[ Kohioma ] wrote:

Hi
Goodbye:

• 00:03:605 (1,2) - blanket?
  00:29:985 (3) - move up a little for the better blanket
  00:31:485 (4) - ^
  00:45:525 (1) - move left for the better flow
  00:59:787 (5) - correct blanket
  01:14:037 (5,1) - ^
  01:23:787 (2) - move this up to avoid overlap
  01:36:724 (5,1) - blanket
  01:36:724 (5,1) - ^
  02:20:412 (1,1) - ^
  02:29:037 (5,1) - correct this
  02:41:039 (6,1) - blanket maybe
  02:41:039 (6,1) - ^
  03:37:851 (5) - move right a little for the better flow
  04:17:772 (2,4) - correct blanket
  04:24:522 (5,1) - ^
  04:47:425 (1) - move left for the better blanket
  05:00:524 (2,3) - blanket
  05:00:524 (2,3) - ^
  05:15:149 (3,4) - ^
  05:26:211 (5,2) - ^
  05:26:211 (5,3) - ^ too maybe

Nice map, good luck

the god blanket! JOKE XD

Lets just say that all the blankets fixed and the other non blankets are few mods that i fixed
but ofcourse, Thanks for the MODS!! its helpful as always

-himei wrote:

ayyyyyyyyyyyyyyy here we go
m4m
00:14:141 (1,2,1,2,1) - these seemed inconsistent for me, i dont really understand the placement you choose there...
00:23:046 (1) - do you really need that slider? i think you shud delete it from reasons of to keep the melody following cuz i follow the flow and emphasizing
00:24:548 (4,1) - ds seems inconsistent here
00:38:046 (5,2) - overlap?
00:50:423 (1,3,4) - can you place the (1) in the middle between 3 and 4? i think it will look better nein
01:36:162 (4,5) - you can make the blanket with sliderstart of (5) to the (4) slider
01:48:162 (3) - place it in the middle of the screen with 90% angle? i mean you got 01:47:412 (1,2) - these things mirrored tho what i did there is make them a line and 5 degree.
02:35:052 (2,3) - what sound you emphasizing with these? seems overmapped
03:21:726 (4,2,1) - these ones seemed inconsistent
04:50:425 (1,2) - make them stacked?

Overall i like this song.
Some parts are overmapped, but i think its a good map!
good luck

no reply = fixed
ty for mods~

From in game reqs

Goodbye

00:05:855 - this inherit point could be here better 00:06:605 - no need for that 1/2 to be slowed
00:17:421 (1) - pretty strong and different sound maybe spaced it more from the previous to emphasized it
00:17:608 - spinner would fit here more than next maybe add 2 spinners in row will fit fine
00:38:796 (2,4) - make like this to avoid the overlap it will look lot cleaner
00:44:400 (4) - nc here 00:44:775 (1) - remove nc 00:45:900 (3) - nv 00:46:275 (1) - remove nc
01:23:787 (2) - maybe move to x6 y218 to avoid overlap also the wierd spacing because
01:27:537 (4) - ctrl g for better flow its strong sound a flow break would fit better
01:35:224 (1) - dont like the 1/4 in strong drum beat maybe try 2 clickable notes and stack on top of 01:35:412 (2) -
01:36:724 (5) - ^ like u did here 01:38:225 (4,5) - just be more consistent about rythm
03:06:914 - u could have change the direction on every downbeat instead of going all circular flow
04:39:522 (2) - nc sv change no one expect that
04:42:897 (1,1,1) - no need nc here imo
05:42:939 (3) - move to x354 y86 and blanket the head with 05:42:189 (1) -

I hope i helped good luck!

Lilyanna wrote:

From in game reqs

Goodbye

00:05:855 - this inherit point could be here better 00:06:605 - no need for that 1/2 to be slowed
00:17:421 (1) - pretty strong and different sound maybe spaced it more from the previous to emphasized it
00:17:608 - spinner would fit here more than next maybe add 2 spinners in row will fit fine
00:38:796 (2,4) - make like this to avoid the overlap it will look lot cleaner

img

00:44:400 (4) - nc here 00:44:775 (1) - remove nc 00:45:900 (3) - nv 00:46:275 (1) - remove nc
01:23:787 (2) - maybe move to x6 y218 to avoid overlap also the wierd spacing because
01:27:537 (4) - ctrl g for better flow its strong sound a flow break would fit better this is supposedly upward sliders
01:35:224 (1) - dont like the 1/4 in strong drum beat maybe try 2 clickable notes and stack on top of 01:35:412 (2) -
01:36:724 (5) - ^ like u did here 01:38:225 (4,5) - just be more consistent about rythm its okay to have a 1 slider 1/4
03:06:914 - u could have change the direction on every downbeat instead of going all circular flow
04:39:522 (2) - nc sv change no one expect that
04:42:897 (1,1,1) - no need nc here imo
05:42:939 (3) - move to x354 y86 and blanket the head with 05:42:189 (1) -

I hope i helped good luck!

no reply = fixed

Thanks for the Mods~!

hello o/

00:17:421 (1) - that should be a long good looking slider, the break is weird

00:25:110 (1) - this slider should be more spaced

00:48:173 (2) - this should be the new combo, the circle before still the old combo

01:00:537 (3,4,5,6) - that symetrical square is weird, because the rest of the map isn't symetrical at all

02:58:664 (1,2,3,4,5,1) - i think this would play better if u make it like this https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/6221847

03:03:914 (1,2,3) - why are these circles no jumps?

03:11:226 (1) - could be more spaced

03:15:726 (2,3) - weird to play

03:29:414 (1,2,3) - i think you should switch number 2 and 3 here

03:41:414 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - i really like this pattern and i think it's very good xD just saying

04:07:847 (2) - i think something like this would be better https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/6221900

04:09:897 (1,2,3,4) - these should be jumps too

04:16:459 (1,2,3,4) - switch 2 and 3?

04:18:709 (1,2,3,1) - should be like this https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/6221951

04:21:334 (4,5,6) - i would switch 5 and 6, but it's not that important

04:27:709 (6,1,2,3,4,5,6) - i think a repeating pattern is better in this case https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/6221987

04:29:785 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12) - it's very weird that you have almost no hitsounds

04:30:910 (1,2,3,4) - 2 reverse arrows are enough since this is only 160bpm, and the reverse arrows are too close: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/6222035

04:32:397 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - this stream gets stacked for no reason

04:33:147 (1) - just remove this, or make it at least 1 white tick shorter

04:35:397 (1,1,2,3,1) - i think the circle would be better placed like that https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/6222081

04:42:897 (2) - at the end of this slider you have to go back

04:45:897 (4) - should be more spaced

04:47:425 (1) - should be more spaced

04:50:237 (4) - why is this no circle?

05:21:899 (1,2) - not necessary -> should be a stream

05:22:649 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - should be way more spaced

05:26:774 (2,3,4) - I would switch 3 and 4. but how to deal with the combo after this?

05:33:899 (1,2) - remove these

05:36:524 (1,2,3) - make slider jumps https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/6222175

05:40:689 (3,4,5,6) - switch 4 and 5?

05:50:032 (4,1) - looks better like this https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/6223292

05:52:870 (2,3,4,5) - switch 2 and 5 to make it more readable

05:54:908 (1) - ends to early

i hope that helped <3 gl on ranking this
btw the jumps are perfect, im very bad at jumping but I almost fc'ed this map

-Tatsuo wrote:

hello o/

00:17:421 (1) - that should be a long good looking slider, the break is weird this should be a title screen

00:25:110 (1) - this slider should be more spaced slider is enough to move more

00:48:173 (2) - this should be the new combo, the circle before still the old combo ill keep, cuz i hate if you nerf the slider to 6 so I do 1-4 number slider only and its good thou

01:00:537 (3,4,5,6) - that symetrical square is weird, because the rest of the map isn't symetrical at all its symmetrical if you take a longer look (lol idk english .-.)

02:58:664 (1,2,3,4,5,1) - i think this would play better if u make it like this https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/6221847 from the past, it should be a line "+" since i added triplet and so there it was. and take a look of 02:59:414 (1,2,3,4) - this

03:03:914 (1,2,3) - why are these circles no jumps? cuz the beat of the song is low, so theres no need to blast jumping

03:11:226 (1) - could be more spaced ds pls

03:15:726 (2,3) - weird to play k

03:29:414 (1,2,3) - i think you should switch number 2 and 3 here too much jump

03:41:414 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - i really like this pattern and i think it's very good xD just saying

04:07:847 (2) - i think something like this would be better https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/6221900 no cuz the beat sounds like 1/3. And if you do a triplet ill just stack them.

04:09:897 (1,2,3,4) - these should be jumps too like i said before

04:16:459 (1,2,3,4) - switch 2 and 3? no its fine to play

04:18:709 (1,2,3,1) - should be like this https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/6221951 past mods they told me its OVERMAP, so i have to reduce it since its a 160bpm

04:21:334 (4,5,6) - i would switch 5 and 6, but it's not that important it is. the song btw

04:27:709 (6,1,2,3,4,5,6) - i think a repeating pattern is better in this case https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/6221987 haha I know the patterns, but i dont want my map to be simple and i dont like repeating patterns. so i changed it.

04:29:785 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12) - it's very weird that you have almost no hitsounds the song, cant hear the hitsound, so i low the volume

04:30:910 (1,2,3,4) - 2 reverse arrows are enough since this is only 160bpm, and the reverse arrows are too close: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/6222035 i follow the per beats. and 04:33:147 (1) - here cuz the next part will be many stream ehhh :v

04:32:397 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - this stream gets stacked for no reason if you love to map a stream maps you;; definitely youll know

04:33:147 (1) - just remove this, or make it at least 1 white tick shorter no

04:35:397 (1,1,2,3,1) - i think the circle would be better placed like that https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/6222081 i prefer this pattern, youll know at my past mods XD

04:42:897 (2) - at the end of this slider you have to go back meni mappers also use this

04:45:897 (4) - should be more spaced nein

04:47:425 (1) - should be more spaced nah its okay to blanket and if you play it, they no idea where are they lol

04:50:237 (4) - why is this no circle? yeah cuz i changed alot after they mods, so added some triple.

05:21:899 (1,2) - not necessary -> should be a stream at the end make it intense but the first 2 slider, is the low and to high

05:22:649 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - should be way more spaced too much space stream. fun fact, supercell dont have stream songs lol

05:26:774 (2,3,4) - I would switch 3 and 4. but how to deal with the combo after this? its too close to the next pattern to switch them

05:33:899 (1,2) - remove these NO.

05:36:524 (1,2,3) - make slider jumps https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/6222175 dude ITS OVERMAP please stop. and this should be a insane difficulty. And your suggestion? i dude do from supercell songs and no insane diff would do that

05:40:689 (3,4,5,6) - switch 4 and 5? no. why do you always want to switch this kind of pattern?

05:50:032 (4,1) - looks better like this https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/6223292 the slider 4 and the next part is slow pattern so its gonna be reducing now.

05:52:870 (2,3,4,5) - switch 2 and 5 to make it more readable its a slow pattern, you dont need to jump this section

05:54:908 (1) - ends to early btw though. do you map? as you can see here, easy to normal only use to (1 circle/slider 1/2) (but if your diff is hard or high can use 1 slider/circle 1/4)

i hope that helped <3 gl on ranking this
btw the jumps are perfect, im very bad at jumping but I almost fc'ed this map

Sorry!!! i didnt see good enough to your mods :<
keep in mind that be mindful of the mods, it can change the creator patternz
but you did your best! I hope one day you'll be a PRO Modder!
Just think what a player will say to you to your mods
no kd

But..
THANKS FOR YOUR HARD WORK! THANKS FOR THE MODS!~

lol

i want this ranked

hi-mei wrote:

i want this ranked

ples rank my button

hey i posted one of my first mods here.. time flies D:

hellohello, m4m from #modreqs

theonlydiff:

1. 00:11:068 (2) - im pretty sure you should fix timing here, slider tail doesn't land on sound properly (listen on slow speed)
2. 00:22:858 - leaving end of spinner for this sound doesn't feel natural to me, i think you should shorten spinner, silence its end and put note here (also this suggestion would justify two ncs in a row 00:23:046 (1,1) - )
3. 00:44:775 (2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4) - are you sure that you don't want to raise space here since sounds become louder? (don't make pp pls, just make first one very short and raise them gradually
4. 00:47:400 (1) - this stands wrong on timeline (should be first tick of next red section)
5. 00:47:798 - missing beat here is odd
6. 00:57:912 (1) - this is too early for this circle
7. 02:28:568 - you don't miss these sounds usually
8. 02:33:927 (3) - maybe cool slow slider for guitar?
9. 03:40:664 (1,2,3,4) - didn't get what this stands for
10. 04:33:897 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,1) - would be cool if you made spacing raise gradually

Such decent quality! Gj and good luck with this one (cant believe im saying this, i hate pp) (my map for m4m)

Zallies wrote:

hi-mei wrote:

i want this ranked

ples rank my button

ok i change my mind
too hard 4 me

lets do dis

"My Love Story".

h4d0uk3n1 wrote:

theonlydiff:

1. 00:11:068 (2) - im pretty sure you should fix timing here, slider tail doesn't land on sound properly (listen on slow speed)
2. 00:22:858 - leaving end of spinner for this sound doesn't feel natural to me, i think you should shorten spinner, silence its end and put note here (also this suggestion would justify two ncs in a row 00:23:046 (1,1) - ) i get that alot
3. 00:44:775 (2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4) - are you sure that you don't want to raise space here since sounds become louder? (don't make pp pls, just make first one very short and raise them gradually uu
4. 00:47:400 (1) - this stands wrong on timeline (should be first tick of next red section)
5. 00:47:798 - missing beat here is odd est vocal
6. 00:57:912 (1) - this is too early for this circle why?
7. 02:28:568 - you don't miss these sounds usually
8. 02:33:927 (3) - maybe cool slow slider for guitar?
9. 03:40:664 (1,2,3,4) - didn't get what this stands for
10. 04:33:897 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,1) - would be cool if you made spacing raise gradually

no re = fix

eae bocetinha

mi lov stori

03:32:414 (1,2,3) - i think this not fit so good, for real, i think u only made this to use the clap in 03:32:789 - but u break the flow like that (and very hurt)

u could do the classic "pause-stack" (idk how name that xd) , but is That

rank pleaz

i suc at modding
Hope it helped ;w;

Good luck!

Ataraxia wrote:

mi lov stori

03:32:414 (1,2,3) - i think this not fit so good, for real, i think u only made this to use the clap in 03:32:789 - but u break the flow like that (and very hurt) change to 2 circles 1 slider

u could do the classic "pause-stack" (idk how name that xd) , but is That would be weird with no claps on it

-Harpuia- wrote:

[notice][My Love Story]

1. 00:11:594 (1) - I would suggest having a different slider shape for this one. Like, say... A simple curve. imo, with that it can highlight the vocal in a way. Also for differentiation. using back and forth kaya hindi
2. 00:22:858 - Would be nice if the sounds here were to be played actively. I think what can be done here is by moving the spinner end to the white tick prior, lowering its volume, and putting a circle on where the end was. sige na ngaa
3. 00:28:110 (2,3) - Increase the spacing for consistency? (Reference: 00:27:735 (1) - having an increased DS together with the sound)
4. 00:28:485 (3,4) - It seems that the piano thingy is followed more here. If so, the more appropriate patterning, imo, would be a 1/2 slider for 00:28:485 (3) - and a circle at 00:28:860 - .
5. 00:39:171 (4,5) - Decrease spacing for consistency with 00:36:171 (4,5) - .
6. 00:51:923 (1,2,3,4) - Just a minor suggestion. If the vocal is the main thing followed here, maybe try to have a different slider shape for 00:51:923 (1) - to "separate" it, in a way, with 00:52:298 (2,3,4) - . This may be applied to the others. no
7. 01:09:912 (1,2) - A normal 1/1, just like the others, should've been alright. vocal on it red should be slider to make more intense but smh no
8. 01:29:412 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - <3 <3
9. 01:44:412 (1,2,3,4) - Emphasis on notes here could be improved imo. Move 01:44:787 (3,4) - in a way that 01:44:787 (3) - could be highligheted. i dont like making correct star but ill improve smh
10. 01:43:662 (2,3,4) - 01:46:662 (2,3,4) - ... - This may cause a little bit of confusion. 01:46:662 (2,3) - is a 1/4 stack while 01:46:755 (3,4) - is 1/2. Players may, in some occassions, interpret 01:47:224 (4) - as a 1/4 note. I'm mentioning it just for a precaution. You could leave it as is if you want. theyre extras so i did was to stack becuase its too annoying
11. 02:03:724 (2,1) - Could use a bit more space in between. overkill tbh
12. 02:14:412 (1,2,3,4) - Making this part look more of a "Z" would be nice for aesthetics. this 02:14:787 (2,4) - im really following their closed up
13. 02:23:412 (1,1,2) - Remove NC at 02:24:162 (1) - . (Reference: 00:47:423 (1,2,3) - ) gg i have to fix all nc from the end
14. 02:35:976 (2,3) - The current section of the map tends to not use the stacks like this one, unlike the prior. Consider unstacking for consistency. its called pattern to make, its not like if you dont stack and the other section dont stack.
15. 03:11:226 (1) - Kinda weird to see a sudden 1/4 slider here, it kinda doesn't fit in this part. A triple would be nice. Buuuut that's all imo xd hahah
16. 03:32:601 (2) - Hm... I think try to do this slider thing on to 01:56:787 (3) - as well. weird no claps on it
17. 04:09:147 (2,3) - Lower the spacing? With the previous ones, the first two seem to have more. nope should be big/increased
18. 04:14:022 (5) - Break down into circles like the others?
19. 05:54:788 (1) - <3 <3

HAHAHAH BAKIT AYAW MO TAGALOG ? !

noreply=good

Zallies wrote:

HAHAHAH BAKIT AYAW MO TAGALOG ? !

Wala lang xd

m4m from #modreqs

very repetitive song so a lot of what i say applies to many locations, im just going to post the timestamp of the first one to avoid clutter

00:03:605 (1,2,3,4,5) - so you used straight sliders for the first measure, then curvy sliders for the first half of the second measure, and then straight sliders for the last half. i'd either make 00:03:605 (1,2) - straight or 00:05:105 (4,5) - curvy just so you're dealing with this a bit more consisently

00:08:159 (3,4) - not sure these slider shapes are justified. sliders w/ red points like this are really harsh looking and it really doesnt fit how relaxing this part of the song is

00:11:068 (2,1) - i love the gradual slowing down but i feel like the last slider here is a bit too slow compared to the first two. speed up 1 or slow down 2

00:11:594 (1) - pretty sure this is mistimed, feels like it should be a bit later

00:17:421 (1) - this is a super sudden note, would make sense to break the established pattern. i'd go as far as to drag this note all the way to one of the corners

00:24:548 (4) - the piano sound on the red tick is held, so it would make more sense to do this part with a circle then a slider, rather than one 1/2 slider and a 1/1 pause

00:36:733 (5) - uncomfortable movement into this note gives it a ton of emphasis, but its just a hi hat sound. feels like the slider tail of 4 is much more deserving of emphasis than this note. maybe change 4 into a 1/2 slider, and then change 5 into two stacked circles?

00:39:171 (4,5) - although not uncomfortable movement, my same criticism applies with giving 5 too much emphasis. same goes for every reptition of this rhythm

00:48:173 (2) - just a general suggestion for this whole part, maybe you could try something where all notes with vocals are cuved sliders, and then all notes that are just drums/accompaniment are straight? it'd give the vocals a little bit more attention which i think would fit nicely

00:48:923 (1,2,3,4) - curves in these sliders dont make much sense to me. i'd sooner just do straight up and down sliders with each pointing into the next for comfortable movement

00:51:173 (3,4) - tilt these a liiiitle bit more up imo

00:51:923 (1,2,3,4) - these sliders break flow for no good reason. id change this pattern to have every slider flow into the next

01:17:974 (2,3,4) - i feel like this pattern puts emphasis on 3 which the song doesnt support. the other iterations of this rhythm do a good job keep emphasis about the same for each of the drum hits.

01:29:412 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - nothing really wrong with this section, i just feel like you could do a lot more here than just mapping the bass drum. again there's nothing technically wrong here so feel free to deny this

01:47:412 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - the vocals here change from being on every 1/2 to being every 2/1, yet the way you map these jumps feels exactly the same. check out the pattern at 01:19:125 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - in this map: https://osu.ppy.sh/b/844134 , i think something along these lines would really fit this part well. regardless of what pattern you choose to use, make sure it repeats every 4 circles to give emphasis to the vocals

01:56:787 (3,1) - i'd keep filler rhythm going and turn this into a 1/2 slider. really feels like these two notes are lacking the intensity that the rest of the chorus has

02:34:864 (1) - increase sv even more for this one or decrease sv for the prior slider just to exaggerate the contrast between the two

04:18:709 (1,2,3) - nc spam for emphasis?

04:24:147 (3,4) - dont hear any instrument playing on every white tick. doesn't make much sense for 3 to be representing two bass drums and then 4 to be representing one snare. should look visually different to highlight the difference between the sounds.

05:54:788 (1) - i feel like this slider should end on the white tick and not the blue tick. just change sv slightly to get it to snap to white tick

good luck!

frogyfro wrote:

00:03:605 (1,2,3,4,5) - so you used straight sliders for the first measure, then curvy sliders for the first half of the second measure, and then straight sliders for the last half. i'd either make 00:03:605 (1,2) - straight or 00:05:105 (4,5) - curvy just so you're dealing with this a bit more consisently 00:00:605 - 1,3 are the same, 00:03:605 - 1,2 and 4,5 arent known as vocal change

00:08:159 (3,4) - not sure these slider shapes are justified. sliders w/ red points like this are really harsh looking and it really doesnt fit how relaxing this part of the song is oh straight slider?

00:11:068 (2,1) - i love the gradual slowing down but i feel like the last slider here is a bit too slow compared to the first two. speed up 1 or slow down 2 speeding up destroy rhythm tbh

00:11:594 (1) - pretty sure this is mistimed, feels like it should be a bit later no its fine

00:17:421 (1) - this is a super sudden note, would make sense to break the established pattern. i'd go as far as to drag this note all the way to one of the corners this is where the title started

00:24:548 (4) - the piano sound on the red tick is held, so it would make more sense to do this part with a circle then a slider, rather than one 1/2 slider and a 1/1 pause 00:25:110 - red tick is high rather than sliderend is the high

00:36:733 (5) - uncomfortable movement into this note gives it a ton of emphasis, but its just a hi hat sound. feels like the slider tail of 4 is much more deserving of emphasis than this note. maybe change 4 into a 1/2 slider, and then change 5 into two stacked circles? insane can make different pattern but not hard

00:39:171 (4,5) - although not uncomfortable movement, my same criticism applies with giving 5 too much emphasis. same goes for every reptition of this rhythm yes becuase the music is also repetition

00:48:173 (2) - just a general suggestion for this whole part, maybe you could try something where all notes with vocals are cuved sliders, and then all notes that are just drums/accompaniment are straight? it'd give the vocals a little bit more attention which i think would fit nicely no need to make all fit perfectly, such as pro mappers who don't need to fit every patterns

00:48:923 (1,2,3,4) - curves in these sliders dont make much sense to me. i'd sooner just do straight up and down sliders with each pointing into the next for comfortable movement just because you didnt agree the repeated slider with curve doesnt make not uncomfortable

00:51:173 (3,4) - tilt these a liiiitle bit more up imo change through top also next pattern

00:51:923 (1,2,3,4) - these sliders break flow for no good reason. id change this pattern to have every slider flow into the next downward pattern, why you always react on curvy slider

01:17:974 (2,3,4) - i feel like this pattern puts emphasis on 3 which the song doesnt support. the other iterations of this rhythm do a good job keep emphasis about the same for each of the drum hits. doesnt support? white tick which is high next is low so i stack rather do a jump

01:29:412 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - nothing really wrong with this section, i just feel like you could do a lot more here than just mapping the bass drum. again there's nothing technically wrong here so feel free to deny this

01:47:412 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - the vocals here change from being on every 1/2 to being every 2/1, yet the way you map these jumps feels exactly the same. check out the pattern at 01:19:125 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - in this map: https://osu.ppy.sh/b/844134 , i think something along these lines would really fit this part well. regardless of what pattern you choose to use, make sure it repeats every 4 circles to give emphasis to the vocals why you showed me an unrankable beatmap? tried to make higher ds modder didnt agree because its too overmap/overkill, and yea its also the same from vocal 1/2 at 1/1 looks like 1/1 vocal trying her best to get through the top so i make same pattern as before aka intense vocal 1/1.

01:56:787 (3,1) - i'd keep filler rhythm going and turn this into a 1/2 slider. really feels like these two notes are lacking the intensity that the rest of the chorus has red tick has nothing

02:34:864 (1) - increase sv even more for this one or decrease sv for the prior slider just to exaggerate the contrast between the two1,1 is a same music tbh

04:18:709 (1,2,3) - nc spam for emphasis? no its abuse

04:24:147 (3,4) - dont hear any instrument playing on every white tick. doesn't make much sense for 3 to be representing two bass drums and then 4 to be representing one snare. should look visually different to highlight the difference between the sounds. extra as much need to be highlighted, sometimes insane doesnt need to they focus on easy patterns.

05:54:788 (1) - i feel like this slider should end on the white tick and not the blue tick. just change sv slightly to get it to snap to white tick fix

updaet

~Hello Zallies!

ah i love dat sonk

My Love Story


omfg finally i finished,i feel drained

~Overall it's a beautiful map but on some parts, the rhythm needs some rework, that's why i wanted to mod your map. Gl!

believe it or not i was actually gunna mod this when u first showed me this map.

but i didnt because these kinds of sliders 00:36:171 (4) - 01:08:412 (1) - 01:53:412 (1) - 02:06:537 (3) - etc
that have just one anchor point that is just BARELY curved tilt the FUK out of me LOL

so if u change all those sliders i might come and mod this :^)

u have some 3 options to fix them, make them a normal curved slider, straight slider, or curve them more so that the anchor point actually does something

PS 01:11:412 (1,3) - space this more

can I help me?

00:11:594 - figure how to make this by urself https://gyazo.com/6f7a9d6b23b51d4285a60665e9c2ba5b and if you do, move the spinner start to 00:20:514 -
00:34:673 (1,2) - use reverse by break the flow itself will make stronger impact to emphasis itself which by easily move (1) to 00:32:985 (4) - tail and (2) to 00:23:046 (2) - tail
01:26:037 (4) - this totally diffrent with last 2 tail stack, try at 01:25:287 (2) - head, much better imo
01:49:474 (4) - stack with 01:48:537 (3) - instead, which not only become better flow, it also emphasis the vocal that get higer overwith the ds
02:08:412 (1) - oh cmon make better slider art would you?
02:58:101 (2) - why not on 02:58:664 (4) - tail instead?
03:02:039 (4) - same as before
03:16:851 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - play the volume
05:08:211 (3) - coz this was last reff this kind of stack would be unneccesary imo

noreply/green=good
Thanks for the Mods !!
improvbed

alright this is a lot less tilting to look at

00:44:775 (2,4) - i think ctrl g makes this pattern nicer imo
00:57:912 (1) - imo its better to place this in the middle
01:46:474 (1) - the finish hitsound kind of lacks impact imo, maybe stack it with a clap too?
same for everything else that is similar to this one ^
02:00:912 (1,2,3,4) - um. how do i explain this. i think you should keep this jump as a part of the same area of the playfield as the previous stuff? 01:59:412 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - (bottom left corner?)
02:28:568 (3) - whats with the random triplet here? if anything a triplet could do here 02:29:318 - cuz of this sound 02:29:224 -
03:04:664 (5,7) - space this more

05:00:524 (2) - woaah i suggest u get somebody to help you do some timing stuff. it gets wayyy off here.
some red lines probably needed

ok as i said on irc, i suggest you rework a few of the jumps in the kiai (ofc this applies for all the kiais)
sorting by priority here
02:02:412 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) -
01:59:412 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - 01:47:412 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) -
at the very least do something about the first one in the list. and ofc do the same to the other kiais.

i hope you can make some more structured jumps.
what do i mean by more structured? like the kind of stuff skystar does (you can check USAO - pendulum for some references)

actually ill just make u an example isntead
i replaced this jump pattern here 02:02:412 - until 02:05:412 -

Kibbleru wrote:

alright this is a lot less tilting to look at

00:44:775 (2,4) - i think ctrl g makes this pattern nicer imo
00:57:912 (1) - imo its better to place this in the middle
01:46:474 (1) - the finish hitsound kind of lacks impact imo, maybe stack it with a clap too?
same for everything else that is similar to this one ^
02:00:912 (1,2,3,4) - um. how do i explain this. i think you should keep this jump as a part of the same area of the playfield as the previous stuff? 01:59:412 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - (bottom left corner?)
02:28:568 (3) - whats with the random triplet here? if anything a triplet could do here 02:29:318 - cuz of this sound 02:29:224 -
03:04:664 (5,7) - space this more

05:00:524 (2) - woaah i suggest u get somebody to help you do some timing stuff. it gets wayyy off here.
some red lines probably needed

ok as i said on irc, i suggest you rework a few of the jumps in the kiai (ofc this applies for all the kiais)
sorting by priority here
02:02:412 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) -
01:59:412 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - 01:47:412 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) -
at the very least do something about the first one in the list. and ofc do the same to the other kiais.

i hope you can make some more structured jumps.
what do i mean by more structured? like the kind of stuff skystar does (you can check USAO - pendulum for some references)

actually ill just make u an example isntead
i replaced this jump pattern here 02:02:412 - until 02:05:412 -

SPOILER

380,115,122412,5,12,0:1:0:0:
187,230,122599,1,2,0:0:0:0:
373,335,122787,1,2,0:0:0:0:
88,88,122974,5,12,0:1:0:0:
282,212,123162,1,2,0:0:0:0:
108,311,123349,1,2,0:0:0:0:
221,138,123537,69,12,0:1:0:0:
247,305,123724,1,2,0:0:0:0:
312,94,123912,5,14,0:1:0:0:
131,167,124099,1,0,0:0:0:0:
306,190,124287,1,8,0:0:0:0:
148,71,124474,1,8,0:0:0:0:
115,256,124662,5,10,0:0:0:0:
312,94,124849,1,8,0:0:0:0:
396,271,125037,1,8,0:0:0:0:
264,11,125224,1,8,0:0:0:0:

05:00:524 (2) - With this, do you mean that it's off the 'ka' vocal or that it's off in general?

the entire section gets fukd in general, listen for urself lol

Kibbleru wrote:

alright this is a lot less tilting to look at

00:44:775 (2,4) - i think ctrl g makes this pattern nicer imo fine ill switch it
00:57:912 (1) - imo its better to place this in the middle keeping at the left that when i placed on middle, distance snap destroyed so i keep on the left
01:46:474 (1) - the finish hitsound kind of lacks impact imo, maybe stack it with a clap too? added clap
same for everything else that is similar to this one ^
02:00:912 (1,2,3,4) - um. how do i explain this. i think you should keep this jump as a part of the same area of the playfield as the previous stuff? 01:59:412 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - (bottom left corner?)
02:28:568 (3) - whats with the random triplet here? if anything a triplet could do here 02:29:318 - cuz of this sound 02:29:224 - just as same as 00:26:233 (4) - and 00:32:046 (5) - it is supposedly that part is a high ds becuase of that silent finish.
03:04:664 (5,7) - space this more got it

05:00:524 (2) - woaah i suggest u get somebody to help you do some timing stuff. it gets wayyy off here.
some red lines probably needed found someone ! !

ok as i said on irc, i suggest you rework a few of the jumps in the kiai (ofc this applies for all the kiais)
sorting by priority here
02:02:412 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) -
01:59:412 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - 01:47:412 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) -
at the very least do something about the first one in the list. and ofc do the same to the other kiais. oh yea the other parts of kiai 2 too okok

i hope you can make some more structured jumps.
what do i mean by more structured? like the kind of stuff skystar does (you can check USAO - pendulum for some references) skystar has some really big ds, ill try my best to make more structured jumps ! i know its a loved map, but its also rankable jumpy

actually ill just make u an example isntead
i replaced this jump pattern here 02:02:412 - until 02:05:412 -

SPOILER

380,115,122412,5,12,0:1:0:0:
187,230,122599,1,2,0:0:0:0:
373,335,122787,1,2,0:0:0:0:
88,88,122974,5,12,0:1:0:0:
282,212,123162,1,2,0:0:0:0:
108,311,123349,1,2,0:0:0:0:
221,138,123537,69,12,0:1:0:0:
247,305,123724,1,2,0:0:0:0:
312,94,123912,5,14,0:1:0:0:
131,167,124099,1,0,0:0:0:0:
306,190,124287,1,8,0:0:0:0:
148,71,124474,1,8,0:0:0:0:
115,256,124662,5,10,0:0:0:0:
312,94,124849,1,8,0:0:0:0:
396,271,125037,1,8,0:0:0:0:
264,11,125224,1,8,0:0:0:0:

overall i rework a few times of jumps at kiai parts. so here it is!
and fix some broken patterns

Updaet'd !

Zallies, were the red lines starting from 05:00:570 in the latest beatmap update or in an earlier one? There's been a lot of changes so I just need to make sure of some things.

hello
[General]
Unused hs:
Old\drum-hitclap.wav
Old\drum-hitfinish.wav
Old\drum-hitwhistle.wav
Old\soft-hitclap.wav
Old\soft-hitfinish.wav
Old\soft-hitwhistle.wav
Old\soft-sliderslide.wav
Old\soft-sliderslide2.wav
Old\soft-slidertick2.wav

Timing line conflicts:
00:47:423 - (volume level)
00:57:912 - (volume level)
02:32:427 - (custom set number)
04:32:397 - (volume level)
04:47:425 - (volume level)
05:50:997 - (volume level)
[My Love Story]
- 00:09:764 (1,1) - You can make some cooler sliders here imo, since these sounds stand out a lot. Even subtle wave sliders or something work.
- 00:24:546 (4) - Either two circles or circle + slider work here since the red is actually stronger here imo // 00:30:546 (5) -
- 00:30:921 (1,2,3,4) - Aesthetic stuff like this can be easily corrected if you moved 4 a bit to the right to form a nice square.
- 00:36:171 (4,5) - I think two 1/2 sliders work nicer since 00:36:733 - isn't very strong and 00:36:546 - is so covering this with a sliderhead and 00:36:733 - with an end works. You can apply this to all rhythms with 00:39:171 (4,5) - etc
- 00:44:775 (2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4) - Would be nice to see some snare emphasis instead of just.. constant jumps at the same DS relatively.
- 00:51:923 (1,2,3,4) - Not a fan of how 1, without vocals, gets put into a pattern consisting of otherwise only vocal sliders. I think you can make 1 stand out differently. // 00:54:923 (1,2,3,4) -
- 00:57:912 (1) - Timing is off here and continues for the whole map. This song has massive drifts in BPM so you need to time it accordingly. Either take it from the ranked set with permission from the person who timed it initially, or get someone to time this.
- 01:27:349 (3,4) - Could use more emphasis on 4 imo.
- 01:27:912 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - The music is increasing in intensity but all the jumps have similar DS. :/
- 01:36:912 (1,2) - One has two vocals the other doesn't, the first should be two circles at least imo.
- 01:39:724 (1) - I think this sliderend should be clickable since it's a lot stronger than the head.
- 01:43:755 (3) - Snare on head clickable snare on tail not clickable is ?? I think both should be clickable lol
- 02:02:412 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - Emphasis on the finishes are quite lackluster imo, you can make more contrast here I think by nerfing/buffing spacing on non-finish/finishes respectively.
- 02:18:162 (2,3,1) - Again finish has the least emphasis why? This happens throughout the map so look at all of your jump sections and make sure they have emphasis otherwise it just looks like jump-spam for no reason.
- 02:22:474 (4,1) - Swapping NCs here seems appropriate considering the snare.
- 02:32:427 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - There's so much spacing here for such soft sounds.. you can do like, stacks or really low spacing overlapped 1/2?
- 03:03:914 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - Emphasissssssssssssssssssssss...
- 04:59:211 (1) - Also think this should be clickable too.
- 05:54:788 (1) - End on the downbeat would sound better.
[ ]
Your jumps really need more emphasis atm they have like none, they're just jumps. And your rhythm is very plain and uninteresting when you put so many things as unclickable when they're strong in the song too. Work on these please.

Good luck!

noreply = fixed

hoping that ill this will be succes
thanks for the mods !

nm from my q

I looked at Mir's mod and decide to find something about jumps xd

00:26:233 (4) - do u really think there should have a note? like 00:29:233 - is ok since it's not clickable
00:30:171 - this should be clickable as music get a bit more intense here (and all the same part later)
00:36:546 (5) - ctrl+g
00:38:233 (7) - put it stack with 4 will make more sense
00:44:025 (3,1) - too close imo. just put 3 away like 491|27
00:45:150 (4) - stack with 2
00:51:923 (1) - ctrl+g to emphasize 00:52:298 (2) -
00:56:048 (4) - ctrl+g? up to u lol
01:42:747 (4) - put at 01:42:935 (1) - , while 01:42:935 (1) - stack with 01:42:560 (3) - (or somewhere like 332|107), then 01:43:122 (2,3) - ctrl+h to fit the flow
01:47:435 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - uhhh... too random imo
01:56:810 (3) - just put a slider here? blank at 01:56:810 (3) - in the intense part feels so weird
01:59:435 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - x_x

:skip some part since they are almost same as previous:

04:12:147 (3) - ctrl+g. i cant see the reason why it keep the same direction as 04:11:397 (1) -
04:54:925 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - bad geometry

uhhh lazy (run

wenever ur redy

Ametrin wrote:

00:26:233 (4) - do u really think there should have a note? like 00:29:233 - is ok since it's not clickable thers a hit finished
00:30:171 - this should be clickable as music get a bit more intense here (and all the same part later) piano is still playing/tried to 1/1 flow on the piano
00:36:546 (5) - ctrl+g making the ds too small
00:38:233 (7) - put it stack with 4 will make more sense guitar rise, making the ds too close
00:44:025 (3,1) - too close imo. just put 3 away like 491|27 woah i though making like ( ) srsly no
00:45:150 (4) - stack with 2 rhythm arent doing the repeated
00:51:923 (1) - ctrl+g to emphasize 00:52:298 (2) -
00:56:048 (4) - ctrl+g? up to u lol ^ same
01:42:747 (4) - put at 01:42:935 (1) - , while 01:42:935 (1) - stack with 01:42:560 (3) - (or somewhere like 332|107), then 01:43:122 (2,3) - ctrl+h to fit the flow making the ds arent so good every new nc, make a new jump pattern
01:47:435 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - uhhh... too random imo tried to make "= jump" xd
01:56:810 (3) - just put a slider here? blank at 01:56:810 (3) - in the intense part feels so weird vocal stopped ikr
01:59:435 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - x_x saem

:skip some part since they are almost same as previous:

04:12:147 (3) - ctrl+g. i cant see the reason why it keep the same direction as 04:11:397 (1) - sure
04:54:925 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - bad geometry

noreply_good

thans fr mdding !

Unused hitsounds:
Old\drum-hitclap.wav
Old\drum-hitfinish.wav
Old\drum-hitwhistle.wav
Old\soft-hitclap.wav
Old\soft-hitfinish.wav
Old\soft-hitwhistle.wav
Old\soft-sliderslide.wav
Old\soft-sliderslide2.wav
Old\soft-slidertick2.wav

Timings:
00:57:935 (volume level)
02:32:427 (custom set number)
04:32:397 (volume level)
04:47:425 (volume level)

make sure the red line and green line are the same volume and custom sample number!

Kibbleru wrote:

Unused hitsounds:
Old\drum-hitclap.wav
Old\drum-hitfinish.wav
Old\drum-hitwhistle.wav
Old\soft-hitclap.wav
Old\soft-hitfinish.wav
Old\soft-hitwhistle.wav
Old\soft-sliderslide.wav
Old\soft-sliderslide2.wav
Old\soft-slidertick2.wav already done removing all of it

Timings:
00:57:935 (volume level)
02:32:427 (custom set number) guitar on the default of soft-hitwhistle
04:32:397 (volume level)
04:47:425 (volume level)

make sure the red line and green line are the same volume and custom sample number!

nore_ply= fix

fix some patterns for aesthetics
and fix the inherited volumes

thanks !

Timings:
02:32:427 (custom set number)

Holy... is very cool <3 I love it

almost forgot hehehe done xd

b

!!!

04:11:397 - Timing from this point on is slightly off. Notes like 04:11:772 - 04:12:147 - 04:12:522 - etc etc are all off.
05:41:439 - Additionally off-timed section.

I really think this map needs way more intricate timing. supercell songs usually have very bad tempo consistency. Try to ask some people that are proficient with timing.

Yukiyo's map has a lot more complex timing. Maybe you can ask to use that timing from pimpG?

Oh yeah provided that gets fixed just get a rebubble.