[niamh]
00:32:890 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - since there are strong sounds on both white and red ticks here you are missing quite a lot of emphasis. (probably best to put a lot more toned down jumps than in the example xd)
I guess? Tried a nifty little pattern there, let's see if it works with some more mods.00:51:435 (1,2) - the massive jump distance between these makes the jump feel a bit "floaty". is it possible for you to move these 00:51:254 (8,1) - in a way that the distance between 00:51:435 (1,2) - would be around 2.5x?
Not really, 00:51:435 (1) would get way to close to the previous stream for comfort IMO. The floaty jump here was intentional, anyway. 00:52:526 (1) - how about having a slight sv increase for this slider ( 00:48:163 (1,1) - to somewhat mirror the effect of these) you could also increase the spacing of these 00:52:890 (2,3,4) - a bit and then have the speed diminish here (like you already do)
I don't really like random SV changes, tbh. I've fiddled a bit with the next pattern, increasing a bit the jump at 00:53:254 (4,1) since that was a neat idea, though. 01:17:981 (5,6) - might want to try ctrl + g on both of these since there isn't 3 sounds like in the pattern before (unless you just want it to mirror the other pattern)
yeah, the idea with these triangles throughout the map was to kinda have the second set mirror the first one. I'm also not control+g'ing here since I think the jump at 01:18:345 (6,1) feels better if 6 goes in that direction, imo.01:45:981 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - the stream jumps in these feel pretty awkward. I'd prefer if you made them flow into each other more naturarly
They flow well as they are, though? I mean, it follows the curve and then goes into a straight line for the next slider.02:38:617 (2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2) - in my opinion something like this would fit the drum better
Maybe. I'm waiting on some feedback from BN's before deciding what to do with stream jumps throughout the diff.02:44:890 (4,5,6) - consider the same as 01:17:981 (5,6) - (making it into circular flow)
No change. Same reason as before.02:53:617 (4,5,6) - how about slightly increased sv for these three?
Why? I don't think there's anything in the song that would imply a need for SV changes here?02:56:163 (5) - there's a strong sound on both the white and red here too
neato03:13:254 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - *stream jump explanation* (if you were to use the same pattern I used you could make it blanket the slider)
flow between 03:13:890 (4,1) is kinda harsh, yeah. But otherwhise it's fine?03:24:890 (6) - minor aesthetic thing here: you could make these 03:24:890 (6,1) - go side by side and then do the same for these 03:25:981 (3,4) - . you already have something similar going on here
Yeah, I made it that way on purpose, but I guess I might as well make those two equals.03:50:163 (3,4) - blanket is slightly off /me runs
#AllBlanketsAreBeautiful03:58:708 (4,1) - same here ^
#OperationFixAllFuckUps04:34:435 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4) - best to just keep this one withount stream jumps. it's pretty similar to 04:30:345 (5,6,7,8) - but it's a bit more intense (after all, these are not actually in the song but only there to build up emphasis so better keep them a bit more toned up)
Sure, removed the jump and did something a lil' bit different with this pattern 04:40:526 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - *stream jump explanation*
this one actually had kinda bad flow, fixed?