Suzuki_1112 wrote:

Hello from my queue~
sorry your beatmap is very good so,less mod.QAQ
I think you can change your diff name,Easy→Normal,Normal→Hard,Hard→Insane I think the star rate 1.44 for the easiest diff isnt appropriate for a Normal diff. Furthermore the current hard would be too easy for an Insane imo. But yes, the current Normal diff would fit as a Hard diff better - I think its fine how it is currently
[Easy]
00:26:790 (2,3) - Reverse Selection, Then Flip Horizontally Changed
[Noraml,Hard]
Perfect! Two Star*****! Omg..., Thank you soooooo much <3
Good Luck for rankkk!

1. 00:31:477 (4) - why not make this one horizonal just like ur general design in the first part?
2. 00:34:290 (1) - 1->2 0.77ds
3. 01:26:790 (1) - touching the hp bar, can drag 01:23:977 (2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5) - together down a bit so that it won't break ur patterns
4. 02:23:040 (6) - u forgot nc here
5. 03:18:586 (1) - why finish..? this surprises me lol

1. 01:45:540 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - this part is too many 1/2 sliders spamming, try adding more variety. a random suggestion, maybe apply to where u think it fits
2. 02:25:383 (2) - a biiit offscreen
3. 02:38:977 (3) - this is a really well blanketed pattern, but the slider path of 3 is kinda vague and maybe not that friendly for players of this level to read, u can consult other ppl for that as well

1. i think ar8+od7 is pretty enough for this diff
2. 00:50:930 (6) - this might flow visually better
3. 00:51:165 (1,2,3,4) - keep ds here feels a bit boring, try ctrl-g 3 and 4 separately, would be fun and better make for the latter jumps imo
4. 01:37:571 (4) - touch hp bar

Garden wrote:

this track is beatiful <3
[Easy]

1. 00:31:477 (4) - why not make this one horizonal just like ur general design in the first part? changed
2. 00:34:290 (1) - 1->2 0.77ds fixed
3. 01:26:790 (1) - touching the hp bar, can drag 01:23:977 (2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5) - together down a bit so that it won't break ur patterns good point, changed
4. 02:23:040 (6) - u forgot nc here fixed
5. 03:18:586 (1) - why finish..? this surprises me lol yeaaaa..., its pretty random. Removed it at all diffs

[Normal]

1. 01:45:540 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - this part is too many 1/2 sliders spamming, try adding more variety. a random suggestion, maybe apply to where u think it fits hmm.. I agree with the lack of variety in this part. Despite that i want to keep 01:47:415 (1,2,3,4) - as sliders (since i think it fits the best) and changing smth before and after that part would break consistency. I keep this how it already is for now because you are the first modder who mentions this and I think for an Easy that is still acceptable
2. 02:25:383 (2) - a biiit offscreen indeed. thanks for mention this (it'd be unrankable lol). Fixed obv.
3. 02:38:977 (3) - this is a really well blanketed pattern, but the slider path of 3 is kinda vague and maybe not that friendly for players of this level to read, u can consult other ppl for that as well i'll keep that pattern for now, it is good to read (no overlaps at the "hard part" of the pattern) and i think people even if they are newbie will not break at that point imo

[Hard]

1. i think ar8+od7 is pretty enough for this diff i wanna keep ar 8.5 for now but i change it to od7
2. 00:50:930 (6) - this might flow visually better it feels way better, yes. I made it being a blanket with 00:51:165 (1) - to be more structured (and hey... one more or less blanket in my mapset? who cares xD
3. 00:51:165 (1,2,3,4) - keep ds here feels a bit boring, try ctrl-g 3 and 4 separately, would be fun and better make for the latter jumps imo it is kinda boring yes, I ctrl + g'd 00:52:102 (3) - but now there's an inconsistency (the jump 00:51:633 (2,3) - is ds1.78 or smth like that and i cant make it further away because i need the overlap with 00:50:696 (5) - , so yea...). I keep it now with just flipping 00:52:102 (3) - , should be no problem i guess... well i hope lol
4. 01:37:571 (4) - touch hp bar unrankabler too lmao, thanks xd. Fixed

Namki wrote:

Hello.
[Easy]
As I can see and hear:
00:04:290 (2) - this is mapped for the same music as this 00:19:290 (2,3) - , but for 00:19:290 (2,3) - you've put whistle here 00:04:290 (2) - and for this 00:19:290 (2,3) - here 00:19:759 (3) - . You should've put whistle here 00:19:759 (3) - instead of 00:19:759 (3) - .
Same here 00:27:259 (3) - . 00:27:259 (3) - istead of 00:27:259 (3) - .
01:34:290 (1) - whistle here. Because here you've put whistle 01:04:290 (1) - . Ooops... I forgot to recheck the HS's, Thank you for pointing that out, all HS are fixed now!
And I saw few bad blankets like this one 02:51:165 (3,4) - . huh..? that blanket is on point oO I'll go through the the diff once again and try to check every blanket just in case

[Normal]
01:22:805 (1) - swap with 01:22:571 (5,1) - , this strong beat should be emphasized 01:23:040 - . the sound that comes up in the music with the slider 01:22:805 (1) - (whose tail is placed on the downbeat which should normally get emphasized like u said but not here) is very special and unique in the song, so it makes more sense to me to emphasize that sound instead of making the simple emphasize at the downbeat (which is at every point in the whole map the case). The slider fits the best to emphasize that sound imo
And here 01:26:321 (5,1) - . And here 01:30:071 (5,1) - and others. ^
02:38:977 (3) - I'm not sure with this slider, path isn't this clear as it should be in Normal tbh. it is very special and maybe a bit hard to read for normal, but why not smth different, smth that could make someone remember the map. Furthermore since that point 02:38:040 (1) - you have time to read that clean pattern which isnt stacked with other objects, so its clean and easier to read.
01:34:290 (1) - whistle, ye. Fixed

[Hard]
00:31:477 (1) - NC looks random. removed nc
02:46:711 (6,7) - 2.17x looks inconsistent here, make 2.3 as before. fixed
03:01:711 (6,7) - and here, yes. ^
01:34:290 (1) - and whistle, I guess. added whistles to the whole part
Btw, there's no triplets in first kiai, maybe add few? think its fine how it is, nevertheless ill consider that

good luck~

1. Turn Widescreen Support off since there is no storyboard.
2. See if you can get a 192kbs mp3 file. 128kbs is rankable but it can be improved.

1. 00:09:915 (1,2) - 1.30x -> 2.30x is rather large and it plays really awkwardly since it isn't consistent with the previous parts. If you're gonna break the spacing, you should do it on a downbeat instead since there's nothing in the song that suggests such a large spike in spacing.
2. 00:13:665 (1) - I feel this slider shouldn't be stacked under the notes because it falls on a powerful beat, and a change in spacing and/or flow should represent that.
3. 00:24:915 (1,2) - Yeah, I'm having trouble understanding what in the song says there should be almost doubled spacing here. It just doesn't make sense on a Hard difficulty. If you're gonna do it, you should do it on a powerful beat and do it fairly consistently.
4. 00:29:836 (5,6) - Same as the above. This happens a lot so just please consider nerfing the spacing here, because 2.30x is too big of a spike for sure. Maybe 1.70x would be more fitting, but even then I don't get what about that beat is so powerful.
5. 00:35:930 (4,5,1,2,3,4) - This pattern looks kinda funny and lopsided: http://i.imgur.com/dzYiYyY.jpg Consider neatening it up, maybe making it more circular? It's just really weird.
6. 01:39:094 (4,5,4,5) - Maybe to add some variety, you can stack these two doubles.
7. 02:54:680 (7,1) - I'm concerned that this may be too challenging to read on a Hard difficulty because of the overlap. Consider not having the 02:54:915 (1) slider end overlap with the 02:54:680 (7) one.
8. 02:56:555 (6,1) - I'd increase spacing or break flow to emphasize this downbeat which has a powerful piano hit on it.

1. 00:55:383 (1,2) - The flow here is a bit harsh for a Normal diff. Consider this instead: http://i.imgur.com/XTLo2FQ.png Of course, adjust spacing after.
2. 01:24:446 (5,6,1) - Fix your spacing here. 1.05x is rather inconsistent and it's noticeable while you're playing.
3. 01:48:821 (4,1) - 1.16x is too inconsistent for a Normal. Fix this 100%.

1. 01:02:415 (3,4) - This flow is rather awkward for an Easy diff. Consider having the first slider lead into the second one much smoother.

Smoothie World wrote:

[General]

1. Turn Widescreen Support off since there is no storyboard. fixed
2. See if you can get a 192kbs mp3 file. 128kbs is rankable but it can be improved. i dont think im able to find another one >.<

[Hard]

1. 00:09:915 (1,2) - 1.30x -> 2.30x is rather large and it plays really awkwardly since it isn't consistent with the previous parts. If you're gonna break the spacing, you should do it on a downbeat instead since there's nothing in the song that suggests such a large spike in spacing. the DS increase is e.g. consistent with 00:06:165 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - and so on. the amount of increase seems (according to other opinions including mine) comfortable. even with mouse it feels really pleasant although i suck with mouse. therefore you are the first modder who says that >.< So no change for now it will 99% stay 1.3 -> 2.3 increase for these parts
2. 00:13:665 (1) - I feel this slider shouldn't be stacked under the notes because it falls on a powerful beat, and a change in spacing and/or flow should represent that. i agree with that, gonna change that later because im despairung on that part atm...
3. 00:24:915 (1,2) - Yeah, I'm having trouble understanding what in the song says there should be almost doubled spacing here. It just doesn't make sense on a Hard difficulty. If you're gonna do it, you should do it on a powerful beat and do it fairly consistently. this spacing is only at specific parts of the song, its not on a random red tick or smth like that, so... And why does spacing increase in a hard not make sense? It is >Hard< so it should be a bit harder, and same DS over and over like in a normal doesnt make sense to me tbh >.<
4. 00:29:836 (5,6) - Same as the above. This happens a lot so just please consider nerfing the spacing here, because 2.30x is too big of a spike for sure. Maybe 1.70x would be more fitting, but even then I don't get what about that beat is so powerful. same reasoning as above
5. 00:35:930 (4,5,1,2,3,4) - This pattern looks kinda funny and lopsided: http://i.imgur.com/dzYiYyY.jpg Consider neatening it up, maybe making it more circular? It's just really weird. i agree, that looked kinda random, i gave it more structure should be fine now
6. 01:39:094 (4,5,4,5) - Maybe to add some variety, you can stack these two doubles. ill consider that
7. 02:54:680 (7,1) - I'm concerned that this may be too challenging to read on a Hard difficulty because of the overlap. Consider not having the 02:54:915 (1) slider end overlap with the 02:54:680 (7) one. it has the best flow 2 objects can actually have in that pattern, so imo its fine
8. 02:56:555 (6,1) - I'd increase spacing or break flow to emphasize this downbeat which has a powerful piano hit on it. uhh... you are actually right, but the circumstances to change that are soooooooooooo high.. ill probably do that later (im sitting here for almost 2h now)

[Normal]

1. 00:55:383 (1,2) - The flow here is a bit harsh for a Normal diff. Consider this instead: http://i.imgur.com/XTLo2FQ.png Of course, adjust spacing after. i agree with that, made it flow pleasanter now
2. 01:24:446 (5,6,1) - Fix your spacing here. 1.05x is rather inconsistent and it's noticeable while you're playing. fixed
3. 01:48:821 (4,1) - 1.16x is too inconsistent for a Normal. Fix this 100%. fixed

[Easy]

1. 01:02:415 (3,4) - This flow is rather awkward for an Easy diff. Consider having the first slider lead into the second one much smoother.fixed

1. 00:44:602 (4) - missing stack with 00:46:477 (2) like you did almost other pattern example 00:41:790 (1,3), etc... but i think you missing this stack
2. 00:51:165 (3) - the end point would be nice if move little down to better flow after objects example i like this flow 00:43:665 (3,4,5)

1. 00:30:071 (4) - this zig-zag look like un-symmetry I kindy like more this slider 00:30:071 (4), this is better than that slider, maybe copy-paste? for nice design lol
2. 00:39:680 (5,1) - as you style, the 4 should be NC then in 1 remove NC, this could be fix you consistency style
3. 00:54:680 (4,1) - ^ same happen
4. 02:39:680 (4,1) - ^ same
5. 02:54:680 (4,1) - ^ same
6. 02:07:805 (1,2) - wrong place combo color

1. 00:24:915 (1,2) - this spacing couldn't be make jump because as you style consistency you don't make song let me example look pattern and listen song in 00:17:415 (1,2,3) - this part song is going repeative and more more but you didn't make jump, so that in 00:24:915 (1,2) -shouldn't make jump, could be nice if use normal spacing if you care consistency (I m fine inconsistency just let you know lol)
2. 00:39:915 (6) - Missing put NC
3. 01:12:727 (4) - missing put NC
4. 02:13:665 (3) - missing put nc
5. 02:35:930 (6,7) - I suprise why you didn't use slider of 1/4 like other pattern ? example 00:50:930 (6,1), etc....
6. 02:36:633 (2,3,4) - this spacing kindy weird for me, would be nice if 02:36:868 (3,4) could be same as spacing 02:36:633 (2,3) example this print https://puu.sh/qfoQS/abd9988058.jpg but this spacing is weird when i did play test or you could use normal spacing like you did in 02:41:790 (1,2,3,4)
7. 02:43:430 (6,7) - same happen as 02:35:930 (6,7)
8. 02:50:930 (6,7,1) - ^ same
9. 02:51:633 (2,3,4) - again spacing weird like this https://puu.sh/qfp3y/ade38ecfd4.jpg or use you own
10. 02:58:430 (6,7,1) - slider 1/4 ?

Phyloukz wrote:

Pereira006 wrote:

[Easy]
[Normal]

Gameplay:

1. 02:07:805 (1,2) - wrong place combo color i dont really know what you mean, firstly i thought its the combo color sequence but that seems alright >.<

I mean in (1) remove NC and put NC in (2) too keep it consistency

[Hard]

Gameplay:

[list]
[*]02:35:930 (6,7) - I suprise why you didn't use slider of 1/4 like other pattern ? example 00:50:930 (6,1), etc.... okay let me try to explain: I personally hear at 02:35:930 (6,7,1) - a different sound as at 02:39:680 (7,1) - . If you listen to what comes after (so the measure 02:36:165 (1,2,3,4,5) - compared to the measure at 02:39:915 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - ) these examples you may notice a difference there. And at 02:39:680 (7,1) - i hear "a cut" (sorry for bad english) in the music whereas at 02:35:930 (6,7,1) - the music goes pleasanter into the next measure (thats why i made at that spot a circle-circle-slider pattern which feels pleasanter than an 1/4 slider into 1/2 slider). I hope you can get what i mean. this is btw consistent over the last 2 kiai, at the first one i made only 1/4 slider to 1/2 slider pattern I understand what you trying explain but I what mean if you listen 2 kiai and 1 kiai they are repeative, example in 00:50:930 (6) - that you said "cut" but the "cut" of sound is same thing as 02:35:930 (6,7), Why I did point this, just let you know if you missing to fix consistency or intentional lol but I'm fine this treat as inconsistency.
[]
pretty cute map and song c:
Any question if you don't understand my english or something ask me in-game I will explain my best
Also let me know Sonnyc will bubble or not

Thank you very much for your mod, was really important to fix the spacing inconsistency in the last 2 kiai's

Phyloukz wrote:

Pereira006 wrote:

[Easy]
[Normal]

Gameplay:

1. 02:07:805 (1,2) - wrong place combo color i dont really know what you mean, firstly i thought its the combo color sequence but that seems alright >.<

I mean in (1) remove NC and put NC in (2) too keep it consistency Omg, I didnt even notice the NC was wrong there lmao, Fixed!

[Hard]

Gameplay:

[list]
[*]02:35:930 (6,7) - I suprise why you didn't use slider of 1/4 like other pattern ? example 00:50:930 (6,1), etc.... okay let me try to explain: I personally hear at 02:35:930 (6,7,1) - a different sound as at 02:39:680 (7,1) - . If you listen to what comes after (so the measure 02:36:165 (1,2,3,4,5) - compared to the measure at 02:39:915 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - ) these examples you may notice a difference there. And at 02:39:680 (7,1) - i hear "a cut" (sorry for bad english) in the music whereas at 02:35:930 (6,7,1) - the music goes pleasanter into the next measure (thats why i made at that spot a circle-circle-slider pattern which feels pleasanter than an 1/4 slider into 1/2 slider). I hope you can get what i mean. this is btw consistent over the last 2 kiai, at the first one i made only 1/4 slider to 1/2 slider pattern I understand what you trying explain but I what mean if you listen 2 kiai and 1 kiai they are repeative, example in 00:50:930 (6) - that you said "cut" but the "cut" of sound is same thing as 02:35:930 (6,7), Why I did point this, just let you know if you missing to fix consistency or intentional lol but I'm fine this treat as inconsistency. honestly deep inside me (lol?) it disturbed me not having the consistency in the first kiai (since i got the idea at the start of the 2nd kiai...). So I added the consistency for the first kiai time: 00:50:930 (6,7,1) - and 00:58:430 (6,7,1) - got changed into circle-circle-slider pattern to fit the policy i made in 2nd and 3rd kiai except that they are normally 1.3x snapped to the previous object (at 2nd and 3rd kiai its 2.3). so yeah... maybe check that out if that is okay first :>
[]
pretty cute map and song c:
Any question if you don't understand my english or something ask me in-game I will explain my best
Also let me know Sonnyc will bubble or not

Thank you very much for your mod, was really important to fix the spacing inconsistency in the last 2 kiai's

Fixed obviously