1. Aldwych's Oni (4,69 stars, 837 notes)
2. Futsuu (2,06 stars, 307 notes)
3. Kantan (1,54 stars, 208 notes)
4. Kin's Inner Oni (5,4 stars, 974 notes)
5. Muzukashii (3,2 stars, 617 notes)
6. Ultimate Oni (6,85 stars, 1152 notes)

SPOILER

Epsile wrote:

This is for the M4M. Thank you, by the way.

BEWARE: VERY GENERIC

General

Everything looks good!

Kantan

00:42:097 (48,49,50) - Change these to k, it fits with the music more imo. Done
00:58:980 (11) - Change this to d for better consistency. Done
01:05:408 (17) - Ehhh, I don't know how to feel about this slider. In a Kantan, you generally wanna keep sliders at a long rate, and not have a super short one like this. It's just my opinion, but if you agree with it I suggest maybe putting a k in there. You're right, done
01:08:408 - Maybe put a d in there. It seems empty without a note in this place. No thanks, I'll leave it empty
01:16:123 (27) - To flow with the music more, and to not make the player bored with regular patterns even though kantan is supposed to be easy, make this a d. Why not
01:23:340 (36,37) - Swap these to k then d. Better consistency and flow. Damn right
01:25:866 (40,41) - Flows with the music more if you use the pattern above. Ye
01:57:196 (17) - Try making this a k instead.
02:00:786 (22) - Make this a k instead. Better consistency and flow. Ok
02:07:966 (7) - Make this a k. Same reason as the note on the same beat before. ^
02:12:068 (14,15) - Eesh, dense much? A k right after a slider is a bit too difficult for a kantan imo. It probably flows well otherwise, and the player would be able to see ahead of it. I'm probably just being a butt. I put a d here and for the others
Good kantan, it just seems a bit slow. :v Great for starters, though! Yes I wanted a very easy diff ! Thanks !

Futsuu

00:19:991 (23) - Make this a k. Fits better with the music. Done
00:38:939 (53) - Make this a k. Better consistency that way. ^
00:52:980 (79) - Make this a k. Fits better with the music. No I avoid being too repetitive
00:53:837 (80,81,82) - If you make that a k, make this pattern d k d.
00:57:265 (85,86,87) - Regardless of if you make that specific change, make this pattern d k d. Fits better with the music. Done
01:04:123 (94,95,96) - Make this pattern d k k. Done
01:05:837 (98) - If you make the above change, make this a d.
01:08:837 - Put a note in here, it seems empty. Done
01:12:694 (106,107) - Swap these, it fits with the music better.
01:23:340 (122,123) - ^
01:43:478 (151) - Turn this into a k, and remove the finish if you want to. It doesn't matter either way, honestly. Changed it to a k but didnt remove the finish.
02:00:786 (28) - Turn this into a k, it has better consistency this way. Done
Overall, it's nice. c: Thanks !

Muzukashii

00:09:254 (25) - Make this a d, flows better with the music. Done
00:21:412 (85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103) - Consider changing this pattern to go according to the music moreso than before. Changed
00:24:965 (107,108) - Eek! 2 1/4 notes! In a Muzukashii, you want to only introduce 1/4 notes. Having this in a muzu is a bit much, in my opinion. Removed
01:19:708 (367,368) - Make this pattern ddd. Fits with the music, plus this is muzu. You can put triples in here. Done
01:24:761 (393,394) - ^
Overall, the muzu is really nicely made. The kiai, however, needs some work. 234 singletaps are a bit difficult wit muzu players, especially with complex patterns like that. Nerfed a bit

I don't really have anything else to say, everything else is pretty nice. c: Just some minor changes here and there, all in all. Aldwych's oni is really nice, as well as the inner oni. Keep up the good work and good luck getting it ranked!

1. 00:03:254 - Move to 00:02:939 - it feels more intuitive to hit at the beginning of this rhythm rather than the end, which is at 00:03:254 - (Otherwise it sounds like you're missing a beat at 00:02:939 - )
2. 00:10:991 - Consider adding a d here. It sounds relatively empty from 00:09:254 - to 00:11:781 - since you're just following the finishes.
3. 00:14:307 - Could be changed to K to emphasize the change in song/rhythm.
4. 00:15:570 - Move to 00:15:728 - to hit the higher note in this rhythm.
5. 00:18:097 - Move to 00:17:939 - to follow the same rhythm as 00:17:465 -
6. 00:18:728 - Move to 00:18:570 - to follow the same higher pitched sound as at 00:15:728 -
7. 00:20:623 - Remove this and change it to this rhythm at 00:20:781 -
   
   (Cursor at 00:20:781 - )
8. 00:37:044 - Change to D. Since you followed the background finish at 00:39:570 - it makes sense to follow it here too.
9. 01:29:656 - Change to K. The song changes, and here's a finish at the beginning of the kiai.
10. 01:41:812 - and 01:42:068 - Change to D's. Since you followed the finish at 01:43:863 -
11. 01:47:068 - This is a really short spinner to have in a Kantan. I'd suggest either extending it to end at 01:47:709 - or removing it and just having a D at 01:47:709 -
12. 02:03:478 - Same thing for this spinner, except it's not as bad as the first one. Either extend it to end at 02:04:119 - or remove it and have a D at 02:04:119 -

Nofool wrote:

wsh canapsh j'reviendrais demain

objectif => kantan ~200 notes, futsuu ~400 notes, muzu ~600 notes

[Kantan]
HP8 WTFF??? j'passe même avec un F là J'ai vu des milliards de Kantan HP 6 mais si tu le dis
ok j'te préviens d'avance pour cette diff j'me suis gouré dans mon écriture, j'ai écris 1/1 à la place de 2/1, et donc 1/2 à la place de 1/1 donc vlà dsl j'ai la flemme de les changer.
* - 00:02:307 - / - 00:07:360 - / - 00:08:623 - rajoutes k stp ty, les 2 premiers parceque ça s'entend et sinon c'est trop vide, le 3ème parceque y'a des instrus qui se sont réveillés sur cette partie donc autant le montrer. added
* - 00:12:886 - jusqu'à - 00:13:991 - mets un putin de spinner stp jpp des big notes. y
* - 00:19:044 - rajoutes k ici, un truc à - 00:19:991 - aussi et vires - 00:21:254 (20) -. le premier k parceque les 1/2 c'est pas interdit en kantan omfg ça augmente pas le sr utilisé comme ça... et sinon add un truc au 2ème timing que j'ai mit parceque c'est la même chose qu'à - 00:14:307 (11,12,13) - sauf que idk pourquoi à - 00:19:360 (18,19) - t'es parti dans un délire chelou tu mets que 2 notes pour en mettre une useless plus loins.. added
* - 00:23:149 - jusqu'à - 00:24:097 - haaa là j'verrais bien un bon slider les noobs aiment bien spam sans savoir ce qu'il font et là c'est le spot parfait. ta telemen réson
* - 00:24:728 - mets un d là stp qu'on change un peu du x x x 1/1 habituel là.. la même à - 00:27:254 -. right
* - 00:29:465 (31,32) - same au lieu de d - - - d calles un truc genre x x x - x et vires - 00:31:360 (33) - pour reprendre comme la première part (si t'as appliqué la suggestion du dessus ofc...). pareil ajoute un truc à - 00:32:307 - (c'est pas déconseillé de revoir ton choix de couleur parceque ces spot sonnent bien en k et d k k pour ici par exemple c'est un peu moche imo, à voir) J'ai modifié les patterns en d k d a part le premier qui n'a pas le kick
* - 00:34:518 (38,39) - bon là déjà on change de song et t'as clairement une ptite mélodie différente des 1/1 chiant, donc à la place de k - - - k test d - k - -. après tu peux caller un d à - 00:35:623 - à la place ça m'a l'air propre. J'ai juste add le d
* - 00:37:044 (41) - et à partir de là refais le truc que je viens de dire au dessus.
* - 00:40:202 (45) - / - 00:41:465 (47) - dans la même idée j'aurais décaqllé ces deux là 1/2 plus tôt, + constant si t'as fais les 2 suggestions précédentes. Je vais laisser comme tel
* - 01:07:980 - d, - 01:08:408 - k, propre et ça n'influ normalement pas le sr. Oké
* - 01:10:980 (23) - ^ same un x x x 1/2 encore ici pls, - 01:14:408 (26) - pareil. Done
* - 01:21:129 - j'callerais bien un petit d ici pour casser la monotonie des 1/1, - 01:26:182 - same. Done
* - 01:42:068 - d stp ty Done
* - 01:49:248 - k stp ty "pour casser la monotonie des 1/1" me forces pas à me répéter stp. - 01:53:350 - la même. ET J'ESPERE QUE TU SAIS QUOI FAIRE SUR LE EUXIEME KIAI PARCEQUE VAIS PAS REECRIRE c bon g conpri je sui inteligen ^^ et le slider à la fin est dégueu btw C'est fait exprès je l'ai rendu encore plus moche pour toi du coup

[Futsuu]
HP7
pas assez de notes blabla mais il faut en rajouter intélligeamment pour éviter d'up le sr blabla aka évtier les 3/2 mélangés aux 1/2
* autant dire sur la première song c'est ultra chaud de rajouter des notes sans up le sr parceque le rythme est immonde. - 00:03:886 - / - 00:08:939 - / - 00:11:465 - d ici stp ty (oui j'ai pas suggest le k comme pour la kantan à - 00:08:623 - parceque c'est mort avec l'autre d sinon et faut faire un choix :/// le d passe mieux avec les autres). Done
* - 00:14:307 - jusqu'à - 00:16:044 - :

fais ça mec c'est op, décalle - 00:18:097 (20) - à - 00:17:939 - et - 00:19:991 (23,24) - comme pour le screen mais en k : k - - - k => k - k k -. 9a rajoute 0 sr, c'est + dense et ça colle mieux à la song. Done
* - 00:24:412 - 00:34:518 - bon pour cette song là j'commence à être flemard mais, du coup c'que tu peux faire c'est rajouter djà un truc ici - 00:24:728 - comme dit pour la kantan, et à - 00:26:939 (34,35) - etc tu peux d d k - k au lieu des simples d - - - k. J'ai fais pareil que la Kantan
* - 00:25:676 (32,33) - tjrs pour cette partie ces deux là etc tu peux les décaller de 1/2 devant ez, et à - 00:29:149 - rajouter un k. avec cette suggestion et la précédente tu cc à tous les morceaux de cette part que ça concerne et c'est bon. Done
* - 00:34:518 (46,47) - d d k - - au lieu d k - - - k + ajoutes k à - 00:36:097 -. Done
*- 00:37:044 - ^ ça fait que de reset t'façon.
*- 00:39:570 (54,55,56,57,58,59,60) - là t'as D - - - k - - - D - - - k - - - D - - - D - - - D, pour augmenter la densité moi j'te propose à la place de faire D - k - k k - - D - k - k k - - D - k - D - k - D, ça augmentera pas des masse le sr voir pas du tout. Done
* - 00:58:551 - / - 00:58:765 - d ici, la même à - 01:00:265 - / - 01:00:480 - etc tu m'as compris. oui
* - 01:05:837 - jusqu'à - 01:19:551 - wsh pour cette song t'as pas besoin de moi, rends la plus dense en suivant + le vocal, mais en gardant des structures répétitives/cohérentes. Fais
* - 01:20:182 (120,121) - d d d - k au lieu de d - - - k + rajoutes un d à - 01:21:761 -. - 01:22:708 (124,125) - k k k - D au lieu de k - - - D. ah oui ça rend pas mal
* - 01:25:235 - repeat ^.
* - 01:29:656 (135,136) - j'pense que pour cette part tu peux prendre les 3/2, ça devrait pas trop chier le sr, aka au lieu de k - - - - - k tu fais k - - k - - k à chaque fois. Dans le cas où t'atteins un sr trop élevé fais pas ça mais ajoutes des d à - 01:31:866 - même si ça suit pas la song (l'un ou l'autre à appliqué sur toute la partie ofc). Ca a l'air d'aller niveau SR avec les 3/2
* - 01:41:940 - d. Done
* - bon pour les kiai j'ai un plan simple, - 01:48:991 (3,4,5) - à chaque fois au lieu de ça tu fais k - k - d d k - k, ça colle bien à la song et c'est propre à jouer. et pour les passages comme - 01:51:043 (7,8,9) - tu fais d - k - d - d d k à la place ez. La vérité j'viens de le remarqué que mtn mais en vrai le deuxième kiai sonne + dense donc tu pourrais même faire + d'ajout que ça. Ok j'ai fais ces ajouts + d'autres sur la fin du kiai

[Muzukashii]
bon ici on delete
* - 00:05:781 (14,15) - vires moi ça.
* - 00:11:623 (37) - ^.
* - 00:14:623 (50) - ^.
* - 00:16:202 (58) - ^. bon tu métonnes qu'il y a trop de notes t'es en chien sur tous les sons possibles........ mec suis que la mélodie et pas + pour des passages hyper calme comme ça, même avec les notes que jt'ai dit d'enlever ça fait archi dense. J'ai enlevé masse
* - 00:23:149 (96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103) - genre là j'te met un spinner/slider au lieu de tout ça quoi, trop de 1/2 c'est nul. Done
*- 00:25:991 (112) - / - 00:26:307 (114) - à delete. bref sur le reste de cette part same, fais + de trou là y'a trop de 1/2 jpp c'est archi calme comme musique. J'ai enlevé 8996 notes
* - ptin sur la partie suivante t'étais en mode ok on va prendre ce ptit son en 3/2 et omg t'as réussi à le chier dès le premier, 00:35:070 (165,166) - ces deux là à décaller de 1/4 plus loins. et du coup avant ces 2 notes à chaque fois garde un espace imo, aka delete - 00:36:254 (171) - etc. Done
*- 00:37:597 (178,179) - encore chié, ces deux là devraient être 1/4 plus loins........
* - 00:52:123 - same pour cette partie éssaie de focus + sur la mélodie et de pas garder autant de 1/2. - 00:52:765 (240,241) - par ex ici tu pourrais avoir un ddd 1/4 mais delete bcp de 1/2 dérrière etc. Done
* - 01:05:837 - ^ pareil, quand le vocal fais une pause mets des breaks. Done
* - 01:19:708 (362,363) - là tu peux ez delete les deux, ou juste le deuxième, recommandé pour - 01:22:393 (378) - parceque le ddk 1/4 c'est la mort en muzu à moins que le truc soit solo au milieu de nul part normalement. surtout que sur la partie qui suit ces 1/4 ont disparu??????? ok Done + Rajouté les 1/4 sur la suite du passage
* - 01:30:287 (418) - vires ce d et mets un kkk 1/4 sur le beat suivant ?? suit bien la song et c'est le genre de 1/4 à prendre quand y'en a. Done
* - 01:32:182 (425,426,427) - same j'sais pas où sont passées les notes mais là normalement c'est k - - d - - k - - - k k k. bref ces deux suggestions là à faire sur toute la part si possible. Done
* - 01:33:761 (429) - encore une note perdue gg, à mettre un 1/4 plus loins. Done
* - 01:57:196 (62,63,64,65,66,67,68) - là tu peux ez faire D K D K 1/1 au lieu de tout ça. et glbalement sur ce premier kiai tu peux probablement réussir à enlever une-deux notes, mais pas besoins d'en enlever bcp à partir d'ici tho. Done
* - 01:59:248 (76,77,78,79,80,81,82) - ^. Done

[Inner Oni]
* - 00:08:623 (23) - k ?? comme pour - 00:07:360 (18) -. Done
* - 00:24:176 (127) - pourrait être un k si tu forces sur la mélodie. Done
* - 00:24:412 - j'avous que sur la partie qui commence ici j'comprend pas le délire des dk en début de structure, c'est clairement des ddk à chaque fois et si tu veux des break autant rien mettre hue, j'trouve ça moche.. idk j'ai rien à proposer par rapport à c'que t'as fait. J'ai remove
* - 00:34:991 (213,214) - en fait si tu veux des doublets qui correspondent à la musique celui aurait du commencer à - 00:35:070 (214) - et après fallait changer le truc de dérrière en virant le premier k de kdkd ou j'sais pas..... parceque le trou à - 00:35:571 - là clairement ça sonne bizarre. No je vais laisser comme ça
* - 00:37:518 (234,235,236,237,238,239) - ^.
* - 01:12:480 (479) - un ptit break?? idk ça manque. Done
* - 01:05:837 (436) - / - 01:12:694 (480) - / - 01:16:123 (503) - big notes portées disparues Done
* - 01:34:708 (664,665,666,667,668,669,670,671,672,673,674,675,676,677,678,679,680,681,682) - ntm clairement. wat
* - 01:36:129 (685,686,687,688,689,690,691,692,693,694,695,696,697,698,699) - parceque autant dire que ça ça devrait être kkkdkkkdkkkdkkkd 1/6 ^^^^^^^ et toute la partie en fait J'ai plus emphasize le synth c'est pour ça que c'est en k

Nofool wrote:

wsh canapsh j'reviendrais demain

[Aldwych's top kak 2013]
* - 00:08:623 (9) - k ? le même son que - 00:07:359 (3) -. Oui
* - 00:15:412 (41,42,43,44,45,46) - k ddk d k => k - k - k, comme pour - 00:20:465 (1,2,3) -. fixed ca me semble legit et au final la current structure était un peu longue.
* - 00:19:518 (11,12) - pareil j'aurais delete ces deux là, pour avoir le même break qu'à - 00:14:307 (34,35) -. Cleaned
* - 00:23:307 (2) - je l'aurais delete, pas de gros intérêt ça sonne plus comme K K xxx.. pour moi. Perso ca me va très bien, ptet parce que KKK K aurait été plus accurate mais le stream l'emporte
* - 00:25:912 (10,11) - possible de delete ces deux là pour rajouter un k à - 00:26:781 - à la place, y'a un son un peu triste à dodge là bas donc à voir.
* - 00:32:149 (52,53) - de même j'aurais viré ces deux là pour un k à - 00:31:833 - à la place, et aussi déplacé - 00:33:254 (60) - à - 00:33:097 -. comme c'est surtout la mélodie qui prime quand tu joues ça me parait mieux de suivre ces sons là. Pour ces deux la je verrais plus en détail ca détruit pas mal la structure courante et j'ai besoin de faire des tests, dans tout les cas cette zone est pas parfaite et j'en suis conscient.
* - 00:34:991 (71) - uhhhh pourquoi c'est pas à - 00:34:833 - ça ? c'est le seule passage où t'as pas fait de ddk donc ça rend bizarre. Oups bien vu.
* - 01:16:123 (77) - mouarf jsais pas si j'mettrais un finisher sur ça, c'est mérité mais en même temps ça fait le finisher perdu vu la suite... idk. J'ai du l'enlever car je l'ai plus
* - bon black or white pour que ça concorde avec ce qu'a fait l'autre pd tu peux éventuellement : rajouter des d à - 01:20:024 - / - 01:22:551 - / - 01:25:077 - / - 01:27:603 -. eh eh. No :V
* - 01:32:182 (15) - k ? est-ce que ça sonnerait pas comme le k précédent par hasard?? ah pour moi non, y'a un beats et le son est pas pareil :V
* - 01:33:287 (22) - alors ça, si tu le gardes faut voir ce que tu fais à - 01:30:840 (8) -, c'est rigoureusement la même chose mais t'as choisis deux sons différents, perso je préfère la première solution vu la snappings de toute la partie, aka déplaces - 01:33:287 (22) - à - 01:33:366 - ? Oui j'ai corrigé, désolé. Premier solution ofc
* - 01:35:893 (35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44) - mouais j'suis pas sûr qu'il y ait besoins de rendre ce mini passages plus complexe que la reste, il me semble pas que la musique est différente à ce point précis. Perso, les patterns ne vont, certes c'est un peu complex, mais la musique l'est aussi /o/
* - 01:43:991 (22) - delete ? pour rendre le D précédent + important.
* - 01:46:171 (34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42) - perso j'aurais vu un truc plus simple type d K d K d d, pas fan des doublets sur ça. Ah perso j'aime bien.
* Premier kiai : qu'est-ce que tu penses de tenter de rendre la première moitiée moins dense ? atm elle est identique (plus ou moins) à celle du second kiai, alors que musicalement la second kiai est bien plus dense. type retirer quelques notes genre - 01:49:119 (55) -, - 01:49:376 (57) -, - 01:51:684 (78) - etc.
Ouais j'ai clean un peu, par parfaitement comme tu l'as mentionné mais dans la direction.

gl

agu wrote:

I decided to mod aldwych's Oni cause I honestly feel it requires a lot of work and I don't have much to do. Awwww D:


First off I'll start by saying I find the finisher usage to be a bit extreme, 00:09:097 - removing this note would help as it's completely uneeded and same with this one 00:11:623 - I'm completly fine for the finishers for me this is how the music has been made with these intense notes, however i deleted the mentionned notes.

00:15:018 - perhaps d? I'm not too fond of all the kats in a row here fixed sounds ok
00:16:360 (43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55) - this part feels really off, I made an image of what I find to be more suitable changed except at the first stream where i did ddk instead due to the melody.



00:18:333 - same as last time, I don't like the high kat usage here and would prefer this to be a don fixed
00:19:676 - feel free to use kat on the clap the clap is not really noticable, so i prefered follow the melody who goes down.
00:19:991 (13,14,15,16,17) - this pattern is awkward, remove the note here 00:20:228 - fixed
00:27:728 - probably d? i'm fine with k.
00:29:781 - k on the clap? Melody for me, i guess both are good, but yep i prefer the melody here.
00:30:018 - remove? I'm keeping for now due to the structure patterns here, the long ones have 3 triples
00:30:333 - I feel d is better here to emphasise the clap afterwards more fixed this one yep

00:34:518 - I'm just gonna say this because I feel like it deserves to be mentioned, this is mapped pretty darn well I looks a bit classic but yeah i like how i made it too, i'm glad you appreciated it.
00:46:518 - this part should honestly get remapped somehow, I leave the decision to you here but I feel like something along the lines of dkd ddd dkd ddd fits decently I agree with you this part is a bit rude, i'm gonna collect further opinions here, some how i had to find a gap between muzu and Inner, so there we go.
00:54:373 - I don't really enjoy how the drag tone here is mapped, remove
01:02:087 - same as above For both abouve, i'm fine with the quints.
01:29:656 - this part could use improving I think but it's really hard to map so I can't even help myself yep this part was a bit challenging and map it properly is kinda hard, so i decided to follow the main melody as most as possible so it's "easy" to recognize and play.
01:46:363 - these doublets are kind of bad imho, move as 1/2 if you want or just remove the first notes of the doublets meeehhhhh it like them, ok since nofool told it too i'm gonna keep noticing on these. But damn D:
01:48:158 - speaking of doublets remove this or rather place it here 01:48:094 - through the whole song This one are legits if you hear closely, also most of the taiko maps are x--xx rather than x-xx--.
01:57:196 - I don't enjoy these finishers on an oni but it's kind of up to you i find them accurate :V

I hope you take all of this into consideration and don't reject everything :T

guro wrote:

[Aldwych's top kak 2013 Oni]

First of all, I would drop the "top kak 2013" and just name it Aldwych's Oni. 👺

00:04:991 (13,14,15) - Make that one to a k d K maybe. There are bright sounds on the both red ticks and a more dull sound on the white one. I don't mind, the D are here to contrast the big and important sounds in this section.
00:10:044 (15,16,17,18,19,20) - I would change that to k d K_d k D for the same reason as above. It just feels more fitting than k k D_k k D imo same reasons it also make the section easier to read and play, i'm not here to trick the player with d D k D k K or stuff like that
00:12:570 (27,28,29) - k d K. See above.
00:21:097 (3) - Having a k here makes sense due to the bright sound that would have been at 00:20:781 (2) - yes, but here no.
01:42:196 (12) - I suggest removing this note here since the sound here is just a reverberant sound and having the k highlighting it seems a bit off maybe but i dislike this 3/2 spacing. Keep noticing if more people are shocked about this note.
02:11:940 (1) 02:14:119 (1) 02:18:222 (1) - The spinners seem a bit too much, considering the part is sorta dense in general. You could replace the spinners with something along these lines I'm fine with these spinners, they shows the differences with the rest of the section since it is different by these "downs" Keep noticing tho

The red note is a D.

Good luck

Aldwych wrote:

¦:^(

Remus wrote:

Hello from my queue o/

Muzukashii

1. 00:30:728 (32) - no need in this don i think. Or move it to 00:30:886.
2. 00:50:307 (110) - kat to emphasize changing os sound at 111.
3. 01:14:944 (206) - don here maybe?
4. 02:09:889 (34) - dan to emphasize 35. No it's better as a k imo

Aldwych's Oni

1. Did not find anything to fix in my opinion.

Kinn's Inner Oni

1. 00:50:386 (299) - why didn't put here don too? D:
2. 01:22:945 (498,499) - swap for better reading and rhytm?
3. 01:29:972 (549) - sounds better with kat, imo.
4. 01:38:577 (618) - kat to better rhytm imo.
5. 02:11:171 (75) - kat here. Why : 02:10:786 (69,71,72) these kats create rhytm, which better to follow 02:11:171 (75,77) to not break it. Plus sounds a little better.

Ultimate Oni

1. 00:16:833 (67,68,69,70,71) - missrhytm here, isn't it? Try smth like this : CLICK
2. 00:44:544 (287) - is this rankable? I heard that in places like that must be gap. Yes it is haha
3. 02:12:004 (101) - the same ^.
4. 02:18:158 (171) - ^.
5. 02:22:260 (216) - ^.

Good luck

Remus wrote:

Kin's Inner Oni

1. 00:50:386 (299) - why didn't put here don too? D: because D feels better
2. 01:22:945 (498,499) - swap for better reading and rhytm? no, it doesn't follow the melody
3. 01:29:972 (549) - sounds better with kat, imo. doesn't flow well with the K
4. 01:38:577 (618) - kat to better rhytm imo. doesn't sound/flow well with the D K
5. 02:11:171 (75) - kat here. Why : 02:10:786 (69,71,72) these kats create rhytm, which better to follow 02:11:171 (75,77) to not break it. Plus sounds a little better. the k are placed to follow the melody, and since there's no melody here 02:11:171 - ; no k here

Good luck

S a n d wrote:

Taiko mod request from: Arrival
Request Type: M4M
Request Diff: -
Modding Content: Kantan, Futsuu, Muzukashii, Aldwych's Oni, Kin's Inner Oni, Ultimate Oni
*Note: I mod map according to my style of mapping, so sorry if it is unpractical >_<*


- This song has quite a high BPM, might want to consider using SV1.2 or SV1.3 for lower diffs such as Kantan or Futsuu.
- Pls delete unused greenlines (been brainwashed by Nwolf, else I wouldn't give two shit) Well... If a BN forces me to do so I will.. but i dont see why i would lol
- Gap between Oni and Muzu is really big, the amount of triplet and the complexity is a whole new level. Please consider shorten the gap Imo it's good atm...


- 00:04:676 - Add K? This sound is too good to be missed.
-- 00:09:729 - ^ Same suggestion as above.
-- 00:10:991 - ^ Same suggestion as above.
-- 00:12:254 - ^ Same suggestion as above.
- 00:10:360 - Change to K? I mean, it has the same sound as 00:09:254 or 00:11:781.
- 00:12:886 - Seem unreasonable to have K emphasizing specific sounds before, but having a finisher right here, even if it's section change, the consistency is causing OCD problems.
- 00:34:518 - Strongly recommend changing this into D, it's section change, it has great sound emphasize, good for clear indication as to a new section.
- 01:05:408 - Change to K? If you listen to the original version (with lesser noise) you can hear that this sound and 01:04:980 - is actually the same sound.
- 01:29:024 - Seems odd to have finisher here, change to k? You don't have one at 01:28:472 as well, also, this helps to better emphasize the finisher for section change at 01:29:656. Which, guess what my next mod is?
- 01:29:656 - Change to K.
- 02:04:119 - Please let the spinner end here, OCD problem. You can see that in Futsuu you end here as well


- 00:04:676 - Change to K? How can you not have a finisher here XD? Look at the note before and after.
- 00:10:360 - Where duh finisher? (Not going to mention the following finisher problems, since you get the idea)
- 00:10:991 - Missing finisher? This is futsuu, you can have more notes.
- 00:37:044 - I said I'm not gonna mention anymore finisher things, but this one, really tho?
- 00:44:307 - You had a note here in Kantan, why not Futsuu? No I didn't o.o
- 00:51:570 - Add D here? I think you can help to emphasize the violin sound here, which didn't appear in 00:50:939, as a variation.
- 01:01:980 - Change to k? It's quite a high pitch when compared to 01:02:408.
- 01:05:408 - The slider is REALLY out of place. This slider is basically what I look like when I'm in a party, pls.
- 01:09:265 ~ 01:10:980 - Consider changing to the following image to better emphasize important sounds and sound much better.
- 02:06:940 - Change to k? Why did this went d when it is the exact same sound as 02:06:427? No, the same sound occurs at 02:06:812 - , not at 02:06:940 (7) -. I'll keep a d here, listen again


- 00:25:044 - Move to 00:24:886 and change to k, this follows the song much better.
- 00:28:202 - Delete and add d at 00:28:360 - Same justification as above.
- 00:32:623 - Move to 00:32:149 and add d at 00:32:781 - Same justification as above.
- 00:37:044 - I won't talk about finis- nfiODSNOIGTNP_#@HJNT_(JREPGINDSPING
- 00:41:465 - Move to 00:41:623 - Structural stuff, same as before, also follows vocal much better.
- 00:56:301 - Add d here? Same as 00:52:873. 00:56:623 - As well as here if you really wanna be consistent. No i don't really like it
- 01:05:408 - Hi, it's me again.
- 01:51:171 - Add d here? There's a sound, though I think you left this out on purpose. It's the case


Hi it's me again XD
- Diff gap is quite big between Oni and Muzukashii as mentioned in general section
- 00:20:781 - Change to k? Clearly a higher pitch when compared to note previous and after.
- 00:25:912 - Delete d? It seemed like a bit of overmap and unnecessary as well.
- 01:09:801 - Move to 01:09:373 - Better repetition as well as following the song.
- 01:14:837 - Delete d? Follows the song much better, as well as a varied structure.
- Croix is perfect <3
- 01:47:196 ~ 01:47:453 - Delete all? No sound here other than the vocal, which I think a break would better emphasize the section change.
- 02:04:119 - I recommend your spinner ends here.
- 02:20:786 - Aldwycilluminati confirmed


- 00:54:908 - Delete d? Follows the original structure better, as well that it seem less of an overmap.
- 01:09:051 - Delete k? There's no sound here, seem unreasonable to have a note here especially when considering the fact that you have been following vocal throughout.
- 01:14:837 - Delete d? Same reason as the first suggestion.
- 01:55:145 ~ 01:56:171 - The diff spike sudden drop here is very awkward.
- 01:56:171 - Please use a finisher, it's the exact same sound as 01:58:222, 02:01:299, consistency issue.
- 02:08:222 - Remove finisher? Seem unreasonable to have a finisher here, also better emphasize the K following it right after.


- 00:15:570 - Delete d? Better emphasize the single notes of k around it, as well as the structure of the song.
- 00:24:886 - Please refer to Muzukashii
-- 00:28:360 - ^ Same as above
- 00:50:623 - Please consider using SV gradient, so it slowly slows down
- 01:05:408 - Hi, it's me...
- 01:06:265 - Change to k, and 01:06:480 change to d? It sounds much better and plays better as well.
- 01:14:837 - Delete d? Less overmap, more structure, better follows the song.
- 01:19:123 - Please consider using SV gradient speed up, so it doesn't look too abrupt.
- 01:34:708 - Bruh.... Not sure if I would agree to this stream of PP here. Even Inner is subtle in this part, this seem a lil too much if you ask me. Well then give me another suggestion ? Every note of this stream fits, maybe its worth a ton of PP, but it doesn't change the fact that the way I mapped it perfectly fits on the music.
- 01:45:658 - Finisher? Do I still need to explain why?
-- Adding on to that --> You might also wanna add finisher at 01:45:786. A bit too much with this one IMO

GL ranking, that took forever lol. Thanks a lot <3

Hi it's me again XD KACKACKACKACKACKACKACKACKACKAC
- Diff gap is quite big between Oni and Muzukashii as mentioned in general section mfw futsu muzu has barely +300 objects while in Muzu / Oni +200 and gap is the most huge in our diff.
- 00:20:781 - Change to k? Clearly a higher pitch when compared to note previous and after. hmmm duno, i like keeping consistency w/ 00:15:412 (39,40,41,42) - as a single note type
- 00:25:912 - Delete d? It seemed like a bit of overmap and unnecessary as well. Keeping consistency w/ 00:29:939 (37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45) - for triple triplets.
- 01:09:801 - Move to 01:09:373 - Better repetition as well as following the song. Why not, doesn't sounds so bad.
- 01:14:837 - Delete d? Follows the song much better, as well as a varied structure. Gonna thinking on future mods, both are ok, just this d is on main tick.
- Croix is perfe ct <3 <3 (But wait, wat is croix?)
- 01:47:196 ~ 01:47:453 - Delete all? No sound here other than the vocal, which I think a break would better emphasize the section change. Ye ok, valid point.
- 02:04:119 - I recommend your spinner ends here. Ye ok, look legit
- 02:20:786 - Aldwycilluminati confirmed 666