I want more viable AR8 extras
forum
DragonForce - Symphony Of The Night
posted
Total Posts
62
Topic Starter
thank you thank you <3
You even used authentic sliders, nice.
Hope this makes it past qualification with AR8!
Hope this makes it past qualification with AR8!
was it explained somewhere why 01:16:342 - a very loud and rhythmically intense section is completely ignored with a break over it?
新人類夢醒時分
Can i just say some things?
sorry for bad english
actually a nice map,i'm just curious about the above stuff lol
Hope this will not cause dq
sorry for bad english
[Legend]
- 00:01:765 (4) - hmm can you explain a bit about such kind of sliders? why did you overlap red and white points at slider end?i see this in every 1/1 slider in the map in fact
http://puu.sh/pCDWg/4056a5faa8.jpg
i think this affects the shape of sliders..and doesnt quite make sense? - 00:13:969 (1,2,3) - the distance seems strange to me lol no way should (1.2)>>(2,3)
- 00:19:393 (9) - NC
- maybe add a break after that?if you miss 2 notes b4 under hr,i think it's hard to pass such a long duration
- 00:33:460 - 00:34:138 - etc. i think you should make them clickable which fits song better(you did this 00:38:799 (3,3) - for eg)
- 01:00:748 (3,5) - looks bad imo
- 01:16:342 - so what's the point with a break here with strong music? this can even be kiai tbh..and it's a nice part which you can surely map
but u start from 01:24:477 - and i cant see any reason - 02:16:003 (1,1) - the NC is unnecessary in fact
- 04:13:911 (1,1) - same for these
- 04:51:199 (1) - 3 ticks will be ok for the curve slider lol
actually a nice map,i'm just curious about the above stuff lol
Hope this will not cause dq
then why the hell do you post this LOL. Not cause dq = all rejected with valid reasons so you want your mods to be deniedsahuang wrote:
Hope this will not cause dq
Yes...I just want to know why he did them intentionallyKaren wrote:
then why the hell do you post this LOL. Not cause dq = all rejected with valid reasons so you want your mods to be deniedsahuang wrote:
Hope this will not cause dq
Well, even if this causes dq this is for improving maps(if the mapper thinks this is necessary), so that's fine..
Topic Starter
sahuang wrote:
Can i just say some things?
sorry for bad english[Legend]
- 00:01:765 (4) - hmm can you explain a bit about such kind of sliders? why did you overlap red and white points at slider end?i see this in every 1/1 slider in the map in fact 你能去看看10年的dragonforce在想想為什麼我post裡說的話大概就能知道我為什麼這麼搞了
http://puu.sh/pCDWg/4056a5faa8.jpg
i think this affects the shape of sliders..and doesnt quite make sense?- 00:13:969 (1,2,3) - the distance seems strange to me lol no way should (1.2)>>(2,3) 對我來說現在的圖也是很多莫名的跳，只能說音樂這種東西給人的感覺都不一樣
- 00:19:393 (9) - NC
- maybe add a break after that?if you miss 2 notes b4 under hr,i think it's hard to pass such a long duration 這個你得要先有個概念，作圖的時候是不用考慮mod的
- 00:33:460 - 00:34:138 - etc. i think you should make them clickable which fits song better(you did this 00:38:799 (3,3) - for eg)
- 01:00:748 (3,5) - looks bad imo 這個也只能說是每個人的感覺不同了
- 01:16:342 - so what's the point with a break here with strong music? this can even be kiai tbh..and it's a nice part which you can surely map
but u start from 01:24:477 - and i cant see any reason如果你要理由我只能說因為爽- 02:16:003 (1,1) - the NC is unnecessary in fact 但是加了nc就會很不一樣
- 04:13:911 (1,1) - same for these
- 04:51:199 (1) - 3 ticks will be ok for the curve slider lol 可以，但是只要能拉出想要的感覺幾個點都不是問題
actually a nice map,i'm just curious about the above stuff lol
Hope this will not cause dq
Thanks.
another speed rank lol
gratz :33
gratz :33
G
G
apologies if any of this has been mentioned before (can't read non-english)
00:10:579 (6,7,1) - is there reason for spacing between 7 and 1? just from playing through a few times you put these weird spaces like this and it doesn't make a lot of sense, musically there is no reason for this extra spacing
00:16:342 (5,6,1) - ^
00:17:359 (3,4,1) - ^
00:49:393 (2,3,4) - ^
01:01:087 (4,5,1) - ^ (i can kind of hear it here since the syllable is enunciated more)
01:06:172 (2,3,4) - ^
01:11:935 (4,5,1) - ^
01:49:562 (3,4,5) - ^
01:54:138 (10,1) - ^
02:00:410 (3,4,5) - ^
02:57:125 (5,1) - ^
03:00:436 (3,1) - ^
03:02:298 (6,1) - ^
03:13:677 (11,1) - ^
03:55:056 (6,1) - ^
04:40:352 (1,2,3) - ^
04:42:894 (10,1) - ^
04:49:165 (3,4,5) - ^
these two are just opinion:
02:13:291 (1) - any reason for the peak in this slider? seems out of place when the sound is the same to the previous slider which has no sudden shift
02:50:918 (5) - ^
02:17:189 (4,1) - if you want to put a space here should also put one between 02:18:545 (4,1) - for the sake of consistency
00:10:579 (6,7,1) - is there reason for spacing between 7 and 1? just from playing through a few times you put these weird spaces like this and it doesn't make a lot of sense, musically there is no reason for this extra spacing
00:16:342 (5,6,1) - ^
00:17:359 (3,4,1) - ^
00:49:393 (2,3,4) - ^
01:01:087 (4,5,1) - ^ (i can kind of hear it here since the syllable is enunciated more)
01:06:172 (2,3,4) - ^
01:11:935 (4,5,1) - ^
01:49:562 (3,4,5) - ^
01:54:138 (10,1) - ^
02:00:410 (3,4,5) - ^
02:57:125 (5,1) - ^
03:00:436 (3,1) - ^
03:02:298 (6,1) - ^
03:13:677 (11,1) - ^
03:55:056 (6,1) - ^
04:40:352 (1,2,3) - ^
04:42:894 (10,1) - ^
04:49:165 (3,4,5) - ^
these two are just opinion:
02:13:291 (1) - any reason for the peak in this slider? seems out of place when the sound is the same to the previous slider which has no sudden shift
02:50:918 (5) - ^
02:17:189 (4,1) - if you want to put a space here should also put one between 02:18:545 (4,1) - for the sake of consistency
would you mind answering the points risen by total terror and kkk?
Topic Starter
sureOkorin wrote:
would you mind answering the points risen by total terror and kkk?
total terror
00:10:579 (6,7,1) - is there reason for spacing between 7 and 1? just from playing through a few times you put these weird spaces like this and it doesn't make a lot of sense, musically there is no reason for this extra spacing because 1 is downbeat so i think it should be a little jump. you can see this in every maps right?
00:16:342 (5,6,1) - ^ same
00:17:359 (3,4,1) - ^ same
00:49:393 (2,3,4) - ^ a little different on here, you may ask me ''here is not downbeat why you put this space'', yea here is not downbeat but it still fit voice right?
01:01:087 (4,5,1) - ^ (i can kind of hear it here since the syllable is enunciated more)
01:06:172 (2,3,4) - ^ same
01:11:935 (4,5,1) - ^ same
01:49:562 (3,4,5) - ^ same
01:54:138 (10,1) - ^ same
02:00:410 (3,4,5) - ^ same
02:57:125 (5,1) - ^ same
03:00:436 (3,1) - ^ same
03:02:298 (6,1) - ^ same
03:13:677 (11,1) - ^ same
03:55:056 (6,1) - ^ same
04:40:352 (1,2,3) - ^ same
04:42:894 (10,1) - ^ same
04:49:165 (3,4,5) - ^ same
these two are just opinion:
02:13:291 (1) - any reason for the peak in this slider? seems out of place when the sound is the same to the previous slider which has no sudden shift because i only know S shaped and curve, 02:10:579 (1) - S shapes has been uesd so i just want to make a different slider, but its hard to make cool slider for me i will improve that xd
02:50:918 (5) - ^ this is not bad right? at least i think so.
02:17:189 (4,1) - if you want to put a space here should also put one between 02:18:545 (4,1) - for the sake of consistency do you mean space is different? 02:17:359 (1) - is stronger than 02:18:715 (1) - so they are not the same space
00:16:342 (5,6,1) - ^ same
00:17:359 (3,4,1) - ^ same
00:49:393 (2,3,4) - ^ a little different on here, you may ask me ''here is not downbeat why you put this space'', yea here is not downbeat but it still fit voice right?
01:01:087 (4,5,1) - ^ (i can kind of hear it here since the syllable is enunciated more)
01:06:172 (2,3,4) - ^ same
01:11:935 (4,5,1) - ^ same
01:49:562 (3,4,5) - ^ same
01:54:138 (10,1) - ^ same
02:00:410 (3,4,5) - ^ same
02:57:125 (5,1) - ^ same
03:00:436 (3,1) - ^ same
03:02:298 (6,1) - ^ same
03:13:677 (11,1) - ^ same
03:55:056 (6,1) - ^ same
04:40:352 (1,2,3) - ^ same
04:42:894 (10,1) - ^ same
04:49:165 (3,4,5) - ^ same
these two are just opinion:
02:13:291 (1) - any reason for the peak in this slider? seems out of place when the sound is the same to the previous slider which has no sudden shift because i only know S shaped and curve, 02:10:579 (1) - S shapes has been uesd so i just want to make a different slider, but its hard to make cool slider for me i will improve that xd
02:50:918 (5) - ^ this is not bad right? at least i think so.
02:17:189 (4,1) - if you want to put a space here should also put one between 02:18:545 (4,1) - for the sake of consistency do you mean space is different? 02:17:359 (1) - is stronger than 02:18:715 (1) - so they are not the same space
kkk
pls remove
this is so painful
no pain no gain
this is so painful
no pain no gain
if youre gonna put random doubles in your map at least put them in more than one place so i can know that i shouldnt play your map
恭喜rank，可惜我手不够快，没抢到#1
哭哭哦
哭哭哦
It's weird