (why not eternal reminiscence D;), the map is difficult, yes, and that's how it should be. The first 3 Kiai's are spaced out equally in difficulties as 7.07*, then 7.12*, then 7.36*. While the last kiai is 7.92*. The song suggests this should be as it is, and that's fine. By personal opinion I think the 3rd Kiai should be a little bit more difficult, somewhere around 7.45*, so the buildup is a bit more even (I guess? idk). Another thing to note is that the 3rd Kiai has 10 less circles than the first two, but similar Slider count, maybe that can be used to increase the difficulty?
Again just opinions I'll probably mod this when some more maps get added.
Take a star <3
obviously i win XD
*me runs
*me runs
...
if raikozens diff stays the way it is, you will have a horrible spread, with the gders listed.
the race of ranking highest starrating map is on
literally
literally
How are you planning to ranks this? It is overmapped as hell
Like seriously, for example 03:26:811 and until the end are just a bunch of notes placed randomly cross the screen lol
Like seriously, for example 03:26:811 and until the end are just a bunch of notes placed randomly cross the screen lol
Just a few passing comments for top diff. If useless don't kds.
Firstly, AR 9.8? Why not just 10? If anything, it would help readability.
00:39:735 (8,1,2) - That's a rather sharp turn. I don't think the music calls for it either. A smaller curve, like the ones before this one, would fit better.
01:31:766 (1,2,3,4) - These notes shouldn't be here. The stream starts at 01:32:034 (5) -
And now the spacing.
On the first chorus it isn't awful, but on the second and the last it starts to get a bit hectic. You could argue that the music calls for the spacing but idk. I would get A LOT more opinions on the final few sections by top players. The spacing will most likely need to be toned down quite a bit, because as much as cross-screen jumps are fun , they are terrible for playability.
Also, why no sliders from 03:56:409 (1) - onwards? If you want to make one last final jump section, make it the last 8 notes or something.
Enough rambling from a player who can't play the map, gl with mapset.
Firstly, AR 9.8? Why not just 10? If anything, it would help readability.
00:39:735 (8,1,2) - That's a rather sharp turn. I don't think the music calls for it either. A smaller curve, like the ones before this one, would fit better.
01:31:766 (1,2,3,4) - These notes shouldn't be here. The stream starts at 01:32:034 (5) -
And now the spacing.
On the first chorus it isn't awful, but on the second and the last it starts to get a bit hectic. You could argue that the music calls for the spacing but idk. I would get A LOT more opinions on the final few sections by top players. The spacing will most likely need to be toned down quite a bit, because as much as cross-screen jumps are fun , they are terrible for playability.
Also, why no sliders from 03:56:409 (1) - onwards? If you want to make one last final jump section, make it the last 8 notes or something.
Enough rambling from a player who can't play the map, gl with mapset.
Arieeru called, he wanted his map back... pls at least use own ideas -.-
What the fuck do you even mean[Haruka-Chan] wrote:
Arieeru called, he wanted his map back... pls at least use own ideas -.-
Probably saw the beginning and nothing else, or can't make the difference between taking inspiration from rhythm and straight out copy-pasting patterns ( which isn't even a bad thing to begin with as long as it's done reasonably, and Kroytz was more than reasonable in taking ideas from arieeru ). Also obviously wasn't there during the 8+ hours stream he spent making the map.WORSTPOLACKEU wrote:
What the fuck do you even mean[Haruka-Chan] wrote:
Arieeru called, he wanted his map back... pls at least use own ideas -.-
god save us all
im not touching the other diffs. i have ptsd now
im not touching the other diffs. i have ptsd now
Everlasting Memories
00:03:408 (1) - why NC fam
00:25:358 (1,3) - blanket lol
00:27:233 (1,2) - i seriously thing ctrl+g this would play better, since you already had this sort of 00:26:429 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - flow. 00:27:500 (1) - also helps with flow break on here?
00:43:572 (1) - 00:43:706 - :C dont ignore this
00:45:715 (1) - this one as well. maybe do dis? http://puu.sh/rkYEE/304a07a488.jpg
00:49:331 (4,5) - ctrl g. coz 00:49:465 - part of the song is more emphasized (drum kick), so i think a more contrast(I CANT ENGLISH) jump is more appropriate
01:00:447 (1) - why NC tho
01:01:384 (5) - NC? coz new section? also to indicate sudden slowdown
01:12:768 (3,5,6,7,8) - youre not gonna antijump this? ;p
01:18:393 (3,4,5,6) - http://puu.sh/rkYNY/c9b7de6e94.jpg imo this is more memorable coz it looks neater and seems super fast.
01:23:215 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - surprised you didnt go for skystar jumps (ladder jumps, see kneesocks)
01:35:000 (1) - here comes that bad idea oshit wadddup http://puu.sh/rkZ1O/c30cb7a671.jpg
01:35:804 (1) - i suggest ctrl g coz imo it plays alot better (more circle flow). also improves impact for the next note. i hope you understand what i mean
01:37:545 (2,3,4,5,6) - try to make this more similar to the star of david. by that i mean make it more neater .
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/49/Star_of_David.svg/2000px-Star_of_David.svg.png
01:44:643 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6) - stab me with a spoon but some jumps here seem placed at random. or just plain messy, or i dont know how jumps are placed anymore.
01:59:643 (1) - ctrl g? seems to play better imo. to fix the spacing problem, 01:59:911 (2) - try placing (2) http://puu.sh/rkZpt/f68eccfa8e.jpg
02:09:822 (5,6,7,8) - if this is gonna stay as an antijump, i hope you fixed the problem i mentioned earlier in this mod. of course, making this a back and forth is also an option.
02:25:358 (1) - i suggest scaling this down to a 1/2 coz 02:25:491 - theres a beat here that you ignored :c
02:31:786 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12) - see if NCing 02:32:054 (4,7,10) - helps with visuals? http://puu.sh/rkZxK/bf78a5770b.jpg
02:33:393 (9) - surprised you didnt NC this
02:33:929 (1,1) - fIX STACKK
02:43:572 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6) - prETTY
02:56:161 (5,6) - i think making a jump instead of 1/4 sliders would be better since the 1/4s in here arent that hearable (to me). maybe something like this? http://puu.sh/rkZEK/a71786f099.jpg
03:47:121 - wow you play screenjumps but not this poor beat? ;c just put them on top itll be fiiinehttp://puu.sh/rkZJe/d4757eef56.jpg
03:55:358 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - crescendo says hi
04:00:715 (1) - make this note more notable pls lol. make it louder?
ekS DEE
00:03:408 (1) - why NC fam
00:25:358 (1,3) - blanket lol
00:27:233 (1,2) - i seriously thing ctrl+g this would play better, since you already had this sort of 00:26:429 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - flow. 00:27:500 (1) - also helps with flow break on here?
00:43:572 (1) - 00:43:706 - :C dont ignore this
00:45:715 (1) - this one as well. maybe do dis? http://puu.sh/rkYEE/304a07a488.jpg
00:49:331 (4,5) - ctrl g. coz 00:49:465 - part of the song is more emphasized (drum kick), so i think a more contrast(I CANT ENGLISH) jump is more appropriate
01:00:447 (1) - why NC tho
01:01:384 (5) - NC? coz new section? also to indicate sudden slowdown
01:12:768 (3,5,6,7,8) - youre not gonna antijump this? ;p
01:18:393 (3,4,5,6) - http://puu.sh/rkYNY/c9b7de6e94.jpg imo this is more memorable coz it looks neater and seems super fast.
01:23:215 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - surprised you didnt go for skystar jumps (ladder jumps, see kneesocks)
01:35:000 (1) - here comes that bad idea oshit wadddup http://puu.sh/rkZ1O/c30cb7a671.jpg
01:35:804 (1) - i suggest ctrl g coz imo it plays alot better (more circle flow). also improves impact for the next note. i hope you understand what i mean
01:37:545 (2,3,4,5,6) - try to make this more similar to the star of david. by that i mean make it more neater .
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/49/Star_of_David.svg/2000px-Star_of_David.svg.png
01:44:643 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6) - stab me with a spoon but some jumps here seem placed at random. or just plain messy, or i dont know how jumps are placed anymore.
01:59:643 (1) - ctrl g? seems to play better imo. to fix the spacing problem, 01:59:911 (2) - try placing (2) http://puu.sh/rkZpt/f68eccfa8e.jpg
02:09:822 (5,6,7,8) - if this is gonna stay as an antijump, i hope you fixed the problem i mentioned earlier in this mod. of course, making this a back and forth is also an option.
02:25:358 (1) - i suggest scaling this down to a 1/2 coz 02:25:491 - theres a beat here that you ignored :c
02:31:786 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12) - see if NCing 02:32:054 (4,7,10) - helps with visuals? http://puu.sh/rkZxK/bf78a5770b.jpg
02:33:393 (9) - surprised you didnt NC this
02:33:929 (1,1) - fIX STACKK
02:43:572 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6) - prETTY
02:56:161 (5,6) - i think making a jump instead of 1/4 sliders would be better since the 1/4s in here arent that hearable (to me). maybe something like this? http://puu.sh/rkZEK/a71786f099.jpg
03:47:121 - wow you play screenjumps but not this poor beat? ;c just put them on top itll be fiiinehttp://puu.sh/rkZJe/d4757eef56.jpg
03:55:358 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - crescendo says hi
04:00:715 (1) - make this note more notable pls lol. make it louder?
ekS DEE
nah, the beginning is hilariously similiar, it really feels like its been stolen. if arieeru doesnt like it, it'd recommend to change it tbh.AyanokoRin wrote:
Probably saw the beginning and nothing else, or can't make the difference between taking inspiration from rhythm and straight out copy-pasting patterns ( which isn't even a bad thing to begin with as long as it's done reasonably, and Kroytz was more than reasonable in taking ideas from arieeru ). Also obviously wasn't there during the 8+ hours stream he spent making the map.
Try again bud!
Ok...
This have TOO MUCH unrankable things considering that have too much diffs.
Let's point out some things (Everlasting one):
1- Your "Crazy jumps", some of them touch the HP bar and taking in mind that they doesn't have emphasis at all!, if you try to make a 8* diff at least do it good!.
2- Slider velocities?, Seriously? on a 0.50x of velocity and taking in mind that we are talink about ¡¡2,30!! of permanent SV and 240 of BPM.
3- 9.8 of AR...
4- Do you want that players touch your Unrankable jumps with 4,3 of CS?.
5- You doesn't Testplayed your map because LOTS of objects of the mapset touche the HP bar.
6- THERE'S NO EMPHASIS!, you putted all like random and it doesn't feel like to take some time on it, mapping takes time dude!.
7- Some things doesn't read good at all like 0.50x sliders, what you was thinking when you do that kind of patterns.
8- ALL it's like a Copy+Paste from the Arieeru map, men be original, if you are going to take ideas don't take all the diff.
9- Random jumps just for increase the difficulty of the diff, men this is really horrible, try to ask to an Experienced pleayer if you can't test it ¬¬.
10- All screen jumps (Jumpscares Ba dum pss) that doesn't go with the song.
11- The point of make a diff harder is make it passable and not D-ble (D-ble: Mostly of the players obtain D)
12- Random triplets.
13- You add a break when isn't necessary (01:53:215 (1) - ) but when you need to add it (02:16:116 (3) - ) you doesn't add it!.
I will pass of this, good night and i know that maybe you are gonna hate me but i don't care.
Ok...
This have TOO MUCH unrankable things considering that have too much diffs.
Let's point out some things (Everlasting one):
1- Your "Crazy jumps", some of them touch the HP bar and taking in mind that they doesn't have emphasis at all!, if you try to make a 8* diff at least do it good!.
2- Slider velocities?, Seriously? on a 0.50x of velocity and taking in mind that we are talink about ¡¡2,30!! of permanent SV and 240 of BPM.
3- 9.8 of AR...
4- Do you want that players touch your Unrankable jumps with 4,3 of CS?.
5- You doesn't Testplayed your map because LOTS of objects of the mapset touche the HP bar.
6- THERE'S NO EMPHASIS!, you putted all like random and it doesn't feel like to take some time on it, mapping takes time dude!.
7- Some things doesn't read good at all like 0.50x sliders, what you was thinking when you do that kind of patterns.
8- ALL it's like a Copy+Paste from the Arieeru map, men be original, if you are going to take ideas don't take all the diff.
9- Random jumps just for increase the difficulty of the diff, men this is really horrible, try to ask to an Experienced pleayer if you can't test it ¬¬.
10- All screen jumps (Jumpscares Ba dum pss) that doesn't go with the song.
11- The point of make a diff harder is make it passable and not D-ble (D-ble: Mostly of the players obtain D)
12- Random triplets.
13- You add a break when isn't necessary (01:53:215 (1) - ) but when you need to add it (02:16:116 (3) - ) you doesn't add it!.
I will pass of this, good night and i know that maybe you are gonna hate me but i don't care.
Topic Starter
Zyl wrote:
Try again bud!
Ok...
This have TOO MUCH unrankable things considering that have too much diffs.
Let's point out some things (Everlasting one):
1- Your "Crazy jumps", some of them touch the HP bar and taking in mind that they doesn't have emphasis at all!, if you try to make a 8* diff at least do it good!. This is why we have a modding process :33
2- Slider velocities?, Seriously? on a 0.50x of velocity and taking in mind that we are talink about ¡¡2,30!! of permanent SV and 240 of BPM. SV doesn't really matter too much.. 2.30 was intentional because idea to have long sliders. High sv generally equates to higher spacing. The two go hand in hand.
3- 9.8 of AR... could easily be 10 but I like 9.8
4- Do you want that players touch your Unrankable jumps with 4,3 of CS?. Most of my maps tend to be 4.2, 4.3 or 4.5 lol x3
5- You doesn't Testplayed your map because LOTS of objects of the mapset touche the HP bar. There is nothing wrong about this lol. Especially for a challenger diff, you can really expect the corners to get hit.
6- THERE'S NO EMPHASIS!, you putted all like random and it doesn't feel like to take some time on it, mapping takes time dude!. Maybe point them out?
7- Some things doesn't read good at all like 0.50x sliders, what you was thinking when you do that kind of patterns. ?
8- ALL it's like a Copy+Paste from the Arieeru map, men be original, if you are going to take ideas don't take all the diff. Some stuff is inspired but a good majority of this map is mine -.-
9- Random jumps just for increase the difficulty of the diff, men this is really horrible, try to ask to an Experienced pleayer if you can't test it ¬¬. I have already! It's passable for sure lol. Remember what kind of difficulty this is and what its intended audience is! Don't call them random when they are jump patterns to follow vocals. As for the kiai they are placed to provide flow with a few patterns mended in. The structural layout and idea for this diff is for 1/2 circles. There are easier diffs if this diff isn't for you~
10- All screen jumps (Jumpscares Ba dum pss) that doesn't go with the song. see above~
11- The point of make a diff harder is make it passable and not D-ble (D-ble: Mostly of the players obtain D) Most players who I've asked for this get around C and B. This is an 8.4* diff you seriously can't expect it to be easily passable/FC'able with high acc. Take into consideration of the spread as a whole before judging a single difficulty. As you climb through the diffs you'll find this diff isn't very exaggerated but singling this diff out is a bit unfair to the easier diffs.
12- Random triplets. a (1/2) ri (1/2) ga (1/2) tou-- (triplets) because she holds it. Former triplets are actually in the song however.
13- You add a break when isn't necessary (01:53:215 (1) - ) but when you need to add it (02:16:116 (3) - ) you doesn't add it!. Well, that depends on how you interpret the song! Look at many of the GD's they do the same xD
I will pass of this, good night and i know that maybe you are gonna hate me but i don't care. Thank you for bringing these points up! I hope to have passed some insight to you~
Topic Starter
Thank you Anxient!Anxient wrote:
god save us all
im not touching the other diffs. i have ptsd nowEverlasting Memories
00:03:408 (1) - why NC fam whoops fixed.
00:25:358 (1,3) - blanket lol lol ok
00:27:233 (1,2) - i seriously thing ctrl+g this would play better, since you already had this sort of 00:26:429 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - flow. 00:27:500 (1) - also helps with flow break on here? hmm maybe? I like the way mines plays out too, but having two flow breaks is a bit odd as well. I changed it to yours because there will be more emphasis on the (1).
00:43:572 (1) - 00:43:706 - :C dont ignore this okay I fixed.
00:45:715 (1) - this one as well. maybe do dis? http://puu.sh/rkYEE/304a07a488.jpg yes, did something similar.
00:49:331 (4,5) - ctrl g. coz 00:49:465 - part of the song is more emphasized (drum kick), so i think a more contrast(I CANT ENGLISH) jump is more appropriate the circles are for the vocals, they are patterned to create flow~
01:00:447 (1) - why NC tho it was to seperate spacing differences in the stream but I do think without the NC it looks better.
01:01:384 (5) - NC? coz new section? also to indicate sudden slowdown doesn't need NC because the combo it's a part of is seperate SV already.
01:12:768 (3,5,6,7,8) - youre not gonna antijump this? ;p don't think so cuz the pitch gets lower here, it's also on an uneven measure so.
01:18:393 (3,4,5,6) - http://puu.sh/rkYNY/c9b7de6e94.jpg imo this is more memorable coz it looks neater and seems super fast. your idea is okay too, I'll stick to mine for stylistic purposes.
01:23:215 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - surprised you didnt go for skystar jumps (ladder jumps, see kneesocks)
01:35:000 (1) - here comes that bad idea oshit wadddup http://puu.sh/rkZ1O/c30cb7a671.jpg k..
01:35:804 (1) - i suggest ctrl g coz imo it plays alot better (more circle flow). also improves impact for the next note. i hope you understand what i mean I think I do but I also think mines has the correct-er flow lol
01:37:545 (2,3,4,5,6) - try to make this more similar to the star of david. by that i mean make it more neater . I can't really do that... but I made the (2) a bit more angular place. just a few pixels.
01:44:643 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6) - stab me with a spoon but some jumps here seem placed at random. or just plain messy, or i dont know how jumps are placed anymore. Well, every combo starts small and goes into bigger spacing while constantly getting bigger altogether.
01:59:643 (1) - ctrl g? seems to play better imo. to fix the spacing problem, 01:59:911 (2) - try placing (2) http://puu.sh/rkZpt/f68eccfa8e.jpg I'll disagree with this because I don't like how it looks nor plays. Mines flows pretty well already.
02:09:822 (5,6,7,8) - if this is gonna stay as an antijump, i hope you fixed the problem i mentioned earlier in this mod. of course, making this a back and forth is also an option. this tiny inconsistency does make your previous suggestion more valid for me so I might consider changing that in the future but my thing with the previous still holds true that the pitch is different compared to this where her lyrics are more consistently 1/2.
02:25:358 (1) - i suggest scaling this down to a 1/2 coz 02:25:491 - theres a beat here that you ignored :c This was a stylistic choice :c
02:31:786 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12) - see if NCing 02:32:054 (4,7,10) - helps with visuals? http://puu.sh/rkZxK/bf78a5770b.jpg it doesnt ._.
02:33:393 (9) - surprised you didnt NC this to me it would look a bit weird.
02:33:929 (1,1) - fIX STACKK lOol OOKKK
02:43:572 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6) - prETTY thANK YOU
02:56:161 (5,6) - i think making a jump instead of 1/4 sliders would be better since the 1/4s in here arent that hearable (to me). maybe something like this? http://puu.sh/rkZEK/a71786f099.jpg they are there to follow the change in synth-pitch.
03:47:121 - wow you play screenjumps but not this poor beat? ;c just put them on top itll be fiiinehttp://puu.sh/rkZJe/d4757eef56.jpg no.. :[
03:55:358 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - crescendo says hi Hi!
04:00:715 (1) - make this note more notable pls lol. make it louder? I'm unsure about this but maybe?
ekS DEE
Streams are beautifully brutal I gotta admit then again it's you LMAO <3 blankets kill me tho
Everlasting Memories
00:02:872 (1) - fix pls
01:42:099 (4) - That's the circle in question, fix blanket pls
01:43:572 (1) - Ctrl + G'd the slider and I noticed this
Move that slider a bit to the right or smth, 01:45:045 (4) is also right under the slider so you might wanna move that too along with the slider.
01:48:393 (3) - blanket problem again, idk if tiny spaces are allowed DDDX
01:49:465 (5) - This too
Uh that's just some but you said that there's no problems on your end so idk anymore
(
00:02:872 (1) - fix pls
01:42:099 (4) - That's the circle in question, fix blanket pls
01:43:572 (1) - Ctrl + G'd the slider and I noticed this
Move that slider a bit to the right or smth, 01:45:045 (4) is also right under the slider so you might wanna move that too along with the slider.
01:48:393 (3) - blanket problem again, idk if tiny spaces are allowed DDDX
01:49:465 (5) - This too
Uh that's just some but you said that there's no problems on your end so idk anymore
(toastin in a future drama bread
so much xi still unranked smh
Ex
00:03:944 (1,2,3) - this sv change is super pointless, notes seem to have equal strength especially that 1-2 is increasing (or the same idk) looks weird too on (3)
00:18:393 (5,6) - not sure what happened here, some weird snapping issues? pretty sure it's just 1/2 rhythm on these, would use 1/4 sliders for better rhythmical flow or 1/8 if you feel fancy
00:21:072 (1,2) - will only say this once, these don't look good without red dot in the middle, especially if they are used just to add variety in the common and basic parts of the song, but I know you like these so w/e
00:45:715 (1) - people don't care about this, but if you decide to leave strong sound (clap) not clickable, I would expect you want the player to at least move through the slider end, right now they will leave the slider in half and jump to 00:46:116 (2) - would rearrange. Especially I don't really like 00:46:384 (3,4) - this is sort of weird to have little cursor movement when vocal synth is strong and selective.
00:46:786 (1,2) - herre is sort of better because movement isn't that sharp
00:48:527 (1,2,3) - this makes more sense but still don't like use of 1/6 in 1/2 / 1/4 song, 1/4 sliders are way better and keep the rhythmical flow consistent
00:54:554 (2,3,4) - more clickables here, feels weak + 00:54:956 (3,4) - 1/2 stack introduced seems super random
00:56:965 - would leave vocal synthesiser mapping and focus on guitar transition here, overtakes
01:01:384 (1,2) - fair enough sv change but blanket ugh
01:10:090 (1) - don't like the direction considering the sv change + sharpness of previous jumps, would follow the notes mroe naturally, sv change will be impactful enough
01:29:375 (4) - 256:351~ (follow line after 01:29:108 (3) - 8) )
01:35:000 (1,2,3,4,5) - pause seems way better idea tension wise, + these sliders look super 1/4, nice to have some cool pacing/reading change for trolling purposes, but on feint hihats? meeeh. Might play fine though, if testers don't complain, w/e
01:48:929 (1,2,3) - super noodle movement here, you exit (1) in the middle of it and do weird arc through (2) into (3), rearrange to something sharp and consistent with the map
02:04:197 (2,3,4,5) - again don't like these little movements
02:05:000 (1,2,3) - make 1 two notes and start (2) and (3) on proper ticks, this is wrong in every universe
02:10:893 (3,4) - eww
02:12:902 (3,4) - this just feels so weak
02:27:366 (5,6) - sort of random isn't it, you could put those everywhere if you place it here, there is a ghost note but not sure if worth it, compared to strong and obvious stacks like 02:19:733 (8,9,10,11) -
02:33:929 (1,2) - again not a big fan, you will probably deny this considering it's an elaborate and thought out ruse
03:27:902 (2,3) - pointless
03:41:027 (3,4) -
03:47:188 (4,5,6) - could map as well stacks here, a bit less feint
03:48:259 (2,3) - again, especially that there is a stronger 1/4 sounds on 03:48:192 -
03:59:375 (4) - no reason for slowdown
Rakozen
00:25:090 (3) - dość mocne, dwie nutki, nie ma się co pieścić ( 00:33:661 (4,5) - ! to samo)
00:34:331 (2) - 186:147 follow line ładnie przechodzi
00:56:831 (2,3) - zrób te gitary/bas
02:11:295 (1) - ??
02:13:438 (3,4) - jak na extreme, stack z niczego, sa ghost notes ale nie wiem po co je mapować akurat tutaj skoro generalnie sa ignorowane
02:18:527 (1,2) - parujesz stopa+werbel, potem 02:18:929 (1,2,1,2) - jakos dziwnie z hihatami, zignorowalbym je i zrobil same sekwencje werbel stopa
02:53:616 (2,3) - bez sensu
03:04:331 (3,4) -
03:05:000 (1,2) - tym bardziej bez sensu the 1/4 triple na ghost notes jeśli ignorujecie wyrażne i dość ważne 1/2
03:27:902 (2,3) -
03:28:974 (2,3) -
03:31:116 (2,3) -
03:40:759 (3,4,5,6) - jak juz to caly stream z tego
03:45:045 (2,3) -
03:47:188 (2,1) - a tu nie ma
Everlasting meme
getting tired, might check this again some other time
00:05:551 (3) - make sliderbody's axis follow the followline
00:18:393 (1,2) - no idea why 1/6
00:48:527 (1,2,3) -
00:56:429 (1,2) - follow line makes
01:02:590 (5) - not following the line makes them look weird, dunno why
01:13:572 (1,2) - again
01:20:268 (3,4,5) - a bit nicer
01:36:741 (4,5,6) - ignoring so many rhythms for the sake of vocal synthesiser and adding triples on ghostnotes, again I think this is a bad idea
02:11:161 (4) - rotate 30cw cause follow line
03:05:804 (6) - again a bit of rotation fix, 03:05:000 (1,3) - have common line, (6) looks off
03:06:474 (3,4) - zz
I don't really like the random use of triples throughout these diffs when ignoring them for the most part, doesn't seem very well structured rhythmically except one part when there are more obvious and mapped consistently. Don't think this song ever call for this intensity as well, (all that's building up for me is annoyance) but that's subjective so whatever. It's well made in general so good luck
so much xi still unranked smh
Ex
00:03:944 (1,2,3) - this sv change is super pointless, notes seem to have equal strength especially that 1-2 is increasing (or the same idk) looks weird too on (3)
00:18:393 (5,6) - not sure what happened here, some weird snapping issues? pretty sure it's just 1/2 rhythm on these, would use 1/4 sliders for better rhythmical flow or 1/8 if you feel fancy
00:21:072 (1,2) - will only say this once, these don't look good without red dot in the middle, especially if they are used just to add variety in the common and basic parts of the song, but I know you like these so w/e
00:45:715 (1) - people don't care about this, but if you decide to leave strong sound (clap) not clickable, I would expect you want the player to at least move through the slider end, right now they will leave the slider in half and jump to 00:46:116 (2) - would rearrange. Especially I don't really like 00:46:384 (3,4) - this is sort of weird to have little cursor movement when vocal synth is strong and selective.
00:46:786 (1,2) - herre is sort of better because movement isn't that sharp
00:48:527 (1,2,3) - this makes more sense but still don't like use of 1/6 in 1/2 / 1/4 song, 1/4 sliders are way better and keep the rhythmical flow consistent
00:54:554 (2,3,4) - more clickables here, feels weak + 00:54:956 (3,4) - 1/2 stack introduced seems super random
00:56:965 - would leave vocal synthesiser mapping and focus on guitar transition here, overtakes
01:01:384 (1,2) - fair enough sv change but blanket ugh
01:10:090 (1) - don't like the direction considering the sv change + sharpness of previous jumps, would follow the notes mroe naturally, sv change will be impactful enough
01:29:375 (4) - 256:351~ (follow line after 01:29:108 (3) - 8) )
01:35:000 (1,2,3,4,5) - pause seems way better idea tension wise, + these sliders look super 1/4, nice to have some cool pacing/reading change for trolling purposes, but on feint hihats? meeeh. Might play fine though, if testers don't complain, w/e
01:48:929 (1,2,3) - super noodle movement here, you exit (1) in the middle of it and do weird arc through (2) into (3), rearrange to something sharp and consistent with the map
02:04:197 (2,3,4,5) - again don't like these little movements
02:05:000 (1,2,3) - make 1 two notes and start (2) and (3) on proper ticks, this is wrong in every universe
02:10:893 (3,4) - eww
02:12:902 (3,4) - this just feels so weak
02:27:366 (5,6) - sort of random isn't it, you could put those everywhere if you place it here, there is a ghost note but not sure if worth it, compared to strong and obvious stacks like 02:19:733 (8,9,10,11) -
02:33:929 (1,2) - again not a big fan, you will probably deny this considering it's an elaborate and thought out ruse
03:27:902 (2,3) - pointless
03:41:027 (3,4) -
03:47:188 (4,5,6) - could map as well stacks here, a bit less feint
03:48:259 (2,3) - again, especially that there is a stronger 1/4 sounds on 03:48:192 -
03:59:375 (4) - no reason for slowdown
Rakozen
00:25:090 (3) - dość mocne, dwie nutki, nie ma się co pieścić ( 00:33:661 (4,5) - ! to samo)
00:34:331 (2) - 186:147 follow line ładnie przechodzi
00:56:831 (2,3) - zrób te gitary/bas
02:11:295 (1) - ??
02:13:438 (3,4) - jak na extreme, stack z niczego, sa ghost notes ale nie wiem po co je mapować akurat tutaj skoro generalnie sa ignorowane
02:18:527 (1,2) - parujesz stopa+werbel, potem 02:18:929 (1,2,1,2) - jakos dziwnie z hihatami, zignorowalbym je i zrobil same sekwencje werbel stopa
02:53:616 (2,3) - bez sensu
03:04:331 (3,4) -
03:05:000 (1,2) - tym bardziej bez sensu the 1/4 triple na ghost notes jeśli ignorujecie wyrażne i dość ważne 1/2
03:27:902 (2,3) -
03:28:974 (2,3) -
03:31:116 (2,3) -
03:40:759 (3,4,5,6) - jak juz to caly stream z tego
03:45:045 (2,3) -
03:47:188 (2,1) - a tu nie ma
Everlasting meme
getting tired, might check this again some other time
00:05:551 (3) - make sliderbody's axis follow the followline
00:18:393 (1,2) - no idea why 1/6
00:48:527 (1,2,3) -
00:56:429 (1,2) - follow line makes
01:02:590 (5) - not following the line makes them look weird, dunno why
01:13:572 (1,2) - again
01:20:268 (3,4,5) - a bit nicer
01:36:741 (4,5,6) - ignoring so many rhythms for the sake of vocal synthesiser and adding triples on ghostnotes, again I think this is a bad idea
02:11:161 (4) - rotate 30cw cause follow line
03:05:804 (6) - again a bit of rotation fix, 03:05:000 (1,3) - have common line, (6) looks off
03:06:474 (3,4) - zz
I don't really like the random use of triples throughout these diffs when ignoring them for the most part, doesn't seem very well structured rhythmically except one part when there are more obvious and mapped consistently. Don't think this song ever call for this intensity as well, (all that's building up for me is annoyance) but that's subjective so whatever. It's well made in general so good luck