1. Legend (6.32 stars, 1433 notes)
2. Tatsujin (5.51 stars, 2189 notes)

Legend - by Spaghetti

Tatsujin - by Raiden

KwaN Sheep must be on every DF map.

Modders/Checkers

Kaifin
Mikii
fieryrage
Raikozen
TheShinyGlaceon
handsome
Xbox
Cryptic
smallboat
newyams99
Ascendance
CelsiusLK
Bakari
Yuii-
CelsiusLK
Ascendance

VINXIS wrote:

im gya

Kaifin wrote:

hi match maker omar has sent me on a quest to mod your map

LEGEND

1. 00:00:425 (1) - the very start of the map was very disorientating for me on my first 2 plays of the map, i understand if you want to keep it as is but i think it would improve sightreadability just a touch if the first stream was some kind of reverse kick slider lead in? just a thought, it was fine once i knew it was coming but stream starts are generally disorientating when its literally the first note of the map, maybe i should get good xd idk what you mean about the kickslider thing, but it is a rough start, one retry though should be enough to get it, will change if others complain
2. 00:17:834 (1) - while fixing stack, it feels like this is really clumped, even though i see what you're doing with the 3 and this note's slider end, maybe give it more space to breathe? i think its fine o-o
3. 00:22:808 (1) to 00:39:906 (3) - wat are the whistles in this section following they feel super random and inconsistent unless i'm missing something, i think you should consist the whistle rhythm you are, the drums in the song play like this in only this section for some reason, delete the notes and listen
4. 00:50:165 (1) - i like this slider shape and the idea but this is a literal jump scare at this slider velocity, perhaps meet in the middle at like 1.25x rather than this HYPER SPEED you got going on, i like it personally though so its up to your taste, i just think it'd improve sightreadability this way will change if complained about again but sudden music sudden placement xd
5. 02:06:020 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - i think this would look nicer if the curves were slightly more defined, your choice but it'd really emphasize it a lot better with more actual pen movement instead of this literally just being a straight stream more or less i think its k
6. 03:41:150 (3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10) - i think i see where you're going with this stream shape, but it really looks sort of unshapely/unfitting as is, i'd recommend reworking this one, perhaps smoothing it out a bit? y tho it looks good imo maybe i just have shit taste

fieryrage wrote:

00:12:238 (1,2,3,4) - golly gee 12 seconds in and already huge star jumps dam will nerf if brought up again
00:40:994 (7) - having a straight up slider here is like ugly for flow wht make it so it goes to the right for flow thx i dont agree i think its better for it to point up to the triple
00:50:165 (1) - tbh just make this a circle instead of a slider, fits the music better (if you keep the slider silence the fuckn slider end thx) fixed slider end XDxddx
01:12:083 (1) - overlap this with 01:11:305 (5) - for muh aesthetics xDDd ?
01:22:497 (1) - why didnt u silence sliderticks on these sliders think of the people who dont use map hitsounds man cuz itd be inconsistent
02:14:570 (2) - basically same thing as 01:01:513 (2) - i think this could be made better by making the slider go vertical instead tho ur cray
02:15:658 (7) - nc muh consistency
02:21:098 (3) - put slider curve thing in the middle so its not ugly pls this is a special kind of nazi mod
02:57:316 (1) - i'd say add a break here instead but ur already barely at 5 minutes so get fucd and beats are way too strong to add a break
03:21:875 (1,2,3) - this triangle could use a bit more spacing since it's pretty not spaced compared to the beginning, this basically goes for all triangles after na i think its fine considering the pattern
03:29:026 (3) - SIOLENCE UR FUCKING SLDIERNDS i think its fine
03:34:000 (3) - ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >
04:05:554 (2,3,4,5) - might be better as single 1/4 sliders instead? ur FUCKing crazy
04:16:590 (1) - not equal spacing even tho distance snap says it is sv change
04:38:352 (3) - more slider dn silences g
04:49:699 (3,4,5) - ur asking for sliderbreaks here at the very end pls dont who tf would sliderbreak on these

handsome wrote:

00:04:155 (1,2) - 1/1 slider so that its different than 00:02:912 (1,2) - why tho lol
01:46:590 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - i th9ink somethjing like this fits better as it fits the drum kicks appropriately http://i.imgur.com/rwiEAoN.png i prefer wot i did
01:55:140 (2) - space this much further, and add a note here 01:55:140 (2) - , it would be much smoother and readable that way, plus it makes sense wtf there was supposed to be a triple on there LOL
01:56:072 (1) - why not a 1/4 slider its kinda supposed to be a copy paste of 01:54:829 (1,2,3,4,1,2,1,2,3,4) -
02:13:171 (4,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - try ctrlh so the jump section goes in the opposite direction, different from the previous kiai
02:15:347 (5) - and u could nc this too
02:20:943 (1,2,3) - prettty sure its 1/6 check with someone on this its not, there's 4 obvious guitar notes there, slurred in 12 34 pairs
02:30:735 (7) - zero emphasis on the finish here, u even know that cuz u put gfreenline 4 hitsounds n shit, do something here most probably change 02:30:580 (5,6) - into a 1/4 slider and maybe just mqaybew NC is haha instead of the one in front lo ima leave it how it is i think its fine since the stream accelerates towards the finish
02:33:611 (2) - delet this imo keeping it consisten is a coo l thing 02:29:492 (1,2) - the difference is that thers no guitar note on the earlier one :d
02:40:839 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - ur favourite mem is better tbh http://i.imgur.com/5sTECNk.png I disagree!
02:46:279 (7) - u should increase sv for this slider tbh y the stream is low spaced and its not a high pace section of the song
03:05:554 (4) - sick meme do a triple instead please else whats the difference lol from the others thats not fun tho
03:13:171 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - y od u random switch between guitar n drum guitar and bass and ill change if someone else mentions
03:22:808 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - wrong pattern, the sound follows the dowmbneat, so its more like http://i.imgur.com/kcRcx1W.png following guitar wh

1. 00:03:533 (4,1,1) - Since there's emphasis on these guitar parts and you represent them with sliders, 00:04:621 (3) - this should be represented as well but you kinda started it late with 00:04:777 (4) - .
2. 00:11:927 (3) - This note particularly sticks out in this jump section especially since it's part of 00:11:616 (1,2,3,4,5,1) - the square pattern, so move it slightly to the right, which would make the spacing more even.
3. 00:24:051 (1,2) - CTRL+H, makes this flow a lot better imo
4. 00:24:984 (3) - You should move this slightly down to make the spacing for 00:24:051 (1,2,3) - consistent and even.
5. 00:26:228 (4,5) - The flow of these 2 notes leading to the (1) slider is kinda jagged, so maybe have this like
   SPOILER

   
6. 00:29:026 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4,1,2,3) - You have like a cool circular motion kinda going on around here in terms of cursor movement, but all of a sudden these 00:32:134 (4,5,6,7) - kinda breaks the flow of it, so maybe have something like this to keep it going?
   SPOILER

   
7. 00:33:378 (3,4,5,1) - This pattern here is rather obtrusive because the distance from (3,4) is rather big and then the distance becomes extremely close for (4,5), to then becoming relatively big again. It also makes for awkward movement, so mayb something like
   SPOILER

   
8. 00:41:461 (1) - Don't you think this should be moved so the jump DS here can be consistent with the rest? Suggestion - x:231, y:257
9. 00:44:414 (3) and 00:47:678 (1) - CTRL+G, flows better imo
10. 00:51:720 (5,1) - If you're gonna separate these with NC, might as well do it with 00:52:342 (6) -
11. 00:59:803 (4,5) - CTRL+G, flows better when it leads to 01:00:114 (1) - imo
12. 01:07:264 (3) - Move this slightly down so all three 01:06:331 (1,2,3) - are spaced evenly from one another
13. 01:21:720 (3,4,5) - This triplet would look much nicer if moved slightly more to the left so the pattern is that of an equilateral triangle xd
14. 01:29:647 (4,5) - CTRL+G, flows better when it leads to the next slider imo
15. 01:31:513 (2,3) - I think it would be cool to CTRL+G these two since it would reciprocate the same movement as 01:32:134 (5,6) -
16. 01:36:798 (1) - NC on this should be unneeded since it doesn't end on a downbeat and also since you decided to split the NC on the first portion on 11 notes, then removing NC would also have the second portion end on 11 notes.
17. 01:38:041 (3,4,5) - I think this would flow a lot better if suggested:
    SPOILER

    
18. 01:42:393 (6) - NC
19. 01:54:829 (1,2,3,4,1,2,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - I think the NC's here can cause some reading issues and needs tidying up: 01:55:295 (1) - Remove NC and then 01:56:072 (1) - Remove NC.
20. 02:04:777 (1,2) - The jump spacing on this should be the same as 02:04:466 (4,5) - to make it consistent
21. 02:24:051 (1,2) - CTRL+G and then move 02:24:362 (1) - as suggested so it flows a lot better:
    SPOILER

    
22. 02:26:538 (1,2,1,2) - Why the small spacing here? This part is emphasized and so these jumps should be larger.
23. 02:35:088 (5) - I know I'm a fan of the whole anti-slider movement, but in this case, I think it plays much more better if you CTRL+G this.
24. 02:38:507 (2) - There's a lil' distinguishable drum hit at the slider end so I think in order to represent that better is to reduce the slider to the previous blue tick and then place a note on the white tick. Something like this:
    SPOILER

    
25. 02:41:461 (1) - Why did you split the NC here in the middle of the 5-note stream? Remove NC and add the NC at 02:41:305 (6) -
26. 02:44:570 (1) - CTRL+G and then 02:45:191 (2) - CTRL+G this; flows better imo considering the movement of 02:44:414 (4,1) -
27. 02:48:300 (1,2) - Switch these two since (1) is where the long-held vocal starts. If you do, I would suggest the pattern here would look like this:
    SPOILER

    
28. 03:10:684 (1) - You should lower down the second anchor point, so the slider looks a lot more curvy.
29. 03:14:880 (2,3,4) - CTRL+G, flows better imo
30. 03:16:279 (4) - I think CTRL+G'ing this would play nicer
31. 03:36:020 (3) - Hehehe
32. 03:40:528 (1) - CTRL+G this and then copy/paste slider, then CTRL+J and CTRL+H, so overall it looks like this (flows really well imo):
    SPOILER

    
33. 04:01:357 (3) - You should move this slightly to the right so 04:00:424 (1,2,3) - spacing between these three are the same from one another.
34. 04:24:673 (1,2,3,4,5) - This anti-stream is not only evil, but can really catch people off guard xd, so CTRL+G it?
35. 04:56:228 (5,6) - This part here kinda bugs me; even thought the song is slowly dying out, this part here is still a lil' emphasized, so the spacing between the two shouldn't be that close. I suggest moving (6) like directly at the center of the grid cuz it's cool like that xdd, or maybe somewhere around there.

1. Tag conflict.

1. CS 2 please.
2. 00:00:891 (6) - Either make this a concave slider with the cave downward or tilt it to be slightly more parallel with the upcoming stream.
3. 00:01:357 (5) - You can do something prettier than a nasty right angle. Maybe have 00:01:046 (1,2,3,4) - arch upward a bit so you can do a sort of downward curve with 5?
   
   ^

   
4. 00:04:155 (1) - Rotate -5?
5. 00:04:777 (4) - Make horizontal parts of this slider slanted more. It'll help better catch the momentum from the 3.
6. 00:20:321 (1,2) - Partially blanket the 00:20:632 (3) - with the 1, then use a flipped version of 1 to replace 2. It looks better and flows better for the eyes.
7. 00:20:787 (4,5,1) - This plays better to me blanketing where 00:19:388 (1) - was. If you move it, you'll have to rework the position of 00:21:098 (2) - but I think its worth it.
8. 00:25:917 (3) - Find another sound other than default hit-whistle, it just sounds eh.
9. 00:27:005 (2,3,4,5) - These are spaced similarly to your opening, which is significantly more intense. Maybe nerf the spacing here a bit.
10. 00:32:601 (7) - Move to x186 y282? It plays a bit better, though the spacing may be too large if you do that. The current jump pattern of 00:32:290 (5,6,7,1) - just seems unnecessarily awkward.
11. 00:42:083 (5) - Because of 00:41:616 (2,3) - , I feel a two circles instead of the slider would be better.
12. 00:50:165 (1) - This feels better CTRL+G'd but it screws up everything else so I dunno. I just don't like the antiflow from the 00:49:855 (3) - here.
13. 01:09:129 (1,1,1) - Rework the placement of these to make the back-and-forth jumps flow a bit better. At the moment it feels like a kind of crooked-like z pattern. Maybe put a curve on the path of them, like this?
    
    ^

    
14. 01:20:010 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,1) - You can do something more creative than just a circle here... The slider on the end is also begging to blanket something and it blankets nothing.
15. 01:37:108 (2) - Move to x114 y171 as when I first played through the spacing wasn't indicative of a 3/4th slider into a 1/4th.
16. 02:26:694 (2,1,2,1) - This almost feels like a jump slow down pattern. I think it plays pretty awkwardly, but moving the 02:27:005 (2) - should fix that up quickly.
17. 02:32:134 (1) - IT BENDS TO THE MUSIC GOD BLESS YOUR SOUL.
18. 02:40:217 (2) - Maybe a wave slider here instead. This pattern just seems a bit boring for a section that has this kind of... looming intensity.
19. 03:26:072 (7,8,1) - This is a super awkward jump transition. Maybe lower the 1 a bit or something, but what you have now just feels awkward.
20. 03:29:026 (3,1) - Exaggerated spacing in my opinion. Move the 3 a bit closer to the 1.
21. 03:36:020 (3) - This slider's anchor points are atrocious... but I like it.
22. 04:05:088 (2,3,4,5,1) - This spacing seems abnormally high for the intensity of the song.
23. Pretty solid map overall. I think the quality of the map got better the farther you got into the map, but I think the song gets better later on so maybe you were just enjoying yourself more? Regardless, hope this helped.

Xbox wrote:

Here ya go \o/
Nice rainbow bg
[Legend]

1. 00:03:533 (4,1,1) - Since there's emphasis on these guitar parts and you represent them with sliders, 00:04:621 (3) - this should be represented as well but you kinda started it late with 00:04:777 (4) - . whaa look at the first one too, theres the same guitar note on the circle before as well.
2. 00:24:051 (1,2) - CTRL+H, makes this flow a lot better imo i dont agree
3. 00:26:228 (4,5) - The flow of these 2 notes leading to the (1) slider is kinda jagged, so maybe have this like loses emphasis of vocals so noty
4. 00:44:414 (3) and 00:47:678 (1) - CTRL+G, flows better imo i think its fine, and the second suggestion breaks a pattern
5. 00:59:803 (4,5) - CTRL+G, flows better when it leads to 01:00:114 (1) - imo will change of others mention
6. 01:07:264 (3) - Move this slightly down so all three 01:06:331 (1,2,3) - are spaced evenly from one another way too big, no thanks
7. 01:31:513 (2,3) - I think it would be cool to CTRL+G these two since it would reciprocate the same movement as 01:32:134 (5,6) - i like how the next pattern works with this one
8. 01:36:798 (1) - NC on this should be unneeded since it doesn't end on a downbeat and also since you decided to split the NC on the first portion on 11 notes, then removing NC would also have the second portion end on 11 notes. warns the sudden sv change
9. 02:04:777 (1,2) - The jump spacing on this should be the same as 02:04:466 (4,5) - to make it consistent why so nazi lel
10. 02:26:538 (1,2,1,2) - Why the small spacing here? This part is emphasized and so these jumps should be larger. leading to the slower sv
11. 02:35:088 (5) - I know I'm a fan of the whole anti-slider movement, but in this case, I think it plays much more better if you CTRL+G this. i disagree, i think it fits the random hihat
12. 02:38:507 (2) - There's a lil' distinguishable drum hit at the slider end so I think in order to represent that better is to reduce the slider to the previous blue tick and then place a note on the white tick. Something like this: would be inconsistent
13. 02:48:300 (1,2) - Switch these two since (1) is where the long-held vocal starts. If you do, I would suggest the pattern here would look like this: i dun wanna ignore drum kicks
14. 03:40:528 (1) - CTRL+G this and then copy/paste slider, then CTRL+J and CTRL+H, so overall it looks like this (flows really well imo): what i have is a triangle pattern though D:
15. 04:01:357 (3) - You should move this slightly to the right so 04:00:424 (1,2,3) - spacing between these three are the same from one another. too big
16. 04:56:228 (5,6) - This part here kinda bugs me; even thought the song is slowly dying out, this part here is still a lil' emphasized, so the spacing between the two shouldn't be that close. I suggest moving (6) like directly at the center of the grid cuz it's cool like that xdd, or maybe somewhere around there. it makes more sense to leave it small cuz of the fadeout though

Cryptic wrote:

here at your request bicboi plz dont urt m bb, sry 4 w8
[Generic CS 5 Diffname]

1. 00:01:357 (5) - You can do something prettier than a nasty right angle. Maybe have 00:01:046 (1,2,3,4) - arch upward a bit so you can do a sort of downward curve with 5? it has a slight tilt so i think it looks fine
2. 00:20:321 (1,2) - Partially blanket the 00:20:632 (3) - with the 1, then use a flipped version of 1 to replace 2. It looks better and flows better for the eyes. thats how i had it before but handsome gave me what's here now and i like it better :d
3. 00:20:787 (4,5,1) - This plays better to me blanketing where 00:19:388 (1) - was. If you move it, you'll have to rework the position of 00:21:098 (2) - but I think its worth it. plays better how i have it imo
4. 00:25:917 (3) - Find another sound other than default hit-whistle, it just sounds eh. im not using any default hitsounds and im following the percussion exactly
5. 00:50:165 (1) - This feels better CTRL+G'd but it screws up everything else so I dunno. I just don't like the antiflow from the 00:49:855 (3) - here. the antiflow follows the pattern before it
6. 01:09:129 (1,1,1) - Rework the placement of these to make the back-and-forth jumps flow a bit better. At the moment it feels like a kind of crooked-like z pattern. Maybe put a curve on the path of them, like this? i playtested both ways and i think what i have looks fine and looks a bit better
7. 01:20:010 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,1) - You can do something more creative than just a circle here... The slider on the end is also begging to blanket something and it blankets nothing. i think the circle looks nice, and does 01:21:098 (1,3,4,5) - count for the blanket? xd
8. 02:26:694 (2,1,2,1) - This almost feels like a jump slow down pattern. I think it plays pretty awkwardly, but moving the 02:27:005 (2) - should fix that up quickly. the sv completely drops to .5 though whaa
9. 02:40:217 (2) - Maybe a wave slider here instead. This pattern just seems a bit boring for a section that has this kind of... looming intensity. im a simple man
10. 04:05:088 (2,3,4,5,1) - This spacing seems abnormally high for the intensity of the song. i gotta get the triangle dude :^). for real though, i got many testplays and the flow of the spacing beforehand seemed to compensate for it