1. Catharsis (5.29 stars, 1234 notes)

Yunomi wrote:

おじいさんはおばあさんのけつを食べる

VINXIS wrote:

-12ms offset tbh

also add spinner starting from 00:11:165 -

xlni wrote:

artist shud b Kumagai Eri : /

xlni wrote:

artist shud b Kumagai Eri : /

Service Unavailable

Connection reset by peer
Reference #54.ddb2c823.ddb2c8ee.1465723665

Spaghetti wrote:

Four Dimensions pls dont

00:33:232 (3,4,5) - this stack could be polished fixed
00:45:872 (4) - diagonal sliders trigger me fixed
00:54:636 (1,2) - ctrl g would kill that uncomfterable antiflow fixed
01:48:232 (1,2,6,7) - why so close to eachother looks d becus its fading out so wanted less spacing

rest of the map looks good gl!!1!!

have some stars

1. uncheck widescreen support xd
2. Audio file bitrate is too high.
   audio.mp3 319kbps
   
   Ranking Criteria - Audio

   The song's audio file must be of reasonable quality. The bitrate of a beatmap's audio file must be no lower than 128kbps and no higher than 192kbps.

1. 00:33:737 (6,7) - the low spacing here pretty much kill a bit of the impact of the beat here 00:33:906 - somehow , I would increase spacing here a bit ,try move 00:33:906 (7) - to around x208 y376 ?
2. 01:14:692 (2,1) - I think the current angle make the things here play pretty weird imo , how about try this placement instead , I think it would make angle flow better
   SPOILER

   
3. 01:23:793 (6,1) - I think it would good if u buff the spacing here a bit so that the spacing will emphasis this cymbal 01:23:962 - better , try move it to around x360 y152
4. 01:28:175 (2,1) - I think higher spacing the way u do here 01:25:310 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - just feel better for this one lol , try move 01:28:344 (1) - to around x216 y340 ?
5. 01:29:355 (1) - tbh I think it looks better if this http://puu.sh/puU7B/d547946986.jpg is not touching each other
6. 01:48:232 (1,2,3) - can u make spacing a bit more consistent ? i think it would play and looks better that way
7. 01:48:905 (5,6,7) - a same
8. 02:30:366 (1) - mm i don't think this nc really necessary lo
9. 02:44:861 (1,2) - sound like 1/6 here even at 100% speed )
10. 02:47:558 (1,2) - this looks pretty inconsistent with others jumps and it make this pretty awkward and weird :l since it pretty low spacing jumps here compare with the other slider to triplet jumps , I suggest u to increase spacing here a bit
11. 02:52:951 (1,2) - 02:53:456 (1,2) - tbh stack pretty kill the movement for the flow here and not really fit with the music here much I would just spacing them instead of stack
12. 03:22:614 (4) - nc this instead of 03:22:951 (1) - ?
13. 03:10:479 (3,1) - transition here is pretty awkward imo since the blue tick at the end of (1) doesn't sound that dominant so it would be just weird to decide to do transition there, ending 03:10:479 (3) - at white tick instead would make transition here a lots better
14. 04:53:288 (5,1) - maybe it just me but i think the angle flow here feel a bit weird somehow lo , I would try to move 04:53:456 (1,2,3,4,5) - to around x29 y144 for better snapping jumps 04:53:288 (5,1) - here
15. 05:12:164 (2,3,4,5) - the pattern aaaaa I think it looks not good in-game http://puu.sh/puXbI/a6c6ced9a8.jpg because of the auto stack at 05:12:333 (3,4,5) - so i suggest u to move 05:12:333 (3,4,5) - to around x165 y277 ?

CelsiusLK wrote:

im here

[general]

1. uncheck widescreen support xd
2. Audio file bitrate is too high.
   audio.mp3 319kbps
   
   Ranking Criteria - Audio

   The song's audio file must be of reasonable quality. The bitrate of a beatmap's audio file must be no lower than 128kbps and no higher than 192kbps.

[same]

1. 00:33:737 (6,7) - the low spacing here pretty much kill a bit of the impact of the beat here 00:33:906 - somehow , I would increase spacing here a bit ,try move 00:33:906 (7) - to around x208 y376 ?
2. 01:14:692 (2,1) - I think the current angle make the things here play pretty weird imo , how about try this placement instead , I think it would make angle flow better
   SPOILER

   
3. 01:23:793 (6,1) - I think it would good if u buff the spacing here a bit so that the spacing will emphasis this cymbal 01:23:962 - better , try move it to around x360 y152
4. 01:28:175 (2,1) - I think higher spacing the way u do here 01:25:310 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - just feel better for this one lol , try move 01:28:344 (1) - to around x216 y340 ?
5. 01:29:355 (1) - tbh I think it looks better if this http://puu.sh/puU7B/d547946986.jpg is not touching each other
6. 01:48:232 (1,2,3) - can u make spacing a bit more consistent ? i think it would play and looks better that way
7. 01:48:905 (5,6,7) - a same
8. 02:30:366 (1) - mm i don't think this nc really necessary lo
9. 02:44:861 (1,2) - sound like 1/6 here even at 100% speed )
10. 02:47:558 (1,2) - this looks pretty inconsistent with others jumps and it make this pretty awkward and weird :l since it pretty low spacing jumps here compare with the other slider to triplet jumps , I suggest u to increase spacing here a bit
11. 02:52:951 (1,2) - 02:53:456 (1,2) - tbh stack pretty kill the movement for the flow here and not really fit with the music here much I would just spacing them instead of stack
12. 03:22:614 (4) - nc this instead of 03:22:951 (1) - ?
13. 03:10:479 (3,1) - transition here is pretty awkward imo since the blue tick at the end of (1) doesn't sound that dominant so it would be just weird to decide to do transition there, ending 03:10:479 (3) - at white tick instead would make transition here a lots better
14. 04:53:288 (5,1) - maybe it just me but i think the angle flow here feel a bit weird somehow lo , I would try to move 04:53:456 (1,2,3,4,5) - to around x29 y144 for better snapping jumps 04:53:288 (5,1) - here
15. 05:12:164 (2,3,4,5) - the pattern aaaaa I think it looks not good in-game http://puu.sh/puXbI/a6c6ced9a8.jpg because of the auto stack at 05:12:333 (3,4,5) - so i suggest u to move 05:12:333 (3,4,5) - to around x165 y277 ?

buce

CelsiusLK wrote:

00:33:737 (6,7) - the low spacing here pretty much kill a bit of the impact of the beat here 00:33:906 - somehow , I would increase spacing here a bit ,try move 00:33:906 (7) - to around x208 y376 nope, i don't want any emphasis on that beat lol
02:44:861 (1,2) - sound like 1/6 here even at 100% speed ) i guess it's 1/6 for now we'll see if that plays weird
02:47:558 (1,2) - this looks pretty inconsistent with others jumps and it make this pretty awkward and weird :l since it pretty low spacing jumps here compare with the other slider to triplet jumps , I suggest u to increase spacing here a bit idk what changed here so i'll leave it as is xd
02:52:951 (1,2) - 02:53:456 (1,2) - tbh stack pretty kill the movement for the flow here and not really fit with the music here much I would just spacing them instead of stack rearranged to something that fits in the same way without killing vocal emphasis
03:10:479 (3,1) - transition here is pretty awkward imo since the blue tick at the end of (1) doesn't sound that dominant so it would be just weird to decide to do transition there, ending 03:10:479 (3) - at white tick instead would make transition here a lots better i need something to start on the white tick and be nc'd there to set up for 03:26:322 (1) - . however i can agree that this is weird to play so i changed it to something that should b easier to read

StarrStyx wrote:

i came.
random mod

[g.]
00:25:142 (4,5,6) - angle seems a bit too sharp to play, perhaps move 00:25:142 (4) - a bit towards the left something like this i guess @deetz
00:54:636 (1,2) - ctrl g these 2? makes it more interesting to play imo @deetz
01:48:232 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - space these out a bit? looks too clumped up imo fixed
01:49:580 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - ^ fixed
02:41:659 (6,7) - this jump feels too wide, and doesn't seem to be emphasizing stuff in the song.. maybe move it upwards (something like x461 y280 i guess) @deetz
03:47:220 (2,3,4,5) - purely aesthetic suggestion, stacking the circles on sliderends seem more interesting fixed
03:58:175 (3) - i would ctrl g this, just to keep a similar feeling to the pattern 03:56:827 (3,4,5) - fixed

idk how to mod lol, the map looks k
gl!

1. 00:16:546 - Weird to have this not mapped in any way, maybe consider starting another spinner here or even a note into a spinner?
2. 00:25:142 (4,5,6) - Movement feels bad here due to the sharp angle, maybe consider 00:25:142 (4) - placing at x: 256 y: 208?
3. 00:31:546 (2,1) - Could stack properly, not a huge thing though.
4. 00:45:366 (3) - Doesn't look good, and the blanket isn't good either. Maybe try something like this instead? It'd improve both the shape and the blanket.
   
   Example

   
5. 01:18:232 (1,2,3) - The spacing decrease here feels really odd, especially because the sound at 01:18:232 - is quite strong so I feel like it should be emphasized more with a spacing increase.
   
   Example

   
6. 01:20:591 (5,6) - Here the spacing feels odd too, it just doesn't really fit with the rest of the spacing you have going around in my opinion. You could stack 01:20:591 (5) - with 01:21:097 (8) - 's head so the pattern gets way more movement?
7. 01:31:715 - Note here could be fitting but it's understandable if you only wanted to follow those long vocals.
8. 01:31:883 (1) - Loop doesn't look good. Maybe this instead?
   
   Example

   
9. 01:49:580 (1,7) - Slider ends are unsnapped.
10. 01:50:085 (3,4,5) - If you wanted to stay consistent with the previous pattern, shouldn't these be stacked?
11. 01:59:018 (1) - Maybe move this a little more to the left so the blanket gets perfect with 01:58:681 (2) - ?
12. 02:35:423 (1) - Not symmetrical, the right bump is bigger compared to the left.
13. 02:44:861 (1) - Small spacing reduce here could be fitting so that the people can realise that this is an 1/6 slider.
14. 04:00:704 (1,1) - So close to being a stack ;x

Asphyxia wrote:

[Catharsis]

1. 00:25:142 (4,5,6) - Movement feels bad here due to the sharp angle, maybe consider 00:25:142 (4) - placing at x: 256 y: 208?
2. 00:31:546 (2,1) - Could stack properly, not a huge thing though. those are too far apart to matter lol
3. 00:45:366 (3) - Doesn't look good, and the blanket isn't good either. Maybe try something like this instead? It'd improve both the shape and the blanket. looks good to me, though i bumped the circle around a bit
4. 02:35:423 (1) - Not symmetrical, the right bump is bigger compared to the left. yup, it isn't symmetrical and that's how I meant it :d
5. 02:44:861 (1) - Small spacing reduce here could be fitting so that the people can realise that this is an 1/6 slider.

Gl~

Asphyxia wrote:

[Catharsis]

1. 00:16:546 - Weird to have this not mapped in any way, maybe consider starting another spinner here or even a note into a spinner?
2. 00:25:142 (4,5,6) - Movement feels bad here due to the sharp angle, maybe consider 00:25:142 (4) - placing at x: 256 y: 208?
3. 00:31:546 (2,1) - Could stack properly, not a huge thing though.
4. 00:45:366 (3) - Doesn't look good, and the blanket isn't good either. Maybe try something like this instead? It'd improve both the shape and the blanket.
   
   Example

   
5. 01:18:232 (1,2,3) - The spacing decrease here feels really odd, especially because the sound at 01:18:232 - is quite strong so I feel like it should be emphasized more with a spacing increase.
   
   Example

   
6. 01:20:591 (5,6) - Here the spacing feels odd too, it just doesn't really fit with the rest of the spacing you have going around in my opinion. You could stack 01:20:591 (5) - with 01:21:097 (8) - 's head so the pattern gets way more movement?
7. 01:31:715 - Note here could be fitting but it's understandable if you only wanted to follow those long vocals.
8. 01:31:883 (1) - Loop doesn't look good. Maybe this instead?
   
   Example

   
9. 01:49:580 (1,7) - Slider ends are unsnapped.
10. 01:50:085 (3,4,5) - If you wanted to stay consistent with the previous pattern, shouldn't these be stacked?
11. 01:59:018 (1) - Maybe move this a little more to the left so the blanket gets perfect with 01:58:681 (2) - ?
12. 02:35:423 (1) - Not symmetrical, the right bump is bigger compared to the left.
13. 02:44:861 (1) - Small spacing reduce here could be fitting so that the people can realise that this is an 1/6 slider.
14. 04:00:704 (1,1) - So close to being a stack ;x

Gl~