not trying to start anything but, why was this poll created (by yourself) coincidentally the same time you showed drastic improvement?
just a thought.
just a thought.
Talked about this with multiple people and they said that it'd be fine if I posted this myself. Clearly they were wrong lol... why would I brag about myself in a top 10 video? I would much rather just set good plays to impress people instead of making a video about my plays, and besides, its like a minute or two of me playing anyways, and there are gonna be far more impressive people in it anyways who will get more plays and commentary etc. as the video moves up the ranks.Ritzeh wrote:
not trying to start anything but, why was this poll created (by yourself) coincidentally the same time you showed drastic improvement?
just a thought.
yep i suspected that i didn't readSmoothie World wrote:
Additionally, players who currently use a tablet will NOT be counted because they are traitors!
No, I'm sorry.. I can't do this. I'm really sorry I've upset everyone.Momiji wrote:
yep i suspected that i didn't readSmoothie World wrote:
Additionally, players who currently use a tablet will NOT be counted because they are traitors!
Smoothie just keep this thread as it is plz, nowhere in your OP have you directly brought attention to yourself by stating that you are a mouse player
All of the attention comes from actually being one and thus being on the list of fuking mouse players, and the surplus attention is only being created right now by trying to artificially create a problem oh mouse player posted mouse player top 10 thread.
I haven't seen anyone getting upset when Nara made korea top 25, I haven't seen anyone getting upset when Amai made poland top 10.
Really? You're such a drama queen.Ritzeh wrote:
not trying to start anything but, why was this poll created (by yourself) coincidentally the same time you showed drastic improvement?
just a thought.
Hows that being a drama queen lol.XII wrote:
Really? You're such a drama queen.Ritzeh wrote:
not trying to start anything but, why was this poll created (by yourself) coincidentally the same time you showed drastic improvement?
just a thought.
not being a drama queen, just being observant.XII wrote:
Really? You're such a drama queen.Ritzeh wrote:
not trying to start anything but, why was this poll created (by yourself) coincidentally the same time you showed drastic improvement?
just a thought.
What a joke. Smoothie World has never made one of these videos, and as soon as he get a bunch of ranks he decides to make a "Winter 2016" Top 10 Mouse Player. And you decide to call someone out who sees this correlation. If you can't see the coincidences then you are blind.XII wrote:
Really? You're such a drama queen.Ritzeh wrote:
not trying to start anything but, why was this poll created (by yourself) coincidentally the same time you showed drastic improvement?
just a thought.
Holy shit, you're so observant!Ritzeh wrote:
not being a drama queen, just being observant.
get your shit together.
XII wrote:
Holy shit, you're so observant!
Even more so at finding spurious correlations! You truly are amazing!
Looks like all we have to do now is never let anyone make a list that they would possibly be in.
Also side note, spiking pp =/= skill. I don't know about you, but this list is using votes. So spiking in pp would not change the skill of players. Hope your observant little eye caught that part of this game.
So....this is basically just 7 assumptions in a text post. Gotcha buddy!Ritzeh wrote:
XII wrote:
Holy shit, you're so observant!
Even more so at finding spurious correlations! You truly are amazing!
Looks like all we have to do now is never let anyone make a list that they would possibly be in.
Also side note, spiking pp =/= skill. I don't know about you, but this list is using votes. So spiking in pp would not change the skill of players. Hope your observant little eye caught that part of this game.Save your eyesNo shit pp =/= skill, but pp is a loose representation of skill and what does a loose representation of skill do? It brings popularity to a person because realistically, most people only care about/pay attention to good scores (usually scores valued high in pp) and base it as their first impression of the player.
The term I used, "drastic improvement", was directly referring to sw's rise in rank over the past few months (more specifically the past week). This is why I bothered to question the "spurious correlations".
You seem to think that I'm the type of person that relies 100% on pp to calculate the absolute skill level of a person. Well that's not true lol.
You fucked yourself over by saying this poll involves votes and not skill while defending someone who appears to want more attention (check reddit and twitter). This poll is more of a popularity contest and pp doesn't change skill at all.
You're looking at this situation with values in true skill ( I like that ) but you're missing the point that I am trying to make. Like what poncho said about the correlations why would sw bother making a Winter 2016 poll instead of best mouse players of 2015? A winter 2016 poll would center the focus on sw's recent scores.
Those are the reasons why I brought this up and at first it was just an innocent question with no intentions of starting shit and to be honest, no one would've questioned about it except for me because no one wants to be that guy that acts differently among the crowd.
Your ass decided to be the one to call me out for my doubts on the timing of this poll while including unnecessary sarcastic remarks. Maybe you're the drama queen here so shut the fuck up.
na you're just being an idiotXII wrote:
So....this is basically just 7 assumptions in a text post. Gotcha buddy!
You seem awfully agitated that I decided to question you? Is your opinion on another hierarchy level than anyone else? Is that why you assumed your opinion and assumptions were obsolete?
You too, looks like you care way too much about rank and what other people think about you. At least from what I read here, haven't really encountered you anywhere else thankfully.Ritzeh wrote:
na you're just being an idiotXII wrote:
So....this is basically just 7 assumptions in a text post. Gotcha buddy!
You seem awfully agitated that I decided to question you? Is your opinion on another hierarchy level than anyone else? Is that why you assumed your opinion and assumptions were obsolete?
Of course you wouldn't know who i am. No one really does.XII wrote:
You too, looks like you care way too much about rank and what other people think about you. At least from what I read here, haven't really encountered you anywhere else thankfully.Ritzeh wrote:
na you're just being an idiot