1. Advanced (2.09 stars, 191 notes)
2. Easy (1.26 stars, 89 notes)
3. Hard (3.23 stars, 256 notes)
4. Insane (4.56 stars, 335 notes)
5. Normal (1.63 stars, 140 notes)

All done by me :3

Neoskylove wrote:

모딩 연습차 와봤는데 상관없죠? 아 아직 힛사를 안 넣었지만 와주신 거 ㄳㄳ

[ㅇㅈ]
00:06:031 (3,4) - 이거 직선 패턴을 http://puu.sh/nCC0n/f06c670ab4.jpg 이래 해주세연 그냥 제 마음인 거지만 굳이 이유를 만들자면 강한 소리가 뚝 꺾이는 느낌을 주는 게 좋은? 그 이전에 곡선 슬라 있었으니 직선으로 변환해주는 것도 ㄱㅊ고...
00:08:309 (2,3) - http://puu.sh/nCC1V/c1ced9a53f.jpg 지금이 더 마음에 듦
00:12:105 (3,4) - 흐름이 조금 어려워연..http://puu.sh/nCC4t/1d54f28855.jpg 이렇게..? 지금이 더 쉽다고 생각하는데... 3의 커브가 오른쪽에서부터 돌기 때문에 그 다음 노트로 건너가는 게 자연스러워져요.
01:13:790 (4) - 얘 컨트롤 hj한 패넡으로 해주는게 좋을것 같아요 http://puu.sh/nCC8T/15a3d140b6.jpg 이것도 강조를 위해 흐름을 일부러 강하게 꺾은 거라서 패스

[ㄴㅁ]
00:55:189 (6,7,8,1) - 6번 머리 7번 8번 1번 머리 정사각형으로 해주시면 이쁠듯 별로 그런 거 생각 안 하고 찍었는데 그걸 정사각형으로 만들려면 6-7이 직선형으로 놓여야 되서 모양을 망침
01:24:419 (3,4,5) - 3단타 어려운거....http://puu.sh/nCCgy/f312ca5d0d.jpg 가능하면 어렵게 해주고 싶었는데 지금 이지 노말 갭이 너무 커서 안 되겠네요. 제시하신 대로는 말고 좀 다르게 고침
01:33:529 (3) - http://puu.sh/nCChG/d701add82a.jpg 그것도 괜찮긴 한데 맵셋 전체에서 딱히 거기에 슬라 끝 넣은 적도 없고 마지막 스피너가 엄청 짧아서 조금이라도 스피너 준비할 시간을 더 줘야 됨

[ㅎㄷ]
00:12:105 (1,2) - 이지에서 얘기한것처럼 http://puu.sh/nCCjz/d4e30b6467.jpg요래 해주면 이쁠듯 이지랑 마찬가지
에라이 잡을거 없다

[ㅇㅅㅇ]
00:17:988 (4) - 디스턴스가 갑자기 훅 줄어든 느낌이라 좀 이상하달까...1번 대가리에 스택 해주시는게 좋아보여용 1번하고는 점프를 넣고 싶고, 흐름에 변화를 준 것만으로 충분히 강조가 된다고 생각
00:26:340 (2) - 컨트롤 hj한 패턴...?이 더 나아 보입니다http://puu.sh/nCCr7/7e128cb4a5.jpg 거기는 원래 개인적으로 생각하던 규칙이 있었는데 깨는 게 낫겠네요. 수정
00:29:376 (2) - 1번 머리 블랭킷 하는 걸로 가보는건 어떠십니까 http://puu.sh/nCCsA/edd785e93a.jpg요래 해서 흠 저런 모양은 제 맵에선 안 쓰이는지라 일단 패스
00:48:546 (1,2,4) - ㅂㄹㅋ 딱히 안 해도 괜찮음 저건 저 모양 나름대로 균형잡힌 모양이라
01:13:790 (4) - ㄴㅋ ㅇㅋ
01:20:623 (1) - 이거 뒤에 치기가 엄쳥 어려버요. http://puu.sh/nCCyo/be4131588e.jpg앞에 4,5 컨쥐하시고...? 01:08:476 (1,2) - 랑 짝을 맞춘 거라... 딱히 치기 어렵다고 느껴지지도 않고요. 앞에 4,5 컨쥐는 못하는 게 거기는 둘 다 점프를 할 곳임
01:25:937 (1) - 딱히 강조할 부분을 아니라고 생각하는데,,,강조할 부분은 01:26:317 - 여긴것 같으니 http://puu.sh/nCCCt/5718ce7539.jpg http://puu.sh/nCCDa/2d209a7194.jpg ㄴㄴ 사실 둘 다 강조할 부분임. 낮은 도로 가다가 갑자기 높은 도로 뛰어오르는데 이건 노래 전체에서 제일 강조해야 할 소리라고 생각하는데요? 그리고 거기서 변속을 준 슬라이더가 빠르게 날아가서 01:26:317 - 에서 쾅 하기 떄문에 여기도 나름 강조가 잘 됐다고 생각

연습차 온거니깐 욕하지 마요....

Dailycare wrote:

[General]
네 그렇습니다 네 그렇습니다. 1500ms로 맞췄습니다.


[Easy]
01:13:109 (1,2) - 이런 직선 흐름보단 01:00:957 (1,2) - 이런 느낌으로 (2)를 꺾어주시는게 어떨까요 아 그렇게 해도 거기까진 좋긴 한데 그 다음 노트와의 연결이... ㅠ


[Normal]
00:15:008 (6) - 여기도 01:27:919 (6) - 처럼 슬라이더 넣기 좋아보이는데, 넣으면 너무 어려워져서 아쉬워요 ㅠㅠ 아 지금 안 그래도 노말은 노트 수를 좀 줄이는 게 스프레드에 도움이 되서 오히려 뒤쪽을 서클 하나로 줄였어요 ㅋㅋㅋ
01:17:476 (3,4,5,6) - 이건 굳이 1/2 슬라이더를 쓰는 것 보다 01:05:324 (3,4,5) - 처럼 만드는게 더 좋아보이는데.. 보컬을 따라가신 것 같아 막 바꾸라고는 못하겠네요.. 네 앞에랑 달리 여기는 보컬이 있는 점에 대해 다르게 해주고 싶었어요.


[Hard]
00:57:160 (4,5,6) - (3)과 거리를 벌린 특별한 이유가 있나요? 드럼 소리 때문..? 인세인에서는 더 확실하게 표현했지만 그 드럼 소리는 좀 더 강렬하게 해주고 싶었습니다.


[Insane]
없.. 다...
근데 전체적으로 조금씩 디스턴스를 줄이는것도 좋을 것 같아요 이번엔 좀 스케일이 크게 매핑이 되긴 했네요 ㅋㅋㅋ 근데 1.30x DS를 기준으로 전반적으로 거리를 맞춰놓은 거라 이제 와서 줄이기는... 힘들 듯하네요.


이렇게 잘 찍으셔서 모딩을 요구하다니.. 남 괴롭히길 좋아하시는 성격이군요?! 모딩 상태가 영 아니어서 쿠도스는.. 근데 개인적인 생각이지만 인센이 하드에 비해 너무 어려운 것 같아요.. 아까 말씀드렸지만 괜찮을 거에요 ㅋㅋ 변속 점프 연타 단타패턴 다 있으니...

HabiHolic wrote:

[General]

오디오 리드인 500이면 좀 짧은데 800이나 1000정도로 해주시면 좋을거같은데 고려해주세요. 뭐 그닥 상관없을지도.. 이건 1500은 해줘야 될 거에요 아마? 그래서 1500으로 고침

01:24:881 - 전체 난이도에서 요부분 클랩이요 제가 커스텀 하나 제안드리고 싶은데 제 랭맵보면 바람의 유령 그맵 커스텀 힛사중에 이런 비슷한 힛사 있음 아마 노멀 커스텀2 클랩 그거일거예요 그거 넣으시는게 어떰? 한 번 해봤는데 약간 둔탁해서 좀 안 맞는 거 같네요... 아쉽지만 보류하겠습니다.


[Easy]

00:16:716 (3,4) - 이거 걍 제안인데 4있는데까지 슬라 하나로 쭉 늘리시는게 어떰 4있는데까지 중간에 음이 있긴한데 무시하셔도 상관없을듯함. 이지지만 웬만큼 다 잡아주는 게 컨셉이라... 3/2박 뒤 서클이라는 게 좀 걸리기는 한데 그래도 저 소리는 빼놓고 싶지 않네요.
00:45:008 (4) - 흠... 이거 그냥 노트 하나 두셔도 될듯한데요 00:45:387 - 여기 강조할 필요도 없을거같은데 한번 고려해보세요 딱히 강조는 아니고 아~ 하는 소리가 길게 울리기 때문에 그걸 표현한 느낌? 이랄까요. 그 후에 00:47:286 (3,4) - 00:50:324 (3,4,5) - 일관성도 있고 너무 저 박자대로만 뚝뚝 끊는 건 너무 지루할 듯해요.
01:29:248 - 약간 거슬리는 힛사인데 이거 방법없을까요 뒤에 음도 있고 하니까 무시할수는 없을테고... 저는 일단 볼륨 줄이기를 추천드릴게요.. 으으음 거기만 볼륨 줄이는 건 제 성향에 안 맞고 일단은 휘슬을 빼볼게요... 어차피 이지라 노트가 많질 않아서 너무 클랩 휘슬 많이 채우면 난잡해보일 수도 있으니...

[Normal]

00:27:349 (7) - 이거 그닥 상관없긴한데 00:27:160 - 여기로 옳기는게 전 자연스러운거같은데. 님은 어떠신지 모르겠네요 그냥 두셔도되고 고치셔도됨 전 일단 보컬파라... 둘 중 하나를 선택해야 한다면 보컬로...
00:36:653 (1) - 저는 보컬맞춰서 1/1 슬라 하나가 좋다고 생각해요. 지금은 진짜 비추드림.. ? 이건 그냥 괜찮다고 생각하는데... 열차가 긴 곳도 아니고요
00:51:273 (6) - 제안인데요 패턴 부드럽게 하시려면 사진참고해서 곡선 약간 고쳐보세요 ㅇㅋ

SPOILER

01:03:805 (8) - 이거 노트 빼시는거 진짜 추천드려요. 어드밴스도 아니고 노멀에서 섬세한 리듬까지 표현할 필요 없이 걍 보컬만 강조하시는걸 추천드림.. 오히려 저건 보컬을 하나 빠뜨리게 되는 거지만, 네 그래도 지워봤습니다. 아무래도 지금은 노트 수를 줄이는 게 스프레드 상 좋으니...
01:32:666 (1) - 이건 제가 잘 모르는걸수도 있는데 개인적으로 전 짧은데 이거 걍 둬도 괜찮겠죠? 으... 일단 불안해서 전 수정하는쪽을 추천드릴게여... BN까지 가보고 안 된다고 하면 지울게요

[Hard]

00:53:172 (1) - 매번 모딩하면서 느꼈던게 요런 점프는 하드에서는 좀 안티점프적인 뭐.. 그런 요소라고 생각하는데.. 사실 이게 간격이 좀 많이 넓어서 안좋아보이는건지는 모르겠는데 실제 플레이하면 나름 점프하기 약간 힘들어요,,,일단 저는 간격 줄이는거 추천드릴게요 예시사진까지 첨부했어요 넵 저도 약간 불편하게 느꼈으니 줄여봤음

SPOILER

01:15:387 (3) - 요것도 간격 조절해주심 좋을듯 조금 줄여봤습니다.

[Insane]

00:06:084 - 뒷 파트랑 일관성이 너무 안맞네요 여기도 노트 추가바랍니다.. 멜로디가 다른데 노트를 똑같이 맞출 필요가 있나요. 앞에는 파미레도가 1/2 순서대로 나왔고 여기는 레도 하고 '시도'가 트릴처럼 빠르게 한 번에 지나가버리니 마지막 1/2은 필요가 없습니다.
01:14:058 (4,1) - 블랭킷 약간 안맞는 기분이 드네요.. 뭐 제가 잘못본걸수도 있는데 걍 4번 약간 옳겨주시면 맞을거같음요.. http://puu.sh/nGcHU/29b4f56c0e.jpg 이 정도면 거의 맞는 거 아닌가요 ㅇㅅㅇ... 1픽셀 정도 고쳐봤...

Moa wrote:

할게없어 모딩하는 1ㅅ
아오 왜가려짐?
[이지]
00:06:273 (1,2) - 이런 텀은 http://puu.sh/nHn1B/f662fad5e2.jpg 이렇게 3/2 슬라와 서클하나로 텀을 1/1로 맞춰주시는게 어떠신지?? 00:06:273 - 00:06:843 - 00:07:603 - 00:08:362 - 이 모두 비슷하게 강하기 때문에 이들만 클릭으로 처리했습니다.
00:09:311 (1) - ^ http://puu.sh/nHn81/3e86b8ec5a.jpg 여기도!? 마찬가지
00:13:868 (3) - 이부분은 http://puu.sh/nHn9C/5cc6231feb.jpg 3/2 슬라 리버스가 더잘어울리는듯하네요 이 이지는 어려운 노말과의 갭을 맞추기 위해 약간 어렵게 만들었기 때문에, 키아이에 준하는 분위기의 부분에서 3/2 리버스 같은 지루한 노트는 가능하면 안 쓰려고 합니다.
00:22:223 (2,3) - 블랭킷 아주 살짝 삐둘어짐 그렇게 집중해서 들여다봐야 보이는 오차는 플레이할 때 전혀 안 보이기 때문에 굳이 안 잡으셔도 됩니다
00:25:261 (2) - http://puu.sh/nHndb/566d8284d6.jpg 우선 이런건 제안인데 위에 리듬 지적한거 전부 우선 다써봄 저도 저렇게 하는 게 더 쉽다는 건 알고 있는데, 00:25:830 - 가 강해서 클릭시켜주려고 했다는 사실을 아신다면...
00:27:349 (1,2,3,4) - 이부분 조금 리듬 이상하다생각됨 http://puu.sh/nHnh0/08a941ae0f.jpg 이렇게 리버스 두개쓰면 좋을거같은데.. 앞에만 리버스했습니다. 뒤에는 00:30:008 - 가 세기는 해도 00:29:818 - 가 표현이 안 되면 어색하다고 생각하기 때문에 이럴 경우 차라리 앞에 박만 치고 뒤를 쉬는 게 제 이지 찍는 방법
00:33:615 (1,2) - 블랭킷 3도나 틀어졌었네... 수정
00:43:868 - 허전한느낌.. 드럼 패턴이 특이해지기 때문에 의도적으로 그쪽에 드럼이 약한 느낌을 주느라 비운 거라 ㄱㅊ. 00:46:906 - 00:49:944 - 일관성 있게 다 비웠고요
00:51:843 (6) - http://puu.sh/nHnng/7ea26bf790.jpg 이리듬 어떰 계속 같은 지적을 하시는데 제가 왜 일부러 3/2 텀이라는 어려운 박자를 쓰면서까지 저렇게 찍었는지 한 번 생각해보셨나요? 모딩할 때는 매퍼의 의도를 파악하고 그에 맞게 보완을 해주는 게 좋습니다. 00:51:843 - 00:52:413 - 00:53:172 - 셋 다 클릭으로 강조를 해줄, 비슷한 소리들이기 때문에 거기에 클릭이 오도록 해준 겁니다.
모양은 괜찮은거같음 근데 3/2 텀이많아서 그냥 저위에 리듬제시한것처럼 1/1로 만들어버렷으면 좋겟지만 뭐 우선 제안임! 제안은 좋습니다만 제가 그런 박자를 쓴 이유가 잘 전달되지 않은 것 같아서 아쉽네요. 더 쉬운 난이도를 만들어주기 위해서라던가, 그런 근거라도 대주셨으면 한 번 더 고민해볼텐데, 너무 직설적으로 본인의 생각만 말씀하신 게 아닌가 싶습니다.
[노말]
00:03:046 - 서클어떰? 안 그래도 너무 밀도가 높은 노말이라 쉬운 부분이라도 하나씩 빼주려고요
00:10:451 - ^ 마찬가지
00:11:210 - ^ 핰 생각해보니 이렇게 우겨밖으면 어려워지겟네 ㅇㅇ 잘 이해하셨
00:34:944 (5,6) - ? DS의 상태가? ? 스택에 의한 거리 오차 처음 보시나요? 항상 맨 아래 깔린 노트의 좌표를 기준으로 디스턴스 스냅이 들어가기 때문에 위에 쌓인 노트와는 ds가 저렇게 차이날 수 있어요.
00:51:273 (6) - 이건그냥 서클로하는게 더좋아보이는? ㄴㄴ 그렇게 하면 5연타 + 3연타 드럼이 너무 표현이 안 되서 맵에 구멍난 거 같음
00:58:109 (1,1) - 스피너와 서클사이거리 이정도로 좁아도되나? 음 최하난이도에서만 신경쓰면되는건가요? 노말이면 괜찮을 거에요. 딱히 스피너가 짧아서 빡세거나 한 것도 아니고 스피너 시작은 강조가 전혀 되기 않기 때문에 서클 하나 넣고 그 뒤에 스피너 시작하는 게 리듬상 더 낫기도 하고
[하드]
괜찮은듯? ㄳ
[인센]
00:02:476 (3,4,5,6,1) - 뭔가 손이 잘안돌아가는느낌 하지만 다이아몬드는 사랑입니다(?)
00:46:337 (3,4) - 이둘의거리보단 00:46:527 (4,5) - 이둘의 거리가 좀더 멀엇음 좋을거같은 느낌 좀 낫나요?
01:27:729 (4,5,6) - http://puu.sh/nHnNE/97c9d04def.jpg 이렇게 5,6번을 서로 바꿔보시는건 어떤지? 아마 지난번에도 말씀드렸었지만 저는 딱히 치는 데에 불편함은 못 느끼겠고 00:14:438 (3,4,5,6,1) - 랑 비슷한 흐름을 만들어주기 위해서 지금 상태를 고집하겠습니다.
는 인센은 전에 irc도해드렷으니 적당히잡겟슘

그것보다 pv가 참 좋네요 나도봐야겟다 트러블 투 러브 인가?

Yuria wrote:

M4M입니다~

[Easy]
00:05:514 (4) - http://puu.sh/nJj5c/147978753b.jpg 이런식으로 위로 살짝 휘어주면 보기 좋을거 같아요 수정
00:07:603 (3) - 블랭킷 하시려고 한거같은데 좀 삐뚤어져 있네용 하 2도...
00:29:818 (3) - 이건 00:30:008 - 이쪽에서 더 강한음이 들리는거같은데 서클 그대로 옮기자니 박자텀이 좀 그러네요. 모아님 모딩 때도 같은 제안이 있었지만, 00:30:008 - 이 음은 00:29:818 - 가 표현되지 않으면 매우 어색하게 들리기 때문에 차라리 앞음만 잡아주는 게 낫다고 생각합니다.
00:44:248 (3) - 앞으로 1/2박 당겨서 3/2슬라를 쓰는것도 괜찮을거같아요 저 부분은 드럼 텀이 변한 것을 따라가는 부분입니다. 보컬을 잡아주기 위해서 드럼 소리가 없는 약한 부분에 노트를 넣을 필요는 없을 것 같네요.
00:47:286 (3) - ^
00:50:324 (3) - ^
00:51:084 (4,5,1) - 이건 그냥 제 의견인데 아래쪽에서 위로 올라가는식으로 하는것도 좋을거 같아요 예시(http://puu.sh/nJinl/6596a0de9e.jpg) 너무 빙빙 도는 느낌이라 별로 좋아하지 않습니다.
01:32:286 - http://puu.sh/nJiSp/bc9e57d5dd.jpg 이런식으로 해서 클릭가능하게 하는것도 좋을거 같아요 가능하면 3/2 텀 후의 서클은 피하고 있는데 그 뒤에 서클이 하나 더 있기까지 하면 박자가 너무 어렵다고 생각합니다.

[Normal]
00:29:438 (5) - 기차가 좀 길어지는거같은데 서클로 놓아서 끊어주는건 어떨까요? 수정했습니다. 기차는 끊어졌는데 노트 수가 더 많아져서 더 어려워진...
00:36:653 (1) - 슬라 방향을 위쪽으로 하는것도 좋을거 같아요 너무 수직으로만 움직이는 느낌이 납니다.
01:15:957 (8) - 01:03:805 - 앞부분인 이곳은 비워두셨는데 빼셔도 될거같아요 지난번에 앞부분에 빼면서 뒤도 빼는 걸 잊어버렸네요. 수정
01:32:666 (1) - 이지처럼 노트를 넣던지 아니면 이지에 스핀을 넣던지 해서 같이 통일하면 좋을거같아요 이지에 스핀을 안 넣은 것은 순전히 시간상 너무 짧아서입니다. 노말은 충분히 들어갈 수 있다고 생각하기 때문에 보류하겠습니다.

가사와 배경음을 같이 살리려니 박자가 좀 어려워진 느낌이네용.. 어려운 인센 - 어려운 하드였기 때문에 노말도 어려운 노말을 컨셉으로 했습니다. 이지도 좀 어려워졌고...

[Hard]
00:12:729 (2) - x:301 y:27로 옮겨주면 블랭킷이 깔끔하게.. 수정
00:16:716 (1) - 블랭킷 살짝 비뚤어졌..? 수정
00:46:527 (3) - x:261 y:216 정도로 옮겨주는 모양도 괜찮은거 같아요 제 의도랑은 달라졌지만 괜찮네요. 수정

[Insane]
00:16:527 (4) - 오른쪽으로 가는것도 괜찮을거같아요 00:16:716 (1) - 이쪽 아래정도? 그 뒤 점프 후 슬라 방향이 도로 되돌아오는 방향이라 별로라고 생각합니다. 사실 지금도 아주 썩 마음에 들지는 않지만 누군가 좋은 방법을 찾아주기를...
00:19:754 (1) - ctrl+j 해서 위 아래로 뒤집고 원래 위치로 옮기면 앞 5번과 모양이 잘 어울리는데 이렇게되면 뒤쪽 배치도 같이 수정해야겠네요. 완전 일직선이 아니라 살짝 꺾이는 동선을 저는 좋아합니다. 말씀하신 것처럼 뒤까지 수정하면서 거기를 일직선형으로 만들어야 할 필요는 못 느끼겠습니다.
00:30:008 (6) - 느리게 변속을 줘보는건 어떨까요? 전 순간변속을 싫어해서 정말 강한 느낌이 아니면 거의 안 넣는데 제안이 많이 들어오네요... 일단 넣어봤습니다.
00:41:970 (1,2,3,4,5) - 연타 모양이 살짝... 별로 이상하게 안 느껴집니다. 애당초 깔끔한 S자형 4점 슬라를 만들고 연타로 변환시킨 건데 모양이 이상한가요?
00:49:375 (3) - 00:50:134 (1) - 여기 머리에 스택하는것도 괜찮은거같아요 원래 그랬었지만 잔잔한 구간에 맞지 않게 점프가 크다는 이유 때문에 조금 아래로 내렸습니다. 지금의 겹침도 느낌이 괜찮아서 이대로 두겠습니다.
00:56:020 (4) - x:166 y:205로 옮겨도 괜찮을거같아요 제가 매핑하던 원칙은 깨지지만 느낌이 좋네요. 수정
00:56:590 (2) - ctrl+g? 00:56:210 (1,2) - 거의 같은 느낌의 보컬이 연속으로 나왔기 때문에 같은 슬라를 썼습니다. 컨쥐를 해야할 정도로 흐름이 나쁘게 느껴지지도 않고요.
01:24:501 (1) - 슬라 길이를 좀 줄이고 01:24:881 - 이쪽을 클릭 가능하게 서클 추가하면 좋을거같아요 거기도 3번째 지적을 받고 있지만 이건 절대 고집하고 싶습니다. 이 맵에는 어떠한 경우에도 소리가 없는 곳에 슬라 끝을 두고 싶지 않네요. 변속을 준 것만으로도 슬라이더 볼이 힘차게 날아가서 슬라 끝을 때리는 게 굉장히 찰지다고 생각합니다.

맵이 좋네요 별 하나 쏘고 갑니당

1. Some blankets here and there can be fixed if you care
2. Seems ready!

1. 00:00:767 (2) - 1 pixel up lol and 00:01:147 (3) - one pixel left and one up
2. 00:11:970 (5) - 1 pixel to left
3. 01:32:286 - I highly suggest having a click here instead
4. Nice diff! Seems ready aswell.

1. 00:06:273 (1,2) - You can do a better job at making these point the same way
2. For a perfect square 00:13:489 (5) - to x488y212 and 00:13:679 (6) - to x410y261
3. How about 00:17:666 (3) - to x322y96 for more clarity? The reason I chose this position is because if you move it to 00:18:235 - it will be 1,00 away from 00:18:425 (1) -
4. Perfect square 2: 01:26:400 (5) - to x270y337 and 01:26:590 (6) - to x180y356
5. 01:31:337 (1,2) - These are not pointing in the same direction, it's like off by one pixel or something lol

1. Try the following: 00:33:615 (1) - ctrl+g then ctrl+shift+r, rotate 20 by selection center, then ctrl+g the slider back
2. Consider adjusting 01:05:894 (2,3) - so 01:06:273 (3) - can point at 01:06:653 (4) -
3. 01:14:438 (1,3) - stack these better :>
4. 01:25:641 (2,4) - ^ check for any more throughout the map to make sure ^^

Janpai wrote:

M4M from your queue

General

1. Nothing wrong for me

Easy

1. 00:06:273 (1) - You can make 1/3 here, it's just that I feel this part is a little empty but it's only nazi 1/3? What do you mean xD There are no 1/3 sounds. And I'm not even using any 1/2s because it's too hard.
2. Add spinner? I found nowhere to put any spinners on this diff... Either they have to be too short, or doesn't have a good spot to end because Easies need much more recovery time than other diffs.
   Really clean diff, I can't point out anything sorry XD

Normal

1. 00:09:881 (2) - Maybe moved to x:149 y:208 for aesthetics? 00:09:881 (2,3) - They're already vertically symmetry. I don't think moving it there is better
2. 00:26:590 (6) - It can be cutter if you curved this a little bit What do you mean by cutter?

Hard

1. 00:01:147 (3,1) - Would you mind to make this two a little bit more symmetrical? Yeah, hopefully it's better now.
2. 01:05:324 (1) - I'm not a fan of this kind of slider sorry, a curved one suites or maybe try this http://puu.sh/nJuCg/ec380586dd.jpg uhh I guess the flow is better with the current one...
3. 01:09:311 (3,4,5) - I think it suits better if you put this on the tail of (2) , I don't see any reason to put that on the white tick Oh turn off the hitsounds and listen carefully. There are good 1/4 sounds on the white tick than on the (2)'s tail.

Insane

1. 00:16:716 (1) - uhuh, maybe put a white anchor on the slider on x:317 y:143 No xD It's for the parallel of 00:15:387 (1,2,3,1) -
2. 00:27:539 (1,2) - Increase the spacing between them, the (2) needs a litlle emphasis I don't think so, it's only a snare drum, without any other strong vocals or something, so I think it's better to just fix the distance to 1.30
3. 01:03:995 (1) - Please emphasize the NC Stacking is already an emphasis. It's better than using a fixed distance.

Sorry for the poor mod don't kd if I didn't help, I enjoyed playing this map goodluck on ranking!

Zectro wrote:

hii sorry for letting you wait for so long >.<


[Easy]

1. Some blankets here and there can be fixed if you care Might look through them if I don't get lazy xD
2. Seems ready!

[Normal]

1. 00:00:767 (2) - 1 pixel up lol and 00:01:147 (3) - one pixel left and one up lol why? I kinda tried a straight there tho
2. 00:11:970 (5) - 1 pixel to left You're so delicate
3. 01:32:286 - I highly suggest having a click here instead It's because the last spinner is too short, so would be better to make players have some recovery section before that spinner.
4. Nice diff! Seems ready aswell.

[Hard]

1. 00:06:273 (1,2) - You can do a better job at making these point the same way How do you even manage to see those little errors
2. For a perfect square 00:13:489 (5) - to x488y212 and 00:13:679 (6) - to x410y261 Yeah I was lazy to use Ctrl+Shift+D to make a perfect square
3. How about 00:17:666 (3) - to x322y96 for more clarity? The reason I chose this position is because if you move it to 00:18:235 - it will be 1,00 away from 00:18:425 (1) - lol 1.00 means nothing for me, since I'm using 1.20x ds on this map. I think 00:17:476 (2,3) - needs a big distance for emphasizing.
4. Perfect square 2: 01:26:400 (5) - to x270y337 and 01:26:590 (6) - to x180y356 ok
5. 01:31:337 (1,2) - These are not pointing in the same direction, it's like off by one pixel or something lol one pixel lol

[Insane]

1. Try the following: 00:33:615 (1) - ctrl+g then ctrl+shift+r, rotate 20 by selection center, then ctrl+g the slider back looks too twisted for me, nah
2. Consider adjusting 01:05:894 (2,3) - so 01:06:273 (3) - can point at 01:06:653 (4) - No I like the fact they're not pointing the next one directly.
3. 01:14:438 (1,3) - stack these better :> editor plz
4. 01:25:641 (2,4) - ^ check for any more throughout the map to make sure ^^ This one's strange, the coordination says they're correct but pulling the circle down by 1 pixel looks better.

Nice job, good luck!

Yoges wrote:

Umm... Yeah forget about the M4M, I can't find a single thing in any of the diffs. Sorry ;w;

1. Looks fine for me

1. There are many polarities in this difficulty that can be avoided quite easily without ruining up the original rhythm. Even if the BPM is slow, beginners might have a hard time actually hitting the red tick notes properly, and that can unintentionally increase the difficulty. Some of them are going to be mentioned below, look for them throughout the whole map.
2. 00:06:273 (1,2) - The polarity here is avoidable, by changing up the rhythm like this. Feels hard to have polarities right off the bat.
3. 00:09:311 (1,2,3,4) - Same here, the polarity here can be avoided by changing up the rhythm like above.
4. 00:13:868 (3,4) - I know, BPM is slow and the polarity might not be challenging, but the polarity can be still avoided easily here, by simply making them into a repeated slider instead of separating them into 1 circle and a slider.
5. 00:16:147 (2,3,4) - But here though... Not sure how can you avoid the polarity on (2) and (3), but I believe polarity on (3) and (4) can be avoided by making (4) into a 1/2 slider starting on 00:17:476 - . Because the BPM is slow, and the 'recovery time' between this note and 00:18:425 (1) - is quite big, so an 1/2 slider wouldn't hurt too much on gameplay.
6. 00:25:261 (2,3) - Again, polarity here can be avoided by doing this instead of the current rhythm.
7. 00:28:299 (2,3) - Make a repeated slider here instead of separating them to avoid the polarity.
8. 01:00:577 (5) - Just 1 more thing aside from the polarities, I feel that the clap here should be the custom 2's, not the custom 3's, as the 'clap' here is the same one like at 00:11:400 (4) - this note's tail.
9. Yea I guess that is all the types of the polarity present in this difficulty. I can see that the polarities are made to emphasize on the strong instrument in the background, but even so, beginners have a hard time hitting those properly as they are technically off-beat. Actually, other than the polarities on this difficulty, I feel the difficulty is fine by it's own right now.

1. Honestly I can't find anything here lol Here are just some of my suggestions(and a few actual 'problems') :
2. 00:19:754 (5,4,4) - and all the similar sliders - would recommend you to add a whistle on each of their heads as the instrument you've emphasized with a whistle on 00:18:425 (1,2) - (as an example) is the same one like those.
3. 00:22:223 (3) - Why not have this slider have the same amount of curve like 00:23:552 (6) - this, or have a ctrl + h-ed version of it? It might look better, but this is just me being too subjective here.
4. 00:40:071 (2) - Very nitpicky here, but I would like it if this slider's shape was a curved one like 00:39:311 (7) - for somewhat of a blanket effect.
5. 01:11:400 (5,6) - It may be just me but I think the sliders could use some whistles to emphasize on that high-pitched instrument, like you did on 01:03:425 (7) - this for example. Same would apply for 01:23:552 (5,6,7) - these as well.
6. 01:27:349 (5,6) - Ok I don't get it here, you did emphasize the same instrument in the kiai, but why not here? I mean, these and 01:03:425 (7) - (for example again) are of the same instrument, and the pitch, so it technically should be consistent.
7. 01:31:337 (1,2,3) - Yea and on all this I would add whistles to emphasize on the same instrument once more.
8. That's all really, I really like this difficulty /o/

1. 00:14:438 (3,4) - I might be just being selfish here, but I feel that the looks of the pattern here could be better if (4) was a flipped version of (3), something like this.
2. 00:15:387 (1,2,3) - Why not increase the distance between each notes here just a tad bit? It might work better as all of them are quite strong, seeing that you've emphasized them with finishes on all of them.
3. 00:39:691 (1) - Not getting why this doesn't have a jump on it when 00:36:653 (1,1) - both of these had jumps on them. The same bell from those 2 notes are present here too, so the jump usage should be kept consistent.
4. 00:40:071 (2,3,4) - Personally I wouldn't go for this pattern, as a similar type of movement was used for a 1/2 jump at 00:35:704 (3,4,5,6,1) - , so the players could get confused here, thinking that the jump from (3) to (4) is a 1/2, but not 1/1. Would use a slider instead of circle for (3), to remove that possibility.
5. 00:58:014 (1) - Like Easy, the clap on the end of the spinner here should be the custom 2's, not the custom 3's.
6. Great difficulty, didn't find much to point out on.

[Sc4v4ng3r] wrote:

Ahhhhh modding as requested in-game.
Made this as soon as possible as you did told me you need my mod(I guess?).

[General]

1. Looks fine for me

[Easy]

1. There are many polarities in this difficulty that can be avoided quite easily without ruining up the original rhythm. Even if the BPM is slow, beginners might have a hard time actually hitting the red tick notes properly, and that can unintentionally increase the difficulty. Some of them are going to be mentioned below, look for them throughout the whole map.
2. 00:06:273 (1,2) - The polarity here is avoidable, by changing up the rhythm like this. Feels hard to have polarities right off the bat. Ok this part is quite quiet, so it should be alright.
3. 00:09:311 (1,2,3,4) - Same here, the polarity here can be avoided by changing up the rhythm like above. yea fixed too
4. 00:13:868 (3,4) - I know, BPM is slow and the polarity might not be challenging, but the polarity can be still avoided easily here, by simply making them into a repeated slider instead of separating them into 1 circle and a slider. On the other hand, I want to keep this. This part is quite intense (I treated this part as semi-kiai on all diffs) so it requires more click actions than other parts, especially on those strong red ticks. It's circle-to-slider 3/2 gap so it's not hard to get 300s.
5. 00:16:147 (2,3,4) - But here though... Not sure how can you avoid the polarity on (2) and (3), but I believe polarity on (3) and (4) can be avoided by making (4) into a 1/2 slider starting on 00:17:476 - . Because the BPM is slow, and the 'recovery time' between this note and 00:18:425 (1) - is quite big, so an 1/2 slider wouldn't hurt too much on gameplay. Oh I already changed 00:17:476 (4) - into a 1/2 slider after talking with Taeyang, maybe you have the older version. But I'm not going to avoid the polarity on (2) and (3) by using a 3/2 slider and a circle because 00:16:716 - definitely requires a click action.
6. 00:25:261 (2,3) - Again, polarity here can be avoided by doing this instead of the current rhythm. Well, it's still circle-to-slider to it's not that hard, also it's because I consider 00:25:830 (3) - these two beats as similar as 00:26:590 (4) - so I wanna make them into a single pattern.
7. 00:28:299 (2,3) - Make a repeated slider here instead of separating them to avoid the polarity. If I do that, I need to ignore 00:29:818 - this beat, and I think putting a note on 00:30:008 - while that one is ignored is meaningless, as the two sounds work as a 'set'. So if I have to select only one, the previous white tick one is better, imo.
8. 01:00:577 (5) - Just 1 more thing aside from the polarities, I feel that the clap here should be the custom 2's, not the custom 3's, as the 'clap' here is the same one like at 00:11:400 (4) - this note's tail. Applied, on all diffs.
9. Yea I guess that is all the types of the polarity present in this difficulty. I can see that the polarities are made to emphasize on the strong instrument in the background, but even so, beginners have a hard time hitting those properly as they are technically off-beat. Actually, other than the polarities on this difficulty, I feel the difficulty is fine by it's own right now.

[Normal]

1. Honestly I can't find anything here lol Here are just some of my suggestions(and a few actual 'problems') :
2. 00:19:754 (5,4,4) - and all the similar sliders - would recommend you to add a whistle on each of their heads as the instrument you've emphasized with a whistle on 00:18:425 (1,2) - (as an example) is the same one like those. No, those whistles are for the 3 1/2 sounds there, which don't exist on 00:19:754 - and things. I think it's fine as it is now.
3. 00:22:223 (3) - Why not have this slider have the same amount of curve like 00:23:552 (6) - this, or have a ctrl + h-ed version of it? It might look better, but this is just me being too subjective here. Well why not, fixed.
4. 00:40:071 (2) - Very nitpicky here, but I would like it if this slider's shape was a curved one like 00:39:311 (7) - for somewhat of a blanket effect. Oh but 00:40:071 (2,3) - these are one set so I want to keep this Ctrl+J'ed version.
5. 01:11:400 (5,6) - It may be just me but I think the sliders could use some whistles to emphasize on that high-pitched instrument, like you did on 01:03:425 (7) - this for example. Same would apply for 01:23:552 (5,6,7) - these as well. Alrighty, I thought finishes already do the job well, but I'll add whistles there too.
6. 01:27:349 (5,6) - Ok I don't get it here, you did emphasize the same instrument in the kiai, but why not here? I mean, these and 01:03:425 (7) - (for example again) are of the same instrument, and the pitch, so it technically should be consistent. Okay, I'm changing all of those into whistle, whistle+clap then. Also there was 00:14:818 - back there too xD
7. 01:31:337 (1,2,3) - Yea and on all this I would add whistles to emphasize on the same instrument once more. Yea did that too.
8. That's all really, I really like this difficulty /o/

[Hard]

1. 00:14:438 (3,4) - I might be just being selfish here, but I feel that the looks of the pattern here could be better if (4) was a flipped version of (3), something like this.
2. 00:15:387 (1,2,3) - Why not increase the distance between each notes here just a tad bit? It might work better as all of them are quite strong, seeing that you've emphasized them with finishes on all of them. No, I don't want to do such a distance-changing patterns in this diff. The strong flow change already does the job pretty well.
3. 00:39:691 (1) - Not getting why this doesn't have a jump on it when 00:36:653 (1,1) - both of these had jumps on them. The same bell from those 2 notes are present here too, so the jump usage should be kept consistent. Put a bit of jump there
4. 00:40:071 (2,3,4) - Personally I wouldn't go for this pattern, as a similar type of movement was used for a 1/2 jump at 00:35:704 (3,4,5,6,1) - , so the players could get confused here, thinking that the jump from (3) to (4) is a 1/2, but not 1/1. Would use a slider instead of circle for (3), to remove that possibility. It's fine imo, the reasons are: 1. There are more than 4 seconds of time between those patterns, which is enough for the players to just forget about the previous one. 2. The previous pattern has roundy movement while this one is just 100% linear. 3. It's a little more far. If that was a 1/2 pattern, it's 2.40x, while the previous one is 2.10x. 4. AR 7.5 is enough to discriminate such gaps.
5. 00:58:014 (1) - Like Easy, the clap on the end of the spinner here should be the custom 2's, not the custom 3's. Yeah fixed
6. Great difficulty, didn't find much to point out on.

Well that's all for me. GL!

1. 00:00:198 (1,2,3,4) - imo works better if you have 00:02:096 - clickable, because that's the start of the meldoy you're following with (4), maybe try http://puu.sh/nPUYV.jpg ?
   same for 00:03:235 (1,2,3,4) - cause same rhythm
2. 00:07:223 (2,3) - ctrl+g the rhythm? Because the whistlethings go from (2) to (3)'s head and on (3)'s tail it's repeating
   (so actually two sliders would match better here, imo, but that doesn't work out if you want to emhasize the sound on (4)'s tail, so just ctrl+g is the best option, imo)
   same for 00:10:261 (2,3) -
   and similar here too 01:26:780 (3,4) -
3. 00:13:868 (3,4) - ctrl+g here, too? The melody starting on (3) goes on and the slidertail is mapped to this "abrupt" clap, which might play better if it's clickable? (I know there is another clap on the 1/2 before, but I don't see any way to cover that without using 1/2 sliders. :/ )
4. 00:15:387 (1,2,3) - having (2) clickable kinda makes players expect that you're going on with following the same instruments, but you're switching to the stronger sound, which is all fine, but it makes this whole pattern feel a little incomplete? Consider using a reverse on (1) instead of teh circle, that matches better with this-rhythm-is-done!-following-a-different-one-now (Idk how to describe this..)
5. 00:25:261 (2,3) - hmmh, imo this would work better if you go with 3/2 slider + circle at 00:26:210 - because atm you have to hold the slider in this small break, where there's no beat and before you have four beats and the vocals and nothign really happens gameplay-wise, so ya.
6. 00:27:349 (1) - I'd prefer if this was split into circle + slider, because there's a completely new sound starting on the reverse
7. 00:29:818 (3) - hmh, makes more sense to place this at 00:30:008 - imo, the sound there is siginificantly stronger and the 3/2 gaps shouldn't be any problem at this point.
8. 00:36:653 (1,2,3,4) - these gap feel weird, imo, because while they match with the beat they ignore the vocals. You could cover them nicely if you used two 3/2 reverse sliders?
9. 00:42:729 (1,2,3,4) - and the following patterns until 00:51:463 (5) - I don't quite get what you mapped this part to, because it seems rather random to me. (Idk, maybe I just missed something major.. if I did, could you explain it to me? >-< )
   If not.. > I think you could tone down this whole part a little, because the pace is steady and doesn't warrant these "breaks", even if some beats are a little louder and some quieter, the main focus here is on the vocals which go on and on.. I'd suggest a rhythm like this:
   http://puu.sh/nPXgO.jpg | http://puu.sh/nPXhW.jpg | http://puu.sh/nPXqG.jpg
10. 00:54:881 (1,2,3) - similar here, I'd prefer if you pay more attention to the vocals here, as they're stronger than the beats. http://puu.sh/nPXy2.jpg
11. 01:04:754 (2,3) - I'd try a 3/2 reverse slider here instead to cover the beat at 01:05:134 - and the vocals
    same for 01:16:906 (2,3) -
12. 01:10:071 (1,2) - similar to something I mentioned above, consider replacing circle with reverse?
    same for 01:22:223 (1,2) -
13. 01:12:349 (4) - cause you've been focusing on the beat before it seems weird to change back to vocals immediately. Maybe a single circle would match better? Also gives beginner players a little time to breathe
    similar here 01:24:501 (4) - but this might work better as two circles, because there is a beat on the secons white tick, but it's completely different than the sliderhead
14. 01:28:299 (1,2) - sounds to me like (2) shoudl start 1/2 earlier?
15. 01:31:337 (1,2,3) - http://puu.sh/nPY1Q.jpg or better http://puu.sh/nPYiN.jpg? because Easy should end at the same point as all other diffs

1. 00:01:527 (4) - similar as in Easy, tail should be clickable, imo, because you're switching focus here. maybe http://puu.sh/nPYps.jpg ?
   same for 00:04:565 (4) -
2. 00:05:514 (5,6) - I'd prefer if you keep this the same as before (00:02:476 (5) - ) because well.. it's exactly the same and if you have the second white tick clickable it doesn't make sense to use a circle instead of a slider suddenly, because it's an on-going melody covering the next red tick as well, but because that would be a little too much the reverse slider would be better, imo
3. 00:06:843 (2,3,4) - ctrl+g so you have the circle first and then the two sliders. You can cover all sounds on the red ticks like that and don't have the beraks of the melody on the slidertracks
   00:09:311 (1,2,3,4,5) - should be the same, I think
4. 00:20:324 (6) - and 00:23:362 (5) - and 00:26:400 (5) - conisder deleting them? These patterns just feel extremely dense, especially compared to the Easy and should be nerfed slightly, imo. I felt like removing these three circles went best with the vocals, but maybe you can think of something better :3
   same for 00:32:476 (5) - 00:35:514 (6) -
5. 00:27:349 (7,1) - stacking a reverse slider below sth else is probably not the best idea. '-' conisder unstacking them? Or might be better to replace the reverse slider with standard 1/1 slider?
6. 00:36:653 (1) - try 1/1 slider instead of 1/2 reverse, there's a beat but it gets completely covered up by the vocals and a simple slider matches them better, imo
7. 00:41:020 (4) - two completely different sounds on head and tail and nothing on the track, consider splitting this into two circles? Or you could add a reverse to (3)
8. 00:48:235 (6) - feels a little too much, cause ecept for the vocals on the head there's nothing else. try http://puu.sh/nPZxc.jpg ?
9. 00:51:843 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - pretty long, maybe http://puu.sh/nPZBo.jpg would work too? less clickable objects
10. 01:03:425 (7) - I'd really like if both of them were clickable, but with the previous objects that's a little too much, maybe you could use 1/1 slider for 01:02:856 (5,6) - and turn (7) into two circles
11. 01:08:932 (5) - to give the vocals a more emphasis this could be replaced with two circles
    same applies to second Kiai
12. 01:27:349 (5,6) - since (6) is clickable the prev 1/2 beat should be, too. (same sounds) also, there's a strong new sound at 01:28:109 - which is unmapped, maybe yoou can try this http://puu.sh/nQ0sn.jpg
13. 01:29:628 (4,5,6,7) - at the end this the song is becoming much quiter and imo it works better if you focus on the sounds that become slower? like http://puu.sh/nQ0BM.jpg
14. 01:32:666 (1) - aah, I don't think it would be a problem to move this spinner by 1/2 and making the beat clickable. It#s still long enough for a Normal, imo

1. 00:05:894 (4) - shouldn't this be another slider?
2. 00:18:805 (2) - 00:21:843 (2) - 00:24:881 (2) - I know the sounds don't really stop, but imo it would be really nice if they would play differently than all the other 1/2s, so they cooould be replaced with a circle.
   same for 00:30:957 (2) - 00:33:995 (2) -
3. 00:27:919 (2,3,1) - can you somehow avoid the overlap? :c
4. 00:41:780 (3,4,5) - how about spacing them? It might be a little confusing to have some spaced 1/4s and some stacked 1/4s and then 1/4s stacked above 1/4 reverse sliders.. spacing them would make this better readable
   same for 00:51:084 (3,4,5) - and 01:30:577 (4,5,6) -
5. 00:47:856 (3,4) - feels weird to have a gap there, because when you're following the vocals this should be "equal". > add reverse to slider or (imo more interesting rhythm) replace the slider with two circles
6. 00:59:818 (1,2,3) - the jump's pretty close to twice the distance as usual, please consider reducing the jump slightly. it might be mistaken for 1/1
7. 01:24:501 (2) - I'd prefer two circles here, cause two different sounds; 01:24:501 - is this beat + vocal and 01:24:881 - the clap and I would want to click the clap. :c

1. 00:06:084 - basically same a sin the other diffs. (I know the beat's slightly weaker than in the prev pattern, but it's still clearly audiable)
2. 00:13:868 (1) - imo this woudl work better with two circles because the melody is still extremely similar to 00:13:109 (3,4,5,6) -
   if you disgaree, consider moving (2) a little furtehr away, the sudden decrease in DS doesn't work well with prev jumps and following jumps, imo
3. 00:18:046 (4) - sounds like this ends 00:18:330 - and not on the red tick. I'm not sure, but if you slow down to 50% and play music starting at 00:18:330 - you'll hear a sound.
4. 00:41:780 (3,1,2,3) - hmmh, I disagree with this. It just comes out of the blue. And the only other time this is used is at 01:28:868 (2,3) - , for the first one a simple stream would make much more sense, imo.It's in the middle of the song, not even the built-up to anything, so this feels out of place.
   For the second one it's directly after the Kiai and the song s getting calmer and slower, but with this pattern you're going in the opposite direction. :/ And the stream at this part isn't really fitting, either. There's absolutely no strong sound on 01:29:153 (4) - and the ones on (3,6,7) are incredibly weak..
   I'd suggest going with two circles for the first pattern and simplifying the rhythm of the second pattern to http://puu.sh/nQ3yM.jpg
5. 01:24:501 (1) - same as in Hard, also, since it's the same sound as the previous objects, it should use the same spacing.