Dream is over boys.
forum
UNDEAD CORPORATION - Bloodthirsty Nightmare Lul...
posted
Total Posts
513
Topic Starter
Dream is over boys.
I STILL HAVE HOPEEphemeralFetish wrote:
Dream is over boys.
You're joking right? Please tell me you're joking.EphemeralFetish wrote:
Dream is over boys.
Wait til I get BN owoEphemeralFetish wrote:
Dream is over boys.
reallyEphemeralFetish wrote:
Dream is over boys.
my set is over then
let me join you
gayzmcgee for bn?EphemeralFetish wrote:
Dream is over boys.
ok_hand
you heard it hereIdealism wrote:
gayzmcgee for bn?EphemeralFetish wrote:
Dream is over boys.
gayzmcgee get moddin
What the fuck rip? D:
I guess that means you can go for loved.
Topic Starter
Id rather not share a spot next to some of the trash that ends up in there.F1r3tar wrote:
I guess that means you can go for loved.
Never forget
EphemeralFetish wrote:
Id rather not share a spot next to some of the trash that ends up in there.F1r3tar wrote:
I guess that means you can go for loved.
Who the fuck do you think you are to say that? val0108?
Id rather not share a spot next to some of the trash that ends up in there.[/quote]
Who the fuck do you think you are to say that? val0108?[/quote]
You don't really need to be val0108 to guess that some of the stuff in loved has horrible quality.
Who the fuck do you think you are to say that? val0108?[/quote]
You don't really need to be val0108 to guess that some of the stuff in loved has horrible quality.
AyanokoRin wrote:
You don't really need to be val0108 to guess that some of the stuff in loved has horrible quality.
Who is he to say that? Isn't the mappers chant to say everytime bad quality is pointed out on their maps that "quality is subjective"? Or that only is used when convenient?
Most of this mappers (BD, rustbell, caren_sk, Mazzerin) are way more reputated mappers than this EphemeralFetish guy whose map is receiving SO MUCH attention just because of it's Star Rating. Still he feels entitled to call the other's work "trash"
Well, when a map is objectively bad like arles maps ( which are just jumpspams and don't portray the music ), I don't see why it shouldn't be called trash.Frc wrote:
AyanokoRin wrote:
You don't really need to be val0108 to guess that some of the stuff in loved has horrible quality.
Who is he to say that? Isn't the mappers chant to say everytime bad quality is pointed out on their maps that "quality is subjective"? Or that only is used when convenient?And talking about the "trash" you pretty much mean arles maps or everything that has jumps is trash for you? Now this guy thinks he is the hot shit because he maps streams when other map jumps.
Most of this mappers (BD, rustbell, caren_sk, Mazzerin) are way more reputated mappers than this EphemeralFetish guy whose map is receiving SO MUCH attention just because of it's Star Rating. Still he feels entitled to call the other's work "trash"
I could give you a lot of other reasons why the loved category has some really shit maps, but I have better things to do and I'm not going to fill this thread more than it already is with drama. Goodbye.
Now maps can be "objectively bad" but endless trash has been ranked in this last years because "quality is subjective lol". You guys are pretty funny
what a joke...
Fetish has a point. He wanted this ranked; not loved
If his reason not wanting loved is because he then becomes associated with trash then so what? Let's hope a qualified BN picks up this set.
If his reason not wanting loved is because he then becomes associated with trash then so what? Let's hope a qualified BN picks up this set.
Dawnsday wrote:
Fetish has a point. He wanted this ranked; not loved
If his reason not wanting loved is because he then becomes associated with trash then so what? Let's hope a qualified BN picks up this set.
This again? I have nothing wrong if he "thinks" those maps are trash, but putting it in a way that "it's objectively trash"? That's quite hypocritical for what we've seen on the last years
That's the thing HE THINKS IT'S TRASH (As do I but that's beside the point.) It's his opinion and the opinion of others; not objective. Stop treating it as such.
Dawnsday wrote:
That's the thing HE THINKS IT'S TRASH (As do I but that's beside the point.) It's his opinion and the opinion of others; not objective. Stop treating it as such.
Well it may be hard to know if he considers it to be trash or thinks its trash by his own opinions when someone after that said that those maps "are objectively trash", wouldn't you think?
Too bad all the Bn's are all fucking scrubs keep going for rank fetish I STILL HAVE HOPE YOU CAN DO IT
stfu dawn u closet furry can't even fc mad machine nob :^)
stfu dawn u closet furry can't even fc mad machine nob :^)
Maybe you can keep discussions focused on this map and not some other ones, what do you say?
be the change you want to see in the worldWrite wrote:
Too bad all the Bn's are all fucking scrubs
if more top-players cared enough to get involved in mapping/modding, there'd be more and better hard maps, it's as simple as that
Topic Starter
New rules have actually motivated me to maybe try for BN again. So yeah you speak some truth fam.Bonsai wrote:
be the change you want to see in the worldWrite wrote:
Too bad all the Bn's are all fucking scrubs
if more top-players cared enough to get involved in mapping/modding, there'd be more and better hard maps, it's as simple as that
For a great low rate you can get online, go to The General and save some time!®
Man, that was a common sense for like years, not something new!EphemeralFetish wrote:
Dream is over boys.
Ayyri
I agree, I feel like if more players tried mapping / modding they'd learn why it's not easy to create a rankable, but 'good' map. Luckily for most mappers they can continue mapping they way they want with the new loved ranking.Bonsai wrote:
be the change you want to see in the worldWrite wrote:
Too bad all the Bn's are all fucking scrubs
if more top-players cared enough to get involved in mapping/modding, there'd be more and better hard maps, it's as simple as that
- 00:18:564 (6) - NC to signify spacing change.
- A lot of my points in Bloodthirsty haven't been applied, definitely look over them again. (Like 00:25:730 (1) - there, 00:26:286 (2) - there, and then a lot of other places.)
Topic Starter
Fixed NC, changed something else suggested by another BN.Cryptic wrote:
Not going to nominate or anything, just doing a super light recheck until I realized a lot of what I brought up is still there...
- 00:18:564 (6) - NC to signify spacing change.
- A lot of my points in Bloodthirsty haven't been applied, definitely look over them again. (Like 00:25:730 (1) - there, 00:26:286 (2) - there, and then a lot of other places.)
I did apply almost everything in your mod, aside from those 2 you pointed out and maybe 1 or 2 more later, so its just looks like I didnt considering you only rechecked the first 30 seconds.
Ayyri
hiEphemeralFetish wrote:
Fixed NC, changed something else suggested by another BN.
f
Things that were done:
-00:53:730 - Changed to a curved slider, so the pattern at 00:52:730 - was more prominent / the sounds are visibly distinctly different.
-01:22:953 - Rather than a slider tail, it was made into a circle. Because it was following the same type of sound as 01:23:175 - , 01:23:397 - , and 01:23:619 -. Which were all clickable, making this one stand out as odd, if it wasn't the same. (Due to the pitch of the sound.)
-01:19:397 - The overall pattern became a bit more spaced, due to the vocal.
-01:35:397 - and 01:35:730 - Added hitsounds to the sliderheads.
-00:53:730 - Changed to a curved slider, so the pattern at 00:52:730 - was more prominent / the sounds are visibly distinctly different.
-01:22:953 - Rather than a slider tail, it was made into a circle. Because it was following the same type of sound as 01:23:175 - , 01:23:397 - , and 01:23:619 -. Which were all clickable, making this one stand out as odd, if it wasn't the same. (Due to the pitch of the sound.)
-01:19:397 - The overall pattern became a bit more spaced, due to the vocal.
-01:35:397 - and 01:35:730 - Added hitsounds to the sliderheads.
continue soon™.
What does "can't play/judge" even mean? I'm baffled such a vague term is used to define something this important.EphemeralFetish wrote:
Dream is over boys.
It seems to be yet another rule to justify any retarded decision the higher-ups might have. The more obscure the rule, the more "technically not wrong" you can be. So fitting of the staff.
Good luck with the ranking, at least you didn't have the retarded idea to make it a hybrid set.
Bye bye...