_MiaoFUuU_ wrote:

Hi NM （Fourm req）

Niamh

1. 00:11:799 (3) - blanket put it to x：236 y：224 sure
2. 00:32:935 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - suggest change into circle Nope. I don't see any problem with my actual pattern. Sliders fit and flow fine as they are now.
3. 00:39:435 (6) - NC，00:40:526 (1) - NC sure
4. 00:43:799 (7) - NC，00:44:526 (1) - NC Nope, not here. Setting NC here and having nothing after that slider is kinda awkward, I think.
5. 00:56:435 - add a circle sure
6. 01:07:254 - try this rhythm https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/5641217 Nope, it's way too confusing. I'm maping to the guitar since it's the prominent sound here.
7. 01:19:799 (4) - stack at 01:21:254 (2) - x：291 y：35 sure
8. 01:25:254 (1,2,3) - not beautiful beautified
9. 01:46:254 (4,1,4,1) - I can't pass this kind of stream....spacing is too far,plz consider to change（you can use slider instead of 01:46:163 (3,3) - or you can use common's stream）
10. 01:48:163 (4) - NC nope, NC every two big white ticks
11. 01:56:345 (2) - optimise sure
12. 02:01:254 (5) - NC nope, NC every two big white ticks
13. 02:05:617 (4) - NC nope, NC every two big white ticks
14. 02:07:799 (5) - ↑ ↑
15. 02:09:981 (4) - ↑ ↑
16. 02:12:163 (4) - ↑ ↑
17. 02:14:345 (4) - 02:16:526 (4) - 02:18:708 (5) - 02:20:890 (4) - ↑ ↑
18. 02:31:799 (2,3) - blanket and 02:31:799 (2,4) - stack yes to stack. As far as I know, I'm already blanketing that
19. 02:38:799 (4,1,4,1) - same with 01:46:254 (4,1,4,1) -
20. 02:39:435 (3) - NC nope, not necessary
21. 02:45:526 - suggest add a circle but there isn't a sound there?
22. 03:13:527 (4,1,4,1) - same with 01:46:254 (4,1,4,1) -
23. 03:15:435 (4) - NC no
24. 03:20:890 (4) - ↑ nah
25. 03:21:617 (1) - ↑ nein
26. 03:24:163 (4) - ↑ いいえ
27. 03:26:345 (4) - ↑ нет
28. 03:28:527 (5) - ↑ όχι
29. 03:28:890 (1) - ↑ 아니
30. 03:29:617 (5) - ↑ nope
31. 03:32:890 (4) - stack at 03:31:254 (4) - https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/5641330 and then NC it yes to stack, no to NC
32. 03:35:072 (5) - NC uh uh
33. 03:37:254 (4) - ↑ nope
34. 03:39:436 (4) - 03:41:617 (4) - 03:43:799 (4) - 03:45:981 (6) - 03:52:526 (1) - 03:53:617 (6) - ↑
35. 04:15:435 (1,4) - stack yes
36. 04:21:981 (5) - NC
37. 04:23:072 (4) - 04:23:617 (1) - NC
38. 04:25:254 (4) - NC
39. 04:27:435 (4) - 04:27:799 (1) - ↑
40. 04:29:617 (3) - ↑
41. 04:31:799 (3) - ↑
42. 04:33:981 (3) - 04:34:435 (1) - 04:34:708 (1) - ↑
43. 04:34:616 (4,5,8,1) - same with 01:46:254 (4,1,4,1) -
44. 04:36:163 (3) - NC
45. 04:38:345 (3) - ↑
46. 04:39:435 (6) - ↑
47. 04:40:799 (4,1,4,1) - same with 01:46:254 (4,1,4,1) -
48. 04:42:708 (5) - 04:43:435 (1) - 04:44:890 (5) - NC
49. 04:47:072 (4) - 04:49:072 (1) - 04:49:254 (6) - NC
50. 04:55:799 (4) - 04:56:890 (4) - NC
51. 05:00:163 (4) - 05:02:345 (5) - 05:04:527 (4) - 05:06:709 (4) - 05:08:891 (4) - 05:11:072 (4) - 05:13:254 (5) - NC
52. 05:20:890 (6) - NC

good luck！

Mayumi Sugihara wrote:

ティルナノーグ stands for "Tír na nÓg", which means "Land of Youth" in Irish. For further info, you know where to look:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T%C3%AD...

riktoi wrote:

Just a small place holder until I finish my mod.

quoted from the description of this youtube video :

Mayumi Sugihara wrote:

ティルナノーグ stands for "Tír na nÓg", which means "Land of Youth" in Irish. For further info, you know where to look:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T%C3%AD...

So, according to this, the title should be something like "Land of Youth...". I don't really count myself as a metadata expert so it would most likely be best to check with someone who can understand the language so you could have as accurate of a title as possible.

Expect the rest of the mod in like 3-6 hours, don't give me kds until I post it thanks.

Akareh wrote:

ティルナノーグ reads, literally, Tír na nÓg, which is a thing in Irish mythology https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tír_na_nÓg (and my diff name is a reference to the story, even!)

I can't submit diacritic marks on the BSS (or at least I always get an error if I try to use them, anyway). That's why the name doesn't have 'em. I can put them in the tags, though, and I've placed the correctly formated Tír na nÓg there, so shouldn't be problems I hope?

Land of youth is a somewhat literal translation of what Tír na nÓg means, but yeah, the japanese actually reads like the irish name.

[niamh]

00:32:890 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - since there are strong sounds on both white and red ticks here you are missing quite a lot of emphasis. (probably best to put a lot more toned down jumps than in the example xd)

raw example of what I would do

00:51:435 (1,2) - the massive jump distance between these makes the jump feel a bit "floaty". is it possible for you to move these 00:51:254 (8,1) - in a way that the distance between 00:51:435 (1,2) - would be around 2.5x?

00:52:526 (1) - how about having a slight sv increase for this slider ( 00:48:163 (1,1) - to somewhat mirror the effect of these) you could also increase the spacing of these 00:52:890 (2,3,4) - a bit and then have the speed diminish here (like you already do)

01:17:981 (5,6) - might want to try ctrl + g on both of these since there isn't 3 sounds like in the pattern before (unless you just want it to mirror the other pattern)

01:45:981 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - the stream jumps in these feel pretty awkward. I'd prefer if you made them flow into each other more naturarly

another raw example that might be a bit too avant garde for this

02:38:617 (2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2) - in my opinion something like this would fit the drum better

example

02:44:890 (4,5,6) - consider the same as 01:17:981 (5,6) - (making it into circular flow)

02:53:617 (4,5,6) - how about slightly increased sv for these three?

02:56:163 (5) - there's a strong sound on both the white and red here too

asd

03:13:254 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - *stream jump explanation* (if you were to use the same pattern I used you could make it blanket the slider)

03:24:890 (6) - minor aesthetic thing here: you could make these 03:24:890 (6,1) - go side by side and then do the same for these 03:25:981 (3,4) - . you already have something similar going on here

03:50:163 (3,4) - blanket is slightly off /me runs

03:58:708 (4,1) - same here ^

04:34:435 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4) - best to just keep this one withount stream jumps. it's pretty similar to 04:30:345 (5,6,7,8) - but it's a bit more intense (after all, these are not actually in the song but only there to build up emphasis so better keep them a bit more toned up)

04:40:526 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - *stream jump explanation*

riktoi wrote:

Here is my mod, as requested.

[niamh]

00:32:890 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - since there are strong sounds on both white and red ticks here you are missing quite a lot of emphasis. (probably best to put a lot more toned down jumps than in the example xd)

raw example of what I would do

I guess? Tried a nifty little pattern there, let's see if it works with some more mods.

00:51:435 (1,2) - the massive jump distance between these makes the jump feel a bit "floaty". is it possible for you to move these 00:51:254 (8,1) - in a way that the distance between 00:51:435 (1,2) - would be around 2.5x? Not really, 00:51:435 (1) would get way to close to the previous stream for comfort IMO. The floaty jump here was intentional, anyway.

00:52:526 (1) - how about having a slight sv increase for this slider ( 00:48:163 (1,1) - to somewhat mirror the effect of these) you could also increase the spacing of these 00:52:890 (2,3,4) - a bit and then have the speed diminish here (like you already do) I don't really like random SV changes, tbh. I've fiddled a bit with the next pattern, increasing a bit the jump at 00:53:254 (4,1) since that was a neat idea, though.

01:17:981 (5,6) - might want to try ctrl + g on both of these since there isn't 3 sounds like in the pattern before (unless you just want it to mirror the other pattern) yeah, the idea with these triangles throughout the map was to kinda have the second set mirror the first one. I'm also not control+g'ing here since I think the jump at 01:18:345 (6,1) feels better if 6 goes in that direction, imo.

01:45:981 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - the stream jumps in these feel pretty awkward. I'd prefer if you made them flow into each other more naturarly They flow well as they are, though? I mean, it follows the curve and then goes into a straight line for the next slider.

another raw example that might be a bit too avant garde for this

02:38:617 (2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2) - in my opinion something like this would fit the drum better Maybe. I'm waiting on some feedback from BN's before deciding what to do with stream jumps throughout the diff.

example

02:44:890 (4,5,6) - consider the same as 01:17:981 (5,6) - (making it into circular flow) No change. Same reason as before.

02:53:617 (4,5,6) - how about slightly increased sv for these three? Why? I don't think there's anything in the song that would imply a need for SV changes here?

02:56:163 (5) - there's a strong sound on both the white and red here too neato

asd

03:13:254 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - *stream jump explanation* (if you were to use the same pattern I used you could make it blanket the slider) flow between 03:13:890 (4,1) is kinda harsh, yeah. But otherwhise it's fine?

03:24:890 (6) - minor aesthetic thing here: you could make these 03:24:890 (6,1) - go side by side and then do the same for these 03:25:981 (3,4) - . you already have something similar going on here Yeah, I made it that way on purpose, but I guess I might as well make those two equals.

03:50:163 (3,4) - blanket is slightly off /me runs #AllBlanketsAreBeautiful

03:58:708 (4,1) - same here ^ #OperationFixAllFuckUps

04:34:435 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4) - best to just keep this one withount stream jumps. it's pretty similar to 04:30:345 (5,6,7,8) - but it's a bit more intense (after all, these are not actually in the song but only there to build up emphasis so better keep them a bit more toned up) Sure, removed the jump and did something a lil' bit different with this pattern

04:40:526 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - *stream jump explanation* this one actually had kinda bad flow, fixed?

I hope you keep working this to perfection ^w^/ yep, that's the idea, at least

from my modding queue

Term Akatski wrote:

from my queue
(i only say fix blanket when i notice a wrong blanket on the first time i play it)
wow you have a really nice style on mapping very nice map thank you!

Niamh
00:10:345 (4) - imo this one fits in better sure, why not
00:48:890 (7,8,1,2,3,4) - fix triangle since its really noticable ( just move 00:49:981 (1,2,3) if it gets in the way ) I... can't see the problem here, sorry
01:46:526 - the 1/8 sound(i dont know what that sound is lel) starts here Yep. I'm starting later on purpose though, since really the sound becomes strong at 01:46:708. And that sound is the piano buzz thingy in the background.
02:32:890 (3) - fix blanket Fixed, I hope?
02:38:345 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3) - lower distance Nope. The stream is a little more spaced here since this part of the song is really intense, I think a higher DS here is reasonable.
02:41:617 (1,2,3,4) - imo the flow is better this way oh, that's really cool! niceeee
03:13:799 - same as 01:46:526 same
03:35:799 (9) - it would be better if this was a slider ending at the 2nd blue tick(move position of it and curve it pointing to the direction of where 1(blue) is) there's no sound at 03:36:072 though
04:41:072 (3) - same as 03:13:799 same
04:48:163 (7) - fix blanket yep
05:25:526 - maybe add a spinner? :3 Hmmm I'm tempted, but I like the way that slider art ends the song

good map good song
good luck
*throws star*

Osuology wrote:

from my queue sorry I was like 9 days late
L0L?

00:15:981 (2,3,4,5) - I don't think this flow really matches the song or the flow you've already been mapping with. I would recommend something like this: I don't think there's a problem with it. It also helps me tell the player that they'll encounter similar patterns (like 00:51:072 (7,8,1)). As far as fitting the song goes, I think it does? I also haven't received any complaints about this before, but if it really becomes an issue I'll figure something up. For now I'm keeping it as is.

00:19:617 (7,1) - This jump bothers me I'm not sure why. I can't see a problem? It's consistent with what I've been doing up to that point (heavy drum sound = jump) and the DS isn't really that big, 00:15:254 (7,1) has one that's similar and 00:15:254 (7,1) has an even bigger one.

00:50:345 (1,1) - NC's are very weird throughout this section, and if you're not going to change it, please tell me why. Changed 00:49:981 (5), keeping the rest. Idea was to have one every big white tick, but I forgot that one. The one's at 00:53:617 (1,1,1,1) are placed since I like to point out SV changes as clearly as possible, even if they're not that big a deal.

01:20:708 (8,1) - This bothers me. First of all, distance is a huge amount, larger than I think would be necessary. Second, again, it's not very consistent with flow. It's a triangle which you really didn't use many of before. (Or at least that I noticed) Try something that feels more snappy than a triangle. Reduced DS. I've been using triangles throughout the whole diff, though? Heck, I basically map by making triangles xDDD 00:14:345 (4,5,6) - 00:48:890 (7,8,1) - 00:49:435 (2,3,4) - 01:00:890 (7,8,1) - 01:13:799 (5,6,7) just to point a few that have come up to that point, and there's a looot more past that. I love to make them.

01:45:981 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - This is a hard decision tbh. I could say that it's stupid to put stream jumps here since you never indicated to the player the map would be this way, but then again there isn't really much before this part that you could change to show the player so... I don't know. Make your decision, personally I would recommend to remove the stream but tbh it's not too important. (Also this applies to the other streams with jumps in them) I really love these stream jumps throughout the diff, for several reasons. First, it's a really calm map, that has practically no streams throughout the diff, so I wanted to make them count, make them feel special somehow everytime they showed up. Streamjumps were the only thing that came to mind when I was mapping. Second, I think they're way more fun to play than an old boring stream here. Third, they're more interesting to look at At this point, unless they are unrankable for some reason, I'd really like to keep them.

02:09:981 (4) - This slider should really be moving upward if you want to remain consistent with your flow. If you look at the other sliders that are on notes like this, they always go the opposite direction of the previous slider, so you should do that with this one. Maybe. I don't think it's that inconsistent, I mainly changed gears here since I didn't have confortable space to make an interesting pattern that went upwards here. Also I wasn't really going for the oppossite direction sliders approach, it just ended like that while I was mapping. 02:16:163 (3,4) - 02:17:254 (6,1) -

02:34:617 () - There is a very slight guitar sound here, not sure if you want to map it or not. If you do, you probably should use a slider that ends on this point. Avoided on purpose, since it made the rhythm way complicated and was awkward to play a slider there when 02:34:708 (8) has a stront sound that should be clickable

02:36:890 (6) - I don't think dropoff flow is a good think here. Why? It plays nice.

03:49:072 (4,1) - I don't like this jump at all. Any reasons for that? It's a big jump, sure, but hardly a stretch considering what's been brought up to that point. It also serves as a way to release energy from the kiai and enter the slow rhythm again IMO.

04:26:890 (2) - That's awfully close. Fixed, I hope?

05:22:890 (1) - This possibly could be in a different timing section.sure

1. Streamjumps in a 4.5 star map the absolute madman
2. Sadly there's quite a lot of overmapping going on, and not the good kind
3. I really like the map and i think you could rank it but the overmapping needs to go

1. 00:48:890 (7,8,1,2,3,4) - if you could make this even spacing between the notes so it looks nice and stuff that'd be great
2. 01:18:708 (1,2) - you're undermapping a triple here, and from what i gather the 2 follows the drums since there's no flute, so mapping it would be justified imo. you also map this 01:20:345 (5,6,7) - triple a second later, which makes ignoring the first one questionable.
3. 01:41:617 (4) - Not sure if i agree with having the sliderend cover such a strong beat. Id rather see the slider be 1/2 and have 4 jumps instead.
4. 03:08:890 (4) - almost exactly the same lol
5. Taking a closer look at it you copied a lot 03:08:890 (4,1,2,4,5,6) - between here and 01:42:708 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - for example. Come on dude. You're better than that. Get off your ass and map a new section, its boring but copying just to save time is not cool. The map quality suffers for no good reason.
6. 01:45:981 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - look man i love jumpstreams, and i love that you have the balls to map them in a 4.5 star map, but there's just nothing justifying the jump, the 1/8 piano thing starts at 01:46:526 (3) - , not 01:46:708 (1) - , there's no sound on 01:46:072 (2) - and 01:46:435 (2) - and not an ongoing beat explaining the 9 note stream. Id just remake it into a jump + triple into the 1/8 slider. Sorry.
7. 02:00:163 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - Does this combo really need to be 8 notes? you could put an NC at 02:01:072 (4) - or something.
8. 02:11:799 (3,4) - I hear a sound for a triple here, but not 02:12:435 (5,6) - here? You could keep the same intensity by just switching them around without making it overmapping. But then again maybe i just cant hear the triple.
9. 02:38:617 (2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2) - Same as my last point about the stream. There's really no way to justify this being the hardest part of the map or a continuous sound for a stream at all and it hurts to say because they're really charming
10. Skipped modding the part that was basically copying
11. 03:13:254 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - Stream issue again :/
12. 03:36:163 (1,3) - muh ocd line them up properly
13. 04:32:890 (1) - This could be moved around and straightend out a bit or so to blanket the 2 better
14. 04:34:435 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4) - you know. and even if you're going to justify it with the violin, it changes tone at 04:34:798 (2) - , not 04:34:708 (1) - , so that needs to be changed either way. I highly reccommend removing the stream for something else though. It doesnt fit the intensity either.
15. 04:40:526 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - ----
16. 05:07:436 (1,2,3,4,1) - As an example, this stream here is at least somewhat justified because there's a very loud continuous violin sound. the jumpstreams dont have that.
    

Rapthorn wrote:

General

1. Streamjumps in a 4.5 star map the absolute madman told you I liked to live dangerously when I requested the mod, didn't I? xDDD
2. Sadly there's quite a lot of overmapping going on, and not the good kind
3. I really like the map and i think you could rank it but the overmapping needs to go

Took me like 3 minutes before i realized it was cirnos theme Cute. Took me like 3 full listens.

1. 00:48:890 (7,8,1,2,3,4) - if you could make this even spacing between the notes so it looks nice and stuff that'd be great fixed, I think?
2. 01:18:708 (1,2) - you're undermapping a triple here, and from what i gather the 2 follows the drums since there's no flute, so mapping it would be justified imo. you also map this 01:20:345 (5,6,7) - triple a second later, which makes ignoring the first one questionable. sure, changed on all instances where this repeats
3. 01:41:617 (4) - Not sure if i agree with having the sliderend cover such a strong beat. Id rather see the slider be 1/2 and have 4 jumps instead. sure I guess
4. 03:08:890 (4) - almost exactly the same lol ^
5. Taking a closer look at it you copied a lot 03:08:890 (4,1,2,4,5,6) - between here and 01:42:708 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - for example. Come on dude. You're better than that. Get off your ass and map a new section, its boring but copying just to save time is not cool. The map quality suffers for no good reason. I only copied a pattern, but I guess it was kinda lazy yeah. Remapped that.
6. 01:45:981 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - look man i love jumpstreams, and i love that you have the balls to map them in a 4.5 star map, but there's just nothing justifying the jump, the 1/8 piano thing starts at 01:46:526 (3) - , not 01:46:708 (1) - , there's no sound on 01:46:072 (2) - and 01:46:435 (2) - and not an ongoing beat explaining the 9 note stream. Id just remake it into a jump + triple into the 1/8 slider. Sorry. I'm an absolute madman for no longer
7. 02:00:163 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - Does this combo really need to be 8 notes? you could put an NC at 02:01:072 (4) - or something. fixed
8. 02:11:799 (3,4) - I hear a sound for a triple here, but not 02:12:435 (5,6) - here? You could keep the same intensity by just switching them around without making it overmapping. But then again maybe i just cant hear the triple. nope, I fucked up here
9. 02:38:617 (2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2) - Same as my last point about the stream. There's really no way to justify this being the hardest part of the map or a continuous sound for a stream at all and it hurts to say because they're really charming Fixed
10. Skipped modding the part that was basically copying
11. 03:13:254 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - Stream issue again :/ hai hai
12. 03:36:163 (1,3) - muh ocd line them up properly ocd'd
13. 04:32:890 (1) - This could be moved around and straightend out a bit or so to blanket the 2 better The idea was to blanket with 3, 2 is just there because flow
14. 04:34:435 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4) - you know. and even if you're going to justify it with the violin, it changes tone at 04:34:798 (2) - , not 04:34:708 (1) - , so that needs to be changed either way. I highly reccommend removing the stream for something else though. It doesnt fit the intensity either. Fixed
15. 04:40:526 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - ---- yep
16. 05:07:436 (1,2,3,4,1) - As an example, this stream here is at least somewhat justified because there's a very loud continuous violin sound. the jumpstreams dont have that.
    

The mod seems a lot harsher than it actually is, its mainly pointing out the streams. I definitely think this could be your first ranked map if you remove the overmapping. Good luck <3

Edit: if you want to discuss the streamjumps i have time for another hour or so, then ill be gone for a while

iLaskee wrote:

Try putting a circle at:
Place: X: 112 Y: 240 When: 00:16:072
I think it adds more detail to the beatmap. Causing it to feel like it is placed in a good position to make people get better at 4 star maps, causing them to play it multiple times, sometimes when live streaming. Which makes it a bit more popular.

- Frontier - wrote:

sorry for a very late mod xD
quick check sorry, no kd please nah man, even if it's a quick mod you deserve them
[Niamh]
Source : 東方Project yep
00:04:526 (1) - move to x 298 y 255 for a perfect blanket with 00:03:435 (2) I think you mean x: 298 y:225? 255 is way to low to blanket anything
00:24:890 (3) - x 224 y 132 ^ yep
01:35:981 (1) - delete nc I like to point out big jumps with NCs and afaik this isn't an unrankable issue?
01:44:708 (1) - ^ Keeping it for consistency with ^

Overall is okay. Not good or bad.
Good luck

Hessu_H wrote:

Here's your NM!

It's just mostly blanket stuff as there's wasn't much i could find

boom

00:11:072 (1,3) - Blanket could be improved
00:39:435 (1,2,3) - Fix blanket
01:05:254 (7,1) - Blanket improvement
03:12:708 (2) - You're missing a strong sound on the white tick here. Maybe make this a 1/2 reverse?
03:43:799 (4,5) - Blanket improvement
03:44:526 (6,1) - ^
03:54:345 (6,7) - A slider would fit better here I feel like the two notes play better if they're both clickable here
03:59:072 (1,2) - This jump kinda feels too big as the sound isn't that loud
04:03:345 (5) - The sound here isn't too big for a note imo Rhythm is way more interesting to play this way though?
04:06:708 - The intensity of sound increases here so maybe increase hitsound volume a bit?
04:32:890 (1,2) - Maybe blanket these?
05:16:526 (1,2) - A blanket here would be great
05:18:708 (3,4) - ^

Suishohana wrote:

Here from my modding queue

Niamh

01:22:708 (10) - Can you make this slider parallel to this one 01:23:072 (1) - ? I really like the slightly not parallel slider patterns, so I'm keeping this as is to mantain the pattern formed by 01:22:708 (10,1,2). I'll make 01:23:435 (2,3) parallels though, and also thanks for making me look at this, 01:23:072 (1) wasn't centered correctly

01:23:435 (2) - ^ As stated ^ I'm keeping as is in regards to 1, but made parallel with 3.

01:27:435 (1) - Move to x: 36, y:108 Sure

01:37:981 (8) - make this parallel to 01:38:345 (1) - ? Nope, idea was to be parallel with 01:37:617 (7) here

01:40:345 (7) - stack this circle on the end of this slider 01:39:435 (4) - ? I mean it's already basically there yep

02:37:254 (7,8) - Maybe make this a blanket. I think the jump it makes will match the sudden pick up in intensity nah, I like the use of the dropout flow here since it matches that the guitar ends abruptly IMO

04:32:526 (7) - Make this slider parallel to this one 04:32:163 (6) - yep

I don't think there's anything else to worry about in my opinion The changes I mentioned are really just personal nitpicks(parallel lines <3) and probably not something to worry about Hope this helped and good luck!

William K wrote:

What a good mapset.

[Niamh]

1. 00:08:890 (5) - I recommend NC-ing here since it fits the music. sure
2. 00:10:345 (4) - How about making this straight up like https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/6056990? It looks more beautiful XD yeah why not xDD
3. 00:11:981 (4,5) - Making this a shaped trapesium would be nicer for aesthetics, I think. And it would fit much better in the music since there's a spacing for drums. I'm keeping this pattern as it stands here. Mostly because I really like the aesthetic of this pattern, but also because I think it plays better like I have it here.
4. 00:32:890 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6) - The star is good, but how about making them spaced lower since that part is pretty calm or just consider making them sliders for a good rhythm Originally I had some sliders here, but those were changed due to some mods pointing out that the drum sounds which these are following would give better feedback if all notes were clickable instead of only 1/2 of them. The spacing isn't really that big, it's just a 1.9 and this is an Insane (even if a kinda easy-ish one). Also the jumps help me prepare players for the section at 00:45:981 (1).
5. 00:35:072 - Lowering the sound here would be some help to the music. Sure, but there's not much I can lower here, the section is at 20% volume
6. 00:48:345 (2,3,4,5,6) - These could blanket 00:47:799 (5) - better. Fixed, I hope?
7. 01:07:072 (6,7,8) - I think you put it the wrong way, 01:07:072 - 01:07:254 - should've been a slider, and 01:07:345 - 01:07:435 - must've been those 2 notes since you hear, the strong instrument is at 01:07:345 - 01:07:435 - . So making them like https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/6057051 would've been better. Nope, this was made on purpose. The guitar 3-string sound at 01:07:072 (6,7,8) is way too prominent to not have it in the rhythm.
8. 01:07:617 (9) - Making number 9 nearer to 01:07:254 (8) - would be much better since 01:07:799 (1) - feels way stronger and number 9 feels inaudible. Stacking it under 8 would be way to confusing, though. I think the lesser evil is just placing it in the middle as it is, connecting both sliders.
9. 01:18:345 (6) - How about CTRL+G-ing this slider so players would not have to move their mouse too fast directly. If you like trolling, it would be good to kill players by HP drain bit by bit XD Nope. I think if I control+g here I break the flow and the mirroring of the previous triangle pattern, which was the intention here. The jump is high but it plays well IMO. This also repeats pretty much everywhere this pattern comes up, so it's a consistent thing throghout the diff
10. 02:21:435 (6,7,8) - Because these notes are triplets, the spacings looks uneven. Consider moving the triplet down a bit? Oh, hey, nice catch!
11. 02:21:981 - I think lowering SV here is not needed since there's only break and 1 circle there. I... didn't even notice this slow lol. I need the section to kick off the kiai though and the SV corrects when the next part begins so it really wouldn't be necessary to change but I guess random SV changes are kinda lame so I'll fix it xDD
12. 03:24:890 (6,1) - How about moving number 6 to the left a bit and then make 03:25:254 (1,4) - them the same? It would be better rather than making them different. No to both. For 6 because I just like triangle patterns and they play just fine here man. Let a dude love his triangles. For 1 and 4 no because I made that on purpose. Plays good, is aesthetically interesting and helps me direct the flow better to the left in the next patterns.
13. 04:43:799 (2) - Blanket this if you meant to. But if not, I recommend blanket this slider to keep them tidy. Fixed
14. 05:20:708 (5) - Consider making this tidier. Triangles, man. Not changing mainly because just a tidy curve is boring to me and also I mirror this in 05:21:799 (7,1)

I think that's all from me :3 It's a good song and mapset. Btw is it Cirno's theme? :V

1. 00:11:617 (2) - add finish
   
   1. 00:15:981 (2) - add finish / remove clap
   2. 00:16:163 (3) - add clap
2. from 00:19:799 - , only here, you can consider the way to use clap. the brilliant whistle sound will be fit much more imo. try these.
   
   1. 00:21:981 - / 00:22:708 - / 00:23:435 - remove clap / add whistle
   2. 00:25:799 (5) - remove whistle
   3. 00:25:981 - remove clap / add whistle
   4. 00:26:708 - remove clap
   5. 00:27:072 - remove clap / add whistle
   6. from 00:28:526 - to 00:32:890 - , remove all clap. this part is still silent part, so it's not fit for ths song imo.
3. 00:40:526 (4) - this bell sound on the song rings at 00:40:526 - just "once". you may have heard this three times, however, second and third are just "echo". you don't have to set whistle several times.
   
   1. 00:40:890 - remove whistle
   2. 00:41:254 - remove whistle
4. 00:52:526 - remove clap / add finish
5. 00:53:617 (1,1,1) - I think, there isn't any necessity to put different sound. it may make feeling of randomliness.
   
   1. 00:53:981 - remove whistle / add whistle
   2. 00:54:345 - remove clap / add whistle
6. 00:54:708 - remove clap / add finish the cymbal rings.
7. 01:01:072 (8) - Sampleset:Auto / remove finish meaningless bassdrum sound imo.
8. 01:03:435 - remove clap / add finish
9. 01:05:617 - Additions:Drum / add finish / remove clap downbeat or beginings of measures often can be good places to put finish I think.
10. 01:07:799 - ^
11. 01:09:981 - ^
12. 01:11:799 (5) - add whistle?
13. 01:14:163 (7) - remove finish
14. from 01:12:163 - , during this Kiai. some finish sounds loud a bit for me. additionally, you can put more clap imo. try these.
    
    1. 01:14:163 (7) - remove finish
    2. 01:15:981 (5) - remove finish
    3. 01:16:163 - remove finish / add clap
    4. 01:20:163 - remove finish / add clap
    5. 01:20:345 (7) - remove clap
    6. 01:20:526 (9) - add clap
    7. 01:22:890 - remove finish
    8. 01:24:708 - ^
    9. 01:24:890 (7) - ^
    10. 01:29:072 - remove clap?
15. 01:29:617 - remove whistle / add finish
16. 01:31:799 - ^
17. 01:33:981 - ^
18. 01:35:072 - / 01:35:617 (5,6) - add finish
19. 01:35:981 - remove finish
20. 01:36:163 - add finish
21. from 01:37:254 - , try this downbeat finish pattern.
    
    1. 01:37:254 - add finish
    2. 01:37:617 - ^
    3. 01:37:981 - ^
    4. 01:38:163 - remove finish
22. 01:38:345 - remove whistle / add finish
23. 01:40:526 - ^
24. 01:42:708 - add finish
25. 01:43:799 - ^
26. 01:53:254 - add whistle consistent with 01:48:890 -
27. 02:18:708 - add finish
28. from 02:39:435 - , during this Kiai. same as from 01:12:163 - ,
    
    1. 02:41:435 - remove finish
    2. 02:43:254 - remove finish
    3. 02:47:435 (4) - remove finish / add clap
    4. 02:47:617 (5) - remove clap
    5. 02:47:799 (6) - add clap
    6. 02:47:981 (7) - remove finish
    7. 02:50:163 - remove finish
    8. 02:51:986 - remove finish
29. 02:56:890 - remove whistle / add finish
30. 02:59:072 - ^
31. from 03:01:254 - to 03:05:617 - . why this part so silent? I suggest to put some sounds.
    
    1. 03:01:254 - add finish
    2. 03:01:981 - add whistle
    3. 03:02:345 - add finish
    4. 03:02:890 (5,6) - add finish both
    5. 03:03:435 - add finish
    6. 03:04:163 - add whistle
    7. 03:04:526 - / 03:04:890 - / 03:05:254 - add finish
32. 03:05:617 - remove whistle / add finish
33. 03:07:799 - ^
34. from 03:09:981 - to 03:14:345 - , same as before
    
    1. 03:09:981 - add finish
    2. 03:10:708 - add whistle
    3. 03:11:072 - add finish
    4. 03:11:618 (5,6) - add finish both

Naxess wrote:

From the offline #modreqs thread

General

1. There's no need for "na" in the tags, since it's already in the title anyway. I guess, yeah
   
   
2. You can also add the following tags:
   
   
   1. comiket 89 c89 (event) I don't think comiket is really necessary in the tags? I mean I'll add it if I must but yeah Actually I'll add this, why not right?
   2. ZUN (composer of the original theme)Reasonable, yeah. Hadn't thought about adding this.
   3. ethnic celtic world (genre)Not really necessary, I think? Genre is added later when approved, and this will be catalogued as Instrumental I guess. Same as nº 1, I'll add it if I must but I don't wanna clog the tags with unnecessary stuff if I can avoid it.
   according to the sources listed in the description.Actually I'll add this, why not right?
   
   
3. The source would more accurately be "東方紅魔郷　～ the Embodiment of Scarlet Devil." , as the original theme comes from this game.
   Add "東方Project" to your tags instead. Sure, I'd had to take a look at other touhou ranked maps, but this seems reasonable enough for now.
   
   
4. Is letterboxing during breaks intentional? It's on by default, and from what I've seen a lot of people don't prefer it, but if it's intentional then it's fine. It's a personal preference, yes. If unreasonable I'll change this though, I don't really care that much.

Niamh

• 
  Hit Objects

1. 00:10:708 (5,6) - This is the same as 00:08:526 (1,2,3,4) - instrumentally. The streams in the song are in groups of two, so having them play three times and then a slider instead of, what would've been, the fourth stream feels a bit strange. Consider unifying these rhythms. It's not the same as 00:08:526 (1,2,3,4). On 00:08:617 (2) there is a sound, albeit a faint one. At 00:10:769 there's actually no sound (or at least I can't hear it/justify a note there. What I'm seeing is a hold from 00:10:708 to 00:10:890 and that's why there's a slider there.
   
   I'm skipping all NC mentions. I'm re-NCing the song from scratch so hopefully all errors pertaining to them will be fixed.
   
   
2. 00:09:981 - This was mapped at 00:07:799 - , and I see no reason to end a slider on it for this part. Generally downbeats would want to be clickable, especially starts of streams, because it allows the player a point of reference to the rhythm. This, in turn, allows them to hold a greater accuracy throughout the map and follow the rhythm of the song better, which is what the game is all about. Click the circles, to the beat.
   Consider doing something like this, for instance. Sure, fixed.
   
   
3. 00:25:981 (1,2,3,4,5) - This section's rhythm feels very... hmm off. You'll notice the sliders end on the downbeats, and in this case the parallel downbeat, 00:25:254 - is being emphasized, but 00:27:435 - is not. The most problematic thing with the rhythm, however, is these three sounds 00:24:526 - 00:24:708 - 00:24:890 - , they're pretty good, right? But in the next measure these sounds are not being reflected in the same way at all, 00:26:708 - 00:26:890 - 00:27:072 - . 00:25:981 (1,2,3) - this could be moved up one beat to fit with how it was at 00:24:163 (1,2,3) - , for example. I'm on the fence about this. I think I get what you're saying, but at the same time the rhythm doesn't really make sense to me if I change 1 from where it is, since that's when the violins start (and what I was following here) and moving 2 and 3 around just feels worse to me while testplaying. I'm keeping this, but I could reconsider.
   
4. 01:45:435 (2) - Consider replacing this slider with a circle and a 1/2 slider like you did at 01:43:254 (2,3) - 01:41:072 (2,3) - 01:38:890 (2,3) - . yep
   
5. 01:46:526 (1) - This repeating slider should end on 01:46:708 - according to the way the piano plays here. It'd be very odd to continue the 1/8 repeat all the way to 01:46:890 - , because the song doesn't suggest that from what I can hear, or am I wrong? Actually, the piano buzz thing extends to 01:46:981. I'm actually shortening these here because otherwise it would be extremely awkward to play. And I've done this the same way pretty much everywhere these repeat throughout the song:
   
   Refer to 01:55:254 (6,7) Should extend to 01:55:526 but would be awkward to break from an 1/8 to a 1/4 stream
   ^ 03:13:799 (1) - ^ 03:14:254
   ^ 04:41:072 (1) - ^ 04:41:526
   
6. 02:12:163 (4,5,6) - This triple seems a bit weird. There isn't even an impact at 02:12:254 - , so that's overmapping. There is, however, a sound on 02:12:072 - , which doesn't happen to be mapped. Why resort to overmapping when there are clear alternatives that actually reflect the song?
   Consider moving your notes as such to match the instrumental cues of song properly. Actually, yeah. I guess I misheard the triplet and thought it came later.
   
7. 03:31:526 (5,6,7) - This is most definitely overmapping and is also inconsistent with how you decided to place the intensity over the notes in it's parallel measure 02:03:981 (4,5) - .yeah, I fixed lots of overmappings throughout the map, seems like this one slipped.
   
8. There are also some other things regarding this part, 04:27:799 - 04:25:617 - , rhythm to be exact. Note how 04:23:435 - is a slider end, 04:25:617 - is also a slider end, but 04:27:799 - is not. If you really want to emphasize those sounds, allow the player to click on the first one that appears, don't end a slider on it. Use the same pattern for the following measures as well, 04:34:526 - 04:36:526 - 04:38:708 - .Sure, I could give emphasis to the big drum sounds, but I think finishes already do an excellent job with that and my rhythm is fine enough, following not only the drums but also the soft violins in this part. I would also need to cut some sliders short at places where there's not really a sound (and I know I've done it in some cases throughout this section but I'd rather it's something puntual to emphasize a big sound and not become the norm).

• 
  Hitsounds

1. 00:07:799 (4,5,6,7,8) - This hitsound pattern is pretty good, try doing the same at 00:09:981 - and 00:10:708 - for consistency. sure
   
   
2. 00:09:617 - 00:16:163 - From these we can conclude that 00:18:345 - is missing a clap. sure
   
   
   
3. 00:40:163 - Not sure this whistle belongs here, refer to 00:44:526 - . Consider unifying them. Whether you add or remove doesn't really matter, as long as it's consistent.
   ^ 00:45:254 - refer to 00:40:890 - sure. Added whistles.
   
   
   
4. 00:50:345 - refer to 00:45:981 - , in this case there's a whistle on one but not the other. sure
   ^ 00:52:163 - 00:52:345 - refer to 00:47:799 - 00:47:981 - I don't think these two are the same, though?
   ^ 00:51:799 - 00:52:163 - refer to 00:47:435 - 00:47:799 - ^ plus they don't have the same intensity, so why should they have to get symmetrical hitsoundings?
   ^ 00:56:345 - refer to 01:00:708 - Again, intensity. 00:56:345 is way softer than 01:00:708 so I can't really have the same pattern?
   
   
5. 01:07:435 - I'm pretty sure this should be a whistle and 01:07:072 - should not. Refer to 01:05:254 - and 01:09:617 - .yep
   
   
6. 01:12:435 - imo you can silence the end of these 3/4 sliders. It gets a bit confusing that the tail and the head of the next slider sounds the same.
   ^ 02:39:708 - I guess? I don't think it is confusing at all though.
   
   
7. 01:47:072 - Was this supposed to be a soft sampleset? The drum sampleset sounds very off with those harsh whistles in this section.
   ^ 03:14:345 - Nope, it was supposed to be a drum sampleset, mainly for the use of the strong finishes at places like 03:19:435 (3,1) -
   
   
8. 02:12:163 - 02:12:526 - add whistles like you did at 02:07:799 - 02:08:163 -
   
   
9. 01:28:890 - 01:29:254 - refer to 01:20:163 - 01:20:526 - Different rhythm? Section at 01:28:890 - 01:29:254 is stronger and leads to the next drum section, so it should have finishes rather than claps to ease the change.
   ^ 02:55:072 - 02:55:435 - refer to 02:46:345 - 02:46:708 -
   
   
10. 03:19:617 - Clap for consistency with 03:18:526 - sure
    
    
11. The consistency between the various phases seem to be very consistent. What is not consistent, however, is how you're using them in accordance to each measure and their parallels within each of these phases, see my examples above. Note that wherever there is one error, there's probably two more due to the song repeating itself twice. Consider requesting a recheck from thzz as well, to make sure everything is in order.

Good luck!

Cerulean Veyron wrote:

Hello~ short mod heh -w-

[- - Niamh - -]

1. 00:19:617 (7,1) - I would really think this jump should have been bigger than 00:18:708 (3,4) - for stressing up the dense downbeat. You can try, at least, moving slider (1) a bit up and right without hurting the pattern for sure. You could possibly readjust the slider tail if you still want the flowing to move towards circle (7). Oh, yeah, actually I kinda messed up there. Reduced 00:18:708 (3,4) a bit and spaced the next jump a bit more, should be fine now.
2. 00:38:345 (4,5,1) - I thought this one could probably be a symmetry patterning, turned out it isn't but the increased distance spacing. Overall, it's pretty fine but visually weird based on the rhythm snap you've used on timeline. Well... rather than balancing it; stack circle (5) somewhere, or add one circle on of these parts 00:38:890 - and 00:39:254 -. Actually, I'll make a symmetric pattern here. I'd prefer not overmapping on 00:38:890 - and 00:39:254 - here. Also the slider direction doesn't really matter here IMO the way the pattern is set so I don't have to change that much
3. 01:07:254 (8) - Well, that string sounds on the track sounds pretty much continuous. So I think keeping up the stream by making this into 1/4 streaming circles, or at least 1/4 reverse slider if you don't mind, can emphasize and follow the song track much clearer. Stream it is
4. 01:28:890 (7,8,1) - Could be better if you make the transition by adjusting the spacing a little bit higher for note density. The track and it's downbeat really deserves something more here tbh, perhaps a jump or just an increase of the distance spacing. I made something different here, hope it works
5. 02:18:345 (3,4,5) - I could literally see you haven't done a spaced triplet like this on any part of the difficulty (except that copy-paste on the last kiai), If I'm right. Which is likely some pattern inconsistency. Either balance the spacing, or redo the rhythm composition here.I mean, yeah not a triplet, but I've used spaced 1/4 rhythms at sections like 01:28:526 (6,7) - 01:35:981 (1,1) - 02:55:799 (6,7) - and more. I think it plays great, so I'd like to keep it as long as it isn't unrankable?
6. 02:39:072 (1) - The new combo on this one seems to be a little, sudden... if you know what I mean. Assuming you haven't add any new combos on some random parts unlike music track changes, or two-track measures on timeline, or slider velocity changes. So this should probably be removed. remains of a time where this was an overmapped spaced stream. Wops.
7. 03:54:163 (2,3,4,5) - Optional objective: Well, at least the structure is great. Not unless you've recorrect some placements for these circles in order to shape it in a better formation. Like a square, or triangle, or something that's in a good shape. Kinda minor by the looks of it, so it's up to you~ Those make a square, though?
8. 03:56:163 - Ehh, why this should be empty though? The piano sounds really audible and mappable, so it deserves a few more notes on this part. If this were a silent track, you could probably leave it as it is. But sadly, it actually isn't. I'm purposefully undermapping here to only the high piano notes, to emphasize the calmness of this section. I could map to all the piano notes, really, but I feel the return is better here by sticking only to the high ones since they're the ones that really carry the rhythm.

The last kiai is probably a copy-paste flip yeee c; Excellent structures you've used on this map btw~
Best of luck!

[ Pennek ] wrote:

o/ \o

Niamh

00:04:163 (3) - spacing It's fine ~ 00:06:526 (4,1) - 00:13:799 (2,3) - and 00:15:254 (7,1) - all use similar spacing here.

00:48:163 (1) - spacing Intentional, it's one of the strongest sounds of this section, so it should have a high jump IMO, like 00:51:435 (1) - or 00:45:981 (1) -

00:49:254 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - I dont see the justification for the big jumps here in the mp3 Has as much justification as the whole of this section, really. I wanted to make spacing big here since it's a unique section in the song that doesn't repeat anywhere else and I felt the buildup at 00:45:617 (4,1,2) - really deserved playing around with some jumps. As for this part in particular, I felt like the rhythm "resets" again at 00:49:981 (5) - so I wanted to make some build up here like at the beginning of the section. Plus it's not that big of jumps, we've had 3.0x before and none of these surpass 2.5x except the last one and that's for buildup as I stated earlier.

04:25:799 (5,6,7) - angle feels weird after playing the whole map with mainly sharp angles I guess, tried something different with this pattern

Also maybe you want to change the background. this song gives me the feeling of the cold north. I see the winter theme in this, but to me it sounds just like a magical kinda music-boxy style, so I think a fantastic themed BG also works as well. Plus we have both "Snow Illusions" and Tír na nÓg in the title, so both interpretations work I'll try and find some winter-y fantastical BGs but if I can't find anything I'll keep this one

very enjoyable map!

- Yoshimaro - wrote:

hi im late af c: better late than never, though

[Niamh]
01:20:890 - raise hitsound volume? sure, but only for this finish sound, 50% sounds way too high to keep IMO

02:41:981 (2,4) - make this same distance as 02:41:981 (2,3) - sure, should be fine now

02:56:163 (7,9) - was this on purpose? fix blanket if it was on purpose, also, maybe make equidistant with 02:55:799 (6,7) - the blanket? yeah, was on purpose. Fixed, I hope.

03:42:708 (1) - give this a bit of spacing, it felt underwhelming for its intensitysure

05:22:890 (1) - 10/10 Ａｅｓｔｈｅｔｉｃｓ

i love this type of music and map combo, its always so fresh c:

1. 00:14:345 (4,5,6,7,1) - Would be nice if you can give a rotated flow on this like 00:05:617 (2,3,4,1) - 00:22:708 (2,3,4,5,1) .
2. 01:17:617 (4,5,6) - 02:44:890 (4,5,6) - Not necessarily needs to be a triangle imo cuz these are unlike 01:16:526 (1,2,3) - 01:26:345 (4,5,6) - etc where those triangles reflected the main instrument.
3. 01:25:072 (8) - Not really a fan of the placement here, it forced a linear(well not completely but almost) flow on 01:24:890 (7,8,1) . Also the way you spaced things there should be more consistent with 02:52:345 (8) .
4. 01:41:254 (3,4) - Was expecting a more consistent(smaller) spacing on this according to your spacing concept in this section, like what you did with 01:32:526 (3,4) .
5. 02:15:435 (1,2,3) - Doesn't look really appealing(at least to me) because you used different shapes on 02:15:799 (2,3) which kinda kills the symmetry/equality or whatever you're trying to do here compared to the others. Same applies to 03:42:708 (1,2,3) - 05:09:981 (1,2,3) .
6. 04:01:254 (3,4) - 04:02:345 (1,2,3) - Use the same rhythm on these places? The way main instrument played is kinda similar on these places imo
7. 04:14:708 (4,5,6) - Better use same/consistent spacing on these circles, kinda hard to read these circles as the same beat spacing considering how you spaced 04:13:254 (1,2,3) which is the same sound.
8. 04:16:163 (3,4) - Was expecting a bigger spacing compared to how you spaced 04:07:435 (2,3) - 04:11:799 (2,3) - 04:20:526 (3,4) which are pretty much similar.
9. 04:30:435 - 04:39:163 - Map both of these or not at all for consistency?

Electoz wrote:

[Niamh]

1. 00:14:345 (4,5,6,7,1) - Would be nice if you can give a rotated flow on this like 00:05:617 (2,3,4,1) - 00:22:708 (2,3,4,5,1) . It would be nice to have, but I can't come up with a rotary flow here that I'm comfortable with. Instead I've shuffled the pattern a bit to make the flow less "strict", hope that works.
2. 01:17:617 (4,5,6) - 02:44:890 (4,5,6) - Not necessarily needs to be a triangle imo cuz these are unlike 01:16:526 (1,2,3) - 01:26:345 (4,5,6) - etc where those triangles reflected the main instrument. I know, but I really like the way these patterns feel and look. Do I really have to change them? Even if they shift from the main instrument they are still following the same rhythm
3. 01:25:072 (8) - Not really a fan of the placement here, it forced a linear(well not completely but almost) flow on 01:24:890 (7,8,1) . Also the way you spaced things there should be more consistent with 02:52:345 (8) . Sure, valid points. I think I've fixed this now
4. 01:41:254 (3,4) - Was expecting a more consistent(smaller) spacing on this according to your spacing concept in this section, like what you did with 01:32:526 (3,4) . I guess it was kinda high here, yeah. Reduced it by a bit, now it's higher by 0.2x or something like that, but that's mainly for aesthetic reasonings and should not affect negatively to gameplay I hope.
5. 02:15:435 (1,2,3) - Doesn't look really appealing(at least to me) because you used different shapes on 02:15:799 (2,3) which kinda kills the symmetry/equality or whatever you're trying to do here compared to the others. Same applies to 03:42:708 (1,2,3) - 05:09:981 (1,2,3) . Fixed all of these to have the same shapes.
6. 04:01:254 (3,4) - 04:02:345 (1,2,3) - Use the same rhythm on these places? The way main instrument played is kinda similar on these places imo sure
7. 04:14:708 (4,5,6) - Better use same/consistent spacing on these circles, kinda hard to read these circles as the same beat spacing considering how you spaced 04:13:254 (1,2,3) which is the same sound. yep
8. 04:16:163 (3,4) - Was expecting a bigger spacing compared to how you spaced 04:07:435 (2,3) - 04:11:799 (2,3) - 04:20:526 (3,4) which are pretty much similar. I mainly placed it where it was to have it under 04:15:435 (1), spaced better now.
9. 04:30:435 - 04:39:163 - Map both of these or not at all for consistency? I originally had a stream there, but I removed it because of mod feedback. Restreamed then

Didn't check the hitsounds but I assume you're polishing them? (According to the last few mods) I think I've polished them all I can on my own, had some hitsound mods/IRC help but they should pretty much be final as far as I'm concerned
Good luck with that then~

Yoshino-- wrote:

Saw a nice song in #modreqs

00:24:163 (1,2,3,4,5) - maybe try this rhythm fits better imo sure

00:25:981 (1,2,3) - ^ same sure

00:36:163 (3) - there is no sound here oops

00:47:617 (4,5,6) - triangle isn't perfect should be now

00:48:890 (7,8,1,2,3,4) - why is this not perfect ._. ^

01:35:981 (1) - does this really need NC? Not really, but I figured I'd have it to make the jump clear since it's a new pattern and 1/4 jumps haven't really come up in the map until here. I'm keeping it.

01:44:708 (1) - ^ Consistency with ^

02:58:708 (6,7) - would be better as a slider, since there isn't really a strong sound on 7 Feels nicer to me with a clickable object, though

03:03:254 (1) - well I guess you wanna keep these NCs then lol 1/4 jump, like before

05:02:891 (1,1) - I don't understand these NCs I also don't, those weren't there last time wtf

05:07:436 (1) - don't think you need this NC ^ wtfff

05:15:800 (1) - maybe move this close to 05:15:436 (4) - Nah, it's the same spacing concept as 03:48:163 (6,1) and 02:20:890 (4,1) -

05:15:981 (1) - remove NC again wtf

05:22:890 (1) - this slider end should not be silent. less than 20% hitsound volume for clickable objects is also unrankable afaik (your hs volume is pretty low in general) Checked the ranking criteria and I can't find any guidelines about hitsound volume. My hitsounds are weak because generally the song has pretty soft sounds throughout, kinda like a music box-style song. If I made them stronger they would overpower the song IMO. Also that sliderend should be pretty low since the song is almost faded out by that point, and it has a clearly audible whistle so it's not like I purposefully silenced it?

gl with the map