It's actually really easy to read and play and doesn't break any rules afaik so yay \ o /Leader wrote:
00:20:108 (3,4,5,6,1) - Is this kind of pattern even rankable?
It's actually really easy to read and play and doesn't break any rules afaik so yay \ o /Leader wrote:
00:20:108 (3,4,5,6,1) - Is this kind of pattern even rankable?
Kinda last time i wanna explain that, we went over this a million times already and trust me, its more than fine. xDLeader wrote:
00:20:108 (3,4,5,6,1) - Is this kind of pattern even rankable?
384059043 wrote:
i've been missing these patterns for long, congratz!
Yeah I was kinda expecting these kinda reactions, but unlike what a lot of people think, the map isn't supposed to be a copy of the old styles. What I tried to do is take the visual style from older mapping eras but still try to maintain a flow/feeling that is somewhat similar to the newer style maps. That's why I didn't make it ar8 and cs5 and I thought people would dislike that anyways, but if there's a desire for that I can go full 2009 mode if you want me to next timeKaren wrote:
if you gonna revive the style it would be better to do it completely (cs5 and ar8), otherwise it looks kinda weird lol.
Hmm... maybe oldstyle patterns with newstyle settings? owoKaren wrote:
if you gonna revive the style it would be better to do it completely (cs5 and ar8), otherwise it looks kinda weird lol. Anyways good to see this kind of maps.
it isn't and it wasn't ever supposed to be xD theres a KIRBY Mix map of this song ranked too (its really fun), so if people would rather play those, i'm not stopping em by making this map \o/Desperate-kun wrote:
Yeah, the jumps and flow of this map are totally modern. Not sure why people think it's a copy of Kirby...
(first one going for rank since how many years?)You can change that to "(first one ranked since how many years?)" now!