1. K (5,15 stars, 1563 notes)

Surono wrote:

edit:

mapped teh spooky song, nvm its kappa xd easter metal song, twong trengteng twe neng~

* 00:05:477 - ~ 00:42:768 - wat de?!/1/! lololl spooky, btw 00:30:477 (1) - wanna try this to be slider? bcus this differ on this part nah I want this to be all spinners
* 00:55:788 - how about kk d? bcus its drum xx x, kk d simple to hit than dkkd and correctly follow drum there is a small reverberation on the third note which I mapped, also 1/6 doublet plays terrible
* 01:00:121 - kat this? to follow next kat, similar instrument ok
* 01:09:120 - this not kkd? like next similar part, here is followed drum.. it can kkd instead for that instrument doesn't flow as good
* 01:10:620 - kdddkkk? that tretengnt.. or this follow guitar? oke this guitar.. eh... I kinda prefer how kdkkd follows the oriental instrument
* 01:50:453 - end of slider, and 01:50:620 - put here note. ?? no lol the 1/6 drumroll lasts till the blue tick prior to the kkkkd
* 01:51:120 - Spontant kiai, eee... just here? too spooki ;w;
* 02:19:786 - have like xx drum with purple tick, 02:19:841 - kat? no lol it's barely audible and 1/6 doubles are dumb
* 03:10:467 - and oke, finale u mapped a jazz genre. gz lelellol.
* 03:16:300 - why not kkkd wwww? last note is a potent snare so I don't want to ignore it
* 03:17:355 - and this ddk, 03:17:467 - emphasize sound at here. I think kkd on kat is unnecessary
* 03:28:466 (86,87,88,89,90,91,92) - you mapped this with cheerful? this sound like.. me irl was a little ki,d.. walk in de garden, lalala~
* 04:00:798 - kat for this sound? I don't think using kat for a potent low frequency downbeat is a good idea
* 04:50:463 - oke oriental, dem folkk., wait.. lol guuud 3plet mirror variaes. I like it!1!! xd thx c:

:^) okey.. this song nice nice, spesially drum of song so varies.. dem
and your longstream I can fine.. dem flow... patterns.. =w=

[-Matt-] wrote:

hi, from request (?)

General

that one small kiai seems lonely, i suggest adding at least one more somewhere, maybe 03:38:799 - 03:49:465 and maybe even 01:19:120 - 01:29:787 - nah that kiai alone is fine

K diff

the random circle placement is annoying me lol
the spinners at the start seem kind of unnecessary and, tbh, boring. this is ofc my opinion but i feel like they don't add anything to the map and should be removed they are necessary for the drain time tho

01:11:120 (25) - d - i feel like there are too many k's in this area and a d here would help normalize things, plus you ended the other two "streams" with d
changed other to kat
02:35:286 - d - there's a drum sound here nah i like the pause

03:12:467 - d - the sax* goes down here. it also equalizes 03:11:355 (8,9) - prefer it as k to differentiate from 14
03:12:800 - k - there's a triangle* here. (if you reject this reject the rest) not audible at all lol
03:13:800 - ^
03:15:800 - ^
03:22:800 - ^
03:23:050 - dk ^

03:31:300 - there's a drum here
03:31:633 - ^ prefer the pauses lol

04:11:131 (32) - k - the string instrument* here is high that don is intentional because later k d represents the guitar much better
04:11:381 - k here and no finisher on 04:11:464 (1) - there's that drum there that i feel needs a note well I think it's barely audible and the finisher is necessary
04:26:464 (54) - finisher? there's a short crash here I don't here any crash

i feel like this ending could be done a little better (it might be too "random" though):
04:50:463 (1,2,3) - kdk/ddk - guitar ends high
04:50:796 (4,5,6) - ddk ^
04:51:129 (7,8,9) - ^
04:51:463 (10,11,12) - ^
04:51:796 (1,2,3) - kdk - music box* high note on start and end
04:52:129 (4,5,6) - ddk - music box* low note on start and high on end
04:52:462 (7,8,9) - kdk same as 04:51:796 (1,2,3)
04:52:796 - kkkkddk - reggae instrument* for first 4, low drum hit on 5th, 6th to emphasize the drum hit, 7th is back to reggae* lmao
04:53:463 (4,5,6) - ddk - low at start and high at end
04:53:796 (7,8,9) - kdk - high at start and end
04:54:129 (10,11,12) - ^
04:54:463 (1,2,3) - kkd - some instrument* for first two, low at end
04:54:796 (4,5,6) - kdd - clack* sound at start, low drum for last 2
04:55:129 (7,8,9) - kkd - tin can* for first 2, low for 3rd
04:55:463 (10,11,12) - ddk - low for first two, high for last
04:55:796 (13,14,15) - kdk - crash at start, low middle, high end
04:56:129 (16,17,18) - ddk - low for first 2, high at end
04:56:463 (19,20,21) - kkk - reggae* for all 3
04:56:796 (22,23,24) - ddk - low first 2, high 3rd
04:57:129 (25,26,27) - kdk - music box* high note on start and end
04:57:462 (28,29,30) - ddk - music box* low note on start and high on end
04:57:796 (31,32,33) - kdk - music box* high note on start and end
04:58:129 - kkkkddk - reggae instrument* same as before
move spinner to 04:58:796 - to make room for the reggae pattern

nah, the patterning here is intentional, mirror patterns work as a little "gimmicky" ending so I think it's fine

maybe end the spinner sooner, like 05:03:796 - why

* forgive my lack of knowledge about instruments

hoped this helped and good luck!

• d=Don
  D=Big Don
  k=Katsu
  K=Big Katsu

• Todo bien

• 
  01:33:120 (27,28) - control+g en estas notas? seria algo como d kdd, suena bien y 01:33:287 - se siente raro siendo d ya que en las demas partes usas k para ese sonido
  01:42:620 (112) - no se si se haya sugerido pero siento esta nota mejor con d (o D tambien quedaria bastante bien), lo mismo va para 01:45:287 (132) - y 01:47:953 (152) - , de hecho, aqui si lo haces con d 02:03:953 -
  02:24:453 (43) - aqui iria bien tener un finisher al igual que en 02:20:453 (28) - , el impacto es mas o menos el mismo que 02:20:453 (28) - , la diferencia es que uno tiene vocal y el otro no xD , si lo cambiaste aplica lo mismo en 02:28:452 (60) - , 02:32:452 (75) - y los demas 1/3 que se repiten igual
  02:51:119 (204,205) - cambiar a d K? d k d K suena mejor imo
  04:23:464 (43) - a partir de aqui igual que en 02:24:453 (43) -, siento que estaria bien con finisher tambien
  04:31:130 (72,73,74,75) - cambiar a dkdd? (o dkdD si aceptaste la sugerencia de los 1/3) siento que suena mejor
  04:50:130 (203) - cambia a d si aceptaste lo de 02:51:119 (204,205) -

Hanjamon wrote:

hi

• d=Don
  D=Big Don
  k=Katsu
  K=Big Katsu

[General]

• Todo bien todo correcto, y yo que me alegro hombre

[K]

• 
  01:33:120 (27,28) - control+g en estas notas? seria algo como d kdd, suena bien y 01:33:287 - se siente raro siendo d ya que en las demas partes usas k para ese sonido la verdad es que tiene mejor flow así, aplicado
  01:42:620 (112) - no se si se haya sugerido pero siento esta nota mejor con d (o D tambien quedaria bastante bien), lo mismo va para 01:45:287 (132) - y 01:47:953 (152) - , de hecho, aqui si lo haces con d 02:03:953 - creo que prefiero kats para la guitarra ;w;
  02:24:453 (43) - aqui iria bien tener un finisher al igual que en 02:20:453 (28) - , el impacto es mas o menos el mismo que 02:20:453 (28) - , la diferencia es que uno tiene vocal y el otro no xD , si lo cambiaste aplica lo mismo en 02:28:452 (60) - , 02:32:452 (75) - y los demas 1/3 que se repiten igual sip, añadido
  02:51:119 (204,205) - cambiar a d K? d k d K suena mejor imo pues si la verdad
  04:23:464 (43) - a partir de aqui igual que en 02:24:453 (43) -, siento que estaria bien con finisher tambien
  04:31:130 (72,73,74,75) - cambiar a dkdd? (o dkdD si aceptaste la sugerencia de los 1/3) siento que suena mejor creo que mejor dkkD
  04:50:130 (203) - cambia a d si aceptaste lo de 02:51:119 (204,205) - see

No es gran cosa lo que he sugerido, solo pequeñas sugerencias, por los demas el mapa me parece bien, asi que suerte :3

hikikochan wrote:

this is really late oops

[K]
02:50:452 (202,203,204,205,1) - reverse the colors of these four notes to match the guitars pitch-wise and to ensure that the next downbeat is a finisher D It was like that previously but I changed it, I like how it fits the rather down-up-down-up voice tone of the vocal
04:29:130 (66) - make this a d? this note is lower than the notes both before and after. i'm guessing this was mapped to the drum part, but that's a lot less noticeable than the guitar solo and therefore this seems a bit strange as a k it's rather the other way around :c it's way higher than 65 and 68 but similar to 67
04:32:797 (80,81) - ctrl+g these two notes, similarly to follow the guitar solo and so that the downbeat at 04:33:464 has greater emphasis by being contrasted with 04:33:130 but the guitar notes clearly differ on that, 81 and 82 are really similar in pitch
04:49:463 (202,203,204) - switch the colors of all these notes for similar reasoning - to follow the guitar solo and emphasize the downbeat of the new triplet section.
if you want this ^ to be different from 04:47:797 (189,190,191,192,193,194,195) for the sake of variety, then 04:49:130 (199) can be made into a k to reflect the vocals that occur here (which are higher in contrast with the corresponding vocal part at 04:48:130 (192)) I prefer to keep it consistent :c

i couldn't find that many things to fix orz orz
also random side comment, this map looks really nice in editor divided into the four quadrants

your normal-hitclap2 (top) vs default normal-hitclap (bottom)

MMzz wrote:

The ending is stupid lmao.

DakeDekaane wrote:

I somehow wish the hitsounds were a bit louder. I know they could be:

your normal-hitclap2 (top) vs default normal-hitclap (bottom)

taiko-normal-hitfinish3 is not being used, remove it.

If you didn't know it, taiko-normal-hitwhistle works as the hitsound for a big kat, in case you want to consider it for the big kats used in the map. Removed taiko-normal-hitfinish3 and tuned up the volume so they can be heard.

02:28:452 (60) - Is this note missing a finish on purpose? Fixed
04:55:796 - 05:01:129 - This section triggers me a lot. It should be more like 04:50:463 - 04:55:796 - with 4 stanzas of triples, not just 2, to be consistent music wise. Then begin the spinner in 05:01:129 - But there are already 4 stanzas of triples...???? As in, 4 triplets of each kind nevermind fixed LOL

1. 02:02:787 and 02:05:453 - I think adding a note here would be good because these spots don't really have a 'reason' to not have a note compared to 02:04:120 which clearly has the guitar stopping after the two chords play.