Bakari wrote:

2b maps are also playable, yet, it does not make them rankable. Care to provide an explanation based on the actual music structure?

VINXIS wrote:

did u afraid when u see my ak74

bbj0920 wrote:

hell extra

00:45:216 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10) - how about putting kickslider at 00:45:216 - and start stream at 00:45:353 - fits the music better imo ok
00:46:443 (5) - https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/5585227 better interpretation imo A speed up in a slowdown section feels kinda awkward o_o
00:53:534 (1) - https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/5585241 like this? better flow and currently 00:53:262 (3,1) - is pretty narrow and 00:53:534 (1,2) - is pretty big the flow is better right now i think O-O...the gap between (3) and (1) make this a pattern that does not play well :V
01:10:443 (5,6,7,8,9) - readability is kinda weird here, https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/5585280 like this i think The major reason for not using straight slider is mainly because of the flow ;P A curvy slider can prevent awkward back-and-forth flow here
01:43:580 (5,1) - a bit too large i think? 01:43:716 (1) - is not even really intense part Three notes 01:43:307 (3,4,5) - before have same spacing so I don't think it is true xD
01:52:443 ~ 01:53:398 - only two sliders her when 01:53:534 ~ 01:56:398 - is mapped with 1/2 fillers to the music? This is mainly for gameplay reason: after that insane kiai section the player would need a short break to recover their energy for a bit, or otherwise they would easily miss here.
02:05:943 (4,1) - agreeing with shiirn here, it's too much. you said it just represents bass, but it's too gimmicky, gone too far. https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/5604876 simply ctrl+g and it will be more comfortable to play If I did that the angle between (4) and (1) would be very narrow which makes the pattern uncomfortable to play. I further tested this pattern and find it plays well indeed.
02:07:716 (1,2,3,4) - very minor though, distance is not even should be fine now lol
02:09:284 (1) - NC on 02:09:353 (2) - instead ok

otherwise it's very great, and as your maps always do it has really clean a e s t h e t i c s
i hope it helped. good luck!

Fort wrote:

02:05:943 (4,1) - are you sure about this overmapping? because my kickass kungfu carnival and my GD on FIRST got dq'd cuz of this (labeled as misleading patterns) :/

btw nice fullscreen

Rizia wrote:

rebub

1. the problem starts from 00:30:762 (1,1,1) - since you mapped 1/2 jumps, people think that slider will become a normal 1/8 kick sliders with just only 1 arrow
2. the second problem is 00:31:307 - triggers players to aim down on 00:31:443 (1) -. Coincidence? i think no because in fact there is some "melodical" sound in 00:31:307
3. i can continue about that melodical thing because you follow melody on 00:30:489 (2) - unconsciously which you automatically follow melodical pattern on 00:30:762 (1,1,1) - and makes 00:31:170 (1) - slider is a nonsense because you skip 00:31:307 emphasize.

1. you can change to 1/4 reversal sliders instead put 1/8, the 1/8s snap can be misleading patterns, the 1/4 snap is really okay and still looks so fast (make SV really slow can help visibility too)
2. keep follow the melody like 00:26:398 (2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - since this jump pattern have some similiarity (yep zigzag pattern)
3. 00:30:762 (1,1,1) - and 00:31:443 (1,1) - map this to a circles so you can reconsidering 00:31:170 (1) - as a 1/8 hold slider and you can reduce 00:31:443 (1,1) - this jump like this http://puu.sh/q6X1b/5734188e52.jpg or make a jump wider like this http://puu.sh/q6X4i/4465f6db3d.jpg

• Fort wrote:

  Rizia wrote:

  rebub

  what wait man
  
  00:31:170 (1,1) - wait what is this? this is the same problem as my map too, the distance is too overrated and it's really misleading with, sorry i didn't mention this too :<<<<.
  

1. the problem starts from 00:30:762 (1,1,1) - since you mapped 1/2 jumps, people think that slider will become a normal 1/8 kick sliders with just only 1 arrow meh, there's one thing called "approach circle" so people should understand that they shouldn't stop that early as long as the break between each note is identical. At least to me, that's not so misleading...(And I watched several replays before and during qualified period from different players, none of them break at this part.
2. the second problem is 00:31:307 - triggers players to aim down on 00:31:443 (1) -. Coincidence? i think no because in fact there is some "melodical" sound in 00:31:307 It depends on what are you following during mapping. In this cases I'm following the bass which is extended to 00:31:375 -
3. i can continue about that melodical thing because you follow melody on 00:30:489 (2) - unconsciously which you automatically follow melodical pattern on 00:30:762 (1,1,1) - and makes 00:31:170 (1) - slider is a nonsense because you skip 00:31:307 emphasize. I skip it because I think the bass is stronger here.

1. you can change to 1/4 reversal sliders instead put 1/8, the 1/8s snap can be misleading patterns, the 1/4 snap is really okay and still looks so fast (make SV really slow can help visibility too)
2. keep follow the melody like 00:26:398 (2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - since this jump pattern have some similiarity (yep zigzag pattern)
3. 00:30:762 (1,1,1) - and 00:31:443 (1,1) - map this to a circles so you can reconsidering 00:31:170 (1) - as a 1/8 hold slider and you can reduce 00:31:443 (1,1) - this jump like this http://puu.sh/q6X1b/5734188e52.jpg or make a jump wider like this http://puu.sh/q6X4i/4465f6db3d.jpg

Regou wrote:

Hope you would understand why I don't want to change this pattern >< and thanks for rechecking!

appleeaterx wrote:

是人？

Spaghetti wrote:

01:34:034 (1,1) - I dont agree with this at all its like completely set up to be read as a 3/4 pattern but it isnt like wtf

appleeaterx wrote:

是人？

Flask wrote:

appleeaterx wrote:

是人？