p/5242755
mmmm I'm not sure how the QAT will handle this situation, since the mapping contribution from the set owner is less than the one from guest. There was some discussion in t/468358&start=0 and seems mostly everyone disagree, so I'm curious if mapping less is allowed now, since there was a case were a map got DQ because of this already, so I guess the same should apply to this map.
mmmm I'm not sure how the QAT will handle this situation, since the mapping contribution from the set owner is less than the one from guest. There was some discussion in t/468358&start=0 and seems mostly everyone disagree, so I'm curious if mapping less is allowed now, since there was a case were a map got DQ because of this already, so I guess the same should apply to this map.