Phyloukz wrote:

Hello, I've never tried a mod on such a great and perfect map and i may be not experienced enough to say anything. But i want to support this map in any way cuz i like it sooooo much >.< So I'll give it a try, if it is not useful or not useful enough then dont gimme kudo ;_; (I'll shoot my only star to your map although this is most likely nothing) omgggg thank you♥

01:41:013 (7,2) - theres a little overlap, maybe it was intended by you, idk >.< good point, maybe now avoided
01:58:202 (1,2) - blanket these maybe? No, this isn't meant to be blanket but parallel with 01:58:202 (1,3) -
02:01:445 (3,5) - fix blanket (thats maybe unreasonable :s) Talked with Asagi, I will fix if minor things so I fixed lol
04:17:499 (2,4) - ^ ^
04:29:336 (1,1) - ^ (prob unreasonable too) I don't think this is the blanket in first place so no fix imo
02:26:418 (5,2) - overlap ok? prob intended by u again fixed

I hope this helps you a tiny bit and i just see that i already shot a star, so here's my 2nd.
I want to see this map ranked!! (:

Akitoshi wrote:

SkyLifeHope wrote:

screw it
i'm shooting 3 stars more

Oh my god lol Thanks xd
tiem to stop nasasayang ung stars mo xd

Asagi wrote:

grabi na ituu

SkyLifeHope wrote:

wait let me get some kudosu to shoot more stars

1. Tags, the ranked mapset has "naoyuki sato follow slowly healing" in the tags. Maybe you could add those?

1. A unique diffname would be nicer than just "Collab" IMO.
2. 00:01:526 (1) - Why a spinner and why not a slider like you did 00:06:634 (1) - here?
3. 00:06:634 (1) - Use a circle's approach circle to help make this curve perfect.
   
   ^

   
4. 00:16:688 (2) - Pretty sure this ends on the 1/3rd tick.
5. 00:18:147 (3,4,1) - These are 1/6ths, so it should be like this.
   
   ^

   
6. 00:18:850 (2,3,4) - Same here, 1/6th.
7. 00:19:282 (1) - Use the trick from above on this slider too.
8. 00:27:066 (2) - Silence the slider end since its not hitting anything.
9. 00:42:634 (7,8,1) - Why not map the 1/4th stream in the background here by making the 7 and 8 kick sliders?
10. 00:52:851 (4,5,6) - 1/6th quadruple here. Starts at 4, ends at 6. (There should be two notes inbetween rather than 1).
11. 00:55:283 (5) - Theres a note of the melody on the blue tick inside this slider. Not sure if you want to hit that or not.
12. 01:01:769 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - Use that approach circle method to make this stream more circular. It looks kind of ugly atm.
13. 01:36:797 (4,5,6,7,1) - Where'd the huge spacing from 5>6 come from? That just seems too large of a jump.
14. General note for the first kiai: I like it overall but all the stacked triplets and streams contradict the feeling of movement the kiai has. I'd unstack or remap a lot of those to create more flow.
15. 02:31:202 (4,5) - 1/6th here, I'd map it like this.
    
    ^

    
16. 02:43:445 (6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6) - So many unmapped 1/6ths here. Even repeat sliders would work. Theres a quad before 1 (6,7,8,1), a triple before 3 and 5, and then a triple after 5. (Triple being 3 1/6th notes.)
    
    ^

    
17. 03:24:797 (6) - 03:25:121 (1) - Random claps?
18. 03:33:878 (3,1) - Unstacked blanket.
19. 04:10:851 (3,4,5,6) - This pattern just has really awkward flow. Not too sure how you'd fix it, but definitely consider changing it.
20. 04:16:689 (4) - Random drum hitsound?
21. 04:29:986 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1) - I really like this pattern, good job.
22. 04:45:553 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - I think this would be better if every other pattern was going downwards. So the first triple is going upwards, then the second is coming down, third is up, fourth is down.
23. 05:08:905 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - Way too large for what it's mapped to. Please nerf. Its larger than some of your kiai jumps.
24. 05:19:283 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - ^
25. 05:34:364 (4,1) - Fix stack.
26. 05:45:229 (3) - Best slider on the map for sure.
27. Overall its pretty good. Looks better in game than the editor IMO which makes it a bit harder for me to mod.

Cryptic wrote:

Heyo, I love this song!

[General]

1. Tags, the ranked mapset has "naoyuki sato follow slowly healing" in the tags. Maybe you could add those? ok maybe follow them

[Collab]

1. A unique diffname would be nicer than just "Collab" IMO. About this case gonna ask Asagi for something cool diffname that I can also agree with him lol
2. 00:01:526 (1) - Why a spinner and why not a slider like you did 00:06:634 (1) - here? I was so lazy on that time lmao changed to 2 changed to wanna-be sliderino arts
3. 00:06:634 (1) - Use a circle's approach circle to help make this curve perfect. sure. nice
   
   ^

   
4. 00:16:688 (2) - Pretty sure this ends on the 1/3rd tick. wow pro
5. 00:18:147 (3,4,1) - These are 1/6ths, so it should be like this. I'm not sure about this but applied now
   
   ^

   
6. 00:18:850 (2,3,4) - Same here, 1/6th. ^
7. 00:19:282 (1) - Use the trick from above on this slider too. ok
8. 00:27:066 (2) - Silence the slider end since its not hitting anything. ok
9. 00:42:634 (7,8,1) - Why not map the 1/4th stream in the background here by making the 7 and 8 kick sliders? nice
10. 00:52:851 (4,5,6) - 1/6th quadruple here. Starts at 4, ends at 6. (There should be two notes inbetween rather than 1). did reverse 1/6
11. 00:55:283 (5) - Theres a note of the melody on the blue tick inside this slider. Not sure if you want to hit that or not. for consistency thingy for my 1/2spams maybe keep now
12. 01:01:769 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - Use that approach circle method to make this stream more circular. It looks kind of ugly atm. tried
13. 01:36:797 (4,5,6,7,1) - Where'd the huge spacing from 5>6 come from? That just seems too large of a jump. woops
14. General note for the first kiai: I like it overall but all the stacked triplets and streams contradict the feeling of movement the kiai has. I'd unstack or remap a lot of those to create more flow.
15. 02:31:202 (4,5) - 1/6th here, I'd map it like this. replaced 4 as circle and 1/6 reverse.
    
    ^

    
16. 02:43:445 (6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6) - So many unmapped 1/6ths here. Even repeat sliders would work. Theres a quad before 1 (6,7,8,1), a triple before 3 and 5, and then a triple after 5. (Triple being 3 1/6th notes.) tbh I want to put 1/6 but that pattern is not suited for 5.7 tier imo. I gonna collect more opinions about this if I can skip few beat by 1/4 triples.
    
    ^

    
17. 05:08:905 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - Way too large for what it's mapped to. Please nerf. Its larger than some of your kiai jumps. RIP SR. Nerfed
18. 05:19:283 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - ^ ^

1. 01:55:282 (8) - こことかの拍子変わる所で青線までスライダー伸ばしてみてはどうでしょうか？
   個人的にはこちらの方が次のFinishが強調されると思いました
   
   04:47:823 (4,1) - ここみたいな感じって言ったら通じるかな？
   
   
2. 03:26:418 (1) - 単発に変えませんか？
   
   
3. 03:36:797 (5) - DnB特有の音の鳴り方に従うならここからNCのが良いかも
   03:39:391 (1,2,3,4) - ここと同じNCの使い方って言うんですかね？言葉にできなぁ～いぃ＾～
   
   
4. 04:32:255 (1) - アクセントの付け方を変えてみませんか(スライダー遅くしませんか)
   
   
5. 05:13:120 (3,4) - 05:12:472 (1) - こちらの強調をハッキリさせるために x1.1 or x1.2に下げてみてはどうでしょう

A s h e m u wrote:

はろー
(既に完成度高い譜面だから少しだけ提案になります)

Tranquility

1. 01:55:282 (8) - こことかの拍子変わる所で青線までスライダー伸ばしてみてはどうでしょうか？
   個人的にはこちらの方が次のFinishが強調されると思いました
   
   04:47:823 (4,1) - ここみたいな感じって言ったら通じるかな？あーすまん、3/4あまり好きじゃないからサビの前だけで十分だと思う
   
   
2. 03:26:418 (1) - 単発に変えませんか？せやな、アサギさんすまんこ
   
   
3. 03:36:797 (5) - DnB特有の音の鳴り方に従うならここからNCのが良いかも ye
   03:39:391 (1,2,3,4) - ここと同じNCの使い方って言うんですかね？言葉にできなぁ～いぃ＾～ fixd
   
   
4. 04:32:255 (1) - アクセントの付け方を変えてみませんか(スライダー遅くしませんか) ここは04:31:283 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - が激しい流れになってるから速くしてもいいと思うぞ
   
   
5. 05:13:120 (3,4) - 05:12:472 (1) - こちらの強調をハッキリさせるために x1.1 or x1.2に下げてみてはどうでしょう 最初はそうだったけどやっぱり05:12:472 (1) - より音がたかいんだよなぁ...

とても綺麗に作られててツッコミどころ探す方が難しすぎる譜面だゾ…(褒め言葉)

Ranked頑張ってー！

transcendental wrote:

sweet map of one of my favorite songs. really disappointed you chose to map the 1/6s as repeats instead of as clickable objects, but to each their own. you did miss a few that were mapped as 1/4, though.

00:57:877 (4,5,6,7,1) - the 1/4 pattern starts at 00:58:120 but the strong sound is on 00:58:201 - , which is my sliderend. Also 00:58:120 - is weak enough to can skip on slider imo
01:13:444 (4) - 1/6 uhm i don't think putting 1/6 here would be nice, both for rhythm and playability
01:23:823 (5) - 1/6 ^
02:31:120 (3,4,5) - 1/6 sure
02:39:390 (5,6,1) - 1/6 ok
02:43:444 (6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - 1/6 ok
03:27:067 (5) - 1/6 x same reasoning
05:11:012 (5) - 1/6 x
05:16:201 (4) - 1/6 x

nextplay wrote:

Hi Mapping Inspiration!:3

Here -> https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7248140 is a bad testplay because i'm 76k

( I love this Map)

have a Star!

Phyloukz wrote:

Hey, remod cuz I love this map and song and maybe with a little bit more experience xD

modddd

00:16:688 (3) - obviously this slider ends on a 1/6 sound but at the same time you ignore the 1/6 sound at 00:16:958 - which makes no sense to me (like mapping the one 1/6 sound but not the other that sounds the exact same). if you add a circle there it sounds more right to me or just dont map it at all (you usually dont map the 1/6's in the intro as i noticed) uhh so yes you mentioned it that don't map the 1/6 for such calm intro, and I made 1/3 gap here for the sound's strength. 00:16:904 - is obviously audible than 00:16:958 - when we play it with 25% playback
00:28:039 - and 00:29:336 - have a bigger emphasis in the song but you treat them the same as 00:28:688 - . 00:27:390 - is even more emphasized in your map cuz of the sliderhead click but in the music its not as emphasized as the spots i pointed out above. so i think the multiple reverses dont fit here removed 2nd reverse

00:59:174 (3,4) - maybe rotate like 20 degrees anticlockwise and re-arrange them to make a better flow into 00:59:823 (1) - current one is fine as i just copypasted from 00:58:526 (1,2) - w

01:44:255 (2,4) - i personally dont like both of them having the exact same slidershape because they represent whole different sounds uhm idk, i might change if necessary
02:08:580 (1,1,1) - same thing here basically: 02:08:580 (1,1) - sound similar so it would be cool to make the same shape for these whereas 02:08:904 (1) - can have a different shape because its different sound vocal emphasis by SV. Slidershapes are still fine for me though :<

01:51:390 (1) - pretty nazi but you can polish this slider a bit more by making the last white line parallel to the other http://puu.sh/tX6Uc/0b66be4e2a.jpg ok
02:05:985 (1) - same here ok
03:25:607 (2) - ^ this and the others have a too wide angle to be parallel in my eyes (last white line) f
03:56:256 (1) - ^ and this too tight, i think you get my nazi problem now XD blame asagi
03:20:418 (2,4) - polish a bit more and make exact parallel http://puu.sh/tX7l1/6578c7b562.jpg maybe they're parallel now

02:44:147 - and 02:44:201 - are also 1/6 sound, why you dont map them too oops

04:05:337 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - i love this xd

04:45:553 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - i think this is really awkward to play, it flows better that way imo http://puu.sh/tX7JX/e4389171d3.jpg changed to all circles like we used to do in similar parts cuz we r evil lo

05:45:229 (3) - beautiful bring asagi back


I love your choice of sliderarts, i really like how you make sliders of 04:19:607 (1) - that type consistently

Okay, thats it for me! I hope i could help you again a bit :3
no kds since i already got some uwu remapped so whyno t

take my invisible stars
Best of Luck in ranking process!!

Scarsnic wrote:

Hello what am I doing :s

Lolis

00:11:823 (5) - here you don't NC but 00:22:201 (1) - is NC f

01:36:147 (1,2,3,4) - Consider changing this structure, currently they are part of a set, so they should have equal significance, but (1) has no vocal. (Vocal seems distinct here in my opinion) I used that pattern as I look with combo color, instruments are still consistent 1/2 so whynott

01:41:985 (5) - Here a slider is used, but after this stacks are used, see 03:45:229 (3,4) - and 04:44:905 (3,4). Consider making consistent c O L L a B dud we don't need to make same on all partsss, at least we're used same 1/2 rhythm lO

01:50:417 (1,1,1) - Is NC absolutely necessary? I understand SV change but it's not such a drastic change as to warrant NC, if you change then just be aware its repeated quite often throughout map ye it's not only about sv, but in the pitch as well to make it more worth with 1 NC per slider.

03:20:418 (2,3,4) - Reconsider this flow, quite unusual from before. idk that wasn't hard on playing, might change it later

03:27:067 (5,6,7) - I believe rotating 03:27:066 (5,6) - something like -90 degree's to incorporate a circle flow might feel more comfortable here rotated but not -90degree as u expecting w

03:30:310 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - Sharp angle here for a reason? Previously there was some curved streams but this one is significantly different from before. What exactly does the ds change reflect here? Perhaps if you wanted to change ds it would fall upon one of the four distinct vocals heard on 03:30:310 (1,7,5,3) - we used same pattern here, 01:27:066 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - but I changed a bit for asagi

03:58:040 (4,5,6,7,8) - as well as 04:15:878 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - and 05:33:716 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - This is unusual, the rhythm choice is different from similar cases such as 01:54:796 (4,5,6,7,8) - and 02:12:958 (4,5,6,7,8) - and 04:57:715 (4,5,6,7,8) - If there was a pattern for diversity perhaps it could be such that the pattern is ABAB but I could not tell if such a pattern was being used 02:12:958 (4,5,6,7,8) - 01:54:796 (4,5,6,7,8) - is mine then others were Asagi. I made it more consistent on Asagi's part as I got permission lol

04:05:337 (1,2,3,4,5) - Perhaps cleaner if you blanket around slider-head of 04:05:013 (3) - ye

04:13:445 (2,3,4,5,6) - consider this flow, quite sharp from 04:13:121 (1,2) - changed in my own way xd


1920x1080 BG change it when necessary xd

Thats all

Great song
Great map

Teach me your ways.

-NeBu- wrote:

nm

00:15:390 (1) - I think you can remove this NC for consistency and for the hp drain ye, i prefer this current NC settings
00:25:769 (1) - ^ ^
00:47:823 (4,5,6,7) - maybe something close to this? (https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7722813) ok
01:15:877 (3,4,5) - you may get better flow if you place it somewhere in right corner between 01:15:390 (1,2) - and ctrl+g this (or maybe its just me) 01:15:715 (2) - is already in corner so it looks way too forced if i apply that
02:18:958 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - you probably wont like it, but since you added clap sound on every fourth circle of NC, you can NC this clap sound to make 1/2 jumps oh ye
04:06:634 (1) - make it more "zigzagged" with slider end slightly more down, it may look better (04:07:283 (3) - I don't think this "blanket" matter here that much) ok
04:11:336 (5) - it may be easy to sliderbreak, maybe triple or different placement? i moved to somewhere
04:54:309 (1,3) - small thing for visual experience, but its not perfectly "reflected" [?] from the long slider (when you overlap the slider on the long one, its not enough rounded) maybe fixed

nothing special from my side, but damn good map, I enjoyed that, I love the song, gl!

Yuii- wrote:

hello i mod modm odmodmo

00:17:985 (2) - make it consistent :d 00:16:688 (3) - oops
00:19:363 - you cannot mute both sliderslide and sliderticks, you need to raise the volume up!! sorry boss
01:11:985 (2) - could separate this into two different objects for vocals and beat on the white tick, like 1/2 slider+circle for example. could do the same for 01:17:174 (2) - we prioritizing the held sound from voclas as it's not intense yet
01:22:850 (3,4) - if you nerf these, you are going to get more emphasis on the important drum sounds that are on 01:23:174 - woo. same goes to like the rest of the pattern like 01:53:985 (4,5) - that one yes, but i dont want to change 01:53:985 (4,5) - as it's structured with 01:53:985 (4,5,1,2,3,4) -
01:24:796 (2,3,4) - personal, but i really think the tails sohuld be clickable, since you're using gradual spacing you can start with a build-up from here instead? could do the same fo rsimilar patterns such as 03:28:040 (2,3,4) - oh yeah took a reference from Asagi's part
01:33:390 - hello mr. sound, refer to 01:35:823 (4,5) - uwu
02:25:282 - 02:26:580 - 02:27:877 - etc. you could also map these piano sounds, instead of making everything symmetrical as if they had the same rhythm I tried to replace them with circles, idk if this works well though w
02:43:444 (1,2,3) - important beats are on the tail ouch tried to remove 1 reverse and stacked a circle, idk if this plays good though ;;
02:44:904 - consider lowering the overall spacing of this whole section because it looks like you're mapping the same thing from the beginning, even if this is supposed to be a really calm section aye sir
03:00:228 (2,3,4,1) - what they are actually audible but nerfed 1 note for you <3
03:17:337 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - vs 03:12:148 (1,2,3,4,5) - why is the first one i mentioned so clickable-heavy fixed for asagi
03:20:418 (2,3) - these aren't aesthetically pleasant curved a slider for asagi
03:23:175 (3) - consider nerfing this pattern so the amount of pressure you'd put on 03:23:337 (4,5) - is bigger. moving (3) to 03:22:526 (1) - 's tail would fix the issue ezpz nerfed for asagi
03:36:472 - make this clickable for emphasissss emphasized for asagi
03:44:255 (5) - a. the fact that you're making the important sounds part of slidertails but the non-important clickable, like 03:45:229 (3,4) - is quite sad *maybe* fixed for asagi
03:53:985 (1,1) - these finishes sound actually bad removed finishes for asagi
03:54:309 (1) - unsnapped, take care!!! snapped for asagi!!!

you should watch my modding streams :d tfw we have different timezone :<

[]

good luck with this map!! very very promising

dqs01733 wrote:

aeiou

rickyrox3 wrote:

loved いつ

tatatat wrote:

Since you were asking for a BN check in chat, I decided to check your map to make sure it followed the ranking criteria.
I checked all your audio files for delays and to make sure they are at least 100ms long.
soft-hitfinish2.wav seems to have a delay of at least 4.75ms, the audio at the beginning seems to just be noise not accounted for when recording. At most it has a 5.8ms delay. Any delay at or above 5ms is not rankable. This should probably be fixed. i replaced my soft-hitfinish2
soft-hitwhistle2.wav has a .58ms delay which is not because of noise. It also has .2s of silent audio at the end of it.
soft-hitwhistle3.wav has a .578ms delay which is also not because of noise. It also has .3104s of silent audio at the end of it. i asked a bunch of ppl and it seems safe
Also your audio file has a whole 1.5s delay, while this doesn't matter that much if you set your offset correctly, I'm just letting you know.is that even an issue lmao

Hobbes2 wrote:

From my queue

i love nekomata master

00:12:796 (1,2,3,4,1,2) - this might sound dumb, but something cool is that these sounds are reused later in the song (specifically here - 02:25:120 (4,5) - and then in this part)
^If you can relate these, that would be really cool. As you know, the sounds decrease in intensity (Its a set of 3, and the first is the highest, and the last is the lowest, etc). In the latter portion of the map, you 02:27:715 (5,6) - stack these, which I guess is because they are the least intense. You can use this concept at the start of the map too for 00:15:390 (1,2) - and it would be cool! I suggest having the first set be the largest spacing, the second set being medium spacing, and stacking the last one, and then using this concept for both the intro and the later part of the map. I think it'd be cool!
^This applies whenever relevant. ohh i see, I didn't stacked the least intense one but applied the spacing thingy, thanks for the idea!

00:18:850 - Could map this purple tick with a circle kinda questionable but yeah, added. I'll let monstrata decide if he's ok with this w
01:59:174 (4) - can be 2 circles for vocals, makes it stand out from the other sets of two 1/2 sliders that have single syllables for each slider applied
02:08:580 (1,1,1) - while the pattern is cool, unlike the previous section there are the two drum hits for 02:08:580 (1) - and 02:09:228 (1) - and using circles for those would fit more. 04:11:824 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - yesss! do this its literally perfect alright
02:12:147 (4) - should be circles, like 01:53:985 (4,5) - sure
02:20:255 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - the melody for these notes is less pronounced than the other ones, but its mapped with the same level of intensity. I would lower the spacing for these. scaled down a bit
02:28:363 (2,6) - stack? whoopies
02:33:390 - should be clickable, cool drum rhythm here. 02:33:228 (1,2) - ctrl+g rhythm oki
03:47:985 - make this clickable like you did earlier fixed4asagi
03:54:309 (1) - move this closer to 03:53:985 (1) - so theres more emphasis on 03:54:634 (1). Also why does 01:51:390 (1) - have no finish but 03:54:634 - does fixed both placements and hs
03:57:391 (5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - http://puu.sh/wMfnw/29ad35ccec.jpg makes more sense, since the triplet sound for 03:57:796 - is more audible. you could also do kickslider rhythms, like this - http://puu.sh/wMfpD/36419549b2.jpg (i think this is the best). You know, like the measure at 04:15:716 (1) - lol hmm, not a kickslider but fixed the rhythm, adding kicks might out of nowhere w
04:04:040 (1,2,3,4) - why all circles here? doesnt fit the music imo, sliders would be better slider + 2 circles still works?
04:23:499 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - again, melody less pronounced here. less spacing pls scaled down too
04:32:255 (1) - why is this a 1/2 slider? and even if it is one, why the weird anti jump 04:32:255 (1,1) - here? I think you can actually map 04:32:499 - asagi explained that it's an impact from 04:31:283 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - and ye mapping 04:32:499 - is kinda overmapped.
04:44:905 (3,4) - manually move these down and to the right by 4 units, so the first note stacks with the tail of 04:44:255 (1) - aight
04:57:390 (2) - unlike before for this you ignore emphasizing 04:57:390 (2) - or 04:57:715 (4) - with any kind of 1/4 fixed i guess
05:08:499 - ignored sound in the melody. repeats in the next section added
05:12:390 - ^ same
05:14:093 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - compared to 05:15:390 (1,2) - i cant tell why the first is all circles and the second is sliders. just compare the intensity, the first doesnt really have anything to signal using circles like that when the latter has all claps and strong drums. added slider on 3rd object on each color
05:21:877 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - yeah..sliders fit much better here. the red ticks for this doesnt have strong enough sound to justify these big jumps aye
05:29:662 (1,1,1) - should be set up and hitsounded more like 04:11:824 (1,2,3,1,2,3), as that's what the music is doing actually they aren't same, but fixed the hitsound
05:41:337 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - same as before melody less pronounced space less k_hand: well nurfd

EDIT - oops guess you set up somethin with mr monstrata lol

Monstrata wrote:

Tranquility

00:14:255 (4) - Can I ask why this is a 1/2 slider but not the others. Just curious, I think its okay. there's a weird sound on 00:14:417 - so yeah, same as 00:24:796 -
00:31:931 (3,4) - The sliders are way too fast here imo... double the speed is really sudden. 00:32:580 (1) - too slowed down to .8
02:05:985 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2) - Didn't really like this section because you switch flows from clockwise to counterclockwise to clockwise relaly frequently in this one section. I think a more consistent flow would be nicer. i tried
02:27:715 (5,6) - I don't think its a good idea to stack, since theyre different pitches and 02:26:417 (6,7) - aren't stacked. as hobbes pointed,
it's about the pitch, i stacked the least intensity one but i can still unstack it if u rly disagree with this setting w
02:38:093 (4,5) - ^ ^
02:43:444 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - NC spam would be nice for readability, and it'll make players more aware of the rhythm here. sure
02:44:580 (8) - I would Ctrl+G this too, it feels better to move upward after playing 7, rather than downwards, considering the movement from 6>7 will cause ppl to drift upward due to momentum. (I'll accept using flowbreak emphasis as valid reason if you want to keep tho) ctrl+g'd
02:53:985 (1) - I think using two circles would fit better since the kicks double here. switching the 2 circles from 1/6 drr sound from 02:53:661 (4) - is kinda brutal to hit for such calm part imo, also i mapped as slidertail on 02:54:634 - so yeah i think it's safe (?)
02:55:282 (1) - This slider is confusing. It's not expected that the slider will go upward instead of downward imo... The bend is completely within the sliderpath so you can't see when the slider bends. Try giving more roon in the center for the slider, or making more spacing here: made it more easier to read

~

03:26:417 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - The circle jumps are significantly bigger than the kickslider jumps so this sequence felt a bit imbalanced. added more spacing on kicks
03:32:904 - 03:39:715 - This section, I wish you emphasized the downbeat or gave it some emphasis. 03:35:175 (5,1) - Doesn't really reflect the vocal line that well. But give me your reasons if you want to keep. i changed the 03:35:175 (5,1) - but other sections were still kinda similar with previous section (which is mine) tbh.. they're both plays fine with several players but any suggestion if you really disagree with rhythm picks?
04:46:282 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - The stream just looks a bit weird... I think you were going for an accelerated stream? Maybe? But only 7>8>1 look bigger. also 2>3>4>5 looks like a weird curve... I would consider remaking the stream. yee i tried, now i'm praying that this works
05:02:417 (1) - Ctrl+G'ing feels nicer to play imo. Gives better emphasis onto 1, and gives a nice angle into the triplet. sure
05:45:229 (3) - Nice thank asagrill

Call me back~ Link metadata if you have it. (Also you can give me another approval map if you have one, didn't expect you to mod entire set)