oh ok lol. congrats!
Thanks Pho! :>
Pho wrote:oh ok lol. congrats!
Wow, I have never said or meant anything remotly like that, of course the starrating is completely irrelevant in this matter, but that's exactly the reason why at least the difficulty should be categorized correctly. There have been a ton of DQs because of falsely named Easy/Normal/Advanced-diffs, so I don't see why higher difficulties shouldn't be treated with the same accuracy. I just wanted to start some discussiom on that because I'm not sure how others see this, I haven't requested a DQ or anything. But Qualification/Disqualification is essential to this ranking system and you should be very well aware that DQs aren't a bad thing (I don't think this map would have any trouble getting requalified anyways).
Tsukuyomi wrote:then what, you guys create a topic called "Don't map under star rating map/ Don't map over star rating map"???
Or sth like "You can only map the map which fits its star rating"???
You'd better send you pm to ppy or tom to change the shit star rating system.
I didn't name the diff, I respect to guest mappers' choice so that's why it is called Insane, I know the outcome that the star rating of Insane diffs will be relatively low comparing with the actual gameplay after finish mapping my Extra, and I have testplayed the diff during the ranking process. the reading and aiming skill is more difficult then most of the maps as well the song have various snapping and there are wubs in some of the section. Even HW decided to use Another for her diff, not based on the star rating, but the CS5, the technical and reading skill as you said, I believe her diff is more challenging than Yoru's or even yf's
Bonsai wrote:yf's Insane definitely looks like an Extra to me because there is a lot of technical and/or reading skil needed, firstly all those 1/8-patterns like especially 00:21:216 (1,2) - (where I really don't understand why you'd make that random 1/8 clickable), the spacing of the 1/4-streams (especially those like 01:07:420 (2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - ), or that monstrosity of unpredicatble SV-, rhythm- and spacing-changes at 00:38:624 (1,1,1,2,3,1,1,1,1) -
Those are not elements of an Insane, imo Insanes should maybe introduce one of such complex gameplay elements while still making it easy to read, grasp and play, which those are not. The starrating of this diff is massively underrated, calling it an Insane misleads players even more
(to avoid possible misunderstandings: I don't have anything against the map itself, just the naming of the difficulty ^^)
Len wrote:p/4948908. just add -nil- on tag!
Reol wrote:the official video,
0:00 ~ 0:37 -> soundtrack 01. -nil-
I think you need to add on tag -nil-
Okorin wrote:The only thing you might be afraid of might be being ninja'd by pho lmao
I have stated the reason above, so I would keep this diff name, same as yf
Okorin wrote:I mean since you somewhat agree you could just get a dq, change the diffname and get it requalified, judging from the general opinions here that shouldnt be too hard.
oh god you are right ;;
pishifat wrote:04:32:657 (4) - pourquoi 1/8