1. osu! forums
  2. Beatmaps
  3. Ranked/Approved Beatmaps
show more
posted

[ Kohioma ] wrote:

Hi
Goodbye:
  • 00:03:605 (1,2) - blanket?
    00:29:985 (3) - move up a little for the better blanket
    00:31:485 (4) - ^
    00:45:525 (1) - move left for the better flow
    00:59:787 (5) - correct blanket
    01:14:037 (5,1) - ^
    01:23:787 (2) - move this up to avoid overlap
    01:36:724 (5,1) - blanket
    01:36:724 (5,1) - ^
    02:20:412 (1,1) - ^
    02:29:037 (5,1) - correct this
    02:41:039 (6,1) - blanket maybe
    02:41:039 (6,1) - ^
    03:37:851 (5) - move right a little for the better flow
    04:17:772 (2,4) - correct blanket
    04:24:522 (5,1) - ^
    04:47:425 (1) - move left for the better blanket
    05:00:524 (2,3) - blanket
    05:00:524 (2,3) - ^
    05:15:149 (3,4) - ^
    05:26:211 (5,2) - ^
    05:26:211 (5,3) - ^ too maybe

Nice map, good luck
the god blanket! JOKE XD

Lets just say that all the blankets fixed and the other non blankets are few mods that i fixed
but ofcourse, Thanks for the MODS!! its helpful as always
posted

-himei wrote:

ayyyyyyyyyyyyyyy here we go
m4m
00:14:141 (1,2,1,2,1) - these seemed inconsistent for me, i dont really understand the placement you choose there...
00:23:046 (1) - do you really need that slider? i think you shud delete it from reasons of to keep the melody following cuz i follow the flow and emphasizing
00:24:548 (4,1) - ds seems inconsistent here
00:38:046 (5,2) - overlap?
00:50:423 (1,3,4) - can you place the (1) in the middle between 3 and 4? i think it will look better nein
01:36:162 (4,5) - you can make the blanket with sliderstart of (5) to the (4) slider
01:48:162 (3) - place it in the middle of the screen with 90% angle? i mean you got 01:47:412 (1,2) - these things mirrored tho what i did there is make them a line and 5 degree.
02:35:052 (2,3) - what sound you emphasizing with these? seems overmapped
03:21:726 (4,2,1) - these ones seemed inconsistent
04:50:425 (1,2) - make them stacked?

Overall i like this song.
Some parts are overmapped, but i think its a good map!
good luck
no reply = fixed
ty for mods~
posted
From in game reqs

Goodbye

00:05:855 - this inherit point could be here better 00:06:605 - no need for that 1/2 to be slowed
00:17:421 (1) - pretty strong and different sound maybe spaced it more from the previous to emphasized it
00:17:608 - spinner would fit here more than next maybe add 2 spinners in row will fit fine
00:38:796 (2,4) - make like this to avoid the overlap it will look lot cleaner

00:44:400 (4) - nc here 00:44:775 (1) - remove nc 00:45:900 (3) - nv 00:46:275 (1) - remove nc
01:23:787 (2) - maybe move to x6 y218 to avoid overlap also the wierd spacing because
01:27:537 (4) - ctrl g for better flow its strong sound a flow break would fit better
01:35:224 (1) - dont like the 1/4 in strong drum beat maybe try 2 clickable notes and stack on top of 01:35:412 (2) -
01:36:724 (5) - ^ like u did here 01:38:225 (4,5) - just be more consistent about rythm
03:06:914 - u could have change the direction on every downbeat instead of going all circular flow
04:39:522 (2) - nc sv change no one expect that
04:42:897 (1,1,1) - no need nc here imo
05:42:939 (3) - move to x354 y86 and blanket the head with 05:42:189 (1) -

I hope i helped good luck!
posted

Lilyanna wrote:

From in game reqs

Goodbye

00:05:855 - this inherit point could be here better 00:06:605 - no need for that 1/2 to be slowed
00:17:421 (1) - pretty strong and different sound maybe spaced it more from the previous to emphasized it
00:17:608 - spinner would fit here more than next maybe add 2 spinners in row will fit fine
00:38:796 (2,4) - make like this to avoid the overlap it will look lot cleaner

00:44:400 (4) - nc here 00:44:775 (1) - remove nc 00:45:900 (3) - nv 00:46:275 (1) - remove nc
01:23:787 (2) - maybe move to x6 y218 to avoid overlap also the wierd spacing because
01:27:537 (4) - ctrl g for better flow its strong sound a flow break would fit better this is supposedly upward sliders
01:35:224 (1) - dont like the 1/4 in strong drum beat maybe try 2 clickable notes and stack on top of 01:35:412 (2) -
01:36:724 (5) - ^ like u did here 01:38:225 (4,5) - just be more consistent about rythm its okay to have a 1 slider 1/4
03:06:914 - u could have change the direction on every downbeat instead of going all circular flow
04:39:522 (2) - nc sv change no one expect that
04:42:897 (1,1,1) - no need nc here imo
05:42:939 (3) - move to x354 y86 and blanket the head with 05:42:189 (1) -

I hope i helped good luck!
no reply = fixed

Thanks for the Mods~!
posted
hello o/

00:17:421 (1) - that should be a long good looking slider, the break is weird

00:25:110 (1) - this slider should be more spaced

00:48:173 (2) - this should be the new combo, the circle before still the old combo

01:00:537 (3,4,5,6) - that symetrical square is weird, because the rest of the map isn't symetrical at all

02:58:664 (1,2,3,4,5,1) - i think this would play better if u make it like this https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/6221847

03:03:914 (1,2,3) - why are these circles no jumps?

03:11:226 (1) - could be more spaced

03:15:726 (2,3) - weird to play

03:29:414 (1,2,3) - i think you should switch number 2 and 3 here

03:41:414 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - i really like this pattern and i think it's very good xD just saying

04:07:847 (2) - i think something like this would be better https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/6221900

04:09:897 (1,2,3,4) - these should be jumps too

04:16:459 (1,2,3,4) - switch 2 and 3?

04:18:709 (1,2,3,1) - should be like this https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/6221951

04:21:334 (4,5,6) - i would switch 5 and 6, but it's not that important

04:27:709 (6,1,2,3,4,5,6) - i think a repeating pattern is better in this case https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/6221987

04:29:785 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12) - it's very weird that you have almost no hitsounds

04:30:910 (1,2,3,4) - 2 reverse arrows are enough since this is only 160bpm, and the reverse arrows are too close: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/6222035

04:32:397 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - this stream gets stacked for no reason

04:33:147 (1) - just remove this, or make it at least 1 white tick shorter

04:35:397 (1,1,2,3,1) - i think the circle would be better placed like that https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/6222081

04:42:897 (2) - at the end of this slider you have to go back

04:45:897 (4) - should be more spaced

04:47:425 (1) - should be more spaced

04:50:237 (4) - why is this no circle?

05:21:899 (1,2) - not necessary -> should be a stream

05:22:649 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - should be way more spaced

05:26:774 (2,3,4) - I would switch 3 and 4. but how to deal with the combo after this?

05:33:899 (1,2) - remove these

05:36:524 (1,2,3) - make slider jumps https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/6222175

05:40:689 (3,4,5,6) - switch 4 and 5?

05:50:032 (4,1) - looks better like this https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/6223292

05:52:870 (2,3,4,5) - switch 2 and 5 to make it more readable

05:54:908 (1) - ends to early

i hope that helped <3 gl on ranking this
btw the jumps are perfect, im very bad at jumping but I almost fc'ed this map
posted

-Tatsuo wrote:

hello o/

00:17:421 (1) - that should be a long good looking slider, the break is weird this should be a title screen

00:25:110 (1) - this slider should be more spaced slider is enough to move more

00:48:173 (2) - this should be the new combo, the circle before still the old combo ill keep, cuz i hate if you nerf the slider to 6 so I do 1-4 number slider only and its good thou

01:00:537 (3,4,5,6) - that symetrical square is weird, because the rest of the map isn't symetrical at all its symmetrical if you take a longer look (lol idk english .-.)

02:58:664 (1,2,3,4,5,1) - i think this would play better if u make it like this https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/6221847 from the past, it should be a line "+" since i added triplet and so there it was. and take a look of 02:59:414 (1,2,3,4) - this

03:03:914 (1,2,3) - why are these circles no jumps? cuz the beat of the song is low, so theres no need to blast jumping

03:11:226 (1) - could be more spaced ds pls

03:15:726 (2,3) - weird to play k

03:29:414 (1,2,3) - i think you should switch number 2 and 3 here too much jump

03:41:414 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - i really like this pattern and i think it's very good xD just saying

04:07:847 (2) - i think something like this would be better https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/6221900 no cuz the beat sounds like 1/3. And if you do a triplet ill just stack them.

04:09:897 (1,2,3,4) - these should be jumps too like i said before

04:16:459 (1,2,3,4) - switch 2 and 3? no its fine to play

04:18:709 (1,2,3,1) - should be like this https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/6221951 past mods they told me its OVERMAP, so i have to reduce it since its a 160bpm

04:21:334 (4,5,6) - i would switch 5 and 6, but it's not that important it is. the song btw

04:27:709 (6,1,2,3,4,5,6) - i think a repeating pattern is better in this case https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/6221987 haha I know the patterns, but i dont want my map to be simple and i dont like repeating patterns. so i changed it.

04:29:785 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12) - it's very weird that you have almost no hitsounds the song, cant hear the hitsound, so i low the volume

04:30:910 (1,2,3,4) - 2 reverse arrows are enough since this is only 160bpm, and the reverse arrows are too close: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/6222035 i follow the per beats. and 04:33:147 (1) - here cuz the next part will be many stream ehhh :v

04:32:397 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - this stream gets stacked for no reason if you love to map a stream maps you;; definitely youll know

04:33:147 (1) - just remove this, or make it at least 1 white tick shorter no

04:35:397 (1,1,2,3,1) - i think the circle would be better placed like that https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/6222081 i prefer this pattern, youll know at my past mods XD

04:42:897 (2) - at the end of this slider you have to go back meni mappers also use this

04:45:897 (4) - should be more spaced nein

04:47:425 (1) - should be more spaced nah its okay to blanket and if you play it, they no idea where are they lol

04:50:237 (4) - why is this no circle? yeah cuz i changed alot after they mods, so added some triple.

05:21:899 (1,2) - not necessary -> should be a stream at the end make it intense but the first 2 slider, is the low and to high

05:22:649 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - should be way more spaced too much space stream. fun fact, supercell dont have stream songs lol

05:26:774 (2,3,4) - I would switch 3 and 4. but how to deal with the combo after this? its too close to the next pattern to switch them

05:33:899 (1,2) - remove these NO.

05:36:524 (1,2,3) - make slider jumps https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/6222175 dude ITS OVERMAP please stop. and this should be a insane difficulty. And your suggestion? i dude do from supercell songs and no insane diff would do that

05:40:689 (3,4,5,6) - switch 4 and 5? no. why do you always want to switch this kind of pattern?

05:50:032 (4,1) - looks better like this https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/6223292 the slider 4 and the next part is slow pattern so its gonna be reducing now.

05:52:870 (2,3,4,5) - switch 2 and 5 to make it more readable its a slow pattern, you dont need to jump this section

05:54:908 (1) - ends to early btw though. do you map? as you can see here, easy to normal only use to (1 circle/slider 1/2) (but if your diff is hard or high can use 1 slider/circle 1/4)

i hope that helped <3 gl on ranking this
btw the jumps are perfect, im very bad at jumping but I almost fc'ed this map
Sorry!!! i didnt see good enough to your mods :<
keep in mind that be mindful of the mods, it can change the creator patternz
but you did your best! I hope one day you'll be a PRO Modder!
Just think what a player will say to you to your mods
no kd

But..
THANKS FOR YOUR HARD WORK! THANKS FOR THE MODS!~
posted
lol
posted
i want this ranked
posted

hi-mei wrote:

i want this ranked
ples rank my button
posted
hey i posted one of my first mods here.. time flies D:
posted
hellohello, m4m from #modreqs

theonlydiff:
  1. 00:11:068 (2) - im pretty sure you should fix timing here, slider tail doesn't land on sound properly (listen on slow speed)
  2. 00:22:858 - leaving end of spinner for this sound doesn't feel natural to me, i think you should shorten spinner, silence its end and put note here (also this suggestion would justify two ncs in a row 00:23:046 (1,1) - )
  3. 00:44:775 (2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4) - are you sure that you don't want to raise space here since sounds become louder? (don't make pp pls, just make first one very short and raise them gradually
  4. 00:47:400 (1) - this stands wrong on timeline (should be first tick of next red section)
  5. 00:47:798 - missing beat here is odd
  6. 00:57:912 (1) - this is too early for this circle
  7. 02:28:568 - you don't miss these sounds usually
  8. 02:33:927 (3) - maybe cool slow slider for guitar?
  9. 03:40:664 (1,2,3,4) - didn't get what this stands for
  10. 04:33:897 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,1) - would be cool if you made spacing raise gradually

Such decent quality! Gj and good luck with this one (cant believe im saying this, i hate pp) (my map for m4m)
posted

Zallies wrote:

hi-mei wrote:

i want this ranked
ples rank my button
ok i change my mind
too hard 4 me

lets do dis

"My Love Story".

h4d0uk3n1 wrote:

theonlydiff:
  1. 00:11:068 (2) - im pretty sure you should fix timing here, slider tail doesn't land on sound properly (listen on slow speed)
  2. 00:22:858 - leaving end of spinner for this sound doesn't feel natural to me, i think you should shorten spinner, silence its end and put note here (also this suggestion would justify two ncs in a row 00:23:046 (1,1) - ) i get that alot
  3. 00:44:775 (2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4) - are you sure that you don't want to raise space here since sounds become louder? (don't make pp pls, just make first one very short and raise them gradually uu
  4. 00:47:400 (1) - this stands wrong on timeline (should be first tick of next red section)
  5. 00:47:798 - missing beat here is odd est vocal
  6. 00:57:912 (1) - this is too early for this circle why?
  7. 02:28:568 - you don't miss these sounds usually
  8. 02:33:927 (3) - maybe cool slow slider for guitar?
  9. 03:40:664 (1,2,3,4) - didn't get what this stands for
  10. 04:33:897 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,1) - would be cool if you made spacing raise gradually
no re = fix
posted
eae bocetinha

mi lov stori

03:32:414 (1,2,3) - i think this not fit so good, for real, i think u only made this to use the clap in 03:32:789 - but u break the flow like that (and very hurt)

u could do the classic "pause-stack" (idk how name that xd) , but is That

rank pleaz
posted
i suc at modding
[My Love Story]
  1. 00:11:594 (1) - I would suggest having a different slider shape for this one. Like, say... A simple curve. imo, with that it can highlight the vocal in a way. Also for differentiation.
  2. 00:22:858 - Would be nice if the sounds here were to be played actively. I think what can be done here is by moving the spinner end to the white tick prior, lowering its volume, and putting a circle on where the end was.
  3. 00:28:110 (2,3) - Increase the spacing for consistency? (Reference: 00:27:735 (1) - having an increased DS together with the sound)
  4. 00:28:485 (3,4) - It seems that the piano thingy is followed more here. If so, the more appropriate patterning, imo, would be a 1/2 slider for 00:28:485 (3) - and a circle at 00:28:860 - .
  5. 00:39:171 (4,5) - Decrease spacing for consistency with 00:36:171 (4,5) - .
  6. 00:51:923 (1,2,3,4) - Just a minor suggestion. If the vocal is the main thing followed here, maybe try to have a different slider shape for 00:51:923 (1) - to "separate" it, in a way, with 00:52:298 (2,3,4) - . This may be applied to the others.
  7. 01:09:912 (1,2) - A normal 1/1, just like the others, should've been alright.
  8. 01:29:412 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - <3
  9. 01:44:412 (1,2,3,4) - Emphasis on notes here could be improved imo. Move 01:44:787 (3,4) - in a way that 01:44:787 (3) - could be highligheted.
  10. 01:43:662 (2,3,4) - 01:46:662 (2,3,4) - ... - This may cause a little bit of confusion. 01:46:662 (2,3) - is a 1/4 stack while 01:46:755 (3,4) - is 1/2. Players may, in some occassions, interpret 01:47:224 (4) - as a 1/4 note. I'm mentioning it just for a precaution. You could leave it as is if you want.
  11. 02:03:724 (2,1) - Could use a bit more space in between.
  12. 02:14:412 (1,2,3,4) - Making this part look more of a "Z" would be nice for aesthetics.
  13. 02:23:412 (1,1,2) - Remove NC at 02:24:162 (1) - . (Reference: 00:47:423 (1,2,3) - )
  14. 02:35:976 (2,3) - The current section of the map tends to not use the stacks like this one, unlike the prior. Consider unstacking for consistency.
  15. 03:11:226 (1) - Kinda weird to see a sudden 1/4 slider here, it kinda doesn't fit in this part. A triple would be nice. Buuuut that's all imo xd
  16. 03:32:601 (2) - Hm... I think try to do this slider thing on to 01:56:787 (3) - as well.
  17. 04:09:147 (2,3) - Lower the spacing? With the previous ones, the first two seem to have more.
  18. 04:14:022 (5) - Break down into circles like the others?
  19. 05:54:788 (1) - <3


holy shit this is really nice
RANK PLS
Hope it helped ;w;

Good luck! :D
posted

Ataraxia wrote:

mi lov stori

03:32:414 (1,2,3) - i think this not fit so good, for real, i think u only made this to use the clap in 03:32:789 - but u break the flow like that (and very hurt) change to 2 circles 1 slider

u could do the classic "pause-stack" (idk how name that xd) , but is That would be weird with no claps on it

-Harpuia- wrote:

[notice][My Love Story]
  1. 00:11:594 (1) - I would suggest having a different slider shape for this one. Like, say... A simple curve. imo, with that it can highlight the vocal in a way. Also for differentiation. using back and forth kaya hindi
  2. 00:22:858 - Would be nice if the sounds here were to be played actively. I think what can be done here is by moving the spinner end to the white tick prior, lowering its volume, and putting a circle on where the end was. sige na ngaa
  3. 00:28:110 (2,3) - Increase the spacing for consistency? (Reference: 00:27:735 (1) - having an increased DS together with the sound)
  4. 00:28:485 (3,4) - It seems that the piano thingy is followed more here. If so, the more appropriate patterning, imo, would be a 1/2 slider for 00:28:485 (3) - and a circle at 00:28:860 - .
  5. 00:39:171 (4,5) - Decrease spacing for consistency with 00:36:171 (4,5) - .
  6. 00:51:923 (1,2,3,4) - Just a minor suggestion. If the vocal is the main thing followed here, maybe try to have a different slider shape for 00:51:923 (1) - to "separate" it, in a way, with 00:52:298 (2,3,4) - . This may be applied to the others. no
  7. 01:09:912 (1,2) - A normal 1/1, just like the others, should've been alright. vocal on it red should be slider to make more intense but smh no
  8. 01:29:412 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - <3 <3
  9. 01:44:412 (1,2,3,4) - Emphasis on notes here could be improved imo. Move 01:44:787 (3,4) - in a way that 01:44:787 (3) - could be highligheted. i dont like making correct star but ill improve smh
  10. 01:43:662 (2,3,4) - 01:46:662 (2,3,4) - ... - This may cause a little bit of confusion. 01:46:662 (2,3) - is a 1/4 stack while 01:46:755 (3,4) - is 1/2. Players may, in some occassions, interpret 01:47:224 (4) - as a 1/4 note. I'm mentioning it just for a precaution. You could leave it as is if you want. theyre extras so i did was to stack becuase its too annoying
  11. 02:03:724 (2,1) - Could use a bit more space in between. overkill tbh
  12. 02:14:412 (1,2,3,4) - Making this part look more of a "Z" would be nice for aesthetics. this 02:14:787 (2,4) - im really following their closed up
  13. 02:23:412 (1,1,2) - Remove NC at 02:24:162 (1) - . (Reference: 00:47:423 (1,2,3) - ) gg i have to fix all nc from the end
  14. 02:35:976 (2,3) - The current section of the map tends to not use the stacks like this one, unlike the prior. Consider unstacking for consistency. its called pattern to make, its not like if you dont stack and the other section dont stack.
  15. 03:11:226 (1) - Kinda weird to see a sudden 1/4 slider here, it kinda doesn't fit in this part. A triple would be nice. Buuuut that's all imo xd hahah
  16. 03:32:601 (2) - Hm... I think try to do this slider thing on to 01:56:787 (3) - as well. weird no claps on it
  17. 04:09:147 (2,3) - Lower the spacing? With the previous ones, the first two seem to have more. nope should be big/increased
  18. 04:14:022 (5) - Break down into circles like the others?
  19. 05:54:788 (1) - <3 <3
HAHAHAH BAKIT AYAW MO TAGALOG ? !

noreply=good
posted

Zallies wrote:

HAHAHAH BAKIT AYAW MO TAGALOG ? !
Wala lang xd
posted
m4m from #modreqs

very repetitive song so a lot of what i say applies to many locations, im just going to post the timestamp of the first one to avoid clutter

00:03:605 (1,2,3,4,5) - so you used straight sliders for the first measure, then curvy sliders for the first half of the second measure, and then straight sliders for the last half. i'd either make 00:03:605 (1,2) - straight or 00:05:105 (4,5) - curvy just so you're dealing with this a bit more consisently

00:08:159 (3,4) - not sure these slider shapes are justified. sliders w/ red points like this are really harsh looking and it really doesnt fit how relaxing this part of the song is

00:11:068 (2,1) - i love the gradual slowing down but i feel like the last slider here is a bit too slow compared to the first two. speed up 1 or slow down 2

00:11:594 (1) - pretty sure this is mistimed, feels like it should be a bit later

00:17:421 (1) - this is a super sudden note, would make sense to break the established pattern. i'd go as far as to drag this note all the way to one of the corners

00:24:548 (4) - the piano sound on the red tick is held, so it would make more sense to do this part with a circle then a slider, rather than one 1/2 slider and a 1/1 pause

00:36:733 (5) - uncomfortable movement into this note gives it a ton of emphasis, but its just a hi hat sound. feels like the slider tail of 4 is much more deserving of emphasis than this note. maybe change 4 into a 1/2 slider, and then change 5 into two stacked circles?

00:39:171 (4,5) - although not uncomfortable movement, my same criticism applies with giving 5 too much emphasis. same goes for every reptition of this rhythm

00:48:173 (2) - just a general suggestion for this whole part, maybe you could try something where all notes with vocals are cuved sliders, and then all notes that are just drums/accompaniment are straight? it'd give the vocals a little bit more attention which i think would fit nicely

00:48:923 (1,2,3,4) - curves in these sliders dont make much sense to me. i'd sooner just do straight up and down sliders with each pointing into the next for comfortable movement

00:51:173 (3,4) - tilt these a liiiitle bit more up imo

00:51:923 (1,2,3,4) - these sliders break flow for no good reason. id change this pattern to have every slider flow into the next

01:17:974 (2,3,4) - i feel like this pattern puts emphasis on 3 which the song doesnt support. the other iterations of this rhythm do a good job keep emphasis about the same for each of the drum hits.

01:29:412 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - nothing really wrong with this section, i just feel like you could do a lot more here than just mapping the bass drum. again there's nothing technically wrong here so feel free to deny this

01:47:412 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - the vocals here change from being on every 1/2 to being every 2/1, yet the way you map these jumps feels exactly the same. check out the pattern at 01:19:125 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - in this map: https://osu.ppy.sh/b/844134 , i think something along these lines would really fit this part well. regardless of what pattern you choose to use, make sure it repeats every 4 circles to give emphasis to the vocals

01:56:787 (3,1) - i'd keep filler rhythm going and turn this into a 1/2 slider. really feels like these two notes are lacking the intensity that the rest of the chorus has

02:34:864 (1) - increase sv even more for this one or decrease sv for the prior slider just to exaggerate the contrast between the two

04:18:709 (1,2,3) - nc spam for emphasis?

04:24:147 (3,4) - dont hear any instrument playing on every white tick. doesn't make much sense for 3 to be representing two bass drums and then 4 to be representing one snare. should look visually different to highlight the difference between the sounds.

05:54:788 (1) - i feel like this slider should end on the white tick and not the blue tick. just change sv slightly to get it to snap to white tick

good luck!
posted

frogyfro wrote:

00:03:605 (1,2,3,4,5) - so you used straight sliders for the first measure, then curvy sliders for the first half of the second measure, and then straight sliders for the last half. i'd either make 00:03:605 (1,2) - straight or 00:05:105 (4,5) - curvy just so you're dealing with this a bit more consisently 00:00:605 - 1,3 are the same, 00:03:605 - 1,2 and 4,5 arent known as vocal change

00:08:159 (3,4) - not sure these slider shapes are justified. sliders w/ red points like this are really harsh looking and it really doesnt fit how relaxing this part of the song is oh straight slider?

00:11:068 (2,1) - i love the gradual slowing down but i feel like the last slider here is a bit too slow compared to the first two. speed up 1 or slow down 2 speeding up destroy rhythm tbh

00:11:594 (1) - pretty sure this is mistimed, feels like it should be a bit later no its fine

00:17:421 (1) - this is a super sudden note, would make sense to break the established pattern. i'd go as far as to drag this note all the way to one of the corners this is where the title started

00:24:548 (4) - the piano sound on the red tick is held, so it would make more sense to do this part with a circle then a slider, rather than one 1/2 slider and a 1/1 pause 00:25:110 - red tick is high rather than sliderend is the high

00:36:733 (5) - uncomfortable movement into this note gives it a ton of emphasis, but its just a hi hat sound. feels like the slider tail of 4 is much more deserving of emphasis than this note. maybe change 4 into a 1/2 slider, and then change 5 into two stacked circles? insane can make different pattern but not hard

00:39:171 (4,5) - although not uncomfortable movement, my same criticism applies with giving 5 too much emphasis. same goes for every reptition of this rhythm yes becuase the music is also repetition

00:48:173 (2) - just a general suggestion for this whole part, maybe you could try something where all notes with vocals are cuved sliders, and then all notes that are just drums/accompaniment are straight? it'd give the vocals a little bit more attention which i think would fit nicely no need to make all fit perfectly, such as pro mappers who don't need to fit every patterns

00:48:923 (1,2,3,4) - curves in these sliders dont make much sense to me. i'd sooner just do straight up and down sliders with each pointing into the next for comfortable movement just because you didnt agree the repeated slider with curve doesnt make not uncomfortable

00:51:173 (3,4) - tilt these a liiiitle bit more up imo change through top also next pattern

00:51:923 (1,2,3,4) - these sliders break flow for no good reason. id change this pattern to have every slider flow into the next downward pattern, why you always react on curvy slider

01:17:974 (2,3,4) - i feel like this pattern puts emphasis on 3 which the song doesnt support. the other iterations of this rhythm do a good job keep emphasis about the same for each of the drum hits. doesnt support? white tick which is high next is low so i stack rather do a jump

01:29:412 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - nothing really wrong with this section, i just feel like you could do a lot more here than just mapping the bass drum. again there's nothing technically wrong here so feel free to deny this

01:47:412 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - the vocals here change from being on every 1/2 to being every 2/1, yet the way you map these jumps feels exactly the same. check out the pattern at 01:19:125 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - in this map: https://osu.ppy.sh/b/844134 , i think something along these lines would really fit this part well. regardless of what pattern you choose to use, make sure it repeats every 4 circles to give emphasis to the vocals why you showed me an unrankable beatmap? tried to make higher ds modder didnt agree because its too overmap/overkill, and yea its also the same from vocal 1/2 at 1/1 looks like 1/1 vocal trying her best to get through the top so i make same pattern as before aka intense vocal 1/1.

01:56:787 (3,1) - i'd keep filler rhythm going and turn this into a 1/2 slider. really feels like these two notes are lacking the intensity that the rest of the chorus has red tick has nothing

02:34:864 (1) - increase sv even more for this one or decrease sv for the prior slider just to exaggerate the contrast between the two1,1 is a same music tbh

04:18:709 (1,2,3) - nc spam for emphasis? no its abuse

04:24:147 (3,4) - dont hear any instrument playing on every white tick. doesn't make much sense for 3 to be representing two bass drums and then 4 to be representing one snare. should look visually different to highlight the difference between the sounds. extra as much need to be highlighted, sometimes insane doesnt need to they focus on easy patterns.

05:54:788 (1) - i feel like this slider should end on the white tick and not the blue tick. just change sv slightly to get it to snap to white tick fix
updaet
posted
~Hello Zallies!

ah i love dat sonk

My Love Story


  1. 00:14:141 (1,2) - : The timing here is off 00:15:238 (2) - .The second note should land on the red tick instead and not on the blue one, which simply means that the bpm is wrong and not the offset. Try putting 76,40.
  2. 00:15:713 (1,2) - : Uh, exact same issue. Try putting 69,75 for bpm.
  3. 00:17:379 - , 00:20:421 - : Those bpm changes make no sense since the bpm is already 160 from 00:17:379. Re-adjust the timing from there to 160 bpm with the right offset.
  4. 00:17:421 - 00:20:421 - : Such an akward pause there, you should definitely map the held vocals.If you don't want, at least put a spinner to keep a rhythmically cohesion with the violins 00:20:421 (1) - .

  5. 00:26:329 (5) - : I don't hear any finish sound there to map an actual triple.If you put 25% speed,the actual finish sounds are located here 00:26:235 - and here 00:26:423 - which is a held one, there isn't any finish sound on the blue tick to differentiate the rhythm.Simply delete it and don't forget to unstack the circle cause different sound.

  6. 00:32:329 (6,1) - : Exact same issue.
  7. 00:32:985 (4) - : Why equal spacing with those 00:32:610 (2,3) - , you could emphasize it better.
  8. 00:35:796 (2,3) - , 00:38:796 (2,3) - : When you map a song, always keep the same emphasizing and spacing for specific sounds, for example these.You can't say ''oh i don't like this note's position here,let me space it out even if im abusing the sounds' emphasizing''.
  9. 00:36:733 (5,1) - : I don't hear any extraordinary rhythm change here for this huge jump, just place it a bit higher or something.
  10. 00:49:673 (3,4,1) - : You could emphasize those better with bigger spacing even if it's a calm part.
  11. 01:18:537 - : Hello?Held vocal?1/2 slider?

  12. 01:21:537 - : Completely bad decision to ignore the vocal's priority here and stop the whole rhythm for those beats' pause, trust me.Also what is this mapped to 01:22:287 (3) - ?What is it following?This is how you should map this whole part from 01:21:537 - to 01:23:037 -


  13. 01:24:537 - : Why dude lol, place a 1/2 slider for god's sake, it's a held one, you can't abuse the rhythm like that.
  14. 01:26:037 - : ^
  15. 01:29:412 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - : I don't understand your mindset here with this monotonous part.The vocals here are shouting at you ''MAP US'', why would you only map the repeatable beats here that the only reason that they exist is to keep the metronome in balance?Your song is all about the VOCALS :!: .
  16. 01:36:537 - : This should be clickable because it's a white tick and the tempo is getting more powerful.


  17. 01:43:474 (1,2,3) - : Completely wrong snapping here.This is a held vocal 01:43:474 (1,2) -and should be mapped as 1/2 slider with the second held vocal also, which is starting from the red tick - 01:43:849 - , not on the blue one.(put 50% or 25% speed to notice it).Overall, this is the correct way on how you should map this part



  18. 01:46:474 (1,2,3) - : I won't write the explanation twice, from now on i will just type ^ for those.
  19. 01:49:474 (4,1,2) - : ^
  20. 01:55:474 (1,2,3) - : ^
  21. 01:58:474 (1,2,3) - : ^
  22. 02:01:474 (4,1,2) - : ... ^
  23. 01:52:474 (3,4) - : You should map a 1/2 slider here since you already mapped the vocals 01:51:912 (1) -.
  24. 01:52:849 (5,6) - : Ctrl + G
  25. 02:16:287 (3,1) - : You should map a 1/2 slider here since you already mapped the guitar sounds 02:13:287 (3) - ,02:14:412 (1) - .
  26. 02:28:568 (3) - : What is it mapped to?This is overmapping, delete it.
  27. 02:31:662 (3) - : lol same, there aren't any drums to place reverse ticks, map 1/2 slider
  28. 02:35:414 - : The offset is off, it should be 155.441.Don't forget to snap the notes later
  29. 02:39:820 - : You should definitely take advantage of the vocal's effect here and add a note for triple.
  30. 02:40:664 (3,4,5) - : Just do this please, never start sliders on blue ticks


    I can't type again the explanation behind the pauses so yeah
  31. 02:46:664 (4,5) - - : Do this
  32. 02:54:726 - : Add circle then make those as 1/2 slider 02:54:914 (1,2) -
  33. 02:57:539 (5,1,2,3) - : These should be like this
  34. 03:00:539 (5) - : Please 1/2 slider
  35. 03:05:414 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - : Yeah again these, rewatch the line for this from above
  36. 03:19:476 (1,2,3) - : God damn again these, you need to remap them dude, so lets start, ^
  37. 03:22:476 (1,2,3) - : ^
  38. 03:25:476 (4,1,2) - : ^
  39. 03:28:851 (5,6) - : Ctrl + G
  40. 03:31:476 (1,2,3) - : ^
  41. 03:32:414 (1,2,3) - : Ctrl + G
  42. 03:34:476 (4,1,2) - : ^
  43. 03:37:476 (4,1,2) - :... ^
  44. 03:47:441 - : Again, the offset is off, put 227.441
  45. 04:08:434 - : Offset should be 248.434
  46. 05:04:461 (1,2,3) - : And it keeps going ... ^
  47. 05:07:461 (4,1,2) - : ^
  48. 05:25:649 (3,4,5) - : Simply do this
  49. 05:28:649 (4,5,6) - : Same thing
  50. 05:29:399 (1,2) - : You should map two 1/2 sliders here.
  51. 05:48:157 (4,5) - : They should be clickable too aswell
  52. 05:54:788 (1) - : 💟, it should end here 06:02:468 - .

omfg finally i finished,i feel drained

~Overall it's a beautiful map but on some parts, the rhythm needs some rework, that's why i wanted to mod your map. Gl!
posted
believe it or not i was actually gunna mod this when u first showed me this map.

but i didnt because these kinds of sliders 00:36:171 (4) - 01:08:412 (1) - 01:53:412 (1) - 02:06:537 (3) - etc
that have just one anchor point that is just BARELY curved tilt the FUK out of me LOL

so if u change all those sliders i might come and mod this :^)

u have some 3 options to fix them, make them a normal curved slider, straight slider, or curve them more so that the anchor point actually does something

PS 01:11:412 (1,3) - space this more
show more
Please sign in to reply.