Oh, someone trying to learn AR10 before their time?
I'll see you on the other side. Make sure your acc stays intact
I'll see you on the other side. Make sure your acc stays intact
I started playing AR10 when I had ~2500pp and my acc is still intact. Maybe you just suck?The Gambler wrote:
Oh, someone trying to learn AR10 before their time?
I'll see you on the other side. Make sure your acc stays intact
chainpullz' acc is better than most of the players near his rank (at least for od10) lolII Jelli II wrote:
your acc isnt intact its shit. But having shit acc once doesnt mean you cant learn to improve it, and ruining your acc can always be unruined
My reading is shit and I put absolutely 0 effort into my top scores. Most of them were done in a few tries. I literally have 50 A's/B's/Sliderbreaks in my top 100 if you doubt me for some reason.II Jelli II wrote:
97 overall acc and a number of 95%s with hr, doesnt seem like good acc to me
who needs acc anyways xdMomiji wrote:
i mean why not both xdII Jelli II wrote:
your acc isnt intact its shit.
id say about 80% of my top plays are within 3 tries, over 50% are 1 trieschainpullz wrote:
My reading is shit and I put absolutely 0 effort into my top scores. Most of them were done in a few tries. I literally have 50 A's/B's/Sliderbreaks in my top 100 if you doubt me for some reason.II Jelli II wrote:
97 overall acc and a number of 95%s with hr, doesnt seem like good acc to me
At what point did we go from talking about my accuracy to comparing your stats to mine? You play more than 3x as much as I do, want a cookie?II Jelli II wrote:
id say about 80% of my top plays are within 3 tries, over 50% are 1 tries
chainpullz wrote:
At what point did we go from talking about my accuracy to comparing your stats to mine? You play more than 3x as much as I do, want a cookie?II Jelli II wrote:
id say about 80% of my top plays are within 3 tries, over 50% are 1 tries
I can link scores I set 18 months ago and scores I set today on the same maps and my accuracy has clearly improved. I'm not going to direct you to a dictionary because I've had you pegged as a hopeless retard for quite some time now and you've yet to convince me otherwise, but intact is a synonym for undamaged. My accuracy is in fact undamaged.
II Jelli II wrote:
chainpullz wrote:
I'm not going to direct you to a dictionary because I've had you pegged as a hopeless retard
What im saying is that not retrying a lot doesnt justify bad accuracy. Thats just not being good at accuracy. Thus when you say your accuracy is intact, id say... maybe? just barely?
The point is, his acc is good for his rank. He is doing fine for his level of skill. He is playing OD10 at rank 10k. If you compare his acc to yours, you are just missing the point of his comment entirely.II Jelli II wrote:
Have fun getting 95%s with hr and tell me more about how undamaged your accuracy is. Try not to be in such denial. But hey, maybe acc isnt for you, at least youre skilled in sick burns like calling someone a hopeless retard.
Hit Accuracy: 97.2%B1rd wrote:
95% with HR is good acc.
I like how everyone seems to bring up my acc like I actually care about it. Yeah, it takes a real pro to get 99%+ on Setting Sail and Cold Green Eyes and have a higher profile acc as a result.[Taiga] wrote:
Hit Accuracy: 97.2%B1rd wrote:
95% with HR is good acc.
For you it might be.
Pure HR player who know how to play this mod and have some notable scores consider 98% as garbage.
TFW Wilchq restart often to get 99%+ because 98% is shit.
@ontopic:
Learning HR is difficult if you dont have good nomod reading on AR9 minimum.
I consider my reading as good one and still, as i try to play HR from time to time - it is difficult.
OD10 too strong.
If you can get 95% acc on most maps with HR, including 150bpm maps with streams, then that is good acc.In this siituation yes, i agree. But you didn't said that properly before.
Yeah, it takes a real pro to get 99%+ on Setting Sail and Cold Green Eyes and have a higher profile acc as a result.If you think it's so easy to acc OD 9.7 then why you don't do this?
Mai boi, acc man, be my friend, we both will chase for acc.N0thingSpecial wrote:
mfw I can't aim so I chose to git gud in accuracy. is that so wrong? T_T
tbh you can mash through a map and still get 97% in most TV size maps
99% with HR is good acc. 98 is the borderline. 97 is shit.B1rd wrote:
95% with HR is good acc.
Jokes on you, I don't play just HR anymore.II Jelli II wrote:
if you think 95% acc fc with hr is good then you better be playing something fkn hard to acc or its shit
A sad state of affairs.II Jelli II wrote:
nice i find nomod and dt players much more impressive than hr. Seems like me and khelly are doomed to not be what we want to be
This..B1rd wrote:
95% with HR is good acc.
Also, forcing yourself to git gud is another thing. I'm talking as a filthy casual xDKhelly wrote:
unless you play 2 hours a week.
I think it's legit to calculate in months though.Khelly wrote:
No I mean, in what sense would it ever take you a year unless you play 2 hours a week.