1. Futsuu (1.56 stars, 131 notes)
2. Kantan (1.09 stars, 93 notes)
3. Muzukashii (2.09 stars, 204 notes)
4. Oni (2.65 stars, 253 notes)

Nyan wrote:

[Kantan]

My suggestion is announcer voice part is great place for break only in Kantan

00:11:521 (24,25) - delete all
00:20:248 (37,38) - delete all
00:24:611 (46) - delete
00:28:975 (54,55) - delete all
00:37:975 (67,68,69) - delete all
00:42:066 (76,77) - delete all
00:46:430 (85,86,87) - delete all
00:55:157 (99) - delete
00:59:521 (108,109) - delete all
01:03:884 (117,118) - delete all
01:12:611 (130,131) - delete all Removed the first one

[Futsuu]

00:37:884 (91) - move to 00:37:975

[Muzukashii]

00:37:884 (124) - move to 00:37:975

[Oni]

00:24:066 (89,90,91) -

1. 00:01:702 (5) - don for better rhytm.
2. 00:15:339 (48,49,50) - comparing with 00:13:157 (40,41,42) - you should make it kkk or make 40-41-42 dons ( for more stability ).
3. 00:22:430 (72,76) - both are claps, but firstly you mapped it as kat, then as don. It's bad for stability.
4. 00:24:611 - nove it to 00:24:748 -
5. Well, on that moment i can say, that you map similar sounds in different way in all parts of a map. It's not bad for playing, but bad for hearing and enjoying gameplay.
6. 00:28:975 - move it to 00:29:111 - .
7. 00:39:339 (128,130,132,134,136) - by what reason you mapped it like kats? I mean yes, some of them are kats, but dkdkdk-type pattern here you lose emphasizing of the song ( the main purpose of mapping taiko is emphasizing of sounds).
8. Well, i can't fully describe every mistake, but i can say in few words : you should choose 1 stable rhytm and map it, but sometimes make it more emphasized (by adding some extra kats, for example). Having of 10 different rhytms in one-rhytm song is bad, really.

1. 00:10:293 (35) - there is no reason to put kat here, i think. Swap 00:10:157 (34,35) - them then.
2. 00:14:793 (52,56,61) - similar sounds, but 61 is don (and idk why).
3. 00:24:611 (90) - in 25% i hear, that this note should be on 00:24:521 - (it's 1/6)
4. 00:25:975 (93) - no reason for note here. Or map vocal 00:25:702 - here too.
5. 00:28:975 - well, what about this?
6. 00:37:702 (139,140) - well, think also for this moment (using of 1/6)
7. 00:41:975 (155,156,157) - hmmmm
8. 00:46:293 (171,172,173,174) - hmmmmmmmmmm
9. 00:48:748 - last time you mapped it and made 5-stream note, no?
10. 01:00:066 (221,222,223) - well, idk how to do normal, but it's ok like this
11. 01:03:884 (237,238,239) - the same as above
12. 01:05:521 (243,244,245,246,247,248,249,250,251) - previous time you maped it like k d k d or something like this, and there you mapped stream? Well, it's your choice, but it's bad : there is no stability in density of the map then. And....01:08:248 (258,259) - swap them.

Remus wrote:

Hi there.

[Muzukashii]

1. 00:01:702 (5) - don for better rhytm.
2. 00:15:339 (48,49,50) - comparing with 00:13:157 (40,41,42) - you should make it kkk or make 40-41-42 dons ( for more stability ).
3. 00:22:430 (72,76) - both are claps, but firstly you mapped it as kat, then as don. It's bad for stability. changed
4. 00:24:611 - nove it to 00:24:748 -
5. Well, on that moment i can say, that you map similar sounds in different way in all parts of a map. It's not bad for playing, but bad for hearing and enjoying gameplay.
6. 00:28:975 - move it to 00:29:111 - .
7. 00:39:339 (128,130,132,134,136) - by what reason you mapped it like kats? I mean yes, some of them are kats, but dkdkdk-type pattern here you lose emphasizing of the song ( the main purpose of mapping taiko is emphasizing of sounds). changed this too
8. Well, i can't fully describe every mistake, but i can say in few words : you should choose 1 stable rhytm and map it, but sometimes make it more emphasized (by adding some extra kats, for example). Having of 10 different rhytms in one-rhytm song is bad, really.

[Oni]

1. 00:10:293 (35) - there is no reason to put kat here, i think. Swap 00:10:157 (34,35) - them then.
2. 00:14:793 (52,56,61) - similar sounds, but 61 is don (and idk why). changed
3. 00:24:611 (90) - in 25% i hear, that this note should be on 00:24:521 - (it's 1/6)
4. 00:25:975 (93) - no reason for note here. Or map vocal 00:25:702 - here too.
5. 00:28:975 - well, what about this? Changed it myself.
6. 00:37:702 (139,140) - well, think also for this moment (using of 1/6) No., i will change it to dk 1/4
7. 00:41:975 (155,156,157) - hmmmm fixed
8. 00:46:293 (171,172,173,174) - hmmmmmmmmmm ^
9. 00:48:748 - last time you mapped it and made 5-stream note, no? i will change it to 5 stream note again. 5 stream note seems okay to me
10. 01:00:066 (221,222,223) - well, idk how to do normal, but it's ok like this Okay, i like this too
11. 01:03:884 (237,238,239) - the same as above
12. 01:05:521 (243,244,245,246,247,248,249,250,251) - previous time you maped it like k d k d or something like this, and there you mapped stream? Well, it's your choice, but it's bad : there is no stability in density of the map then. I like this stream, but i will change it into the better stream And....01:08:248 (258,259) - swap them.

That's all i can suggest.
Good luck!