1. 00:51:550 - change k? pitch is up to up from here.
2. 01:02:042 - same.
3. 01:08:599 - add d? to follow the backvocal ww.
4. 01:23:681 - d?
5. 01:31:222 - k? same as 01:36:468 - .
6. 01:40:813 - add d to follow the 　accompaniment sound same as 01:38:190 - .
7. 01:48:272 (652,653) - 　change kk or dk ? to express the next song and for a variation from before ddd~~k stream flow. it plays better imo w.
8. 02:36:140 (1,2,3,4) - kdkd? to make a more consistent and for making a gap on only 02:37:616 - , to sounds up (to 02:37:616 - )or not (to 02:36:304 - ).
9. 02:41:386 (1,2,3,4) - same.
10. 02:44:337 (1,2) - prefer to dk imo with plays ww
11. 02:58:354 - , 03:08:845 - k ? ddkd- ddkd- ddkk- ddkk? (kdkd-kdkd-kdkk-kdkk?)
12. 03:50:239 - change k , to express the sounds up.
13. 04:00:075 - k?
14. 04:01:796 (1,2) - kd?
    how about change to k on 03:57:944 - , 04:02:206 - , 04:03:190 - ,04:04:173 - (and 04:04:255 - too if you like)? Its not bad to variate on purpose for expression the less bass sound part.
15. 04:10:075 - k too?
16. 04:26:960 - change d? 04:24:173 (21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29) - less d sound imo..
    
17. 05:34:747 (303,304) - either change to k to follow the more main.
18. 05:42:452 - add k and 05:43:681 - remove instead? its really short pattern… ;_; 05:41:878 (1,2,3,4,5) - . Instrumental needs more power imo.
19. 05:45:894 - , 05:45:976 - add k too?
20. 05:52:944 - same , add? , 05:54:829 - remove?
21. 05:56:468 - add k ? lol
22. 06:05:813 (1,2,3) - consider change to kkd same as 02:36:140 - theory.
23. 06:06:632 (1,2) - dk?
24. 06:11:058 (1,2,3) - , 06:17:124 (1,2) - , 06:16:304 (1,2,3) - same.
    
25. 06:47:124 (1,2,3) - ddd?
    
26. 06:56:058 - remove….? idk why its longer only just here.
27. 07:25:157 (1,2,3,4,5) - ddddk?
28. 07:26:140 - prefer to d imo www
    
29. 07:48:927 - d? same sounds with next 07:49:009 - on drums.
30. 07:50:813 - d,07:50:976 (1,2) - dk instead? kkdkkk flow seems not the best way to hear and it plays better too imo.
31. 07:49:993 (1,2,3) - dkd? same reason.
32. 08:08:763 (1,2,3) - dkd? pitch is lower than 08:06:140 (711) - .
33. 09:11:878 - k? same as 09:10:567 - 09:11:222 - vocal tone theory?

JUDYDANNY wrote:

Hello Midnait :3/ requested to check the bubbled map via PM , and sorry to late
There are mostly my opinions.

Symbol meaning

1. >> Normal suggestion.
   Big text >> Strong suggestion.
   >> Questionable imo.
   >>> Needs to improve some. (Rhythm is not good , plays or sounds weird)
   No comment >>simple (you can notice easily: just hits on drums or simple beats) , or already explained on the other place. OR JUST MY OPINON.

[Madnaait]

1. 00:51:550 - change k? pitch is up to up from here. Seems good
2. 01:02:042 - same. ^
3. 01:08:599 - add d? to follow the backvocal ww. I'll keep, just to emphasize the melody more
4. 01:23:681 - d? Okay
5. 01:31:222 - k? same as 01:36:468 - . okay
6. 01:40:813 - add d to follow the 　accompaniment sound same as 01:38:190 - . Doesn't sound okay for me lol
7. 01:48:272 (652,653) - 　change kk or dk ? to express the next song and for a variation from before ddd~~k stream flow. it plays better imo w. Changed to dddkk
8. 02:36:140 (1,2,3,4) - kdkd? to make a more consistent and for making a gap on only 02:37:616 - , to sounds up (to 02:37:616 - )or not (to 02:36:304 - ). I changed 02:36:796 (967,968) - to k d
9. 02:41:386 (1,2,3,4) - same. ^
10. 02:44:337 (1,2) - prefer to dk imo with plays ww Firetruck, I've never noticed that lol
11. 02:58:354 - , 03:08:845 - k ? ddkd- ddkd- ddkk- ddkk? (kdkd-kdkd-kdkk-kdkk?) Okay
12. 03:50:239 - change k , to express the sounds up. Seems okay
13. 04:00:075 - k? Oh man sounds much better like that
14. 04:01:796 (1,2) - kd? Following voice here, so no change
    how about change to k on 03:57:944 - , 04:02:206 - , 04:03:190 - ,04:04:173 - (and 04:04:255 - too if you like)? Its not bad to variate on purpose for expression the less bass sound part. It's okay as it is imo, but I see where are you coming from
15. 04:10:075 - k too? It's the same as 04:07:452
16. 04:26:960 - change d? 04:24:173 (21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29) - less d sound imo.. Sounds good
    
17. 05:34:747 (303,304) - either change to k to follow the more main. Changed to k
18. 05:42:452 - add k and 05:43:681 - remove instead? its really short pattern… ;_; 05:41:878 (1,2,3,4,5) - . Instrumental needs more power imo. I removed the note, but didn't add the k at 05:43:681
19. 05:45:894 - , 05:45:976 - add k too? Okay
20. 05:52:944 - same , add? , 05:54:829 - remove? idk about this one, 05:54:829 has melody in it ;_;
21. 05:56:468 - add k ? lol Added a don there, and 05:56:632 - Changing this to k seems more appropiate imo
22. 06:05:813 (1,2,3) - consider change to kkd same as 02:36:140 - theory. I'll keep, to make a difference between the rest of the patterns of that song
23. 06:06:632 (1,2) - dk? Lol changed
24. 06:11:058 (1,2,3) - , 06:17:124 (1,2) - , 06:16:304 (1,2,3) - same. Same as the other
    
25. 06:47:124 (1,2,3) - ddd? Uh, sounds weird imo
    
26. 06:56:058 - remove….? idk why its longer only just here. Because in the next part there isn't that "extra voice" that sounds right there lol
27. 07:25:157 (1,2,3,4,5) - ddddk? Seems weird, but I'll change it to emphasize a bit more the melody
28. 07:26:140 - prefer to d imo www I'll keep
    
29. 07:48:927 - d? same sounds with next 07:49:009 - on drums. Why did I change that to k? wwww
30. 07:50:813 - d,07:50:976 (1,2) - dk instead? kkdkkk flow seems not the best way to hear and it plays better too imo. I'll keep as it is, there's a big amount of voice in that pattern so I decided to make it with a bit more k's lol
31. 07:49:993 (1,2,3) - dkd? same reason. ^
32. 08:08:763 (1,2,3) - dkd? pitch is lower than 08:06:140 (711) - . Yeah, I wanted to do that but always forgot :^)
33. 09:11:878 - k? same as 09:10:567 - 09:11:222 - vocal tone theory? Okay

Maybe seems ok. call me back after fixed them.

JUDYDANNY wrote:

It's easy to understand the theory and relatively cleaned.
Looks fine, good Luck(¦3[___]

#2

Noob

My first play. It's DTable

1. 02:31:714 - Green line should be moved to 1/4 left since it doesn't work if player tap key before 02:31:714 -. Also volume seems bit too loud. Try to make lower and add green line at 02:32:944 -
2. 04:18:435 - Lower volume please.
3. 09:56:468 - Move green line to left

1. 02:14:009 (798,799,800,801,802,803,804,805) - Maybe ddkddkkd to follow the melody? 02:14:173 (800,801) - 02:14:419 (803,805) - Each second sounds are lower pitch than first.
2. 11:22:862 - Spinner endpoint should be here

tasuke912 wrote:

Hi I'm a long song-hater.

Noob

My first play. It's DTable

[ General]

1. 02:31:714 - Green line should be moved to 1/4 left since it doesn't work if player tap key before 02:31:714 -. Also volume seems bit too loud. Try to make lower and add green line at 02:32:944 -
2. 04:18:435 - Lower volume please.
3. 09:56:468 - Move green line to left

[ Inner Oni]

1. 02:14:009 (798,799,800,801,802,803,804,805) - Maybe ddkddkkd to follow the melody? 02:14:173 (800,801) - 02:14:419 (803,805) - Each second sounds are lower pitch than first.
2. 11:22:862 - Spinner endpoint should be here

Volume setting isn't perfect, but it's easy to fix. Patterns are good.

You may call me back when you are done

Midnaait wrote:

xEchoAlertx wrote:

For what specific reason(s) is this OD7?