It won't be effective because eyes won't move faster than hand.
Hmm, you might be right. Did anyone do the science already?Ninonuko wrote:
It won't be effective because eyes won't move faster than hand.
It's from my experience, sometimes I rely on peripheral vision to aim because I don't have enough time to focus on the circle i.e. bull's eyeSouled_Eagle wrote:
Hmm, you might be right. Did anyone do the science already?Ninonuko wrote:
It won't be effective because eyes won't move faster than hand.
^^This.Ninonuko wrote:
It's from my experience, sometimes I rely on peripheral vision to aim because I don't have enough time to focus on the circle i.e. bull's eye
Eyes have kinda the fastest muscles in body so...Ninonuko wrote:
It won't be effective because eyes won't move faster than hand.
So basically it polls at inconsistent rates between 50-100hz which is even less than tablet and doesn't have the error magnitude/propagation guarantees that a tablet has. I was skeptical when zenny popped in touting about how optical keyboards are the next best thing (still not enough unbiased data collected to confirm/deny and narrill did a good job debunking some of the marketing propaganda) and they have much much better listed specs than this. If you've ever tried playing with vsync on you'll understand just how shitty that polling rate is.Souled_Eagle wrote:
According to product specs the eye to app latency is 15 ms
I've pasted the specs from the website down below for easy acces:SPOILEROperating range: 18-40" / 45-100 cm
Headbox size: 16 x 12" / 40 x 30 cm at 26" / 65 cm
Data rate: >60 Hz
Eye to Application latency: 15 ms +/- 5 ms
Screen size: Up to 27"
Weight: 0.2 lb / 91 grams
Size (WxHxL): 0.8x0.6x12.5 in / 20x15x230 mm
It's fastest reacting muscle, still it won't move the cursor faster than hand I think.HK_ wrote:
Eyes have kinda the fastest muscles in body so...Ninonuko wrote:
It won't be effective because eyes won't move faster than hand.
peppy wrote:
I have one of these and can confirm playing a single map with it will make your either vomit or feel horrible for up to four hours afterwards (tried on a few people, so sample size is 3). [...]
The precision and polling rate of the devices are not issues for what it's worth. But I would recommend this to no one that wants to keep their sanity.
Or just be adamqs and HDHR the "unreadable" map anyways. :pShiirn wrote:
At lower levels of play it can certainly seem feasible to follow maps with direct eye movement as the spacing between notes is often within that point, but as spacing and speed goes up, it becomes impossible to keep up with moving your focal of vision to every new note, so you fall back on muscle memory and instinct along with just plain practice at relying on peripheral cues - this is why some things are "unreadable", because they aren't following the standard rules that automatically crop up as player habits evolve to fit higher difficulties of challenge in this game.
If the map input was insubstantial there would be no reason not to toss on flashlight as well. You can say the same thing about ar11 reading but when it comes down to it there is a dependence on map input even if some basic memorization is required. This dependence implies that actual reading is being done, even if it's different from the normal connotation of reading.Shiirn wrote:
At that point it's simply due to memory as opposed to actually reading the input of the map.
about the slider part just imagine doing something like endless tewi inaba park using your eyesNinonuko wrote:
It's fastest reacting muscle, still it won't move the cursor faster than hand I think.
+ sliders will make it even harder for eyes to track
+ you move your hand more than your eye when you masturbating, so it's more trained than your eyes in term of continuous movement
Edit : welp, I think hand is more agile than eyes exactly (not faster).