Wagakki Band - Senbonzakura

posted
Total Posts
39
show more
Topic Starter
pkk

Pituophis wrote:

:o
hitsounds so good.
thanks d00d

still need to add green lines to make the hitnormal slider ends quieter during kiai and stuff, although that's only an issue with default skin since the hitnormals sound a lot like the claps
Aria Brynhildr
Dank map, have a star :))

And maybe a mod if you don't mind one from a modding/mapping newbie. Btw, am very noob at modding and mapping, did I say that already? :)
Topic Starter
pkk

Aria Brynhildr wrote:

Dank map, have a star :))

And maybe a mod if you don't mind one from a modding/mapping newbie. Btw, am very noob at modding and mapping, did I say that already? :)
Thanks for the star 8-) glad to hear you like the map

If you would like to mod it, you can give it a go! You gotta start somewhere haha
ProfessionalBox
yes
Yuuya_ke
Hi. First "mod" I've ever done. :o

Easy
All I could find were these discrepancies...

00:15:553 -The slider doesn't properly surround the previous circle.
01:12:807 - Same
02:40:651 - Same
04:19:474 - Same

Normal
I mean, it's incomplete. I don't really have anything for you. :lol:

Death Blossom
I played this myself and I quite enjoyed it. I got nothing. :)
Topic Starter
pkk

rickyrox3 wrote:

Hi. First "mod" I've ever done. :o

Easy
All I could find were these discrepancies... fixed all

00:15:553 -The slider doesn't properly surround the previous circle.
01:12:807 - Same
02:40:651 - Same
04:19:474 - Same

Normal
I mean, it's incomplete. I don't really have anything for you. :lol:

Death Blossom
I played this myself and I quite enjoyed it. I got nothing. :)glad to see you enjoyed it 8-)
thanks for the mod, ricky!

I think modding can be just as enjoyable as mapping sometimes, it's always nice to be able to help others out 8-)
Spaghetti
Topic Starter
pkk

Spaghetti wrote:

grats on community manager!
Mazzerin
  1. 04:12:807 (1,2,3,4) - this should definitely be 2 clicks, string instrument goes on the 1/2, same everywhere, you even hitsound the 1/2s but they have no emphasis at all (alternatively doubles with spacing between both of them) also feels weird how they got same spacing as 00:35:945 (1,2,3,4) - these, cause intensity differs
  2. 00:41:043 (3,4) - these should be circles cause of the string instrument, also if you for whatever reason don't do that they're still very underspaced
  3. 00:47:709 (1,2,3,4) - 00:35:160 (1,2,3,4) - this stuff would be much better if it was more spaced/spaced out accordingly to the pitch
  4. 00:48:494 (1,2,3) - should be all circles, also really underwhelming for how intense it gets there compared to 00:35:945 (1,2,3,4) -
  5. 00:52:807 (5,6,7,8) - space out more
  6. 01:32:807 (1,2,3,4) - this sound like it should be a condensed stream into a jump (between 01:33:102 (4,1) - ), or well actually swapping the spacing of these and 00:35:945 (1,2,3,4) - would be a good idea
  7. 03:13:592 (1) - should be much more intense from here, there's double bass and shit even, space stuff like 03:14:376 (1,2) - out, also could move stuff like 03:14:964 (4) - 03:15:847 (5) - 03:17:121 (3) - further away so they're properly emphasized
  8. 03:17:513 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - well this should get a huge buff for sure, looks like a poor child that got no love from his dad right now
  9. 03:48:102 (1) - why is this chorus mapped the same way as the other 2? the vocals get more intense, the guitar gets more intense, everything does, but it's literally the same, it's just underwhelming, increase the SV to like 2,5 and just move objects around a bit, should be enough
  10. 04:00:651 (1) - same for the ending, but also should increase spacing on these 04:06:141 (1,2,3,4,5) - by a lot
  11. 04:10:062 (1,2,3,4,1) - this is good, first time this pattern is this spaced and it's at almost the most intense part
  12. 04:13:200 (1) - aaand this whole part should be even more spaced cause of that double bass, this 04:18:690 (1,2,3,4,5) - 04:22:611 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - feels like a joke at this point
Topic Starter
pkk

Mazzerin wrote:

  1. 04:12:807 (1,2,3,4) - this should definitely be 2 clicks, string instrument goes on the 1/2, same everywhere, you even hitsound the 1/2s but they have no emphasis at all (alternatively doubles with spacing between both of them) also feels weird how they got same spacing as 00:35:945 (1,2,3,4) - these, cause intensity differs I like the four clicks here to also map the drums, as well as because I prefer this as a transition into the downbeat over two sliders or two spaced doubles. I just feel that they don't have the same effect as this. Increased the spacing though.
  2. 00:41:043 (3,4) - these should be circles cause of the string instrument, also if you for whatever reason don't do that they're still very underspaced changed to circles
  3. 00:47:709 (1,2,3,4) - 00:35:160 (1,2,3,4) - this stuff would be much better if it was more spaced/spaced out accordingly to the pitch increased spacing at third and fourth objects
  4. 00:48:494 (1,2,3) - should be all circles, also really underwhelming for how intense it gets there compared to 00:35:945 (1,2,3,4) - agree
  5. 00:52:807 (5,6,7,8) - space out more good idea, I did a little gradual spacing increase over the spread of those four notes
  6. 01:32:807 (1,2,3,4) - this sound like it should be a condensed stream into a jump (between 01:33:102 (4,1) - ), or well actually swapping the spacing of these and 00:35:945 (1,2,3,4) - would be a good idea it is a good idea, but I don't really like the stream --> jump into slider pattern and the way it plays. I think the current pattern provides enough emphasis while remaining comfortable to play. I've also angled the slider upwards away from the flow of the stream to create emphasis so I'll stick with my current pattern.
  7. 03:13:592 (1) - should be much more intense from here, there's double bass and shit even, space stuff like 03:14:376 (1,2) - out, also could move stuff like 03:14:964 (4) - 03:15:847 (5) - 03:17:121 (3) - further away so they're properly emphasized kinda remapped this part
  8. 03:17:513 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - well this should get a huge buff for sure, looks like a poor child that got no love from his dad right now agree. just because my dad didn't love me as a child doesn't mean I can't give this stream some love.
  9. 03:48:102 (1) - why is this chorus mapped the same way as the other 2? the vocals get more intense, the guitar gets more intense, everything does, but it's literally the same, it's just underwhelming, increase the SV to like 2,5 and just move objects around a bit, should be enough increased sv + spascing
  10. 04:00:651 (1) - same for the ending, but also should increase spacing on these 04:06:141 (1,2,3,4,5) - by a lot agree, increased SV/spacing on ending + spaced stream pattern
  11. 04:10:062 (1,2,3,4,1) - this is good, first time this pattern is this spaced and it's at almost the most intense part thank
  12. 04:13:200 (1) - aaand this whole part should be even more spaced cause of that double bass, this 04:18:690 (1,2,3,4,5) - 04:22:611 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - feels like a joke at this point increased spacing ddd
thanks mazzerin [!]

very helpful
blizzardice
:thinking:
Lasse
I think silencing normal-sliderslide seems like a nice idea considering most sounds you mapped sliders to don't really work well with the normal slide
if not: 03:32:023 - should probably be N:C2 like 03:47:709 - ?

why is the break snapped so weirdly

x
00:29:671 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - really bothered me on my sightread testplay, even at this ar. you could just make it overlap at least a bit less with the stream before
00:49:278 (1) - felt like it could use more emphasis with how strong it is and movement into it (start of slider) is kinda uncomfortable, how about trying something like http://i.imgur.com/L2bp5tE.jpg
00:55:160 (3) - why no 3/4 slider? fits the guitar thing so well
01:01:435 (8,9) - first is a held sound, second has really loud drums on both ticks, to having them mapped differently would be great
01:07:219 - with what the triples here are mapped to, skipping this seems so wrong lol
01:07:807 - this thing 01:07:513 (2,3,4,5,6) - is like continuous drums, but you do this? how about at least making 01:07:709 (4) - into a 1/4 slider if you want to keep the current clicking and spacing? though I think a full stream would work better
01:18:690 (3) - did you forget to nc this? would make sense with 01:17:513 (1,1) - // 02:21:435 (3,4) - too then
01:45:258 (2,1,2,3,4) - a) 01:45:258 (2,1) - this spacing for active 1/4 here is stupid looking at how you spaced this part overall
b)01:45:356 (1,2,3,4) - is som ephasized in the song, spacing similar to 01:32:807 (1,2,3,4) - and/or maybe a pattern that requires a bit more snapping would be nice
02:13:788 (4,5,1) - why is this like the only spot you don't stack these for this part
02:21:827 (1,2,3,4) - you used way more spacing the first time this happened and that made more sense to me
02:33:200 (3) - movement into this is pretty akwward to play with how it cuts so hard into the rather circular thing from before http://i.imgur.com/D3tYmSY.jpg at least that is how most people will probably play that (at least how I did lol)
03:00:258 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1) - idea is nice, but it felt like you didn't fully pull it off, with how you seperate them pattern/combo wise, why not even go for something like http://i.imgur.com/aV1n57C.jpg so it actually feels outstanding
03:32:023 (1) - stupid without sliderends http://i.imgur.com/NTPy61Y.jpg, but since that doesn't have to be considered for rankability and it worked okay for me on sightread I'm fine with it personally
04:10:356 (2,4) - spacing seems a bit too much already, even with slider leniency, why not something like http://i.imgur.com/Ckd8I5w.jpg to reduce it a little
04:25:749 (1) - think this would work better if you manually did some stacking things, so it actually appears under 04:25:356 (3) - instead of under the slidertail

insane
fix ur shit http://i.imgur.com/1XTngzk.jpg
some rhythm(combo things from x might apply here too
00:51:239 (2,3,4,5) - since it's such low bpm and kinda slow here I'd expect people to not make much use of leniency on the slider before, so curving this stream a bit would make it feel way nicer http://i.imgur.com/ypN8hk3.jpg
02:04:572 (1) - even it leads into a slowdown, the note is still pretty emphasized and all so spacing it more like 02:03:004 (1,2) - (or at least not overlapping) fits better
02:15:455 (4,1) - why the random manual thing?
02:16:729 (3,1) - kinda easy to mistake for different rhythm/less repeats with how 1 is spaced/placed and how you didn't really utilitize 2xrepeats so far. could try something more like http://i.imgur.com/OTp6Oya.jpg
04:10:356 (2,3,4,1) - can you be consistent with how you space the overlaps in the same pattern? would look much better
04:23:003 (5) - small spacing increase to fit increasing pitch?

hard
01:07:709 (6,7) - multiple 1/4 sliders seem a bit much for this part, why not http://i.imgur.com/X0akv2r.jpg ?

n
02:50:062 (1) - could reduce the self-overlap a bit for clearer path/readability

e
01:12:807 (1) - why the nc?
01:36:337 (1) - seems a bit edgy for eady I think, reduce or even removing the self-overlap would be great // 02:35:945 (1) -- 03:26:141 (1) - 04:06:925 (1,2) -
something like 01:26:925 (1) - or 02:07:709 (1) - works at least a little better I think

nice, though getting like two or so more mods to have some more input before I recheck this wouldn't hurt
buny
nice map, hitsounds are very nice. The start gave me a bad impression of the mapping style but it actually played out very well.
Topic Starter
pkk

a loli wrote:

nice map, hitsounds are very nice. The start gave me a bad impression of the mapping style but it actually played out very well.
thanks! I mapped the beginning of the song a while ago so that's probably why it's a bit weird; I might fix it up later though.

Lasse wrote:

I think silencing normal-sliderslide seems like a nice idea considering most sounds you mapped sliders to don't really work well with the normal slide I swear I had it before and now it's disappeared...added it back in
if not: 03:32:023 - should probably be N:C2 like 03:47:709 - ?

why is the break snapped so weirdly first osu deletes my normal-sliderslide, hitclap and hitclap2, and now it randomly snaps my break
- _-


x
00:29:671 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - really bothered me on my sightread testplay, even at this ar. you could just make it overlap at least a bit less with the stream before I think this one is ok, usually people don't mess up on this part often. The spaced stream has pretty low spacing compared to what I had before
00:49:278 (1) - felt like it could use more emphasis with how strong it is and movement into it (start of slider) is kinda uncomfortable, how about trying something like http://i.imgur.com/L2bp5tE.jpg : ok_hand : veri nice
00:55:160 (3) - why no 3/4 slider? fits the guitar thing so well o good idea, added a cool circle slider here
01:01:435 (8,9) - first is a held sound, second has really loud drums on both ticks, to having them mapped differently would be great good point but here I wanted to capture the dddrum rrrroll and I thought that two 1/4 sliders going down like that would be good
01:07:219 - with what the triples here are mapped to, skipping this seems so wrong lol remapped this section
01:07:807 - this thing 01:07:513 (2,3,4,5,6) - is like continuous drums, but you do this? how about at least making 01:07:709 (4) - into a 1/4 slider if you want to keep the current clicking and spacing? though I think a full stream would work better yeah I turned it into a stream from your previous suggestion
01:18:690 (3) - did you forget to nc this? would make sense with 01:17:513 (1,1) - // 02:21:435 (3,4) - too then done
01:45:258 (2,1,2,3,4) - a) 01:45:258 (2,1) - this spacing for active 1/4 here is stupid looking at how you spaced this part overall
b)01:45:356 (1,2,3,4) - is som ephasized in the song, spacing similar to 01:32:807 (1,2,3,4) - and/or maybe a pattern that requires a bit more snapping would be nice I agree that at a glance it may seem absurd (and possibly ??? to read) but I really like the effect this pattern creates. The slider to the circle is fine because slider leniency, then the 1/4 jump into the spaced stream is a really nice pattern for emphasis, and I've made the pattern easy by using low spacing on the stream compared to other parts in the map. Even though the stream is linear, the emphasis from the jump/snap into a different direction is very nice imo. That being said I know it's probably very questionable, which is why I moved circle 2 closer to the stream by like 2 pixels or something I honestly don't remember
02:13:788 (4,5,1) - why is this like the only spot you don't stack these for this part oops, I was going to unstack all the triplets onto sliders in this section and similar sections, except for two of them since the flow from the previous slider wouldn't make sense without a stack. Anyways I unstacked a couple of them
02:21:827 (1,2,3,4) - you used way more spacing the first time this happened and that made more sense to me increased spacing
02:33:200 (3) - movement into this is pretty akwward to play with how it cuts so hard into the rather circular thing from before http://i.imgur.com/D3tYmSY.jpg at least that is how most people will probably play that (at least how I did lol) my intention here was to have them played in individual slider-circle patterns to emphasize the downbeats (referring to white ticks, not just the big ones, to avoid confusion), and breaking the flow/making sudden movements like in this pattern is a great for emphasis !!
03:00:258 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1) - idea is nice, but it felt like you didn't fully pull it off, with how you seperate them pattern/combo wise, why not even go for something like http://i.imgur.com/aV1n57C.jpg so it actually feels outstanding I tried something like this before, but I realized that I am not hanzer : / but your pattern feels nicer to play than what I tried to do before, so changed xd
03:32:023 (1) - stupid without sliderends http://i.imgur.com/NTPy61Y.jpg, but since that doesn't have to be considered for rankability and it worked okay for me on sightread I'm fine with it personally xd
04:10:356 (2,4) - spacing seems a bit too much already, even with slider leniency, why not something like http://i.imgur.com/Ckd8I5w.jpg to reduce it a little o this is nice, fixd
04:25:749 (1) - think this would work better if you manually did some stacking things, so it actually appears under 04:25:356 (3) - instead of under the slidertail nice idea, fixed

insane
fix ur shit http://i.imgur.com/1XTngzk.jpg wtf there was a random timing point on a downbeat LOL
some rhythm(combo things from x might apply here too
00:51:239 (2,3,4,5) - since it's such low bpm and kinda slow here I'd expect people to not make much use of leniency on the slider before, so curving this stream a bit would make it feel way nicer http://i.imgur.com/ypN8hk3.jpg fixed
02:04:572 (1) - even it leads into a slowdown, the note is still pretty emphasized and all so spacing it more like 02:03:004 (1,2) - (or at least not overlapping) fits better fixed
02:15:455 (4,1) - why the random manual thing? it auto stacks to the left of the slider and I wanted it to the right, although I did end up reducing the spacing a bit so it sticks out less
02:16:729 (3,1) - kinda easy to mistake for different rhythm/less repeats with how 1 is spaced/placed and how you didn't really utilitize 2xrepeats so far. could try something more like http://i.imgur.com/OTp6Oya.jpg fixed
04:10:356 (2,3,4,1) - can you be consistent with how you space the overlaps in the same pattern? would look much better k
04:23:003 (5) - small spacing increase to fit increasing pitch? ya

hard
01:07:709 (6,7) - multiple 1/4 sliders seem a bit much for this part, why not http://i.imgur.com/X0akv2r.jpg ? removed the circle instead since I wanted at least the two 1/4 sliders to emphasize the drums

n
02:50:062 (1) - could reduce the self-overlap a bit for clearer path/readability ye

e
01:12:807 (1) - why the nc? nuked from this earths atomosphere
01:36:337 (1) - seems a bit edgy for eady I think, reduce or even removing the self-overlap would be great // 02:35:945 (1) -- 03:26:141 (1) - 04:06:925 (1,2) - fixed all except the last one since they're pretty small so even if you do happen to misread, you won't break B-)
something like 01:26:925 (1) - or 02:07:709 (1) - works at least a little better I think

nice, though getting like two or so more mods to have some more input before I recheck this wouldn't hurt ok 8-) thx
thank you Lasse! :)
Xexxar
deeeeeeeeeath blossom

  1. 00:24:475 (2,2) - i think this might be better if you were to make these 1/2 sliders and allow for a clickable beat on 00:24:769 - :^)
  2. 00:41:729 (2,3) - you'd probably find a more enjoyable pattern if you made this more like this: (or something) http://puu.sh/s7LvP/557d967a3f.jpg cause the cut in angle would be more satisfying to play than the way its laid out atm. (the slider could also be in the other direction)
  3. 01:42:611 (1,2,3) - you might find a more satisfying pattern with emphasized spacing on the downbeats of the sliders: ex: http://puu.sh/s7LE9/427badea9e.jpg
  4. 01:45:258 (2) - if you place this at 394 302 it might look a bit better and be a bit more doable. (idk why)
  5. 03:00:258 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - kinda strange that you do this here since its pretty much the only instance, i know why you do it cause of the drum on the downbeat, but this would probably play better and feel more natural just as consistent spacing.
  6. 03:09:474 (4,5,1,2,3,4) - you should alter this pattern so that 03:09:474 (4,5) - are control G, the emphasis is on each beat so this way you'll focus all of them. Also the visuals of this pattern could be better just saying xddd
  7. 03:11:533 (2) - felt awkward, might want to adjust it so that it isnt so anti flow


general: 02:45:356 (1,2,3,4,1) - i feel like you should be more consistent with your design on this part of the song, all instances should have this general spacing emphasis.

ya good map tho i cant really say much
Topic Starter
pkk

Xexxar wrote:

deeeeeeeeeath blossom

  1. 00:24:475 (2,2) - i think this might be better if you were to make these 1/2 sliders and allow for a clickable beat on 00:24:769 - :^) gr9 idea but i feel that would make the rhythm too 'busy' for that section, so I went with circle + 1/1 slider
  2. 00:41:729 (2,3) - you'd probably find a more enjoyable pattern if you made this more like this: (or something) http://puu.sh/s7LvP/557d967a3f.jpg cause the cut in angle would be more satisfying to play than the way its laid out atm. (the slider could also be in the other direction) didn't ctrl g but I vertically flipped the second slider so that it curves downwards from the head, and moved the circle a bit. it plays a bit better now : ok_han d
  3. 01:42:611 (1,2,3) - you might find a more satisfying pattern with emphasized spacing on the downbeats of the sliders: ex: http://puu.sh/s7LE9/427badea9e.jpg
  4. 01:45:258 (2) - if you place this at 394 302 it might look a bit better and be a bit more doable. (idk why) I wanted the emphasis to be between the spaced stream and the circle after the slider, which is why I have that jump there. I tested this pattern a bunch of times and I really like the way it plays so i will k e e pd
  5. 03:00:258 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - kinda strange that you do this here since its pretty much the only instance, i know why you do it cause of the drum on the downbeat, but this would probably play better and feel more natural just as consistent spacing. the mini jumps between each group r pretty cool, but i know what u mean. however i already spaced them pretty close to each other to the point where i can combo that pattern fine without making any extraneous cursor movements, but i will think about reducing spacing further or something
  6. 03:09:474 (4,5,1,2,3,4) - you should alter this pattern so that 03:09:474 (4,5) - are control G, the emphasis is on each beat so this way you'll focus all of them. Also the visuals of this pattern could be better just saying xddd kept the 4 and 5 but I changed the pattern so it plays better


general: 02:45:356 (1,2,3,4,1) - i feel like you should be more consistent with your design on this part of the song, all instances should have this general spacing emphasis. yeA fixed the spacing here

ya good map tho i cant really say much
ok thanks dad
Topic Starter
pkk
for you map there is only one thing I see so far in the insane
and its about the background sounds in the kiai seems like you map them sometimes and not other times
which is pretty normal until you do 1/2 jumps without any triples
aka there is background noise 02:27:709 - that is mappable for 1/4
and 02:30:847 -

but that means basically nothing since they are so quiet and you don't map them both times
bc you make a triple 02:38:102 (4,5,1) - with the same instrument
similar instrument but different context in the music and different position in a bar/phrase, which is why I used a different rhythm

anyways this 02:40:062 (2,3) - should be a triple and 02:43:200 (2,3) - is strong enough for triple as well
this isn't a triple because the 1/2 ping pongy sounds in the music are more prominent in the second kiai than they are in the first (you can barely hear them, if at all in the first kiai) which is why I used a triplet instead to map the drums in the first kiai. For the second one, I keep my 1/2 consistent in the firstr two kiais and use 1/2 when the vocal is being held

02:53:200 (1,2,3,4) - this should be 1/6 rhythm
you can hear two distinct beats on 3 and 4. Anyways this sounds like 1/8 to me, but even if it were 1/6, this 1/4 works to simplify the rhythm as playing a 1/6 into 1/4 pattern would not be fun or intuitive

putting the motion on the blue ticks here doens't make sense to me --02:56:827 (3,4,1,2,3,4) -
ya gud point. unstacked all the circles in this instrument section so the movement occurs between all objects

03:01:239 (2,3,4) - the background noise 1/4's don't match this.
or any triples in that section up to 03:04:180 -
removed circle at 03:03:690 - , the rest of the triples are supported by the music. As for the 1/8 sliders, I used them to emphasize the plucking sounds in the music. I only used two pairs of them because I didn't use triples there, and because the low pitched pluck sounds only occurred in those bars. I didn't find it fitting to put anywhere else

03:22:709 (4) - this is mapped to a background sound that you normally don't map prior (unless you tried to and misrhythmed)
i mapped it at 01:10:945 (4) -

03:23:298 (2) - & 03:21:729 (2) - == 03:20:160 -
removed circle at 03:23:298 - . For 03:20:160 - , I have no circle there because I wanted to emphasize the 1/2 vocals in the beginning of the section in particular

03:30:847 - to 03:31:435 - could be all 1/4
you're right, there are 1/4 sounds, but I used 1/2 rhythm here to emphasize the four distinct drum sounds. I feel that this gives more impact than using seven circles, especially the impact on 03:31:435 (2) -

I like this sv change 03:47:709 (1) - , it would be cool if you had more sv changes like this 02:23:004 - and 01:20:258 - .
thanks, although I only used SV change right before the last chorus in both insane and highest diff because I wanted to emphasize the more intense vocal compared to the other two choruses

03:49:964 - this is strong.
03:55:454 - is also strong, but I only mapped 1/2 there to let the vocal stand out more, as I feel that using a triplet diminishes the effect I was trying to achieve. However, I do have a circle at 03:56:239 - where I change the rhythm in order to have two 1/2 sliders to lead into the last section of the chorus

04:11:925 (2) - 04:15:846 (2) - 04:22:121 (2) - 04:25:258 (2,3) - this isn't 1/4
there's a constant 1/4 beat in the background so I used 1/4 there

basically you mapped a lot of things as 1/4 and they aren't -- this should be adjusted for Death Blossom. (cool name btw)
as I said, there's a constant 1/4 beat `L_` but glad to see you like my name, it's a shame that overwatch stole it : /

edit: also removed 00:08:004 - in hard, removed 00:08:592 - in top diff

t h a nk s!
Free Hong Kong
Doormat
m4m as requested, sorry for being late. only looked at Easy-Insane as asked

[General]
  1. i get why you did the hitsounding stuff in the hard+ difficulties with the soft-hitnormals, but they make the soft-hitnormals really stick out like a sore thumb, especially at the beginning :/


[Easy]
  1. 02:40:651 (2,1) - nice distance snap error lol. pretty easy fix if you rotate the 02:40:651 (2) - by 20 degrees clockwise and move it to x128|y204
  2. 04:06:925 (1) - 04:08:494 (2) - not sure about these shapes for an easy; i'd try to make the sharp curves here more noticeable
  3. 04:13:200 (1) - wondering why this one is a repeat slider when 04:16:337 (1) - and 04:19:474 (1) - aren't. would be kind of neat to see some consistency since you did so everywhere else


[Normal]
  1. minor thing, but there's a beat at 00:11:632 - you could include
  2. 01:57:513 (5,1) - looks like it could be a blanket. if it is a blanket, you did your job poorly :<
  3. 02:09:278 (1) - maybe instead of a repeat slider you could divide this up into three circles to that it reflects the "1,2,3,4" in the lyrics
  4. 02:21:827 (1) - combo inconsistency with 01:19:082 (5) -


[Hard]
  1. 00:58:690 (1,2) - blankets pls
  2. 01:01:827 (1) - maybe try a 3/4 slider and circle at 01:02:219 - instead? aka do what you did for insane maybe
  3. 01:58:298 (1,2) - 01:59:866 (1,2) - 02:00:651 (1,2) - 02:01:435 (1,2) - fix the stacks lol
  4. 02:09:278 (1) - same suggestion as normal about dividing this up into three circles for "1,2,3,4" emphasis in the song lyrics
  5. 02:21:827 (1,2,3,4) - maybe unstack these to give it a distinction/emphasis from 02:20:258 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - ? for example you could use the pattern you used at 01:19:082 (1,2,3,4) -
  6. 03:14:670 - kind of expected to see a note here to mimic 03:13:592 (1,2,3) - etc.


[Insane]
  1. 00:41:729 (2,3) - shouldn't the rhythm here be ctrl + g? you skipped over the strings at 00:41:827 - and it's the only time you skipped over the string like that in this diff and in Death Blossom
  2. 02:09:278 (1) - something something "1,2,3,4"
  3. 02:05:258 - there's a vocal that lands on the beat here if you want to use it
  4. ya looks good


ya looks good. go get them bns brother
Topic Starter
pkk

Doormat wrote:

m4m as requested, sorry for being late. only looked at Easy-Insane as asked

[General]
  1. i get why you did the hitsounding stuff in the hard+ difficulties with the soft-hitnormals, but they make the soft-hitnormals really stick out like a sore thumb, especially at the beginning :/ lowered beginning 20% points to 10%; changed some soft hitnormals to normal hitnormal. shud beg ud now


[Easy]
  1. 02:40:651 (2,1) - nice distance snap error lol. pretty easy fix if you rotate the 02:40:651 (2) - by 20 degrees clockwise and move it to x128|y204
    I'm not sure which tilts me more: AiMod not picking this up, or this even happening in the first place
  2. 04:06:925 (1) - 04:08:494 (2) - not sure about these shapes for an easy; i'd try to make the sharp curves here more noticeable
    agree, changed to some obtuse angles and redid the pattern
  3. 04:13:200 (1) - wondering why this one is a repeat slider when 04:16:337 (1) - and 04:19:474 (1) - aren't. would be kind of neat to see some consistency since you did so everywhere else
    made the next 1/1 slider at the beginning of the next next bar into a repeat slider for consistency :heavy check mark


[Normal]
  1. minor thing, but there's a beat at 00:11:632 - you could include
  2. 01:57:513 (5,1) - looks like it could be a blanket. if it is a blanket, you did your job poorly :<
    unblanketed it more to indicate that it's not supposed to be a blanket
  3. 02:09:278 (1) - maybe instead of a repeat slider you could divide this up into three circles to that it reflects the "1,2,3,4" in the lyrics
    that makes sense, although I went for a repeat slider because I felt that it matched the back and forth effect of the vocal better, as well as giving that final drum beat more emphasis as a single circle after a repeat slider, as opposed to four circles in a row
  4. 02:21:827 (1) - combo inconsistency with 01:19:082 (5) -
    good catch, fixed


[Hard]
  1. 00:58:690 (1,2) - blankets pls
    yes sir
  2. 01:01:827 (1) - maybe try a 3/4 slider and circle at 01:02:219 - instead? aka do what you did for insane maybe
    that could work, although I feel that would create a higher object density than I would have liked for this section in the music. I try to use 1/4 sparingly here
  3. 01:58:298 (1,2) - 01:59:866 (1,2) - 02:00:651 (1,2) - 02:01:435 (1,2) - fix the stacks lol
    alright, osu trolling me once again `L_` manually stacked them
  4. 02:09:278 (1) - same suggestion as normal about dividing this up into three circles for "1,2,3,4" emphasis in the song lyrics
    ya same, I will keep slider
  5. 02:21:827 (1,2,3,4) - maybe unstack these to give it a distinction/emphasis from 02:20:258 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - ? for example you could use the pattern you used at 01:19:082 (1,2,3,4) -
    good idea, unstacked
  6. 03:14:670 - kind of expected to see a note here to mimic 03:13:592 (1,2,3) - etc.
    I wanted to do this but I figured it might be a bit too tricky to play slider into two circles + a jump after, compared to one circle and a slider. I'm also kind of pushing the concept of 1/4's in my hard diff in this section so I wanted to tone it down a bit


[Insane]
  1. 00:41:729 (2,3) - shouldn't the rhythm here be ctrl + g? you skipped over the strings at 00:41:827 - and it's the only time you skipped over the string like that in this diff and in Death Blossom
  2. 02:09:278 (1) - something something "1,2,3,4" d
  3. 02:05:258 - there's a vocal that lands on the beat here if you want to use it I will leave it unmapped, 1/4 before the slider feels a bit weird
  4. ya looks good


ya looks good. go get them bns brother !
thanks doormat!

gonna go grab the video now and stick it in the set
show more
Please sign in to reply.

New reply