1. Unused Hitsounds

   soft-sliderslide10.wav
   soft-sliderslide12.wav
   soft-sliderslide17.wav
   soft-sliderslide19.wav
   soft-sliderslide21.wav
   soft-sliderslide23.wav
   soft-sliderslide25.wav
   soft-sliderslide28.wav
   soft-sliderslide32.wav
   soft-sliderslide35.wav
   soft-sliderslide37.wav
   soft-sliderslide39.wav
   soft-sliderslide43.wav
   soft-sliderslide45.wav
   soft-sliderslide47.wav
   soft-sliderslide49.wav
   soft-sliderslide51.wav
   soft-sliderslide53.wav
   soft-sliderslide55.wav
   soft-sliderslide6.wav
   soft-sliderslide8.wav

1. Well even tho this difficulty is very dense, but still AR 5 is way too much for "first" difficulty of the set . please nerf to 4 or 4.5
2. 00:06:951 (2,3,4,5) - Well since you are using 1/2 alot here , it would hurt to remove repeat from 00:08:022 (5) - and use circle at 00:08:451 - so that it emphasizes the loud melody and cymbal properly
3. 00:31:594 - 01:20:451 - and others like these i would make these clickable also for same reason as above , but these ones are'nt actually as strong as the previous one
4. 00:41:879 (6,1) - Swap NC's for consistency
5. 01:25:594 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,6) - In this whole section , Your NC patterning is really weird , Sometime the nc is after 2 downbeats , sometime after 3 and sometimes after 4 . there is no consistency at all so you should rather fix it
6. 02:37:594 (4) - NC
7. 04:24:308 - Well its pretty clear the sound one this downbeat is twice as intense as 04:23:879 - in term of both vocal and melody , The snare and cymbal also make this one a really important beat , Executing it like this on a slider end is a really bad idea.

1. 00:05:879 (1,1) - You really dont need to spam NC here , I know NC for sv change is a thing . But its just a guideline not a rule . The sv change here is hardly even noticeable. You could safely remove NC from 00:06:522 (1) - and it will be all cool as before.
2. 00:06:522 (1,1) - ummm http://puu.sh/uOGwc/76db69d394.jpg is this tiny overlap really necessary , its looks bad bad
3. 00:36:308 (1,1) - Stack
4. 00:57:094 (6,7) - You should rather leave them DS'd . The reason for this is that the sound at 00:57:308 - is more powerful so stacking it doesnt emphasize it in terms of spacing .More like these exist in the diff so check them yourself
5. 01:37:165 - You broke your NC patterning from here , so remove nc from 01:37:165 (1) - and add at 01:38:451 (4) - and so one
6. 02:11:879 (1) - Cute
7. 02:22:165 - Rip NC patterning again
8. 03:21:308 - Again , Make this clickable for better emphasis

1. 00:57:094 (6,7) - Same as in hard
2. 02:28:594 - and another break in NC patterning , are these intentional? they exist in all diffs . If intentional , i cant really tell why would u do it this way

• General
  

1. maybe finish normal diff like hard and last diff? because bpm don't look similar: normal and hard

• Normal
  

1. 00:22:594 (2,3) - imperfect blanket (i don't know if that's the point)
2. 02:35:879 (2,1) - this overlap doesn't look nice imo i suggest maybe at x:74 y:126
3. 02:38:451 (2,1) - :/ https://puu.sh/xes29/67073b1b77.png
4. 03:08:451 (1) - idk if this spinner is too short for newbies maybe if it's fine it's okay but if it's not good i suggest to enlarge it until 03:11:022
5. 04:02:558 (1,1) - same here ^
6. 04:24:737 (3,2) - stack them?

• Hard
  

1. 04:01:165 (3,4,5) - i don't think this overlap is necessary here

• Sinfonia
  

1. 00:14:237 (2,3) - better stacking?
2. 03:05:987 (1,1,1,1,1) - why this is not similar as 04:02:558 (1,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5) - i think you can emphasis the 1st part before the break
3. 03:47:022 (1,4) - better stack on sliders tails

ShogunMoon wrote:

Heyo!~

NM from my Q

• General
  

1. maybe finish normal diff like hard and last diff? because bpm don't look similar: normal and hard That shouldnt matter, since the bpm is only differen cause of the piano timing at the end and mapping that in the normal would be too difficult to follow for beginners

• Normal
  

1. 00:22:594 (2,3) - imperfect blanket (i don't know if that's the point) fixed
2. 02:35:879 (2,1) - this overlap doesn't look nice imo i suggest maybe at x:74 y:126 fixed
3. 02:38:451 (2,1) - :/ https://puu.sh/xes29/67073b1b77.png fixed
4. 03:08:451 (1) - idk if this spinner is too short for newbies maybe if it's fine it's okay but if it's not good i suggest to enlarge it until 03:11:022
5. 04:02:558 (1,1) - same here ^ should be fine
6. 04:24:737 (3,2) - stack them? ya

• Hard
  

1. 04:01:165 (3,4,5) - i don't think this overlap is necessary here wanna keep it in line with the pattern of 03:59:879 (1,2,3) -

• Sinfonia
  

1. 00:14:237 (2,3) - better stacking? ya, damn rounding errors
2. 03:05:987 (1,1,1,1,1) - why this is not similar as 04:02:558 (1,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5) - i think you can emphasis the 1st part before the break true
3. 03:47:022 (1,4) - better stack on sliders tails A

Clean mapset!

gl!~

josh1024 wrote:

From the queue:

Finally I'm here. Not much of a help tho. sorry.

Normal
01:46:272 (1) and 04:02:558 (1) mapped differently? lol yea made them consistent
04:34:594 (3,4,5) wide angle plus only used once. I'm not quite comfortable w/ this. changed the slider 04:33:951 - to make it flow
better into the angle

Sinfonia
01:34:379 (3,4,5,6,7) drum 03:23:022 (4,5,6,7) no sound but same pattern 03:50:879 (4) drum but no pattern? made first pattern same as last one
03:49:165 (6,7) maybe have larger space before 7 than 6. ya

Smokeman wrote:

i care about low diff marathon spreads C:

General

Meta checks out.
05:05:498 (1) - i think these long sliders are fine with muted slider ticks and slide as the vocals are pretty constant and clean. If you want you could add for just this slider the following quieter soft-sliderslide https://puu.sh/AaUe3/4ecd143417.wav ya

Sinfonia

01:24:951 (1,2,3,1) - This felt kinda excessive. You think you could nerf it a bit? Like reduce 01:25:379 (3,1) - /move 01:25:379 (3) - to 224|64 ya
01:34:594 (4,5,6) - ctrl+g the rhythm ? I know you follow the vocals but the slider ends weird on a the first drum. Followed by the second drum on first of the two following circles. ya
03:41:022 (1,2,3) - space these more out like 01:24:951 (1,2,3,1) - ya
04:30:308 (6) - Have you considered putting this liek so https://puu.sh/AaSKx/911f7207ae.jpg . it looks a bit too close to 04:29:451 (4) - making the pattern looks kinda crammed even tho 04:29:451 (4,5) - are pretty space-y and free-y kinda. nah I dont see how its too crammed or too close to 4, I prefer the circles to have the opposite angle of 5


hard

01:20:237 (5,6) - let this stack in the direction of the slider just like 00:30:737 (4,5,6) - (in other words custom stack it) nah that looks too weird
01:30:737 (1,2,3,4,5,1) - pretty packed but ok


normal

all cool


all looks good!
call me Mr.Back

Nozhomi wrote:

K go

[Hard :]

1. 02:43:594 (4,5,6) - I can't understand why you stacked them when vocal could be emphazied with 02:44:022 (6) - . Also there's better spot to use stack like 02:51:094 (2,3,4,5) - imo. yea true changed that, tho left 02:51:094 (2,3,4,5) - cause the linear movement kinda achieves the same effect

[Sinfonia :]

1. 00:07:165 (3,4,5,6,7) - Not hitsounded LO whoops

I secretly wish last diff was AR9
Mukyu~