A slightly better mod than last time, or at least I hope it is
No kudosu, as it is a re-mod
Edit: Why did you give me kudosu, I even said in the beginning not to
0 1 2 3 4 5
6K Basic
00:06:992 (6992|3,7165|0,7337|3) - instead of using an {x,y,x} pattern, I would stick to using patterns like 00:04:234 (4234|2,4406|3,4578|4) - or 00:04:923 (4923|1,5096|3,5268|5) -. That's because there's nothing musically that suggests this pattern
00:07:682 (7682|5,7854|2,8027|5) - as with above
00:08:371 (8371|1,8544|4,8716|1) -
00:22:509 - I'm pretty sure you want a double here - to keep consistent with 00:21:992 (21992|1,21992|0) -, 00:20:268 (20268|4,20268|5) -, etc
00:50:613 - a note here for the melody?
00:57:509 - did you want a double here? It has the same sound as at 00:56:475 (56475|1,56475|0) -
01:00:268 - as with above when compared to 00:59:234 (59234|1,59234|2) -
I'm not too sure but consider adding a note at 01:00:785 - and 01:00:958 - for the bass. I'd make it a jack in {5}
01:14:923 (74923|0,75096|4,75268|0,75440|4) - I don't like this {x,y,x,y} pattern. I'd keep {a,y,b,y}, since the 2nd/4th notes have the same pithces but change the columns of the 1st/3rd notes
01:29:578 - I'd add another note here, since its a piano chord, not a note
01:30:096 - as with above
I think an LN suits 01:32:165 (92165|1) - better. Also, it's not like this is going to make the difficulty much harder to play
4K Basic
00:21:992 - double, as with 6K
00:50:613 - add a note, as with 6K
00:57:509 - add a note, as with 6K
01:00:268 - ^
01:00:785 - add a note, as with 6K
01:00:958 - ^
01:14:923 (74923|3,75096|0,75268|3,75440|0) - as with 6K, I'd use a different pattern. Consider {3,0,3,1} - that way you only need to change 01:15:440 (75440|0) -
01:29:578 - add note, as with 6K
01:30:096 - ^
01:32:165 (92165|2) - change to LN, as with 6K
4K/6K Advanced
00:33:889 - I think you forgot a note
Maybe move the end of 00:50:785 (50785|5) - to 00:52:854 - and change 00:52:854 (52854|0) - into an LN. I can't see why 00:52:854 (52854|0) - is an SN and why 00:50:785 (50785|5) - extends past it
00:54:923 (54923|4) - this sound ends at 00:55:613 -
01:21:303 - I think the piano chord deserves a double
01:24:061 - ^
01:25:440 - ^
01:30:096 - double here for the piano chord?
6K Extreme
00:07:854 - I'm not sure why this is a double
00:09:234 - ^
00:10:613 - ^
00:21:820 - not sure why this is a double
00:32:940 - did you forget a note here? (drums)
00:36:992 - ^ (melody)
00:39:837 - ^ (drums)
00:50:785 (50785|2) - um, isn't this supposed to end at 00:52:854 -?
I'd like it better if 00:59:061 (59061|2,59104|1,59147|0) - was changed into a {0,1,2}. It looks neater to me
01:04:665 - forgetting a note? (drums)
01:06:044 - ^ (drums)
Between 01:07:509 - and 01:08:889 - is mapped really weirdly, as in you haven't mapped any other parts of this difficulty in this way. I'm pretty sure it's because you removed the drums, so add them back in
01:10:182 - missing a note? (drums)
01:15:699 - ^ (drums)
01:26:820 - ^ (piano)
01:27:050 - ^ (piano)
01:27:509 - ^ (piano)
_
That's about it. Tell me if you want any clarifications