Guest
home
beatmaps
rankings
community
store
help
forum
  1. Forums
  2. osu!
  3. Gameplay & Rankings

Am I considered OK at osu?

posted
Total Posts
57
royteneij
14 posts
Joined September 2015
Topic Starter
royteneij
I can do 4* - 4,7* maps check my recent passes for my best ones :) 75% of the time i score a B. I usually have around 85% acc on 4*+ maps

Just wanna know thx :D
silmarilen
5,579 posts
Joined February 2010
silmarilen
No, you're absolutely terrible. Just the fact that you think an 85% acc score is good shows that already. Don't even bother with any score below 95%.
Someone who gets SS on 3* is better than someone who gets 85% on 4*.
N0thingSpecial
2,355 posts
Joined November 2015
N0thingSpecial
you are bad compared to anyone significantly higher rank than you, but you are good compare to people with significantly lower rank then you. that is all now play more
-Makishima S-
2,434 posts
Joined August 2013
-Makishima S-
You are bad.

Everything below 97% acc on farmable maps is shit, everything below 95% on gimmick/hw maps is shit. I am talking about pure FC.
royteneij
14 posts
Joined September 2015
Topic Starter
royteneij

silmarilen wrote:

No, you're absolutely terrible. Just the fact that you think an 85% acc score is good shows that already. Don't even bother with any score below 95%.
Someone who gets SS on 3* is better than someone who gets 85% on 4*.
That's the thing i probably can SS 3* but i just prefer playing faster paced maps, so i should probably just work on acc right?
uberpancake
160 posts
Joined December 2012
uberpancake
If you consider yourself OK at osu, I guess you are OK at osu. Depends on your own standards.

By my standards you are not, though.
Yolshka
669 posts
Joined April 2014
Yolshka
Tbh it doesn't really matter what other people think, if you feel like you're doing alright it's fine, you have to be going for your own standards, i feel like that's what really matters.
But judging yourself correctly is part of the improvement.
Edit: pancake was faster :oops:
Endaris
5,282 posts
Joined June 2010
Endaris

royteneij wrote:

silmarilen wrote:

No, you're absolutely terrible. Just the fact that you think an 85% acc score is good shows that already. Don't even bother with any score below 95%.
Someone who gets SS on 3* is better than someone who gets 85% on 4*.
That's the thing i probably can SS 3* but i just prefer playing faster paced maps, so i should probably just work on acc right?
"probably"
SSing is harder than you think, prove it.
royteneij
14 posts
Joined September 2015
Topic Starter
royteneij
"probably"
SSing is harder than you think, prove it.
i'll give it some tries :)
Hibiya-chan
303 posts
Joined February 2016
Hibiya-chan
SSing 3* maps is hard tho :o

I, most of the time, play 3*-3.9* and can only S them w/ or w/o HD mod :(

royteneij wrote:

"probably"
SSing is harder than you think, prove it.
i'll give it some tries :)
Don't even think of using the PF mod. It's a bad practice imo.
Shohei Ohtani
Shohei Ohtani
you are garbage.
Domp
8 posts
Joined April 2014
Domp
Trashier than me. And that's saying a lot.
Hvick711
73 posts
Joined July 2014
Hvick711
Guys you're all terrible because I'm higher ranked player.
-Makishima S-
2,434 posts
Joined August 2013
-Makishima S-

-Toushin wrote:

Guys you're all terrible because I'm higher ranked player.
We are all trash because Cookiezi is a god.
mulraf
1,067 posts
Joined January 2012
mulraf
#<300.000 well. there are over 300.000 active players that are better than you. yet looking at it from another perspective there's probably around 1 million more or less active users overall, so you're prolly around the top 30% which is kinda decent.
but the most important thing: what the heck's the idea behind making a own thread in a forum and let you tell by other people if you are good? if this is serious than i've rarely seen something this complacent.
Endaris
5,282 posts
Joined June 2010
Endaris
1 million active players is way off. There are barely 8 million registered ones and I'm pretty sure more than 7.5 million of them don't even have 1k plays(in standard). I'd suspect the active playerbase (with some margin of error depending on what you think is "active") to be somewhere between 50k and 150k players.
mulraf
1,067 posts
Joined January 2012
mulraf
welp. i always wonder how many active players there really are myself. maybe you're right. but 50k is way off too. i mean in 24 hours the peak of playing people is usually close to 20k. just assuming that completely different people play 12 hours later from that point we have another maybe 15k = 35k. and then there's a lot more different people in between that just log in for maybe half an hour. i'd say about 75k different people / day. for me playing a few games each month is considered active. guessing it's about 250k >at least< then.
well.... nvm. getting to much into a different topic. just something that interests me as i said :x
Yuudachi-kun
5,432 posts
Joined August 2014
Yuudachi-kun

silmarilen wrote:

No, you're absolutely terrible. Just the fact that you think an 85% acc score is good shows that already. Don't even bother with any score below 95%.
Someone who gets SS on 3* is better than someone who gets 85% on 4*.
OP is bad confirming.
dem0nwing
10 posts
Joined September 2010
dem0nwing

silmarilen wrote:

No, you're absolutely terrible. Just the fact that you think an 85% acc score is good shows that already. Don't even bother with any score below 95%.
Someone who gets SS on 3* is better than someone who gets 85% on 4*.
It doesn't matter what your accuracy is, if somebody is consistently passing content that you can't pass at all, then you are worse. It doesn't matter how many low-level songs you can grind to SS.
Yuudachi-kun
5,432 posts
Joined August 2014
Yuudachi-kun

dem0nwing wrote:

It doesn't matter what your accuracy is, if somebody is consistently passing content that you can't pass at all, then you are worse. It doesn't matter how many low-level songs you can grind to SS.
Someone who can pass 7 star maps but not fc them is shittier than someone who can fc 6 stars and not pass 7. Passing is easy and generally means jack shit.

See: All those people who can pass airman and actually think they're good because they can 79% C it.
Endaris
5,282 posts
Joined June 2010
Endaris

Khelly wrote:

See: All those people who can pass airman and actually think they're good because they can 79% C it.
I can pass Airman with EZ at 78%, im gud
Yolshka
669 posts
Joined April 2014
Yolshka

dem0nwing wrote:

It doesn't matter what your accuracy is, if somebody is consistently passing content that you can't pass at all, then you are worse. It doesn't matter how many low-level songs you can grind to SS.
Maybe, but the main source of pp is accuracy so by just going for passes you are saying no to potential pp.
Sayorie
975 posts
Joined December 2014
Sayorie

ShadyAngel wrote:

Maybe, but the main source of pp is accuracy so by just going for passes you are saying no to potential pp.
FC + high acc > FC > high acc

Trying to pass a significantly difficult map might not produce any pp, but it might, in some extent, push your skill limit higher. You won't improve if you don't test your limits, IMO.
Frolski
131 posts
Joined October 2014
Frolski
Nope.
Sayorie
975 posts
Joined December 2014
Sayorie
Care to explain how?
show more
Please sign in to reply.

New reply

0
1 / 57