[_Chichinya_] wrote:

jai jai mod req via PM!!!


[General]

- Up the HP to 6
- Up the OD to 7
^ Too harsh, no
- and ... IDK xD

[La unica diff !]

- Yes translate that XD, Change this to k... 00:30:362 (92) ok - and this to d 00:30:195 (91) changed 90 - sound better for me
- change to D 00:30:529 (93) - Nothing to emphasis
- add a note here 00:54:445 (279) - and change to k 00:54:529 (280) -
- add a k here 00:59:445 (317) - OK
- add a d here 01:04:779 (364) - OK
- delete this one 01:05:279 (369) - OK
- add a k 01:09:945 (415) - No, remain 3-plet patterns here
- change to k 01:10:362 (419) - ^
- change to k 01:39:862 (672) - No, low pitch(compared to next SE)
- add a k 02:01:945 (99) - no
- change to k 02:02:112 (101) - OK
- add k 01:58:195 (63) -
- add a k here 02:08:945 (165) -
- idk i thing about this 02:22:529 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122,123,124,125,126,127,128,129,130,131,132,133,134,135,136,137,138,139) - but... in my oppinion you need fix it (? seens overmapped... idk why Changed some note ( except for this part 02:31:862 (121,122,123,124,125,126,127,128,129,130,131,132,133,134,135,136,137,138,139) - this part fit amaizing XD )
- change to k 02:35:195 (147) -
- same here change to k 02:35:779 (150) -
^ Don't see a point
[Comments]

and this is the end :3 :^) other stuff are good for me xD hahaha good map good song i hope you get Luck ranked this

[-Matt-] wrote:

hi! from irc
move 00:41:945 (180) - to 00:42:445 - and make it a k (same structure as 00:40:195 (164,165,166,167,168,169,170,171) - ) nope
00:59:779 - k (theres a ringing noise in the bg that stands out here) I see your point but this ruin the consistency

01:18:529 - 01:38:195 - (all the kkk d kkk d should be ddd k ddd k, same with the d k k d k k d, it should be k d d k d d k, (keep finishers as finishers)) nope, D fits the emphasis SE
02:00:862 - do a 1/6 dddkkkd here, (theres a drum in the bg that goes for this whole section) Could not hear that 1/6 sound
im not going to mod the cancer stream of death lol.
03:19:695 (540) - d, (same pitch as 03:19:362 - ) nope, the SE is same pitch with the prev note

03:27:862 - 03:38:529 - same as before, kkk d kkk d > ddd k ddd k, keeping finishers ^
03:43:862 (112,113) - ctrl+g, (matches music better) OK
03:49:195 (129,130) - ^ ^

im also not modding this cancer stream of worse death either lol

04:49:112 - k (theres a drum sound here) nope, cannot hear that sound

sorry about bad mod

crazy map, but nice regardless. gl!

ZTH wrote:

Hello~ From my modding queue.

General

1. No general issues here.

Taiko Detonator

1. 00:45:195 (206, 224) - The use of don/kat in this short stream doesn't follow the music that well. You seemed to use dons on every white ticks, but these parts have the increased/emphasized melody so kats work better here. Try experimenting the image below (doesn't have to be exact):
   
   ^ Well, idk how to fix, followed ur pattern
2. 01:01:612 (338) - change to d for smoother flow. k feels abrupt. OK
3. 01:12:779 (441) - move this note to 01:12:945. The new 1/4 break seems to emphasize the previous and next note better. idk, remaped this part, hope I did not made it worse
4. 01:17:195 (482,496) - This short stream also doesn't sound appealing. 01:17:779 (489,490) - Ctrl + g for these two notes? Because 01:17:862 (490) definitely needs to be a k, considering the next notes (which have the same exact sounds) are k. ok
5. 01:28:695 (576,577) - Ctrl + g. 01:28:862 (577) has a much higher pitch than the previous note so k suits better. No, this one follows the another SE
6. 01:44:945 (710) - change to d for smoother flow. (There are too many kats here, which quite overpowers the song.) changed as dkkdkkk
7. 01:58:279 (65,66) - Ctrl + g. Ascending pitch so dk applies better. OK
8. 01:59:862 (78,94) - This stream just sounds so random and I really can not figure out the style you are going for here. (Care to explain for an inexperienced modder like me? ) Because I would place kats on those accentuated melodies instead (like the image below). Fixed this stream
   
9. 02:23:862 (18,19,20,21) - I really don't hear any 1/6, as well as other 1/6 in this stream. (The 1/6 starting at 02:31:862 is fine though. Can hear the subtle beats)
10. 02:50:195 (265,266,267,268) - Again, can't hear any 1/6. (Seems like there are more 1/6 patterns later on with inaudible 1/6)
    ^I do hear the 1/6 SE
11. 02:50:529 (269,270,271,272,273,274) - These pattern feels a bit odd, considering the doublets in kiai are all either kd or dk. Either change these doublets to dk/kd for consistency or use more dd/kk.
    ^fixed a bit
12. 03:38:029 (88,89) - Ctrl + g for smoother flow. Made it both k
13. 03:58:862 (214,215,216,217,218,219,220,221,222) - Instead of ddk dkk dkk, go for kkd dkk kdd? Seems more consistent when you look at the previous patterns during kiai (and flows better). ok
14. 04:02:195 (250,251) - Ctrl + g. There's a large bass drum (and snare?) happening on the first note so kd fits better.
15. 04:12:862 (379,380) - Ctrl + g. Same reason as above.
    ^ ok
16. 04:21:196 (479) - change to k. d sounds a bit bland here.
    ^ctrl + g with next note instead
17. 04:21:446 (482,483) - Ctrl + g. Same reason as above but the other way around.
    ^blah, change too much here, mainly ooxooxoxooxooxox here
18. 04:39:112 (696,697) - Ctrl + g. Simply sounds better.
    ^fixed in my own way
19. 04:54:112 (840,841) - Ctrl + g. Loud bass drum and snare(?) on the second note, which serves better as a k. ok
20. 05:06:029 (945) - change to k. d really sounds bland.
21. 05:13:195 (1007) to 05:15:862 (1040) - The last stream suddenly becomes simple and independent to the song, despite you using complex patterns during the rest of the map. This quite kills the flow so I recommend you to make this last stream a bit more complex.
    ^OK
    
    

General an alright map, but the use of dons and kats seems a bit arbitrary at some times. Plus, the use of 1/6 is really questionable. Might want to get more experienced modders on that.

Still, GL with your map~

1. 00:35:529 (123,124,125,126,127,128,129) - I recommend to use kkkkkkd because the sound doesn't give any feedback for another d. Maybe you wanted to create your own rhythm, but currently pattern is odd and to me, not pleasing to play. (03:50:195 - you did it here as well)
2. 00:46:195 (218,219,220,221,222,223,224) - Currently this pattern does somehow fit the melody, but I call this rather clustered. Because of that, you can consider having only 1/4 instead. Maybe this needs more reconsideration from more parties.
3. { 00:57:195 ~ 01:02:362 - I suggest to remove all notes and remap this part with 1/1 don and follow higher pitcheds sounds with kat like this. It's not because pattern structure is bad; actually it is quite good. It is rather because you can't emphasize this and upcoming parts well enough. 00:57:195 differs from previous part in pace, yet it contains the same amount of notes which makes everything feel the same.
4. 01:02:529 ~ 01:06:529 - Same here, just with the difference to have a kat every second beat: Picture
   } If you've done what I suggested in these two sections, the upcoming part at 01:07:862 - should be much more emphasized than before, which rises the quality of the beatmap due to having contrast. Have a picture of the two sections together:
   
5. 01:15:362 (88) - kat? To me it seems to fit better with previous pattern at 01:13:862 - due to amount of kats it provides.
6. 01:15:862 (468,469,470,471,472,473) - ddk kkd try this out. Seems to be more accurate to the melody.
7. 01:17:862 (489,490) - Swap these notes. To be honest, it doesn't make much sense to suddenly place the don one tick later; it makes the pattern unconsistent and misses the significant bass-beat in the background.
8. 01:18:529 ~ 01:29:195 - How about every second kkk is a k k in the part, so the upcoming one has a little higher impact with a higher density of kats?
9. 01:26:695 (556,557,559,560,562,563) - Consider deleting these notes, so the finishers stay alone and upcoming part has even more impact! The song having no notes at this part would support this idea as well.
10. 01:18:529 ~ 01:39:862 - Additionaly, I believe this part can act as chorus, so kiai would be possible for this one. It is very emphasized due to finisher anyway.
11. 01:41:862 - Patterns like this one I believe, would be better to map with the song as xooxoox. Having own patterns is fine, especially for varity, but I'm not sure if it is a good move doing so when there is a clear sound which goes in this given way.
12. 01:44:529 - ^
13. 01:50:529 (1) - Considering using finishers for these notes due to the sound in the music. Not a must. Just an idea of mine for varity.
14. 01:59:862 - Second half of stream doesn't seem to fit anyhow to the melody and beat, so that's why I suggest you somethign like this:
    
15. 02:22:529 - About the kiai I won't say anything in specific now beside a comment about the 1/6: There are no 1/6, but it can be fine since it is used in a very consistent way. Dispite that, I recommend you to change every note before the 1/6 to a kat, so playing them is way more appealing since switching hand becomes easier. I am talking about patterns like 02:23:779 (17,18) -
16. 02:26:445 (51,52) - Additionally, if people can agree with 1/6, please keep it as dddk and don't change it out of the sudden. Else it can be considered as random as there is no other kddk which would backup this pattern.
17. 02:44:029 (206,207,208,209) - I see no reason for a dkkd here. Keep it consistent or else just use finishers in general. But tbh, I believe finishers would be more appropriate here, e.g. as D k.
18. 02:45:195 ~ 03:06:529 - You have to reconsider the whole 1/6 use. This is a part which would be worth to disqualify for, since you are using 1/6 in a very incosistent way on places where 1/6 are not given. This is very problematic as it makes look like very random, while without, it would be very clean. My recommendation is to either remove all 1/6 or, if you really insist in having some, have them at the end of a section as you did at 02:50:195 (257,258,259,260) - . So your next 1/6 would be at 02:55:529 -.
19. 03:10:362 (451,452,453,454,455,456,457,458,459,460,461,462,463,464,465,466) - Just want to mention that I think this fits well, even though it is an odd pattern.
20. 03:27:862 ~ 03:33:195 - Same suggestion as before: every second kkk to k k ? But this time you don't need a kiai.
21. 03:35:695 (67,68,69) - k D please. Having no finisher at the beginning of this section makes upcoming one feel odd.
22. 04:01:195 ~ 04:43:862 - Recommending to cut the stream. Consider following: You have a 42 sec long stream with very complicated patterns and additional 1/6 + the fact that this song is over 5 minutes long which makes missing here a very unforgiving thing. Beside that, I believe cutting it gives out a better structure and makes it not appear to be too monotonous. You can have for example at 04:03:529 - just two 1/2 kats which would fit perfectly to the piano. Later, at the second part of the kiai, you can consider having a longer stream.
23. 04:11:862 ~ 04:17:196 - Second half of the kiai can be improved I would say because, currently the patterns sound very random to me as they don't match the melody so well. Instead of calling out specific things, I will just give you a pattern which might bring up ideas for you for a new structure. Current one I gave is a bit improvised, but still follows at some degree the melody in a consistent way:
    
    
24. 04:42:529 - This time recommending to have no 1/6 at all. After such a long and tiering stream, I think it is unforgiven to have suddenly these 1/6 bursts. It is to me at this point rather a combo breaker and doesn't have much connection to the previous 1/6.
25. 05:07:862 (967,968,969,970,971,972,973,974,975,976,977,978) - It would be nice if this pattern is like the one at 05:05:195 (945,946,947,948,949,950,951,952,953) - , so you have more consistency. Due to sudden pattern changes it becomes inconcistent and due to the, kinda messy.
26. 05:15:640 (1042) - kat

OnosakiHito wrote:

It is time for M4M!

[ Taiko Detonator]

1. 00:35:529 (123,124,125,126,127,128,129) - I recommend to use kkkkkkd because the sound doesn't give any feedback for another d. Maybe you wanted to create your own rhythm, but currently pattern is odd and to me, not pleasing to play. (03:50:195 - you did it here as well) -OK
2. 00:46:195 (218,219,220,221,222,223,224) - Currently this pattern does somehow fit the melody, but I call this rather clustered. Because of that, you can consider having only 1/4 instead. Maybe this needs more reconsideration from more parties. Simplified the patterns
3. { 00:57:195 ~ 01:02:362 - I suggest to remove all notes and remap this part with 1/1 don and follow higher pitcheds sounds with kat like this. It's not because pattern structure is bad; actually it is quite good. It is rather because you can't emphasize this and upcoming parts well enough. 00:57:195 differs from previous part in pace, yet it contains the same amount of notes which makes everything feel the same.
4. 01:02:529 ~ 01:06:529 - Same here, just with the difference to have a kat every second beat: Picture - checked the patterns, every second beat is k already
   } If you've done what I suggested in these two sections, the upcoming part at 01:07:862 - should be much more emphasized than before, which rises the quality of the beatmap due to having contrast. Have a picture of the two sections together:
   
   Yea, maybe you are right, changed.
5. 01:15:362 (88) - kat? To me it seems to fit better with previous pattern at 01:13:862 - due to amount of kats it provides. made it k kkk k
6. 01:15:862 (468,469,470,471,472,473) - ddk kkd try this out. Seems to be more accurate to the melody. ok
7. 01:17:862 (489,490) - Swap these notes. To be honest, it doesn't make much sense to suddenly place the don one tick later; it makes the pattern unconsistent and misses the significant bass-beat in the background. ok
8. 01:18:529 ~ 01:29:195 - How about every second kkk is a k k in the part, so the upcoming one has a little higher impact with a higher density of kats? Prefer current pattern, fits the song better
9. 01:26:695 (556,557,559,560,562,563) - Consider deleting these notes, so the finishers stay alone and upcoming part has even more impact! The song having no notes at this part would support this idea as well. Made it D k D pattern
10. 01:18:529 ~ 01:39:862 - Additionaly, I believe this part can act as chorus, so kiai would be possible for this one. It is very emphasized due to finisher anyway. Ok
11. 01:41:862 - Patterns like this one I believe, would be better to map with the song as xooxoox. Having own patterns is fine, especially for varity, but I'm not sure if it is a good move doing so when there is a clear sound which goes in this given way.
    ^ Changed a bit, not sure if it is good or not
12. 01:44:529 - ^
13. 01:50:529 (1) - Considering using finishers for these notes due to the sound in the music. Not a must. Just an idea of mine for varity. sure
14. 01:59:862 - Second half of stream doesn't seem to fit anyhow to the melody and beat, so that's why I suggest you somethign like this:
    ok
15. 02:22:529 - About the kiai I won't say anything in specific now beside a comment about the 1/6: There are no 1/6, but it can be fine since it is used in a very consistent way. Dispite that, I recommend you to change every note before the 1/6 to a kat, so playing them is way more appealing since switching hand becomes easier. I am talking about patterns like 02:23:779 (17,18) I think the current 1/6 patterns are good enough
16. 02:26:445 (51,52) - Additionally, if people can agree with 1/6, please keep it as ddd k and don't change it out of the sudden. Else it can be considered as random as there is no other kddk which would backup this pattern. That k is put because the SE pitch there is not same as others.
17. 02:44:029 (206,207,208,209) - I see no reason for a dkkd here. Keep it consistent or else just use finishers in general. But tbh, I believe finishers would be more appropriate here, e.g. as D k. I would like to end the stream with a d, ending this stream with a k is too awkward for me.
18. 02:45:195 ~ 03:06:529 - You have to reconsider the whole 1/6 use. This is a part which would be worth to disqualify for, since you are using 1/6 in a very incosistent way on places where 1/6 are not given. This is very problematic as it makes look like very random, while without, it would be very clean. My recommendation is to either remove all 1/6 or, if you really insist in having some, have them at the end of a section as you did at 02:50:195 (257,258,259,260) - . So your next 1/6 would be at 02:55:529 -.
    I reduced some 1/6 here
19. 03:10:362 (451,452,453,454,455,456,457,458,459,460,461,462,463,464,465,466) - Just want to mention that I think this fits well, even though it is an odd pattern. thx
20. 03:27:862 ~ 03:33:195 - Same suggestion as before: every second kkk to k k ? But this time you don't need a kiai. No change, reason mentioned
21. 03:35:695 (67,68,69) - k D please. Having no finisher at the beginning of this section makes upcoming one feel odd. Fixed with my own way
22. 04:01:195 ~ 04:43:862 - Recommending to cut the stream. Consider following: You have a 42 sec long stream with very complicated patterns and additional 1/6 + the fact that this song is over 5 minutes long which makes missing here a very unforgiving thing. Beside that, I believe cutting it gives out a better structure and makes it not appear to be too monotonous. You can have for example at 04:03:529 - just two 1/2 kats which would fit perfectly to the piano. Later, at the second part of the kiai, you can consider having a longer stream. I prefer making this whole kiai as stream, because the SE are given out non-stop which stream would fit more than cutting the stream.
23. 04:11:862 ~ 04:17:196 - Second half of the kiai can be improved I would say because, currently the patterns sound very random to me as they don't match the melody so well. Instead of calling out specific things, I will just give you a pattern which might bring up ideas for you for a new structure. Current one I gave is a bit improvised, but still follows at some degree the melody in a consistent way:
    
    
    I think 04:13:862 (398) - 04:14:529 (406) is the main problem ,fixed that place, but others are fine to me.
24. 04:42:529 - This time recommending to have no 1/6 at all. After such a long and tiering stream, I think it is unforgiven to have suddenly these 1/6 bursts. It is to me at this point rather a combo breaker and doesn't have much connection to the previous 1/6. There are very strong sound in the background music therefore I place these 1/6s
25. 05:07:862 (967,968,969,970,971,972,973,974,975,976,977,978) - It would be nice if this pattern is like the one at 05:05:195 (945,946,947,948,949,950,951,952,953) - , so you have more consistency. Due to sudden pattern changes it becomes inconcistent and due to the, kinda messy. Tried to fix this
26. 05:15:640 (1042) - kat OK

That's all about it from my side. I do say the map has potential. Many of the patterns you made are consistent and have an understandable connection to each other. Maybe the 1/6 can be debated about and I am sure there should be some discussion about it, but for now I believe, as long as they are consistent and not too hard, it should be fine. Some other patterns on the other hand need to be reconsidered, especially when it is about their density. What the map lacks most in some parts is contrast which give certain parts more or less impact.

For now I wish you good luck!

Ppus wrote:

[General]

I think you can change diff. name for inner oni or ura oni. Custom diff names are allowed in marathon
and, change OD to 6 or 5. Nah, 6.5 for challenge(Actually I plan to increase it to 7.5)

[Taiko Detonator]

00:27:445 - just add one d here For constant 3plets here and maintain consistency with the patterns after, rejected

00:35:695 (126,127,128,129) - instead of kkkd just put dddd
Rejected, does not give out lower pitch SE here
00:46:195 (218,219,220,221,222,223,224) - well... it's a good pattern, but... try change to dddkkkd
Prefer current one , sorry

01:47:445 (722) - k
does not match the SE, rejected
02:32:584 (132,133,134) - kkd this stream it's the because of 7*
Nope, SE are increasing pitch here. dkkd is for turning pitch
02:44:029 (206,207,208,209) - dddk
pitch are slightly high here, kkk fits more.
03:10:695 (458) - k I'll think about this

03:35:695 - kkd ddkkd weird, but I changed it to dkkdk

05:04:779 (938) - k
Don't see a point to change this note. Rejected

Good luck with rank!!!
short mod ;w;

Backfire wrote:

[General]

HP4 maybe? This is a very long map with lots of notes and the stream at the end will probably lead to many misses. I think HP4 helps them pass it easier.

lel why everyone ask me for HP change w, HP5 is for more challenging to pass map
[Taiko Detonator]

02:34:529 - until 02:42:529 - needs some good tweaks, it currently sounds and plays really messy. This part is a rest area
02:34:862 - k k k kkd
02:36:195 - k k kkkkd
02:37:529 - k k k kkd
^I am following drum sound here, and the drum does not have any pitch change, I'll reject all 3
02:38:695 - d kdk d kdk d nice, changed
02:39:862 - k ddk ddkkddk k I prefer not to use 3plets+ in this part, rejected
02:41:195 - d ddk kkkkd k d ^
Then the section is fine. I can explain them mostly as, well, it needs to be more k focused instead of don, and there is kind of messy use of finishers. I suggest NOT using finishers for this section because it becomes too hard to use them unless you sacrifice 1/4.
Oh, I see, removed all finishers.
03:39:862 - D here, because there is a clear cymbal crash, but also, delete this note here 03:40:029 - because it kind of clashes with that idea.
1st accept. 2nd rejected, I want to maintain the ddkdddkd... pattern here

04:48:529 - dkddk kkd because of the music here, also apply this to 04:53:862 - by making the stream dkddkdk One of the best maps ever made period.
Changed dkddk only

Thanks for mod, kds given

pmriva wrote:

00:55:852 - add some notes at the blank space No, those places are without any SE

00:56:862 - add 1/6 No, this place is a signal for a very different session cut
00:53:529 (272,273,274) - kkd
00:54:195 (277,278,279) - kkd Weird patterns, rejected
01:04:529 (360,361,362,363,364) - ddkdk Ok, it fits
02:16:362 (235,236,237) - ddk
02:42:529 (194,195,196,197,198,199,200,201,202,203,204,205) - kkkd kkkd kkkd Both reject, strange patterns

the rest are good, i love the longstream Thx!

lamkwokhot wrote:

Hi God /me runs
02:35:529 (148) should be a blue note rather than the current red one pitch is same as the previous one, reject
02:36:862 - 02:37:195 (154,155,156,157,158) should be kkkkd rather than the current dkddd kkddd instead, found it fits the rhythm better (there is a desending pitch flow here
03:42:029 (109) should be a blue note rather than the current red one This one has a lower pitch than the next note, moreover, this note does not belong to previous part.
03:47:362 (129) should be a blue note rather than the current red one ^
04:23:862 - 04:24:445 (519,520,521,522,523,524,525,526) don't understand why you cut your pattern with a ddkkddkk .-. or at least it should be a ddkkkkdd OWOb This is a symmetric pattern with the previous 32 notes, other patterns are too weird for me atm
04:34:529 - 04:35:112 (648,649,650,651,652,653,654,655) same as 04:23:862 - 04:24:445 This area does not give out dkkdkkdk pattern SE

minor changes~

Prophecy wrote:

00:40:945 - you're missing a note here. This area is obviously optional, I don't think it'll be good to add note here, I'll leave it as it is for now
00:45:195 (206,207,208,209) - start from here, you can add few 1/6, it's little bit like 00:35:529 (123,124,125,126,127,128) - , but the dense is not really high, 4 1/6 would be nice? Some baka BNs hate my use of 1/6.So Idk how to response to this
00:46:195 (218,219,220,221,222,223,224) - a little bit complex, simplify this. swapped 219,220 with 221,222
00:46:695 (225,226,227,228,229) - you dare it's d k d k d, check the music again. It is for consistency for the patterns.
00:55:862 (289,290,291,292,293,294,295,296,297) - why not combine this? you combine this type of note at 00:45:195
(206,207,208,209,210,211,212,213,214,215,216,217,218,219,220,221,222,223,224) - . The SE are weaker here so that I don't combine these notes together.
01:04:779 (363,364) - ddkkk or ddkdk? ddkdk
01:07:862 (394) - k to emphasise. I prefer k at another tick. Like this 01:08:195 (397) -
01:23:112 - maybe you missing a note? It is for purpose, in order to seperate the 2 SEs.

02:44:029 (206,207,208,209) - lol, same as 02:42:529 (194,195,196,197,198,199,200,201,202,203,204,205) - Did it already

[]
GL! your mapping skill improved a lot

Zetera wrote:

Hey, you asked for a m4m.

|00:26:529 (60,61,62,63,64,65) - Why are those kdk dkd? There doesn't seem to be a noise at the back of the triplet that should be emphasized with a k. What I thought of is kdd kkd kdd kkd for 00:26:529 (60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71) - . Applies for every instance of kdk dkd. But I feel weird if any 2 of the 3plets are same in 4 3plets.
|02:26:529 - This one caught me offguard, because putting 1/6 in a chaotic stream like that is quite demanding. This is the only 1/6-pattern that stands out from the others in the stream, and while it does make sense, I'd still make it simpler.
The SE pitch there is isolated from the other 4/1 pitch SE. Therefore I used a k there.
|03:10:779 - I'd change this into a d because dddkkk seems little intuitive to me. Changed to ddkdkk
|03:59:862 - I'd love to see this pattern simplified, though I could hit it properly, it was not nice and not easy to play. I don't know how to fit it as the SE are giving 1/6 beat at that time.

I'm afraid that's it, it is a really solid map. Sorry for pointing out the obvious.

Good luck, I'll star this as well.

sing216 wrote:

mod囉:@hi god

d = red note
k = blue note
D = Big d
K = Big k

[Taiko Detonator]
01:27:862 (564) - change to d and 01:28:029 (565) - change to k Rejected, I like to leave this pattern as it is.
02:09:362 (167,168,169) - change to ddk Ok
02:31:445 (116,117,118,119,120) - change to kddkk would be smoother FOR PP AND CONSISTENCY'S SAKE I ACCEPTED IT ! THANKS BOSS
02:39:028 (168) - , 02:39:529 (172) - , 02:39:862 (174) - , 02:41:195 (184) - change to D 咁樣好易miss, rejected
03:32:279 (37) - k move to 03:32:445 (38) - to be closer to the music
03:34:945 (60) - k move to 03:35:112 (61) - to be closer to the music
^Rejected, I am following the patterns used from 01:18:529 (494) -

Hope my advice can help you

TheShinyGlaceon wrote:

01:12:612 (437) - Switch to a don did this in self-mod

01:12:862 (440) - Switch to a kat ^

01:14:445 - add a kat Here to keep the rythm more nope, for consistency in 01:15:529 (464,465) -

01:44:862 (700) - add kat here so it sounds better with the high pitch Custom pattern here, moreover ddkdkkk is werid here

01:45:029 - Seems like u can add a 1/6 between the kat and the don but thats optional
^I'll leave it as it is.
01:47:612 (752) - Switch to kat For consistency, changed,Tho I think it would be a bit boring

02:45:695 (224,225) - i would perfer that u Switch these two using Ctrl+G ?
I think I did it in self-mod so yea
I haven't much to fix on this map since its already really Good

(These changes might sounds different for you since i have a different hitsound)

i wanna See this map get ranked Only if BN gives a damn to me

I'll Keep Looking Through to see if i find anymore helpful changes

Still training to become a good modder hopefully this is helpful and i look foward to helping you again

Mihaugoku wrote:

KREYGASM

Really fun map!

Mihaugoku wrote:

KREYGASM

Really fun map!

ikin5050 wrote:

19:19 Chocola_2287: mod
19:19 Chocola_2287: weave
19:20 ikin5050: ohai
19:20 ikin5050: fucks sake
19:20 ikin5050: lol okay
19:20 ikin5050: ill do it now
19:20 ikin5050: havent warmed up anyway
19:24 ikin5050: wanna spec?
19:26 Chocola_2287: nop
19:26 Chocola_2287: playing other game
19:26 ikin5050: kk
19:28 ikin5050: gonna play ht hr and ill upload replay too
19:30 ikin5050: is there 1/8?
19:32 Chocola_2287: no
19:34 ikin5050: beginning feels like x.u with less 1/6
19:34 ikin5050: still waiting for massive stream
19:34 ikin5050: just back from 10 day holiday, rip stamina
19:36 ikin5050: about halfway through the first mixed long stream has patterns that are kd(dddk)
19:36 ikin5050: thats aids to play imo xD
19:42 ikin5050: i love playing it
19:42 ikin5050: the 500 note stream is so nice to play
19:43 Chocola_2287: :O
19:43 Chocola_2287: nice to hear that
19:43 Chocola_2287: sadly some shits do not know how to appriciate it
19:43 Chocola_2287: they just HLed all the 1/6 I used and say wtf are these shit
19:46 ikin5050: i mean this is basically the same argument as x.u.
19:46 ikin5050: does it fit the song? yes
19:46 ikin5050: is it nice to play? thats subjective
19:46 ikin5050: you could argue to map the last kiai without the long stream and to the music more closely with bursts and singles
19:46 ikin5050: but that would instead of making it a challenge diff make it another diff in the mainstream
19:46 ikin5050: this fits the music just as fine in my opinion
19:47 Chocola_2287: but seems some ppl would like to force me to cut the stream
19:47 ikin5050: plus bpm is generous
19:47 ikin5050: so 1/6 isnt too fast
19:47 ikin5050: you could do a second diff that removes a lot of 1/6
19:47 ikin5050: like i could help with that if you want
19:47 Chocola_2287: the piano voice are diffusing all over the kiai
19:47 ikin5050: then just have bursts and all instead of long stream
19:48 Chocola_2287: meh
19:48 Chocola_2287: I am too lazy to do one more
19:49 ikin5050: should i like help with it?
19:49 Chocola_2287: meh
19:49 Chocola_2287: I think it is fine as it is for now
19:49 ikin5050: okay if people bitch about it too much you could pull a lolcubes with hades: the end
19:50 ikin5050: gonna try weave just hr
19:50 Chocola_2287: lolcubes? is he even a BN?
19:50 Chocola_2287: I think he will be on BN's side more than in my side
19:51 Chocola_2287: i think ur map not newest...
19:52 ikin5050: blinking not on point for me
19:52 ikin5050: oh sorry ill update
19:53 ikin5050: okay
19:53 ikin5050: 02:23:779
19:53 ikin5050: that pattern is a bit eh
19:53 ikin5050: cuz its kkd(dddk)
19:53 ikin5050: which is a bit don heavy
19:54 ikin5050: if it fits with the music alright id suggest changing it to kkk(dddk)
19:54 ikin5050: just for general playability, in my view
19:56 ikin5050: 02:21:195
19:56 ikin5050: this spinner has 2 different notes/pitches in it
19:56 ikin5050: i'd change it to a regular slider and a finish slider
19:56 ikin5050: at 02:21:195 and
19:56 ikin5050: 02:21:862 until 02:22:195
19:57 Chocola_2287: i prefer u do forum post
19:57 Chocola_2287: I am not feeling well atm
19:57 ikin5050: k sorry

^Rejected lider and finisher slider, not really nice to put slider before that stream
02:25:112 - same as mentioned before
02:27:779 - ^ meh if you can change it to smth like kk(dddk) do it as long as it fits with music
02:29:112
02:30:529
^ Fixed already with Sayaka's help

00:46:195 - i feel this isnt the right pattern and that ddddddk would fit too Rejected, the last note must be d because heavy beat is heard at that tick
00:46:695 ---- 00:56:862 feel like it needs more notes, even though calm part the bpm isnt that high and just adding some more triplets wouldnt hurt This part is rather calm compared to the previous part, so I chose to reduce note density here
00:55:862 - stream up to 00:57:029 with 1/6 on 00:56:862, 00:56:918, 00:56:973, 00:57:029 Wut, pls no, that isn't a 1/6 beat in the music
01:41:862 - replace with doubles at 01:41:862, 01:42:112, 01:42:362
same at 01:44:529, 01:47:195, Possible, but would make the map a bit bored
02:00:862 - start 1/6 here? meh, make no sense


02:42:529 , 02:43:029 , 02:43:529 , 02:44:029 , 02:44:529 - i dont think these are the right pattern cuz pitch on first note is same as on last, so i'd change to kddk for all and kdddddk for the last one Will seek for more opinion for this
03:00:862 - dont hear a sound here for 1/6? following 02:55:529 (311,312,313,314,315) -
03:05:195 , 03:05:529 , 03:05:826 - i think adding 1/6 here is good because the music turns really fast repeat beats so i'd say make some interesting pattern like
03:05:195 starting
(kkkd)k(dddk)k(dkkd)k(dddk)kd
03:06:529 ending
I am not focusing on drum fx here.


as mentioned in the chatlog, i personally enjoy the long streams and think they fit well because they're beautifully crafted and play nicely, good luck

Shinzo- wrote:

★ ★ ★ Mod for Mod ★ ★ ★

[General]

1. maybe try to confirm the metadata since it's conflict with https://osu.ppy.sh/s/312935

Sent a metadata request to kwan

[Taiko Detonator]

00:56:195 - it just weird when you ignore the 1/4 sound that can be heard clearly and you layer 1/4 in 01:06:529 - where the sound is not exactly 1/4 what?
01:14:445 - you must add a k here for consistency with 01:09:112 - Did this in a reverse way
01:39:779 - seriously you can just delete this and change 01:39:862 (658) - to D since 01:39:779 - has no important sound( just an echo) and 01:39:862 - is really better to has a finisher since it was like changing to the next phase of the song
Accepted
01:41:862 (673) - 01:52:529 (16) - the pattern will be better and make sense if you change this to k rejected the 1st one, 2nd one accepted for flow and to make a different part in addititon, 01:57:862 (60) - changed this to k
02:19:862 (267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277,278,279,280,281,282) - ok imo this shouldn't be 1/4 like that, well maybe it's your style but hey what sound that you layer ? there's no 1/4 sound there, i just can hear that in 02:21:862 - instead. well if your style is following empty sound then it's ok tho Customized pattern here
02:55:529 - isn't the 1/6 starts 02:55:695 - here ? 03:06:195 - this one too Would like to seek more opinion about this, it is possible, but not really friendly pattern (for me, kkkd choke me more easily than dddk does)

Good Luck !

IamKwaN wrote:

Hello there, as per your request.

Title: Weave Detonator
Artist: Sampling Masters MEGA & Tatsh
Source: グルーヴコースター3 リンクフィーバー

References:
http://media.vgm.io/albums/91/18819/188 ... 126171.jpg
http://puu.sh/pZPAT/1639858b30.png from http://groovecoaster.jp/music/196_weavedetonator.html
http://puu.sh/pZPSQ/1986b5d61f.png from http://groovecoaster.com/

Good luck!

IamKwaN wrote:

It must be in the Source, same case for Anime opening/ending full versions and various kind of arcade game music remixes.

iloveyou4ever wrote:

When rank

_kumakichi wrote:

too pro too god cannot mod
stars given

good luck~

IamKwaN wrote:

so many hong kong taiko players i do not know o.o

ptar124 wrote:

Hey there, from in-game pm

Taiko Detonator

00:26:529 (60,61,62) - I dont really like how 00:26:695 (62) is a kat. I think this note is better off as a don. The notes that land on 1/2s up until that point is d-d-k-d-k-d-k-d but after that, it continues off the being kdk, hence changing the notes that land on 1/2s to k-k instead of the usual k-d. The parts after that triplet will not need changes since the pitch went down. kdd does not match the fx at all

00:46:862 (226) should be a kat because of the up-beat in the background. If you decide to change this, it may be better to tweak its surrounding notes so that you don't end up having 3 kats in a row. Also, if you decide to change, 00:47:195 (228) should still be a don because of the downbeat. Here's how I would do it https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/5578956 or maybe also make 227 a kat. I understand if you choose not to though, as the up-beat consists of both a kick and a snare and a don can still be mapped to the kick. Yea, it might fits the song but I would not change it because of my mapping style. Keeping this part simple would be better for me

01:07:612 (390) - imo, this could be a don but the way it is is also fine No change, would easily choke players

01:14:362 (454,455) - you sure you don't want to make this a triplet? Yes, no triplet here, I found out that 01:14:362 (451,452) - should not be connected because there is a change of the pitch.

01:28:362 (566,567,568) - you've been using DONs all the way up until here. You might want to keep the motif going and make all finishers in this section DONs or the way it is is also fine. Changed 566 only , 567 and 568 does not fit a D because 567 has higher pitch than 566 and have same pitch as 568

02:17:695 (247,248,249,250,251,252,253,254,255,256,257,258) - all of these start with kats and some also ends with kats. Imo, it makes the hitsounding lack the bass sound in general although the music hasn't change the slightest bit. You might want to add in some more dons. Changed, not sure if u accept this pattern or not,

02:22:529 (1) - Don't get me wrong, I did read the disclaimer about 1/6s but I think putting it in at the start of each measure (every 4 beats) really interrupts the flow of the music. Notice that I'm only saying the music because the map still flow just fine. I think you should at least let the music flow through for a little bit before choking. I think every 2 measures would be a good frequency which means that I think 02:23:862 (18,19,20,21) and 02:29:195 (86,87,88,89) should be made into 1/4. 02:26:529 (52,53,54,55) can stay as it can be used to emphasize the change of chords. Nope, the pitch goes up every 1st half measure and goes down every another half measure, this made the period 1 measure, therefore I used 1/6 4plets every single measure

02:37:195 (158,159,160,161,162,163,164,165,166,167,168,169,170,171,172,173,174,175,176,177,178,179,180,181,182,183,184) - I know that you have 1/4s but you should probably throw in some finishers. It sounds a little bit awkward. Uh, reused D for every single measure for better emphasis

03:50:529 (142) - you sure you want to start kiai here? Yes, this is a really clear sign that the song goes from soft to hard part

HP 5 is fine but I would prefer HP 4 or 4.5 given the already pretty high OD and the length of the song Fixed in the prev. mod

The map in general is of pretty good quality,there weren't anything that sounded awfully off either. I loved the last kiai so much lol, it looked hard but it's actually not that hard and it fits the song pretty well too. How the 1/6s are put into this map is also better than most I've seen posted in my queue (those who try to overmap 1/6s when they can't even make normal maps right, pisses me off to the point I sometimes reject their requests). In fact, it's one of the best ones I've seen. Hope to see this ranked