forum

Am I considered OK at osu?

posted
Total Posts
57
show more
Yolshka
Tbh it doesn't really matter what other people think, if you feel like you're doing alright it's fine, you have to be going for your own standards, i feel like that's what really matters.
But judging yourself correctly is part of the improvement.
Edit: pancake was faster :oops:
Endaris

royteneij wrote:

silmarilen wrote:

No, you're absolutely terrible. Just the fact that you think an 85% acc score is good shows that already. Don't even bother with any score below 95%.
Someone who gets SS on 3* is better than someone who gets 85% on 4*.
That's the thing i probably can SS 3* but i just prefer playing faster paced maps, so i should probably just work on acc right?
"probably"
SSing is harder than you think, prove it.
Topic Starter
royteneij
"probably"
SSing is harder than you think, prove it.
i'll give it some tries :)
Hibiya-chan
SSing 3* maps is hard tho :o

I, most of the time, play 3*-3.9* and can only S them w/ or w/o HD mod :(

royteneij wrote:

"probably"
SSing is harder than you think, prove it.
i'll give it some tries :)
Don't even think of using the PF mod. It's a bad practice imo.
Shohei Ohtani
you are garbage.
Domp
Trashier than me. And that's saying a lot.
Hvick711
Guys you're all terrible because I'm higher ranked player.
-Makishima S-

-Toushin wrote:

Guys you're all terrible because I'm higher ranked player.
We are all trash because Cookiezi is a god.
mulraf
#<300.000 well. there are over 300.000 active players that are better than you. yet looking at it from another perspective there's probably around 1 million more or less active users overall, so you're prolly around the top 30% which is kinda decent.
but the most important thing: what the heck's the idea behind making a own thread in a forum and let you tell by other people if you are good? if this is serious than i've rarely seen something this complacent.
Endaris
1 million active players is way off. There are barely 8 million registered ones and I'm pretty sure more than 7.5 million of them don't even have 1k plays(in standard). I'd suspect the active playerbase (with some margin of error depending on what you think is "active") to be somewhere between 50k and 150k players.
mulraf
welp. i always wonder how many active players there really are myself. maybe you're right. but 50k is way off too. i mean in 24 hours the peak of playing people is usually close to 20k. just assuming that completely different people play 12 hours later from that point we have another maybe 15k = 35k. and then there's a lot more different people in between that just log in for maybe half an hour. i'd say about 75k different people / day. for me playing a few games each month is considered active. guessing it's about 250k >at least< then.
well.... nvm. getting to much into a different topic. just something that interests me as i said :x
Yuudachi-kun

silmarilen wrote:

No, you're absolutely terrible. Just the fact that you think an 85% acc score is good shows that already. Don't even bother with any score below 95%.
Someone who gets SS on 3* is better than someone who gets 85% on 4*.
OP is bad confirming.
dem0nwing

silmarilen wrote:

No, you're absolutely terrible. Just the fact that you think an 85% acc score is good shows that already. Don't even bother with any score below 95%.
Someone who gets SS on 3* is better than someone who gets 85% on 4*.
It doesn't matter what your accuracy is, if somebody is consistently passing content that you can't pass at all, then you are worse. It doesn't matter how many low-level songs you can grind to SS.
Yuudachi-kun

dem0nwing wrote:

It doesn't matter what your accuracy is, if somebody is consistently passing content that you can't pass at all, then you are worse. It doesn't matter how many low-level songs you can grind to SS.
Someone who can pass 7 star maps but not fc them is shittier than someone who can fc 6 stars and not pass 7. Passing is easy and generally means jack shit.

See: All those people who can pass airman and actually think they're good because they can 79% C it.
Endaris

Khelly wrote:

See: All those people who can pass airman and actually think they're good because they can 79% C it.
I can pass Airman with EZ at 78%, im gud
Yolshka

dem0nwing wrote:

It doesn't matter what your accuracy is, if somebody is consistently passing content that you can't pass at all, then you are worse. It doesn't matter how many low-level songs you can grind to SS.
Maybe, but the main source of pp is accuracy so by just going for passes you are saying no to potential pp.
Sayorie

ShadyAngel wrote:

Maybe, but the main source of pp is accuracy so by just going for passes you are saying no to potential pp.
FC + high acc > FC > high acc

Trying to pass a significantly difficult map might not produce any pp, but it might, in some extent, push your skill limit higher. You won't improve if you don't test your limits, IMO.
Frolski
Nope.
Sayorie
Care to explain how?
Rurree
In CTB, high acc and less misses are more important than high combo if you're looking for pp, I think that also applies to Standard.
Sayorie
Well people from G&R keep saying that FC really matters. And afaik, FC does matter, because I already lost a handful of pp because of overwriting an FC with a higher acc score with misses.
Yuudachi-kun

Rurree wrote:

In CTB, high acc and less misses are more important than high combo if you're looking for pp, I think that also applies to Standard.
In ctb acc soesnt really matter and is just a joke; it's more of a combo game than std
Cipse

Rurree wrote:

In CTB, high acc and less misses are more important than high combo if you're looking for pp, I think that also applies to Standard.
I haven't tested it in !standard, but in Taiko, pp is given based on accuracy, regardless of score. I tested this out on some maps and found that I would lose pp for any new high score that had a lower accuracy than the previous.

SPOILER
This sometimes makes hitting a big don/katsu with a single key annoying
Rurree

Khelly wrote:

Rurree wrote:

In CTB, high acc and less misses are more important than high combo if you're looking for pp, I think that also applies to Standard.
In ctb acc soesnt really matter and is just a joke; it's more of a combo game than std
With score, yes, but acc does matter if you're looking for pp. I have a friend who got 1 miss with like 99.6% on a Rain diff and got 142 pp, I fc'd it but with 98%, got 137 pp.
Xyrus_old_1

Arthraxium wrote:

Trying to pass a significantly difficult map might not produce any pp, but it might, in some extent, push your skill limit higher. You won't improve if you don't test your limits, IMO.
Depends. If you can't read a map, grinding it won't teach you read it, it will only help you memorize it. Grinding a stream map where you run out of stamina half way will increase your stamina though.
dem0nwing

Khelly wrote:

dem0nwing wrote:

It doesn't matter what your accuracy is, if somebody is consistently passing content that you can't pass at all, then you are worse. It doesn't matter how many low-level songs you can grind to SS.
Someone who can pass 7 star maps but not fc them is shittier than someone who can fc 6 stars and not pass 7. Passing is easy and generally means jack shit.

See: All those people who can pass airman and actually think they're good because they can 79% C it.
I didn't know what song you were talking about so I played it. . . and that song is legit broken. The healthbar leniancy is wayyyyyy too low. I can't pass any 7 star songs and I can pass that because the health bar is like a 2 star song on easy mode. I couldn't fail even if I tried because 1 note gives you back like your entire health bar. Bringing up the biggest outlier in the entire game is meaningless.

In songs with balanced healthbars (see 99% of them), pass/fail is the best indication of skill. You can grind a song until you get good acc and combo, it just happens through repetition. If you can't even pass a song, however, it doesn't matter how much you grind until you actually get good enough to start beating it. In a multiplay situation, when paired up with random unknown songs, the person who can pass the higher songs will win every time.

Anecdotal: I have a friend with higher accuracy and PP than me, yet I have a 90% win rate in multiple (any song, even the ones he chooses). He can't pass the songs I can pass, but he grinds more on individual maps and always exits out of a song if he's about to finish with less than like 97% accuracy. Remember, leaderboards are mostly single player, so you can grind your songs as much as you want and eventually you'll get them down as long as you can pass them.

Obviously, if you're at the level where everyone can pass every song, consistency and accuracy begin to come into play. The fraction of the playerbase that can pass practically any map in the game, however, is super small and, like the top 1% of most games, has to be looked at differently.
Rhonin
Considering your playtime, I think you're barely OK op, no need to feel insecure.
ithgyu
ofc youre not even ok at osu, you have barely scratched the surface. Get 4 digits to be ok at osu
Rilene

II Jelli II wrote:

ofc youre not even ok at osu, you have barely scratched the surface. Get 4 digits to be ok at osu
sounds easy to do
N0thingSpecial

Cookiezi wrote:

ofc youre not even ok at osu, you have barely scratched the surface. Get 2 digits to be ok at osu
Xyrus_old_1

Rafis wrote:

ofc youre not even ok at osu, you have barely scratched the surface. Become #1 to be ok at osu
Minhtam
75% is terrible. 87% is terrible. Heck, even 98% is terrible.

99% or better is considered to be good. #LearnToSS
I Give Up
play more
Rilene

Minhtam wrote:

75% is terrible. 87% is terrible. Heck, even 98% is terrible.

99% or better is considered to be good. #LearnToSS
im terrible then
KupcaH

dem0nwing wrote:

I can't pass any 7 star songs and I can pass that
Can I have replay? Pls.
Yuudachi-kun

Minhtam wrote:

75% is terrible. 87% is terrible. Heck, even 98% is terrible.

99% or better is considered to be good. #LearnToSS

Tfw mintham will never even have my beautiful 90% fcs in mytop plays #learntostreamfaster
dem0nwing

KupcaH wrote:

dem0nwing wrote:

I can't pass any 7 star songs and I can pass that
Can I have replay? Pls.
Not sure why you want a replay, but while I'm here I'll upload a few (for whatever reason you're asking)

First playthrough of the song:

https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B48wc ... DNMOE5LbGs

In fact, this song is so leniant, you can legit stop playing intermitently and miss like 10 notes in a row, then pick right back up no problem. . .

Like this playthrough I did for lols (second playthrough of the song, intentionally did 3-5 second AFKs throughout):


https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B48wc ... 3poZTdNREE


Bonus replay on Hidden (Not gonna lie, I failed the first time because I got offbeat. This is the second try, making this my 4th actual playthrough of the song):

https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B48wc ... jU3SHJrQ2M


Did you think I was lying or something?
Minhtam

Khelly wrote:

Minhtam wrote:

75% is terrible. 87% is terrible. Heck, even 98% is terrible.

99% or better is considered to be good. #LearnToSS
Tfw mintham will never even have my beautiful 90% fcs in mytop plays #learntostreamfaster
This is true. I rage at getting 99.66% FCs. The thought of a 90% FC is like the thought of playing Neverending Nightmares. I would never.
StephOsu
no you suck everyone in here sucks
Hibiya-chan

StephOsu wrote:

no you suck everyone in here sucks
Except Cookiezi, hvick225, and Rafis lmao xD
show more
Please sign in to reply.

New reply