M4M from my queue
[Easy]
Your NC's at the start kinda confuse me, I guess you're going off the vocals? I feel like doing it every 2 measures would be better imo. So NC 00:04:910 (3) - instead of 00:04:021 (1), etc etc
00:04:021 (1,3) - Aren't properly blanketed if you want them to be.
00:08:021 (1) - I feel NC should be on 00:08:466 (2) - instead.
00:09:799 - There isn't really an exact sound here so making it a clickable circle doesn't really make sense. Would fit more as a slider-end.
00:11:577 - ^ The same applies here. The vocal happens before this white tick and there's no instrumental sound on it so it probably shouldn't be clickable.
00:17:799 (4,1) - Kind of a tight flow here, you could move 1 up and to the right some to make it more natural - Like this maybe? Could make a triangle https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/6419489
00:29:354 (1) - NC should be on 00:29:799 (2) - to follow the NC every two measures pattern.
00:36:466 (1) - NC should be on 00:36:910 (2) -
00:44:021 (1,2) - Might be better if these are the same shape? They're currently tilted a bit differently and it's kinda weird. Same with 00:40:466 (1,2). If you're going to rotate the second slider a bit, rotate a bit more. Otherwise just use the same shape.
00:55:132 (1,1) - These almost overlap because of the blanket so it looks kinda bad. Maybe find a different shape for 00:56:466 (1) -
01:14:243 (1,2,3) - The gaps between these sliders are not equal so this pattern looks messy.
[Railgun's Hard]
00:09:354 (3) - I like this note having a decent spacing to it, but I don't like the spacing on 00:09:577 (4) - as the sound here doens't deserve any more than the usual 1.3. It is an offbeat slider after all, starting on a red tick.
00:08:466 (1,2) - This rhythm doesn't really make sense. You're ignoring the vocal on 00:08:799, and yeah 3/4 is weird and all but you could use a passive rhythm so it's not confusing to the player. Just a big reverse slider is better than this imo, starting on 00:08:466, with reverse at 00:08:799 -
00:12:021 (1,2,3) - If you're using 3/4 gaps here, why not continue it for 00:12:910 (5,6,7)? Instead of a 1/2 slider for 00:13:132 (6) - just put a circle on 00:13:243. I don't really like 3/4 gaps in hards regardless so reverse sliders are probably better here instead of circles.
00:17:354 (5) - NC should be here
00:22:688 (1) - Kind of a big jump don't you think? Much bigger than anything so far, and I suppose it's a strong downbeat, but is it THAT strong?
00:28:466 (2) - 1.67x spacing to this note makes sense, but 1.67 spacing from this note does not. Lower the spacing for 00:28:688 (3) - as it doesn't need to be emphasized in any way.
00:43:799 (7,1) - This is kinda neat, why not do it again at 00:47:354 (6,1) - ?
00:53:577 (2) - Why does this have two red nodes? The second one makes the big curve look ugly as part of it is randomly straight
01:07:799 (4) - Not a fan of this offbeat slider, 01:08:021 - should be clickable. Maybe make 01:07:799 - a circle then 01:08:021 - a 1/2 slider.
01:12:466 (8) - NC should be here
01:22:466 (5) - As before, I prefer this to involve the sound at 01:22:577 - so you're not switching from using 3/4 gaps to 1/2 ones while the song continues to use the 3/4 gaps.
[Broom]
Same NC concerns as easy, but I guess it's not as big of a deal for this diff as the rhythm is less cookie cutter.
00:12:021 (1) - Would move so its not as close to 00:11:132 (3) -
00:16:466 (2,4) - Why are these spaced differently?
00:32:910 (5,1) - stack? This way the jump is from 00:33:132 (1,2) - which makes much more sense then from 5 to 1.
00:33:354 (2) - Btw, NC should be here, not 00:33:132 (1) -
00:52:910 (6) - NC would fit here! new measure + big jump, so the NC adds on to the emphasis.
I really like how the triangle jump patterns play but I feel you could clean up the aesthetics of them a bit, they feel a bit...messy? I don't really know how to describe it.
Nice mapset overall, good luck!
[Easy]
Your NC's at the start kinda confuse me, I guess you're going off the vocals? I feel like doing it every 2 measures would be better imo. So NC 00:04:910 (3) - instead of 00:04:021 (1), etc etc
00:04:021 (1,3) - Aren't properly blanketed if you want them to be.
00:08:021 (1) - I feel NC should be on 00:08:466 (2) - instead.
00:09:799 - There isn't really an exact sound here so making it a clickable circle doesn't really make sense. Would fit more as a slider-end.
00:11:577 - ^ The same applies here. The vocal happens before this white tick and there's no instrumental sound on it so it probably shouldn't be clickable.
00:17:799 (4,1) - Kind of a tight flow here, you could move 1 up and to the right some to make it more natural - Like this maybe? Could make a triangle https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/6419489
00:29:354 (1) - NC should be on 00:29:799 (2) - to follow the NC every two measures pattern.
00:36:466 (1) - NC should be on 00:36:910 (2) -
00:44:021 (1,2) - Might be better if these are the same shape? They're currently tilted a bit differently and it's kinda weird. Same with 00:40:466 (1,2). If you're going to rotate the second slider a bit, rotate a bit more. Otherwise just use the same shape.
00:55:132 (1,1) - These almost overlap because of the blanket so it looks kinda bad. Maybe find a different shape for 00:56:466 (1) -
01:14:243 (1,2,3) - The gaps between these sliders are not equal so this pattern looks messy.
[Railgun's Hard]
00:09:354 (3) - I like this note having a decent spacing to it, but I don't like the spacing on 00:09:577 (4) - as the sound here doens't deserve any more than the usual 1.3. It is an offbeat slider after all, starting on a red tick.
00:08:466 (1,2) - This rhythm doesn't really make sense. You're ignoring the vocal on 00:08:799, and yeah 3/4 is weird and all but you could use a passive rhythm so it's not confusing to the player. Just a big reverse slider is better than this imo, starting on 00:08:466, with reverse at 00:08:799 -
00:12:021 (1,2,3) - If you're using 3/4 gaps here, why not continue it for 00:12:910 (5,6,7)? Instead of a 1/2 slider for 00:13:132 (6) - just put a circle on 00:13:243. I don't really like 3/4 gaps in hards regardless so reverse sliders are probably better here instead of circles.
00:17:354 (5) - NC should be here
00:22:688 (1) - Kind of a big jump don't you think? Much bigger than anything so far, and I suppose it's a strong downbeat, but is it THAT strong?
00:28:466 (2) - 1.67x spacing to this note makes sense, but 1.67 spacing from this note does not. Lower the spacing for 00:28:688 (3) - as it doesn't need to be emphasized in any way.
00:43:799 (7,1) - This is kinda neat, why not do it again at 00:47:354 (6,1) - ?
00:53:577 (2) - Why does this have two red nodes? The second one makes the big curve look ugly as part of it is randomly straight
01:07:799 (4) - Not a fan of this offbeat slider, 01:08:021 - should be clickable. Maybe make 01:07:799 - a circle then 01:08:021 - a 1/2 slider.
01:12:466 (8) - NC should be here
01:22:466 (5) - As before, I prefer this to involve the sound at 01:22:577 - so you're not switching from using 3/4 gaps to 1/2 ones while the song continues to use the 3/4 gaps.
[Broom]
Same NC concerns as easy, but I guess it's not as big of a deal for this diff as the rhythm is less cookie cutter.
00:12:021 (1) - Would move so its not as close to 00:11:132 (3) -
00:16:466 (2,4) - Why are these spaced differently?
00:32:910 (5,1) - stack? This way the jump is from 00:33:132 (1,2) - which makes much more sense then from 5 to 1.
00:33:354 (2) - Btw, NC should be here, not 00:33:132 (1) -
00:52:910 (6) - NC would fit here! new measure + big jump, so the NC adds on to the emphasis.
I really like how the triangle jump patterns play but I feel you could clean up the aesthetics of them a bit, they feel a bit...messy? I don't really know how to describe it.
Nice mapset overall, good luck!