1. osu! forums
  2. Beatmaps
  3. Ranked/Approved Beatmaps
show more
posted
FINALLY A MOD

ALLELUJAH
posted
i got silenced for posting a mod earlier yesterday, so here's another mod:

00:01:515 (1,2) - you very much know these are inaudible sir, you cannot do that!!
02:22:733 (5,1,2) - this pattern looks very bad
02:27:983 (2) - 02:37:433 (1,2) - i don't get these ncs tbh. also don't you think the first pattern should have more spacing? cause it looks quite unemphasized as it is currently
02:59:783 (3,4,5,6,1) - this pattern plays quite bad, trust me i'm a professional at this
03:12:533 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - you could've gone for progression as well, because you are doing the same 03:14:333 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - there for example so it'd be cool hehehe
03:28:733 (1) - not having something on the red tick is kinda worrying me because there's two sounds that are getting ignored ouch
04:08:633 (2,4) - oh come on, have some respect for visuals :(
04:27:383 (5,6,1) - why are these triplets soooo spaced apart compared to like the whole rest of the map lol

its ok, you can give me +2 kudos whenever you want, no need to hurry
posted

Yuii- wrote:

i got silenced for posting a mod earlier yesterday, so here's another mod:

00:01:515 (1,2) - you very much know these are inaudible sir, you cannot do that!! you need to stop playing at 5% volume
02:22:733 (5,1,2) - this pattern looks very bad why are you so mean to mister smile face? https://i.imgur.com/FPRwS4z.png
02:27:983 (2) - 02:37:433 (1,2) - i don't get these ncs tbh. also don't you think the first pattern should have more spacing? cause it looks quite unemphasized as it is currently I guess you're right about the NCs, not sure about the spacing though, it seems fine as it is now? Doesn't need to be larger
02:59:783 (3,4,5,6,1) - this pattern plays quite bad, trust me i'm a professional at this You're judging by looks again! Don't oppress my patterns, they're very kind inside. (srsly tho, it plays fine, trust me, I playtested it enough)
03:12:533 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - you could've gone for progression as well, because you are doing the same 03:14:333 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - there for example so it'd be cool hehehe alright
03:28:733 (1) - not having something on the red tick is kinda worrying me because there's two sounds that are getting ignored ouch I am aware, I wanted to match the guitar better, but I still don't like it in the end so eh, meh, fixed
04:08:633 (2,4) - oh come on, have some respect for visuals :(Visuals' are a fool's weakness
04:27:383 (5,6,1) - why are these triplets soooo spaced apart compared to like the whole rest of the map lol Because it's the 3rd chorus one octave higher lol

its ok, you can give me +2 kudos whenever you want, no need to hurry hai
posted


i think ir bork
posted
wait WTF
posted


thinking emoji
posted
I feel like this map needs more stars to inspire the mapper to stop being lazy achieve greatness, so I helped the cause.
posted
hello is this the kd bank
posted
D
posted
Notice: The star priority is not 235, but actually 1,235. Guys, what the fuck.
posted

LowAccuracySS wrote:

Notice: The star priority is not 235, but actually 1,235. Guys, what the fuck.
Actually it's 1259 because it went back to 0 after 1024
posted
Actually it's 1258 because it only goes up to 1023 and then instead of going up to 1024 it resets back to 0 so yeah
posted
02:08:333 (1,2) - le mouvement est en back & forth partout dans la section sauf ici. A moins que ce soit une exception c'est peut-être mieux de rester sur ce concept là?

02:59:333 (1,4) - ça touche donc c'est gay

03:09:383 (2) - comment est votre blanquette?

03:33:533 - en vrai la densité me perturbe un peu ici, c'est tellement peu dense alors que la musique part en couilles derrière. J'aurais préféré voir quelque chose qui prenne en compte la seconde guitare.

03:47:483 (5,7) - en vrai jpense c'est mieux de blanquette ces deux notes vu que les deux objets apparaissent a l'écran en même temps
posted

BOUYAAA wrote:

02:08:333 (1,2) - le mouvement est en back & forth partout dans la section sauf ici. A moins que ce soit une exception c'est peut-être mieux de rester sur ce concept là? Début de la nouvelle phrase, donc j'ai cassé le back n forth xd c'est + pour la variation en vrai, mais je la fait tomber à un moment précis et pas random au moins xd

02:59:333 (1,4) - ça touche donc c'est gay t'es homophobe?

03:09:383 (2) - comment est votre blanquette? à sec, avec du gravier

03:33:533 - en vrai la densité me perturbe un peu ici, c'est tellement peu dense alors que la musique part en couilles derrière. J'aurais préféré voir quelque chose qui prenne en compte la seconde guitare. ah ui je comprends, mais j'ai voulu faire un gros contraste avec la fin du solo + cette part, ça donne aussi un break time pour souffler un peu, et puis j'ai map l'autre guitare à 03:42:683 (1) - histoire de pas complètement l'ignorer

03:47:483 (5,7) - en vrai jpense c'est mieux de blanquette ces deux notes vu que les deux objets apparaissent a l'écran en même temps je blanquette le médian wesh
thx BOUYAAA
posted
might wanna prepare, t/641995 Kasai is catching up o-o
posted


Not even close.
posted

GoldenWolf wrote:



Not even close.
Shots fired isnt it?
oh well, gl on rank either way!
posted
bjr!!

[Extra Stage]

alien sliders z :|
  1. 02:59:933 (4,5) - p'tetr que tu peux faire un overlap comme tu le fait d'habitude pour suivre la cohérence, vu que c'est le même bruit? :eyes:
  2. 03:00:083 (5,1) - le spacing il est pas trop ptit? le ton a l'air plus fort que les autres new combo imo, et 03:01:583 (7,1) - a l'air un peu bcp spaced
  3. 03:01:133 (4,5,1) - (mineur) mh blanket? t'as sans doute voulu blanket 4 mais ça fait chelou pour 5 du coup :thinking:
  4. 03:08:183 (6,7,1,2,3,4) - imo c'est dommage de mettre qqch de si dur à lire, vu que y'a pas d'autre pattern de ce genre autre part. mais après ça reste qqch d'unique et c'est tjrs cool!!
  5. 03:27:383 (1,3,1) - l'intensité m'a l'air de diminuer mais pas d'augmenter imo et vu que tu suis bien l'intensité p'tetr que tu pourrais ctrl+g ça 03:27:383 (1,1) - ? o: (mh libre à toi d'accepter ou non, vu que ça fait chelou après pour la suite 03:28:433 (4,5,6,7,1) - sob)
  6. 04:37:433 (2,2) - tu rates des sons sur les sliderend, p'tetr que tu peux les remplacer par un jump? up to u!!

omg

omg

(Thanks to Hysteria for the help!!!)

boo, orvoar!!
posted
I'll drop my big kds star :^)
posted
Yo so I promised you a mod ~
Overall wtf is this spacing LOL really nice map though (can clearly see how much experience you have with mapping tbh)

Maybe enable epilepsy warning? The background flashes up a couple of times and this sudden pop up from dark to light might trigger epilepsy, not sure though

03:08:183 (6,7,1,2,3,4) - might wanna move 2,3,4 a bit to the left (e.g. x=64 y=72) for more readability, while playing the difference in spacing is barely readable.

Besides those I dont really have anything other to remark, I understand your thought process behind most concepts so I don't really see anything else keeping it away from getting ranked :p

gl!
show more
Please sign in to reply.