Grats!! bro ~
thxhandsome wrote:
haha woah man
this caught my attention, may i know why 02:31:187 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - is mapped like that? there's several things wrong with this and i want to know the explanation why before it get requal'd well lol im mainly staying consistent, and im following the kicks instead of vocal here, so wat do you think this part suppose to be tho cuz i dont see a problem here xd
1. its mapped very similarly to 01:34:616 - although not really a bad thing, it makes no sense when the vocal is pretty much the main melody here yap still mainly staying consistent, i know the vocal is the main melody at the second kiai, so i used different patterns like 02:26:045 (1,2,3) - 02:27:330 (7,8) - 02:29:473 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - etc to express the vocal for the main melody and the kicks for consistent, these patterns you cant see it at the first kiai
2. following along with that logic, 02:29:473 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - this feels like its following the vocals, considering you're ignoring percussion on 02:29:902 - and the 'split stream' on 02:30:759 (7,8) - . this means you're aware of the vocals and are following it, so why suddenly change to the 'melody'? the vocal here is unique so imo following vocal with a complete different slider usage here seems a good choice, yea ive missed a kicks but the structure is still following the melody
3. 02:35:687 (6) - and i have no idea what this is following.. if it was the melody it should be 2 stacked circles well i want to used this patterns to express the vocal either, and 2 notes here seems inconsistent to me tbh lol
this was my beef with this map, cuz you could have done somethign really interesting like 00:48:330 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - which i really liked
some other stuff i didn't like:
- 02:42:330 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - i see that you said you didnt fix this from Atamare's mod cuz it was intentional..? why was it intentional? unlike 02:38:902 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - that had some sense because of the 'oh oh', this doesn't really have 'repetition' to it. 04:20:473 (8,9) - this would have been much better here. mainly staying consistent, and 04:20:473 (8,9) - this part is different cuz the whole structure at the last half kiai is different so yea xd
- the outro feels a little overspaced, compared to the other 'slow sections' it doesn't have much of a melody going for it outro is different with other calm part tho, so different spacing usage makes sense
- 03:47:795 (4,5) - really helps if these were stacked, right now it feels like a guessgame stacking might cause misread cuz 03:47:473 (2,3) - , and stacking here seems inconsistent to me cuz 01:26:687 (3,4) - 02:52:402 (3,4) - isnt stacking either
there's actually a lot of interesting melodies that could be mapped more accurately towards, but was scrapped in favour of 'white tick emphasis' it seems. and a few really weird switching inbetween synths, vocals and percussion all the time. when i played it, it didn't really feel like i was tapping to the song but just a monotonic track. lol im sorry about it cuz im trying out sth new :>
- 03:47:795 (4,5) - really helps if these were stacked, right now it feels like a guessgame stacking might cause misread cuz 03:47:473 (2,3) - , and stacking here seems inconsistent to me cuz 01:26:687 (3,4) - 02:52:402 (3,4) - isnt stacking eitherthere's not consistency here, 03:47:473 (2,3) - its not a valid comparison because 1/4 stack is visually so different from a 3/4 stack, especially when you have SL at 4. 01:26:687 (3,4) - 02:52:402 (3,4) these aren't even the same rhythms nor the same verses of music. i'd say keeping 03:47:795 (4,5) - as it is right now would be even more confusing considering the examples you've brought up.
Now we need more anime songsLasse wrote:
so much halozy in qualified o:
osu need more halozyLasse wrote:
so much halozy in qualified o:
thx :>_DT3 wrote:
Woohoo, gratz, NiNo!
anime music*Doyak wrote:
Now we need more anime songs