DoKito wrote:

04:11:208 - Maybe you can do something more intense here because of these whistles (?) in the background. ill remap this section soon its pretty terrible right now
05:24:089 (3) - You could turn this slider into a 1/8 kickslider. for the build up cymbal thing? feels weird to snap stuff when theres not strict notes there so na
08:16:753 - I like those expanding streams more. Maybe you can expand the streams here as well? or increase the SV in general with every new slider/stream. every 4th stream in this song im doing that separated-by-sliders thing tho
14:39:664 - Drag the break until here.tru

Oh boi. 23 minutes and all I got is 4 lines. thanks!!

Ponoyoshi wrote:

Hello, M4M

I don't know if it's allowed but some objects touching/being off of my screen like that
02:40:516 (4) - 04:03:593 (3) - 05:19:250 (3) - 09:55:511 (5) - 10:53:011 (3) - they're fine ingame lol. the editor squishes stuff near the bottom so there's enough room for the timeline at the top

12:15:664 (1) - Maybe doing more little sliders on this part ? reverse is good but kinda boring sometimes :/ song isnt really doing anything special so id rather keep it super calm. last time i mapped this at https://osu.ppy.sh/s/239360 i made it constant 1/2 sliders which was more intense than i liked g

14:01:789 (13) - combo isn't too much ? not all tha tdifferent from 07:46:389 (2) - the streams in this song

14:53:194 (1) - You'll do the timing later on this part ? [simple note] yeah timing will be fixed at some point lol

18:49:875 (3) - First play I miss that triple cause I mingled it with a double just before it, change the orientation of the triple could be good for people full comboing for 19 minutes i think reading a 1/2 stack vs a triple stack isnt gonna be much of a concern:(

22:50:534 (1) - Add some nice slider shapes here ? :< spin looks terribly exhausting [theanticlimax]

Well, sorry if my mod is bad, but your map is so cool ! ty!!

Left wrote:

M4M~

[Long Long map but Short Short mod]
02:57:593 (2,3) - I think just one slider is better. because there's no noticable beat in 02:57:708 (3) - and you used 02:55:516 (1,2) - like this. yes
03:27:247 (2,3) - ^ thers definitely a sound on 3 there tho lol
02:55:516 (1,2,1) - strong beat in tail of slider? how about this rhythm? http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/5439751 that follows percussion alright, but im focusing on the string instrument g
05:31:359 (3,1) - too close considering 05:31:495 (1) - 's beat is great establishing when to click stuff with variable timeline gaps more important than emphasis at this point
10:59:011 (2,3) - blanket very
12:27:664 (1) - why it's only 1/1 with missing one sound? only way to express the high pitch instrument lo
15:45:432 (2) - I thought this could be more suitable pattern according to music. http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/5439835 yes
16:22:805 (3) - ^ ctrl G liking the parallel on 1/2s actually (and i repeat the same thing later)
17:23:313 (4,5) - blanket
22:41:694 (5,6,1) - wow this part of song is amazing how about this? i think it needs more Distance to show tension of here. http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/5439885 yes
22:50:534 (1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1) - how about slider art? It's visually more appealing. i like how spinners are consisetntly the same. hard to do that with sliders unless i just make a huge circle shape then copy paste it for each spinner, which is just as dumb as repetitive spinners lol

OwO Good Luck! thank s!

Sharkie wrote:

[Extra]
(Uh, this map is perfect, as always. Just doing nazi things cuz there's nothing wrong.) g

1. 02:48:362 (2,2) - These don't look perfectly parallel to me (lol nazi af) yes
   
2. 02:52:170 (2,1) - You probably don't care, but its not a perfect blanket. yes
   
3. 03:09:708 (2,) - 03:10:747 (1) - Same thing as earlier. yesyes
   
4. Okay I'm going to stop pointing out blankets lol
   
5. 03:24:593 (1,2,3,4,1) - I found this kinda weird because you stacked on the snare hits but changed the spacing on a bass drum. Usually, you do the opposite. Unless you're following the chord change? I dunno fam. Just my opinion. stacking for the same sound then moving for different sound i guess
   
6. 03:27:824 (1,2,1,2,1,2,3,4,1) - So good om g g
   
7. 03:35:670 (1,2,3,4,1) - Same thing as 03:24:593 (1,2,3,4,1) -
   
8. 03:43:055 (1,2,3,4,1) - I guess it does make sense because the spacing and the rhythm has been consistent, so its logical. In any case, I'd just give the pattern some more thought about changing.
   
9. 05:48:950 (1) - Hmm, Maybe ctrl+g this? I think it makes sense with similar patterns like 05:50:859 (2,3,1) - . rather give the single circle->slider stuff sharp motion and the multi circle stuff continuous motion. just easier to play it like that
   
10. 09:20:011 (1,1,1,2,1) - For a second I thought it was a different map...? more like 7 different maps
    
11. 10:50:011 (1) - I think this jump's a tiny bit too big. Maybe not? Iunno. expressing intensity with low density rhythm means mlg spacing
    
12. 11:36:635 (1) - Not gonna make this a slider? I'm saaaad. slider was for whent here were multiple cello sounds
    
13. 13:52:601 (4) - Would you consider moving this to x:209 y:66, I think the larger spacing would fit. o k
    
14. 14:00:664 (1) - This stream was so badass it made my computer lag. G
    
15. 20:52:608 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - Kinda expected this spacing to be larger. did
    
16. 22:25:008 (1) - Really love this transition. i also like sliders
    
    Sharkie's Shitty Short Mods™
    t y! !

CaffeAmericano wrote:

Hi Pishi, M4M
Extra

• 04:27:380 - 22:37:663 - Timing point and inherited point volume conflict oops
  
  05:13:057 (3,4) - This seem to have almost twice the DS relative to comparable sounds the ones after this are even larger idk what u mean
  
  08:49:480 (1,6) - Shape looks similar, maybe you intended to stack these o ok
  
  08:34:753 (1) - 08:43:480 (1) - I think these can use larger jumps to emphasize snare progressive spacing more important than individual sounds right here

There's nothing wrong, why is this not ranked yet :/ I'm not gonna be helpful here, so I'll finish my M4M with another mapset you linked me.

Good luck~

• 07:46:207 -
  07:50:571 -
  07:54:935 -
  08:03:662 -
  08:08:026 -
  08:12:389 -
  10:02:011 -
  10:04:011 -
  11:01:969 -
  11:03:969 -
  11:09:969 -
  11:13:969 -
  11:15:969 -
  14:00:664 - this one is actually like the only one i really agree with adding a nc here, i'd personally add it 14:01:789 (13) - here

• Break at 07:24:098 - is 19.329 sec long
  Break at 11:36:835 - is 38.259 sec long
  Break at 18:17:412 - is 26.984 sec long

• there's unused green lines everywhe R like 06:16:768 - but its a pishi map so its ok right
  
  02:18:593 (1) - adding a slight curve to this slider makes it look like its limping make it straight
  02:25:978 (1) - ok this one like barely even curves y even add one here
  02:47:785 (4,5,6) - spacing change is kind of awkward here since it doesnt increase that much which (imo) it should, maybe increase it a bit here?
  03:05:208 (3) - idk why you didn't nc this when you did it in the previous sections (ie 02:58:747 (1,1) - stuff like this, i get the other ones are prob for readability but consistency is my trigger word so yh)
  03:24:593 (1,2,3) - this could be a jump for the fact that its fairly intense, i dont really feel like a triple represents these notes well enough tbh
  03:28:285 (1,2,3) - this on the other hand is ok but the flow is kind of all over the place mainly because of the sudden 03:28:632 (4) - jump this note provides here but what do i know about high bpm mapping :d
  03:28:747 (1,2) - nice misaligned blanket i think??
  03:31:978 (1,2) - why didn't you stack these when the rhythm is similar to 03:28:285 (1,2,3) - h
  03:39:362 (1,2) - ^
  03:58:285 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - shouldn't the blue ticks be silenced since no note occurs on them
  04:05:208 (1) - pretty useless nc
  
  for a pretty intense buildup the triple stacks here are kind of underwhelming, this could use more jumps imo xd
  
  04:19:343 - the fact this is on the blue tick triggers me pls fix timing here thx
  04:27:380 (1) - unsnapped break line :d
  04:27:960 (2,3,4) - make this a repeat slider to ease players into the rhythm?
  04:45:186 (3,4) - ok pls ujust stack stuff like this if u dont increase the ar
  05:04:541 (1) - why nc this when you nc'd the note before it tbh
  05:32:859 (3) - why no nc ??
  05:33:404 (5) - would be better as two ds'd circles going towards 05:33:677 (1) - but im shit at patterning so ya
  05:37:359 (3) - why n o nc?/?
  05:50:586 (4) - why nc this??? (tho seriously theres really no point to this nc since it's still perfectly readable without it imo, also keeps the pattern you had going before)
  06:05:314 (4) - nc this cuz you did that for like every other pattern in this section d
  06:11:041 (2,3,4) - WHAT KIND OF TRIANGLE IS THIS
  06:16:768 (1) - this note hits so late nice timing :d
  06:24:950 (1,2,3) - omg.
  06:25:495 (4,1) - ehh im not really a big fan of this direct stack here solely because you didnt do it before, and nothing in the rhythm really warrants it, i'd just make it separate from the sliderend
  06:38:314 (3,4) - pretty weird continuation of a back and forth pattern, i don't really think it fits here and deserves a different jump but h
  06:43:195 (1) - can u fix ur fucking breaks
  06:47:065 (1) - z
  07:01:985 (7) - why do some notes like this have the clap (ie 07:03:504 (9) - here) and this/others dont
  07:17:705 (1,2,3,4) - just nc these because im pretty sure everyones gonna die of drain here with hr and i dont want Stat of the Un
  07:23:898 (4) - extend break so it ends where guitar ends :d
  07:44:027 (1) - z
  08:16:753 (1) - pretty pointless rhythm change since this is the last section in this that uses this rhythm i'd just keep the circle spam but thats just me
  08:32:026 (1) - end section of this slider isnt perfectly straight and aligned with the OTHER ONE
  08:22:753 (4) - i'd nc stuff like this to keep the nc pattern you set in the next sections continuous (you do this a couple times in this section so look thru as needed i guess??>)
  08:54:935 (4) - nc here cuz rhythm change??
  09:11:026 (4) - extend break again?????
  09:32:011 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - feel like these should use more spacing than the previous ones since the song is louder now
  10:30:011 (1,2) - almost stacking these looks ugly af just space it out / stack normally thx
  11:35:635 (1) - THEREN IS VERY CLEARLY A NOTE AFTER THIS SLIDER???
  11:36:635 (1) - extend break so it matches with when the audience applauds? cuz u did it 14:38:726 (4) - here so y not
  
  how fucking long is this song
  
  12:15:664 (1) - pretty loud hitsounds for a relatively no sound section
  12:59:914 (2,3) - y not just make this a repeat slider
  13:10:414 (3) - while it's not needed i still think blue tick sliders like this in this section should be silenced
  14:09:664 (1,2) - ok at least silence these tbh
  14:35:351 (1) - pretty useless nc part 3: the new comboening
  14:53:194 (1) - z
  14:53:194 (1,2) - THBIS ISNT PERFECTLY STRAIGHT
  15:06:982 (3) - nc :d
  15:14:082 (1) - add spinner here maybe?
  
  ok not gonna bother modding slow section because how can u screw that up
  personally i'd silence slider ticks in this section but whatev
  i will say one thing about two sliders in particular
  15:40:601 (1) - massive trigger slider holy FUCK WHAT ARE THESE CURVES
  15:54:839 (1) - NO FOR REAL
  
  16:50:771 (3,4) - pretty weird stack
  17:12:127 (1) - i'd also silence the blue tick sliders in this section
  18:13:144 (1,3) - blanket here could be improved imo, moving slider one pixel left kind of works??
  18:17:212 (1) - i'd extend break to where violin starts picking up again
  18:44:996 (1) - z.
  19:26:069 (3) - i'd nc this for the new rhythm, and do it for all the other parts like this
  19:50:444 (3,4) - direct stacks are kind of misleading but i guess theres no better way to do it here so wh
  20:09:569 (2,3,4) - why are the sliders spaced out so much compared to the circlesz, if you're gonna do this just nc the start
  20:10:319 (1) - useless nc if you dont apply the other suggestion tho :d these two suggestions go for the next ones
  20:30:151 (1,2,3,4,5) - this is a really nice meme
  20:46:951 (6) - nc?
  21:09:408 (6,1) - don't really agree with this being spaced out a lot compared to the slider, doesn't really fit rhythm imho, feels awkward
  21:25:351 (5) - why no nc to keep consistency with 21:19:865 (1) - ?
  21:30:151 (1) - break doesn't really fit here since the guitar in the bg
  21:40:779 (5) - ya nc stuff like this 2 if you did the previous suggestion (goes for this section as well :d, tho even if you didn't accept it you nc'd some sliders that replace these notes so i'd nc stuff like this just to be consistent)
  21:59:979 (5,6) - just make this the same rhythm as 21:59:636 (3,4) - it feels REALLY clunky and imo looks ugly otherwise
  22:03:408 (2,3,4,1,2,3) - idk if it's just me but these drums and the next snares like this feel like they gradually intensify so idk why this is a constant spacing
  22:41:694 (5) - nc :d
  22:42:230 (1) - extend break to next downbeat for that moan or whatever the fuckj it is
  22:50:534 (1) - z.
  
  nice spinners tho i think there should be circles before the spinners

Strategas wrote:

reccfkheck

Countdown in 2016 LUL a

03:06:593 (1,1,1,1) - if you increase sv on a larger scale it would have abetter effect onwhat you tried to do the point was more to have curves increasing than sv. sv is there to avoid sliders squishing from curves and the short sliders visibly different

03:09:132 (3) - 03:14:670 (3) - me no comprende what are the sv changes here suppose to mean and how come didn't use it for 03:11:901 (3) - but imo you shouldn't use sv change on these at all cuz they are 1/4 sliders and don't really effect how it plays ya

03:19:055 (3) - if you took a second to emphasize these also adding NC helps that idea (especially to indicate the sv change which doesn't matter) s

03:21:362 (1,2) - trig ger disrespecting my ugly waves

03:28:632 (4) - dun really see reason to seperate this one from the stack 03:28:285 (1,2,3) - if you stack with the rest the emphasis will be much clearer made hitsounds more clear about the difference and spaced better. would rather not stack all of them because it plays super gross

03:35:670 (1,2,3,4,1) - this thing more acceptable cuz spacing more indicative what's important what's not

03:39:478 (2) - I hear this on blue tick ><><><<> for a second I thought that 1 started the continous sound s

04:19:362 - did you add this break so late or purpose or yes

04:33:186 (3) - 04:38:992 (3,4) - 04:45:573 (4) - etc. mb you could find some cool hitsound for this, dun think the default drum whistle good enough drumwhsiitle is perfection

07:06:501 (9) - finish pls and overshadow the finish on the next beat ew
07:19:253 (2,3,4) - these ones yes tho

07:46:389 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23) - me 2

09:24:011 (1,2) - can you recheck timing feels like 30 ms off s

10:10:011 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4) - might be just me but I feel like a lot of those 1/6 ticks don't really have anything i think i fixed it through hitsounding. like hitsounding made it sound terrible but now it doesnt and i can say "its following the cello"

11:18:135 (2,3) - big wa its the same as the one right before it 11:16:135 (2,3) -

12:59:914 (2,3) - too close (important stuff) very

13:51:476 (3,1) - this spacing was cooler if you compare to 13:53:726 (4,1) - y

14:24:289 (4) - out of place symmetried

14:53:194 (1) - volume feels too high for this whole section z

15:40:601 (1,2) - can improve how it looks d

16:00:813 (3) - snapping isn't very correct but lets pretend you map only 1/4 sounds agree

16:36:534 (4) - almos shiirn these arent even shiirn sliders

18:46:080 (5,2) - http://image.prntscr.com/image/7679fed0 ... c780f3.png close enough I guess being in the middle = point
going exactly around sucks when it means i need to change slider curves

19:15:718 (2,3,4,5) - can look better f

22:42:364 - spinner mb spinners for the spinner only section better

zura

ezek wrote:

Hi~
Let's see ;w;

Cool pishiflow~

1. 02:54:016 (2) - It would look awesome if you do a smooth curve instead to make a blanket with the next slider's shape pic mk
2. 03:44:208 (3) - This slider is touching the life bar on default skin~ g
3. 04:10:054 (2,3,4) - Oh my, this one even touches half of the life bar with stacking on ;w; gg
4. 04:49:638 (3) - Snack bar again ggg
5. 07:14:478 (5,6,7,8,9) - This may result confusing for some players since you're covering half of the slider with circles ._. by repeating 1/4 sliders on the same beat every measure i htink peopel wont have problems with it g
6. 08:38:026 (5) - Rotate to the same angle as (4)? kinda like it moving upwards actually lol
7. 09:20:011 (1,1) - Nothing wrong here, I just wanted to say it's cool xD agreeeee
8. 10:49:511 (3,1) - The transition between these two sliders feels a bit awkward imo, I would Ctrl+G (3) and place the head again on circle (1)~ result downed
9. 12:44:914 (3,1) - Improve blanket plz z
10. 17:53:822 (3) - Sir, you sinned here and I don't think I have to tell you why~ did the rest
11. 19:18:791 (3) - No big deal here, just wanted to let you know~
12. 20:04:694 (1) - ^
13. 20:53:465 (2) - ^

Nice spinners btw~