ok game over time to rip thisAscendance wrote:
Game over.
lol jk
ok game over time to rip thisAscendance wrote:
Game over.
no rip because he don't care about thisRockageek wrote:
JBHyperion wrote:
May Tom94 and his broken pp system rest in peace.
Sorry everyone but I had to do this
i seeHibari wrote:
no rip because he don't care about this
from tom94 ask
I think I have to clarify a bit here.Serena- wrote:
In REFLEC BEAT, the song is titled "IMAGE-MATERIAL- <REFLEC BEAT Edition>".
The phrase inside the brackets might be refering to what version it is. the artist wouldn't have to state the version of the song in a sneak peek. (the blog post was a sneak peek, not an actual review of the album) or maybe they planned on using it in REFLEC BEAT after he posted the post and changed the title.
The important thing is that it was a sneak peek, and the song wasn't even officially released when the artist posted it.
You guys should have more consistency, if every evidence points out it should be titled as IMAGE -MATERIAL- <Version 0>(or -Version 0-) and you just confirm it by the artists' words that was when the song wasn't even officially released, these is a problem.
According to your words this map should just be titled Dynasty as well : https://osu.ppy.sh/s/434695 and it is just one of the many ranked maps to list.
Also, the album was released first and then it came to REFLEC BEAT, so the source should be fine.
Just stating my thoughts, no need for drama or anything.
IamKwaN wrote:
I think I have to clarify a bit here.Serena- wrote:
In REFLEC BEAT, the song is titled "IMAGE-MATERIAL- <REFLEC BEAT Edition>".
The phrase inside the brackets might be refering to what version it is. the artist wouldn't have to state the version of the song in a sneak peek. (the blog post was a sneak peek, not an actual review of the album) or maybe they planned on using it in REFLEC BEAT after he posted the post and changed the title.
The important thing is that it was a sneak peek, and the song wasn't even officially released when the artist posted it.
You guys should have more consistency, if every evidence points out it should be titled as IMAGE -MATERIAL- <Version 0>(or -Version 0-) and you just confirm it by the artists' words that was when the song wasn't even officially released, these is a problem.
According to your words this map should just be titled Dynasty as well : https://osu.ppy.sh/s/434695 and it is just one of the many ranked maps to list.
Also, the album was released first and then it came to REFLEC BEAT, so the source should be fine.
Just stating my thoughts, no need for drama or anything.
First of all, IMAGE -MATERIAL- <REFLEC BEAT Edition> is a rearranged game size version of IMAGE -MATERIAL- <Version 0> / IMAGE -MATERIAL- . That is, they are completely different songs with different duration.
For the song we have here, the official uses two titles for the same song in this case.
One is IMAGE -MATERIAL- (claimed by the composer, you can't really doubt it as the composer writes the song and they have the right to name a song), the other is IMAGE -MATERIAL- <Version 0> (as shown on the CD back). Both of them are referring to the album, so the song probably has alternative names.
So, both are acceptable equally as they are statements quoted by the official. I hope thing is settled and doubts are cleared.
410969,326.086956521739,3,2,0,30,1,0
411890,240,3,2,0,30,1,0
412603,288.461538461538,3,2,0,30,1,0
412891,230.769230769231,3,2,0,30,1,0
414020,244.897959183673,3,2,0,30,1,0
414721,210.526315789474,3,2,0,30,1,0
414931,240,3,2,0,30,1,0
415362,235.294117647059,3,2,0,30,1,0
416054,214.285714285714,3,2,0,30,1,0
416696,240,3,2,0,30,1,0
417407,292.682926829268,3,2,0,30,1,0
417699,255.31914893617,3,2,0,30,1,0
418330,461.538461538462,3,2,0,30,1,0
420898,461.538461538462,3,2,0,30,1,0
Ascendance wrote:
so leave it to CLSW to reply to the mod when it's finished and don't cause any dramas.
MOD IS NOT MAPHollow Wings wrote:
mappers even told some unbelieveble ideas or various suggestions as other styles' mappers.
^ this.Hollow Wings wrote:
i know my maps may be questionalble, and still here those are. believe it or not, i've almost considered all possible points of people even in the last drama, by asking bunches of peoples' opinions much more than ones appeared in this thread. for that, you can regard my works as depending on - i can say, like at least 100 persons' - opinions in every map i've made. they can be short irc mods, tests or even detail checking by tools, double tests after those. noobs have complained those tricky patterns to let me low down some ridiculous spikes, pros have given personal opinions to let me provide more confortable settings to play, mappers even told some unbelieveble ideas or various suggestions as other styles' mappers. then i choose what i wanna insist and what really should be changed: just like seeking mods and giving feedback, but i think lots of people didn't remind how important that is. you may say this map is not perfect and i haven't think deep, just test me, find the issue and convince me. if you really can do that, it'll be always welcomed.
osu!catchCLSW wrote:
CtB is not a communistic world, mappers don't have to satisfy 'ALL' people though. I won't deal with nonsense.
hahahaAscendance wrote:
osu!catchCLSW wrote:
CtB is not a communistic world, mappers don't have to satisfy 'ALL' people though. I won't deal with nonsense.
kudosu please
magic bomb... ctb is not ur mode..... just respect "all ppl"CLSW wrote:
CtB is not a communistic world, mappers don't have to satisfy 'ALL' people though. I won't deal with nonsense.
No need for rude responses.Len wrote:
magic bomb... ctb is not ur mode..... just respect "all ppl"CLSW wrote:
CtB is not a communistic world, mappers don't have to satisfy 'ALL' people though. I won't deal with nonsense.