Thanks!Natsu wrote:
-PC's hexagon
- 00:23:643 (3) - mapping the slider tail at such important beat as the stanza don't fit the song, since that beat is the start of the new section section and it needs a click action I get that you mean this is the start of a new beat, but that doesn't mean it needs to be clickable. Note how the sliderhead of 00:23:643 (3) - is a kick in the song? the slidertail is not. I feel the kick weighs way more than the definition of a starting beat, and in this case, I see zero issue not mapping a click to the sliderend. This pattern also flows really nicely into the next one imo. I really can't agree with your reasoning here, the end of the slider is basically the start of the melody of 00:23:988 (1,2,3,4,5,6) -, by not giving a click action to that beat you are really killing the song rhythm Alright, I see what you mean and it makes sense, but it honestly kills the charm of this part changing this, especially if I need to make 00:23:643 (3) - a 1/4 slider. Closest I could get to mapping this beat without having two identical sliders for completely different sounds was to map 00:23:643 (3) - as a 3/8 slider with a circle on the new beat. It plays well and should be fine.
-PC
- 00:04:161 (3,4,5,6) - the 4 beats stream sounds bad, since the music is suggesting you to bring click actions to only two of them 00:04:161 (3,5) - , check the top diff and listen how better the two 1/4 sliders sounds compared to your stream and tbh it's weird that you mapped a similar rhythm in a more properly way at 00:06:919 (3,4) - and we aren't talking about spacing, but rhythm Yeah, these are inconsistent with the rest. Changed to sliders. Although I disagree the previous stream sounds bad, since it's mapped to the background arpeggio. (Also what's with comparing diffs? I checked top diff and 00:04:074 (3) - isn't mapped to any sound in the part you linked. 00:09:592 (3) - nor is this one sebu....)