Hou Rearu wrote:

Serenity

1. 00:10:416 (3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - As it is the very beginning it might be made in more easy way, more smooth.
2. 00:34:499 (2) - sure this white tick wants be clickable
3. 01:19:499 (3) - ctrl+G did something else here
4. 01:23:916 (6) - Don't hear a thing allowing this to be triple Hmm I hear differently
5. 01:43:833 (3,4) - feels weird for me
6. 01:57:999 (2) - no The circle here is meant for the vocals
7. 02:40:833 (2,3,4) - again nothing for triple here Same as above
8. 02:50:249 - fill it and and connect pattern
9. 03:05:666 (1,2,3,4,1,2) - a lillte bit uncomfortable, tho plays fine to me o.o
10. 03:11:999 (8,1,2,3,4) - feels strange ehhh idk what you mean by that
11. 03:13:666 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2) - so boring... I guess everyone finds this boring :< idk I'll come up with something...
12. 03:54:332 (2) - Sure white tick wants to be clickable
13. 04:32:832 (2) - nosame as above

1. 00:10:999 (1) - Even though the current one plays fine, the movement would feel much better of the slider was pointing upwards.
   
   Example

   
2. 01:08:333 (1,2,3) - The spacing feels awfully close between these sliders, it's especially weird because the vocals keep increaseing their tone into something more powerful compared to 01:06:999 (1,2,3,4,5) - .
3. 02:31:499 (1,2,3,4,5) - I don't really like the overlaps that are happening between the jump pattern (editor-wise, at least), you could try something like this? Spacing might be a bit too big, though.
   
   Example

   
4. 02:51:749 (1) - The spinner feels really odd here, maybe it's because the song doesn't really change its intensivity at all. I personally think this would be better off with a long slider or two, or then mapped normally, rather than spinner.
5. 03:05:666 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3) - This pattern looks messy compared to the similar ones before. Might be intentional, considering you may have not wanted a star pattern and something else, but if this is not the case, just do it by ctrl shift D and make it perfect.
6. 03:34:333 (5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,1) - The stream shape could be better, the curves are kind of disappointing. Try this for the sake of visuals?
   
   Example

   
7. 03:38:666 (1,2,3) - The idea of these is nice, but I don't hear sound in the background that would support the 1/2. Maybe you could do something similar to 03:35:999 (1) - ? The idea of a long slider would feel nice.
8. 03:56:832 (2) - If you want a perfect stack with 03:55:832 (2) - , move the red anchor to x:229 y:151.
9. 04:13:665 (4) - No idea if this was your intention again, but you can move your note to x:111 y:99 so it's in the middle of 04:14:165 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - .
10. 04:47:999 (5,1) - Blanket.

1. 00:13:499 (1) - I dislike the fact that this finish is covered by the slider end. I also feel like you could follow the melody better with a note into 1/2 slider, so consider this?
   
   Example

   
2. 02:26:333 (4) - Maybe rotate a little bit for a better blanket with 02:25:166 (4) - ?
3. 02:31:333 (2,3) - NC both of them to stay consistent with 01:14:999 (1,1,1) - ?
4. 03:13:666 - This might be little boring for the players play, considering it's just 1/1 notes in a row one after another. Maybe try to do something what Giralda did, and play with 1/1 1/2 sliders?

Asphyxia wrote:

ヾ(｡･ω･)ｼ
[Serenity]

1. 00:10:999 (1) - Even though the current one plays fine, the movement would feel much better of the slider was pointing upwards. I tried to make adjustments to make this work but I couldn't help but keep the blanket for 00:11:499 (3,1)
   
   Example

   
2. 01:08:333 (1,2,3) - The spacing feels awfully close between these sliders, it's especially weird because the vocals keep increaseing their tone into something more powerful compared to 01:06:999 (1,2,3,4,5) - .
3. 02:31:499 (1,2,3,4,5) - I don't really like the overlaps that are happening between the jump pattern (editor-wise, at least), you could try something like this? Spacing might be a bit too big, though. I made tried to avoid some of the overlaps, but I didn't want to enlarge the spacing any further.
   
   Example

   
4. 02:51:749 (1) - The spinner feels really odd here, maybe it's because the song doesn't really change its intensivity at all. I personally think this would be better off with a long slider or two, or then mapped normally, rather than spinner. The spinners in the map act as a "break-point" for players as there isn't any, or rather lack of, appropriate points in the map where a break is justified.
5. 03:05:666 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3) - This pattern looks messy compared to the similar ones before. Might be intentional, considering you may have not wanted a star pattern and something else, but if this is not the case, just do it by ctrl shift D and make it perfect.
6. 03:34:333 (5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,1) - The stream shape could be better, the curves are kind of disappointing. Try this for the sake of visuals?
   
   Example

   
7. 03:38:666 (1,2,3) - The idea of these is nice, but I don't hear sound in the background that would support the 1/2. Maybe you could do something similar to 03:35:999 (1) - ? The idea of a long slider would feel nice.
8. 03:56:832 (2) - If you want a perfect stack with 03:55:832 (2) - , move the red anchor to x:229 y:151.
9. 04:13:665 (4) - No idea if this was your intention again, but you can move your note to x:111 y:99 so it's in the middle of 04:14:165 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - .
10. 04:47:999 (5,1) - Blanket.

Shyotamaze wrote:

I was told to mod that map but I suck so take a star instead

Mikii wrote:

wow im retarded

gl

jonathanlfj wrote:

Dark Giralda III

Depths wrote:

my body is reggie