This map seems a little bit emptier than expected, but it is for rank so I won’t complain
[Lightning]
00:28:032 (28032|1) - the jack before the LN is a bit uncomfortable to play, you might want to shift the LN to 3
00:28:547 (28547|2,28632|1,28718|3,28718|0) - I kinda feel like this sound can be emphasized more,
suggestion?00:39:518 (39518|2,39604|3,39690|2,39690|0) - same here, my suggestion but
this kinda fits better again
00:53:404 (53404|3,53918|1) - ctrl+h? The sound seems to be going up for me
00:56:147 - this section is not really consistent, I suggest that from 01:07:118 - that you use the pattern you used for the start
01:18:090 - same goes for this part, watch out for consistency errors
01:43:804 (103804|0,103890|1,103975|3,104061|2) - similar to the one before, I would use
this for the intended effect
01:45:861 (105861|2,106032|2,106204|2,106547|2,106718|2,106890|2) - unless there is an effect you want to bring up I don’t see why you should use this because it’s not advisable for playability’s sake
01:49:975 (109975|3,110147|1,110318|2,110490|0) - a
suggestion for pitch relevance
01:53:404 (113404|2) - this note seems to be a ghost
01:53:490 - add notes to bring up these sounds?
01:53:747 - there should be an LN here for consistency, it’s the only part without one
01:58:890 - same as above ^
02:00:261 - I guess for this part you can probably use
this02:04:375 - same as I mentioned
02:07:804 - to 02:10:204 - since the pitch is relatively the same you can probably use jacks here?
02:30:004 - you can probably add a note here to cover this sound
Even so there is already a note 02:31:632 (151632|1) - here so it makes sense to put one 02:31:632 (151632|1) - here. The notes I mentioned make the section a bit more comfortable to play since you’re avoiding the unorthodox rhythms
02:31:632 (151632|1) - consistency thing comes back in this section
02:57:690 (177690|1,177861|2,178032|3) - ctrl+j for pitch relevance?
03:04:032 (184032|2,184204|1) - ^
03:07:804 - something something consistency again
03:30:775 (210775|1,210947|1,211118|1,211290|1) - I don’t see anything that makes sense to put these
03:33:004 (213004|1,213175|1,213347|1,213861|1,214032|1,214204|1,214204|2,214375|2,214547|2) - same for these
03:35:232 (215232|2,215404|2,215575|2,215575|1,215747|1,215918|1,216604|2,216775|2,216947|2,216947|1,217118|1,217290|1) - aaaaa
of course if you do decide to change it please be consistent across that section
03:44:490 (224490|0,224575|1,224661|3,224747|2) -
this again apparently
03:46:204 - I’m ok with this i guess, just for this section here 03:47:575 -
this is my take on it, it’s also more comfortable to play
03:50:661 (230661|1,230832|2,231004|0,231175|3) -
this for pitch/vocal relevance again if you want to
03:51:347 (231347|1) - don’t see why you should reduce to a single note when there’s 01:50:661 (110661|2,110661|3) -
whew time for the stream, clocking in at an hour and a half now…
03:51:518 (231518|2,231775|2) - not a big fan of shields but it’s ok I guess…
some parts of the stream are quite awkward to play, but I won’t get to them much because it’s hard to pinpoint where exactly
but generally stuff like 03:52:290 (232290|2,232375|1,232375|3,232461|0,232547|2,232632|3) - and 03:54:947 (234947|2,235032|1,235118|3,235118|0,235204|1,235290|2,235375|0,235461|1,235461|3,235547|2) - are quite hard to hit and they feel a bit strange, so keep that in mind
04:01:290 (241290|0,241290|2,241461|2,241461|0,241632|0,241632|2,241804|1,241975|0,241975|2,242147|3,242318|2,242318|1) - don’t break the stream because of this, it makes players lose momentum
Here's a suggestion
04:02:832 (242832|2,243004|2,243175|2) - don’t see why you should do this
04:23:232 (263232|1,263232|0,263404|1,263404|0,263575|0,263575|1,263747|2,263918|0,263918|1,264090|3,264261|2,264261|1) - here too, the
suggestion is similar but I highlighted a few notes below because I changed it to achieve that pattern
04:31:461 (271461|0,271547|1,271632|3,271718|2,271804|3,271804|1,271804|0) -
to give that effect again
04:49:461 (289461|2) - move to 1, players are not going to like hitting that after rolling everything below
04:52:032 - rhythm starts to become unorthodox again, so I’ll put a box to show where to add a few
05:13:975 (313975|1,313975|2,313975|0,314147|1,314147|3,314147|0,314318|2,314318|0,314318|3,314490|3,314490|1,314490|2,314661|2,314661|0,314661|1,314832|0,314832|3,314832|1,315004|0,315004|2,315004|3,315175|1,315175|3,315175|2,315347|1,315347|0,315347|2,315518|3,315518|1,315518|2,315690|0,315690|2,315690|3,315861|1,315861|3,315861|0,316032|0,316032|1,316032|2,316204|1,316204|2,316204|3,316375|0,316375|1,316375|3,316547|1,316547|3,316547|2) - feels as if this entire chunk can be replaced with a
jumpstream, but that’s for you to decide
05:24:775 (324775|1,324861|2,324947|3,324947|0) -
same thing as earlier apparently
if you wish to follow that then move 05:25:290 (325290|2) - to 1 and 05:25:461 (325461|1,325632|0) - 1 column to the right for both
05:26:661 (326661|2,326661|3) - I thought you used a single LN for this one earlier, be consistent
05:36:175 (336175|1,336347|1,336518|1) - I think I’ll let this one slide
though I must admit that most of these Camellia charts tend to end up stale if they want to be ranked, but I may be shunned by my
the minijacks I pointed out are still very subjective, but I wanted to bring out an effect, it is up to you whether or not you want to include them