1. Smile (6 stars, 1549 notes)

kunkakunkakunkakunka wrote:

From my Q～ It is first mod after a long absence.

Insane

1. 00:02:738 (7) - Because 00:02:824 - does not have a sound, I recommend the change to the circle --nono,it has small sound
2. 00:29:481 (5) - NC?
3. 00:43:367 (1) - The 00:43:710 - is a strong sound. I recommend the change to the circle here. http://puu.sh/nm3v3.jpg
4. 00:44:052 (1) - I think that NC is not necessary.
5. 00:50:224 (2) - Would you switch to 2 circles? I recommend it to make a flow of the rhythm to 00:50:567 (3) -
6. 01:10:281 (6) - Would you do stack to 01:09:081 (1) - of this tail?
7. 00:46:795 (1,2) - I feel NC from 00:47:138 (2) - to be naturally. A lot of same NC follows after this. I recommend NC of the downbeat as much as possible. Such a feeling 03:01:195 (8,1) -
8. 00:52:281 (8) - Somewhat unnatural. try this http://puu.sh/nm6R3.jpg
9. 00:57:767 (1,2,1) - The NC is unnatural. When you follow consistency, the NC is 00:57:767 (1) - . However, The 00:58:624 (1) - is not necessary. Because I want to recommend that I add NC to downbeat, I think the NC to be 00:58:110 (2) - .
10. 02:21:595 (5) - I think that this is not necessary. 02:20:567 - and the 02:20:910 - and 02:21:252 - have rhythm and a sound same as 02:21:595 (5) - . However, notes is not placed. Only here feels that there is a circle unnaturally.
11. 03:07:024 (6) - NC?
12. 04:08:567 (5,1) - ctrl+G?
13. 04:22:281 (4) - I think that this note does mismatch here. Would you change to normal 1/2 slider? If it is adoption, I recommend NC to 04:22:624 (5) - according to consistency. ---i keep first
14. 04:45:252 (4,5) - ctrl+G?
15. 04:45:766 (6) - NC plz～
16. 05:03:252 (1) - I think that NC is not necessary. 05:05:995 (1) - same.
17. 05:19:881 (1,1,1) - I can't recommend 1/8. The sound of the 05:19:881 (1) - terminates in the 05:19:967 - exactly. In addition, As for the 05:20:224 (1) - and the 05:20:567 (1) - , a sound is not prolonged. Therefore, I recommend the change to the circle.---i keep first
18. 05:21:081 (2) - I recommend stack to 05:20:910 (1) - . (1) and (2) have a sound, but (3) is a very weak sound. Isolation is desirable for the (3).

I think it to be good map overall. GL

1. 00:09:081 (2,3) - slighly more space that these would touch each other
2. 00:10:795 (4) - NC?
3. 00:12:852 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - more space between these, because that's pretty lame spacing for buildup
4. 00:15:595 (1,3,5,7) - would fit better as 1/2 sliders
5. 00:19:024 (5,6) - why are these sliders?
6. 00:21:081 (1) - make this slider like it would blanket itself, overlapping itself looks pretty bad quickly done example
7. 00:32:738 (5) - NC?
8. 00:34:452 (4) - pretty lame spacing imo
9. 00:38:310 (2) - no sound here?
10. 00:44:052 (1) - on here make some of these streams like 00:47:138 (5,6) -
11. 01:01:367 (2,4) - blanket could be done better
12. 01:13:710 (9,11) - overlap
13. 01:28:710 (4,5,6) - stacking these is not good idea imo, and you maybe know why
14. 01:52:281 (7,11) - nc one or another, combo 14 not cool
15. 02:19:024 (7) - why no NC?
16. 02:47:138 (7) - NC?
17. 02:53:824 (2,3) - better blanket?
18. 02:55:195 (6) - did you know that you never make simply curved sliders with more than one anchor? (unrankable)
19. 03:07:024 (6) - NC?
20. 03:45:938 (5,7) - looks like overlap
21. 03:48:167 (1) - pretty lame spacing for this part
22. 04:22:452 (6) - NC?
23. 04:35:824 (1,2,3,4,1) - woah Woah WOAH wut? this kind of stream... no just doesn't keep the balance anymore. By deleting these 5 focking notes, like 1/300 notes of the song and the difficulty drops by 0.2 stars means that these are way too hard for this map
24. 04:58:110 (1) - same as before
25. Summary: not bad map but all the difficulty in this map comes only from the streams

uuuget wrote:

Hi,from modding queue
[smile]
01:24:681 (4) - 这一段是比较轻快的短音，感觉相对比较慢速的1/2滑条放在这里有点突兀，不如换成个2连stack或者两个短滑之类的怎么样？--√
01:40:624 (1) - 和前面的串间距再小点儿吧，因为只有一个，太容易被读成1/2跳了 ---不改
01:52:110 (5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12) - 这里串变速加点NC吧--√
01:54:852 (4,5,6) - 这个比较慢的折返滑条踩着比较快的音，感觉有点不合适 ---不改
03:10:967 (1) - NC往前移一个？和后面保持一致（或者让后面的都和这个一致）--√
03:48:852 (1,2,3,4) - 从这里往后3节，让单点间距也每节递进一下如何？--√
[insane]
短滑条（和折返）用distance snap感觉臃肿，个人看法
02:42:338 (1,2,3,4) - 慢滑条踩快音，感觉别扭 ---不改
03:03:081 (1,2,3) - 这里没有等间距，不知道是不是故意的 ---故意做的
03:10:452 (5) - 同smile ---没动

Lumin wrote:

Hmm NM here from myh queue

[Smile]

1. 00:09:081 (2,3) - slighly more space that these would touch each other
2. 00:10:795 (4) - NC?
3. 00:12:852 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - more space between these, because that's pretty lame spacing for buildup ---keep
4. 00:15:595 (1,3,5,7) - would fit better as 1/2 sliders
5. 00:19:024 (5,6) - why are these sliders? ---keep
6. 00:21:081 (1) - make this slider like it would blanket itself, overlapping itself looks pretty bad quickly done example
7. 00:32:738 (5) - NC?
8. 00:34:452 (4) - pretty lame spacing imo
9. 00:38:310 (2) - no sound here?
10. 00:44:052 (1) - on here make some of these streams like 00:47:138 (5,6) - ---keep
11. 01:01:367 (2,4) - blanket could be done better
12. 01:13:710 (9,11) - overlap
13. 01:28:710 (4,5,6) - stacking these is not good idea imo, and you maybe know why
14. 01:52:281 (7,11) - nc one or another, combo 14 not cool
15. 02:19:024 (7) - why no NC?
16. 02:47:138 (7) - NC?
17. 02:53:824 (2,3) - better blanket?
18. 02:55:195 (6) - did you know that you never make simply curved sliders with more than one anchor? (unrankable) ---keep , i don't think this is unrankable
19. 03:07:024 (6) - NC?
20. 03:45:938 (5,7) - looks like overlap ---...no here
21. 03:48:167 (1) - pretty lame spacing for this part ---change as uuuget said
22. 04:22:452 (6) - NC?
23. 04:35:824 (1,2,3,4,1) - woah Woah WOAH wut? this kind of stream... no just doesn't keep the balance anymore. By deleting these 5 focking notes, like 1/300 notes of the song and the difficulty drops by 0.2 stars means that these are way too hard for this map ---you will know this is Extra diff lol
24. 04:58:110 (1) - same as before
25. Summary: not bad map but all the difficulty in this map comes only from the streams

1. 前面3分半没有break啊……01:20:052 - 之后那段让玩家休息一下吧，跟后面的break一样
   
2. Letterbox设定不同，统一一下

1. 00:15:595 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - 为什么从这个小节开始就变1/2了……还是从下个小节再1/2比较好。如果这里一定要跟的话用滑条也行
   
2. 00:53:567 - 鼓点感觉还是可以跟，00:53:481 (3,4) - 换成一个原地三连就好了
   
3. 00:56:910 (2,4) - B
   
4. 01:13:110 (7) - 删
   
5. 两段kiai，感觉间距还没00:54:681 - 01:41:995 - 这段大呢……感觉总体稍微摆开点会更好
   
6. 02:36:167 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - 这段跟得很密，但实际上应该是往后那段更高潮，所以后面这段（02:38:224 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - ）的ds最好拉大一些
   
7. 02:39:424 - 02:41:824 - 02:42:167 - 这几个地方跟会更有趣

1. 00:05:310 (3,4,5,6,7) - 7放到串6下面，或者平行，看着更舒服
   
2. 00:29:481 (7) - nc？
   
3. 00:34:452 (4) - 这小节前三个都是滑条，这个也换成滑条更舒服
   
4. 00:34:795 (5) - nc？
   
5. 00:44:395 (2) - nc是不是应该在这儿
   
6. 00:52:281 (1) - 换成note？
   
7. 00:52:624 (3) - nc是不是应该在这儿
   
8. 00:55:367 (2) - ^ 这些地方你的insane也是nc加在小节线上的吧？是弄错了还是故意的？后面nc问题不说了
   
9. 01:34:795 (6,7) - 既然你加这个音效了的话就拉开点放吧。不过我觉得有点吵，insane同
   
10. 02:25:195 (2,3) - 换滑条
    
11. 02:38:224 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - 间距放大原因同insane
    
12. 03:45:424 (1,2,3,4) - 没必要叠吧
    
13. 04:22:452 (1,2,3) - 这样放五连有点别扭，这仨改折返滑条吧
    
14. 我打不了这难度说得可能不对，但是我觉得变间距长串而且最后间距这么大……你这图都不到6星，04:35:481 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - 等几个地方实在有点太难。

Pata-Mon wrote:

M4M

[General]

1. 前面3分半没有break啊……01:20:052 - 之后那段让玩家休息一下吧，跟后面的break一样
   
2. Letterbox设定不同，统一一下

[Insane]

1. 00:15:595 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - 为什么从这个小节开始就变1/2了……还是从下个小节再1/2比较好。如果这里一定要跟的话用滑条也行
   
2. 00:53:567 - 鼓点感觉还是可以跟，00:53:481 (3,4) - 换成一个原地三连就好了
   
3. 00:56:910 (2,4) - B
   
4. 01:13:110 (7) - 删 ---不
   
5. 两段kiai，感觉间距还没00:54:681 - 01:41:995 - 这段大呢……感觉总体稍微摆开点会更好
   
6. 02:36:167 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - 这段跟得很密，但实际上应该是往后那段更高潮，所以后面这段（02:38:224 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - ）的ds最好拉大一些 ---懒改
   
7. 02:39:424 - 02:41:824 - 02:42:167 - 这几个地方跟会更有趣

[Smile]

1. 00:05:310 (3,4,5,6,7) - 7放到串6下面，或者平行，看着更舒服
   
2. 00:29:481 (7) - nc？
   
3. 00:34:452 (4) - 这小节前三个都是滑条，这个也换成滑条更舒服 ---不
   
4. 00:34:795 (5) - nc？
   
5. 00:44:395 (2) - nc是不是应该在这儿
   
6. 00:52:281 (1) - 换成note？
   
7. 00:52:624 (3) - nc是不是应该在这儿
   
8. 00:55:367 (2) - ^ 这些地方你的insane也是nc加在小节线上的吧？是弄错了还是故意的？后面nc问题不说了
   
9. 01:34:795 (6,7) - 既然你加这个音效了的话就拉开点放吧。不过我觉得有点吵，insane同
   
10. 02:25:195 (2,3) - 换滑条
    
11. 02:38:224 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - 间距放大原因同insane
    
12. 03:45:424 (1,2,3,4) - 没必要叠吧
    
13. 04:22:452 (1,2,3) - 这样放五连有点别扭，这仨改折返滑条吧 ---懒改
    
14. 我打不了这难度说得可能不对，但是我觉得变间距长串而且最后间距这么大……你这图都不到6星，04:35:481 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - 等几个地方实在有点太难。

GL

T-Mac wrote:

来了

[Insane]

testplay

总体来看很多东西似乎都有点挤的太拢，很多blanket基本都是贴在一起的，对我来说这样不是很好看

00:37:881 (6) - 这个我觉得是可以拆成两个1/4的

01:17:995 (1) - 这堆滑条感觉贴的太近，可以跟主难度一样拉开放的

01:29:995 (1,2,3) - 这里可以把音量慢慢加到 01:31:024 (1) - 这个点的大小了，多插几条绿线

02:26:738 (6) - ctrl+G

04:11:481 (1,2) - 这个感觉是没必要用滑条的，4个圈就能解决的事情

04:12:852 (1) - 这一段4个NC太多了，2个就够了 ---凑合吧

其实没什么大问题，但是像 03:22:795 (5) - 这种用的太多，一个长图用太多这个可能会让人审美疲劳的，我觉得稍微拉一下，跟这样差不多的感觉可能就会好很多，而且1/4滑条之间也总是贴的太近感觉好像也不是特别好，而且感觉这个难度似乎是为了适应新的RC糊的，用心的程度上被主难度拉开10条街 --又被你发现糊的 那个捂脸的表情

[Smile]

tsetplay

01:40:624 (1) - 比较希望这个的flow是接前面那个串下去的，否则这个变向感觉有点突然

01:41:310 (1,2,1) - 1/2和1/4的间距感觉太接近了，处理起来会比较麻烦

02:55:195 (6) - 丑

03:41:824 - 也是把音量慢慢往上加，和 insane是一样的道理

03:51:938 (1,2,3,4,1) - 前面是0.3 0.6 1.1，那这个就1.8的DS好了 ---懒改啊 ,这样也可以了

04:03:595 (3,4,5,6) - 这地方比较难处理 ---故意漏掉5连的

04:48:852 (2) - 这地方全是水平的滑条看着没啥意思

别的没有，感觉上次试图的时候讲过挺多东西的，再看的话好像也没什么比较大的问题了

1. Combo colors?
2. There are some sections where you just use whistles and don't really use any drum-related hitsounds, even though the drums are pretty clear in the music, such as 00:55:367 - and 01:41:995 - , and I'm just wondering if you're intentionally doing this? I think it would feel more satisfying to hit these notes if they also had hitsounds following the drums in the song in these sections.
3. Here's a testplay. I was playing with a mouse, so I kinda derped some places.

1. 00:02:567 (6,7) - Doesn't matter much, but maybe curve these sliders to blanket 00:02:910 (8,9) - ?
2. 00:11:481 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4) - This whole section is a bit weird. The song is clearly having a buildup here, where notes are increasing in pitch, but the note sections 00:12:852 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5) - feel much less powerful than the slider sections since there's a lack of beats. Imo, having the note section first, then changing into sliders makes more sense: http://i.imgur.com/h0qmEES.png
3. 00:21:081 (1) - shorten this to 00:21:681 - , then add a 1/4 slider at 00:21:767 - ? The slider would follow the same sound as 00:21:938 (1) - , and it makes sense that both of them land on sliderheads instead of the first one being on a slidertail.
4. 00:32:395 (3) - Is this default clap intentional?
5. 00:33:424 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5) - Same as previous section.
6. 00:40:281 - Again I think these notes feel much less powerful than the notes before because of their spacing, even though the music is building up. Imo it would make more sense if 00:38:910 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - started out closer together, and everything gradually increasing in spacing.
7. 00:44:395 - Your NCs here are a bit messy. Try having the NCs at 00:44:395 - , 00:45:595 - , 00:47:138 - , 00:48:338 - , 00:49:881 - , 00:51:081 - 00:52:624 -
8. 00:44:395 - Not that you have to do this, but something interesting you could try is to have these sliders point up/downwards depending on if the pitch increases or decreases from the previous slider.
9. 00:53:481 (4,5,6) - Slight spacing irregularity.
10. 00:55:367 - 01:15:938 - Why didn't you map the background instruments instead of the vocals here The rhythm in the background sounds much more interesting to me, and you get several opportunities to map the vocals later on in the song.
11. 01:08:224 (9,10) - Blanket the (9) with (10)? With straight sliders that is.
12. 01:17:995 (1,1,1,1,1,1,1) - These are really cool
13. 01:31:710 (3,4,5) - Mmm, this 1/4 jump is kinda unexpected as you skip the 1/4 beat at 01:31:795 - , so you're only following part of the 1/4 notes here. You should place these closer together, or just map this rhythm out by shortening 01:31:710 (3) - to 01:31:795 -
14. 01:34:624 (5) - Remove this note, and add a note at 01:34:538 - and 01:34:710 - ? This rhythm is really distinct and clear for this section of the song.
15. 01:38:738 (6) - I would just map this as 2 notes as well, since it kind of lets up on the intensity in the buildup with a slider right now.
16. 01:40:624 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - This could be a bit janky to hit on a sightread. You also mapped it differently at 03:52:280 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - . You should stick with one of them imo. Either works I guess, but having 1/4 sliders would definitely make this part easier to do without sliderbreaking.
17. 01:44:052 (4,5,6,7) - I would personally increase spacing on this part compared to 01:43:024 (6,7,1) - because of the increased pitch, but I guess what you're doing works too, seeing as you do the same thing at 01:49:367 (4,5,6,7,8) - .
18. 01:46:110 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - Arrange your notes like this? http://i.imgur.com/05OoD0y.png so the main melody lands on sliderheads and notes rather than sliderends.
19. 01:50:567 (3) - Missing whistle on sliderhead.
20. 01:51:338 (6) - Delete this note? The gap between (5,7) would put more emphasis on (7) this way. It's also not very clear what beat you're following with this note.
21. 01:51:424 (7) - and 01:51:767 (3) - Try adding whistles on these? And remove the whistle on 01:51:595 (1) - .
22. 01:53:310 (2) - This note is a bit too close to (1) compared to other notes like 01:42:338 (2) - and 01:45:424 (4) - .
23. 02:07:881 (1,2,3,4) - The spacing here is really weird. It makes more sense if (2,3) is spaced, while (3,4) is closer together imo.
24. 02:25:710 (1,2) - Swap NC.
25. 02:35:481 (1) - I get that it's in a pattern, but it feels reaaaally close to (5). Maybe move it to somewhere like 406;273 so it still creates a pattern with the sliders, but is a bit further away from (5)?
26. 02:35:481 (1,2,3,4) - These beats all sound the same in terms of intensity, so (3,4) really sticks out since it's half the spacing of the other notes here. It does make a neat pattern, but doesn't feel as good to play imo. You also get some uneven spacing between 02:35:824 (3,4,5) -
27. 02:55:195 (6) - While this looks neat with (4) (though it's actually a bit off from blanketing perfectly), it doesn't look as good the moment (4) fades away. And the slider stays for a while, so it becomes pretty noticeable. It'll look better if you just use a regular curved slider with 3 anchor points. You'll have to fiddle around a bit to get the blanket to look good though.
28. 03:08:738 (2,3,4) - Why not this http://i.imgur.com/JfKoiQo.png
29. 03:10:452 (5) - For these sliders, you should make the sliderend silent. Makes for a cool effect.
30. 03:14:910 (8) - Why isn't this a slider too?
31. 03:22:795 (5,6,1) - This spacing is weird. Why is the spacing much closer for the 1/2 jump than the 1/4 jump?
32. 03:25:538 (1,1,1) - Hmm, I don't think you need to make this kind of irregular spacing. It's pretty clear that this is 3/4 from the new combos, so doing the spacing change as well makes it more confusing imo.
33. 03:27:595 (1,2,3,4) - Again I feel like you kind of let up the tension when you switch to 1/1 notes here, after using 1/4 repeaters for the buildup.
34. 03:48:167 - This works really well though, since you start out with the lowest spacing and then increase as the music builds up.
35. 03:52:452 (2,2,2) - These are a bit too close to the (1)'s imo. Because of how it's very common to use sliders when dealing with streamjumps, it's very easy to misread and confuse these as 1/4. I'd move them a bit further away from the (1)s.
36. 04:09:595 (4,5,6) - These are so close togetheeeeer
37. 04:11:481 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - These also feel a bit too close when the music is having a buildup. Try stacking (4) with (2), then place (6) where (7) is right now, and put (7) somewhere around 170;263?
38. 04:22:281 (4,5,1,2,3) - This 5 note stream kinda came out of nowhere. You don't map it as a stream at 02:10:624 (1,2,3,4) - either. Just following the vocals here keeps it consistent with the previous and next notes.
39. 04:28:281 (3,4,5,6,7,8) - The spacing here is closer than previous notes, but the music doesn't really let up on its intensity, so this part doesn't fit very well. It makes for a nice looking pattern, but I don't think it's good to sacrifice the general feel of playing a map for looking like a good pattern, and it's probably possible to create some other interesting pattern while also following the songs general intensity.
40. 04:48:510 - Maybe it's just me, but the hitsounds here are kinda hard to hear.
41. 04:53:310 (3,4) - Move these up a bit? http://i.imgur.com/dSBFvkl.jpg I think it makes the pattern look nicer, as (2,3)'s sliderheads don't end up so close to each other.
42. 05:11:652 (5,6,7) - Make the rotation of the angle on these three sliders consistent?
43. 05:19:195 (3,4) - Why did you map this part differently from 05:16:452 (3,4) - ? The repeat slider + 1/2 slider feels better to play for me.

Smile

General

CXu wrote:

Hi. From my m4m queue. I'm really sorry it took so long, I got swamped in schoolwork
I'll be modding the extra diff.

[General]

1. Combo colors?
2. There are some sections where you just use whistles and don't really use any drum-related hitsounds, even though the drums are pretty clear in the music, such as 00:55:367 - and 01:41:995 - , and I'm just wondering if you're intentionally doing this? I think it would feel more satisfying to hit these notes if they also had hitsounds following the drums in the song in these sections.
   //hitsound will be check after , the same as sb(wipping ;w;;;
3. Here's a testplay. I was playing with a mouse, so I kinda derped some places.
   //cool ! enve play with mouse >~<

[Smile]

1. 00:02:567 (6,7) - Doesn't matter much, but maybe curve these sliders to blanket 00:02:910 (8,9) - ?
   //keep
2. 00:21:081 (1) - shorten this to 00:21:681 - , then add a 1/4 slider at 00:21:767 - ? The slider would follow the same sound as 00:21:938 (1) - , and it makes sense that both of them land on sliderheads instead of the first one being on a slidertail.
   //i think this is good for now , i should keep this sorry
   
3. 00:55:367 - 01:15:938 - Why didn't you map the background instruments instead of the vocals here The rhythm in the background sounds much more interesting to me, and you get several opportunities to map the vocals later on in the song.
   //lol
   
4. 01:44:052 (4,5,6,7) - I would personally increase spacing on this part compared to 01:43:024 (6,7,1) - because of the increased pitch, but I guess what you're doing works too, seeing as you do the same thing at 01:49:367 (4,5,6,7,8) - .
   //yep , the same as after part
   
5. 03:14:910 (8) - Why isn't this a slider too?
   //because here is too short , so i didn't make slider

Alright, that should be it. It's a really fun map Good job, and good luck!

Hou Rearu wrote:

Hello,
From my queue
Blue is just an advice
Pink is strongly recommended
The stuff i am not sure with but it might be okay, just to mention my opinion on it.

Smile

1. 01:45:424 (4,5,6,7) - Not sure if it should be done like that, i hear the music there and it's a bit different
   this way:
   //keep mine ,sorry
   
2. 02:02:566 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - Probably better to start with slider then make small jump to circle
   //like those all is note+slider , so i keep them ,sorry
   
3. 02:29:310 (5,6,7,8,9) - Set these in other way. Like this: [spoilerbox]
   //5648(4notes) bad for me
   
4. 02:38:224 (1,2,3,4) - Separate them a bit else, helps avoid missread.
   //keep first , will consider if other modder say that
   
5. 02:56:567 (3) - Feels weird(its possition)
   // lol
   
6. 03:30:510 (3,4,5,6,7) - Better sliders with low distance between insted?
   // i perfer now

General

I think the spaced streams are way too hard , but it belongs on you actually.
//lol , believe the player, they can catch them
BG <3 <3 <3
Nice map, will give you a star, probably.
Good luck

General

1. Choose combo colors?

Smile

1. Increase OD to 8.2 or 8.3
2. 00:44:052 (2) - nc
3. 00:52:452 (7) - start nc from here
4. 00:54:681 (2) - nc
5. 01:01:710 (3,4) - fix blanket
6. 01:05:995 (1,2) - ^
7. 03:04:795 (7) - start nc from here
8. 03:11:995 (1,2) - fix blanket
9. 03:23:138 (6) - finish this at 03:23:438 -
10. 03:26:224 (1,2,3,4) - use 1/8 or 1/6 sliders instead cuz 1/4 feels slow
11. 04:58:967 (2) - nc

Insane

1. 00:56:910 (2) - move up to fix blanket with (4)
2. 02:32:738 (1) - move left to x:418
3. 02:54:167 (3) - move left to x:378
4. 03:07:881 (5,1) - fix blanket
5. 03:26:652 - 03:26:995 - 03:27:338 - remove timing points
6. 04:17:138 (2,4) - this needs to be fixed , move (2) right to x:298
7. 04:17:995 (6,1) - fix blanket
8. 04:28:281 (2,4) - ^
9. 04:51:252 (1) - move to 355,22 to make better blanket with (4)
10. 05:16:795 (4,5,6) - make them evenly spaced ~ 05:16:795 (4,5) - these are farther than 05:17:138 (5,6) -

Vert wrote:

m4m

[ex]
00:49:881 (1,2,3) - 怎么不用折返了 ---keep
00:51:938 (4) - ^ ---^
00:53:395 - 有音
00:53:652 (5,6) - 这俩合成一个折返
01:00:510 (10,1) - 不是很喜欢这种，把10放下面点或者1放上面点
01:16:281 (2) - 1/2+单点？
01:44:567 (7) - 往左上放啊，67太近了
01:49:710 (6,7) - ^
02:01:881 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - 我以前也喜欢这么摆串后来被喷成傻逼 ---keep
02:38:224 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1,2) - 前面串挺好的突然变成这种不是很舒服
04:59:481 - 结尾后面的间距有些大吧，和kiai比好像没啥区别的感觉 ---keep

Insane稍微看了一下好像没发现什么明显的值得说的地方
gl

DeRandom Otaku wrote:

Hi ~ from my queue

General

1. Choose combo colors?

Smile

1. Increase OD to 8.2 or 8.3
2. 00:44:052 (2) - nc
3. 00:52:452 (7) - start nc from here
4. 00:54:681 (2) - nc
5. 01:01:710 (3,4) - fix blanket
6. 01:05:995 (1,2) - ^
7. 03:04:795 (7) - start nc from here
8. 03:11:995 (1,2) - fix blanket
9. 03:23:138 (6) - finish this at 03:23:438 - ---keep
10. 03:26:224 (1,2,3,4) - use 1/8 or 1/6 sliders instead cuz 1/4 feels slow ---keep
11. 04:58:967 (2) - nc

Insane

1. 00:56:910 (2) - move up to fix blanket with (4)
2. 02:32:738 (1) - move left to x:418
3. 02:54:167 (3) - move left to x:378
4. 03:07:881 (5,1) - fix blanket
5. 03:26:652 - 03:26:995 - 03:27:338 - remove timing points
6. 04:17:138 (2,4) - this needs to be fixed , move (2) right to x:298
7. 04:17:995 (6,1) - fix blanket
8. 04:28:281 (2,4) - ^
9. 04:51:252 (1) - move to 355,22 to make better blanket with (4)
10. 05:16:795 (4,5,6) - make them evenly spaced ~ 05:16:795 (4,5) - these are farther than 05:17:138 (5,6) -

Really Nice Map!!~ GL

1. 00:10:795 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - 总感觉这里的sb怪怪的。。好像慢了一拍
2. 00:26:224 (8) - 拉远点。。00:26:052 (7,8,9) - 让这三个等间距怎么样
3. 00:31:195 (3) - sb的星星有点歪。。
4. 00:42:338 (1) - sb的星星应该放在这，听了下这里有个重音
5. 00:51:767 (3) - 这个可以折返，这段折返主体=。=
6. 00:53:995 (1) - sb的星星好像又歪了。。00:54:681 (1) - 这个就很不错啊233
7. 01:15:938 (1) - ^
8. 01:17:652 (7,1) - 可以整合成一个滑条，人声好像也是这样的
9. 01:40:538 (4,1,2) - 感觉好容易都读成1/4，不过应该没问题
   01:41:995 - auto模式开启
10. 01:49:881 (7) - 大概是改位置了结果忘了改sb吗23333
11. 02:07:195 (2,3) - 这段星星轨迹大概都是按照比较舒服的移动来的，那么这里的星星我觉得改成逆时针的弧会更好看一点。
12. 02:09:081 (6) - 这里和后面的1跟的vocal？我觉得可以延长到蓝线
13. 02:31:881 (3) - 强迫症 星星歪了好难受
14. 02:33:767 (4) - 拉开
15. 03:10:967 (6,1) - 这俩ctrl+G好受许多
16. 03:26:052 (1) - 往右边挪一些好一点，还是建议这三个1/3等间距跳
    03:53:652 - auto又开启啦
17. 03:53:652 (1) - 星星不大对啊111 往下
18. 04:28:281 (3,4) - 不建议stack，这里都是跳突然stack有些突兀
19. 04:31:538 (5,6,1) - 感觉要被打包
20. 美丽

sahuang wrote:

稍等
来骗
额 这图三角能量也太多了吧
sb好

[Insane]

1. 00:33:424 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - 不是很懂这边为什么要一个个圈隔那么多，滑条加圈的衔接填满不是更好么。。---√
2. 00:36:510 (2,3,4) - 2,3的叠毕竟突兀，没必要---√
3. 00:51:081 (4,5) - 其中之一NC---√
4. 01:01:367 (2,3) - blanket---√
5. 01:16:624 - 最好clickable---√
6. 01:58:452 (1,2,3,4) - 可以用点滑条，比如3和4用2个滑条替代什么的，现在略空---√
7. 02:38:224 (1,2,3,4) - 前面节奏那么密集这边突然空。。。---√
8. 没什么大问题。。都不改也行其实

[Smile]

1. 感觉和insane一个风格。。只是间距大了。。
2. 00:05:567 (6,7) - 可以把7往下一点?现在这个不大好看
3. 00:21:938 (1) - 我是觉得http://puu.sh/oQlp8/7b9019ca3f.jpg会好一点。。 ---√
4. 00:33:424 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - 这个难度出现这种东西真不合适。。后面大概还有很多 ---√
5. 01:13:367 - 最好clickable

额，随便写了点，感觉整体很工整了，就是一直在三角形有点无聊，那些单点太空

GL
觉得没用就不要kds了

Frenkie09 wrote:

Insane
·00:36:852 (4) - 这个圈圈距离拉大点好。 ---√
·00:37:881 (1,2,1) - 这里有点丑，3个断滑条开头凑成小三角好看点 ---√
·00:44:052 - 这里开始用61拍放，节奏不对 ---6分拍再书,先保留4分
·01:17:995 - 这里开始的声音应该逐渐递减，而不是逐渐递增，你仔细听听歌，人声逐渐递增，节奏变音逐渐递减为0（所以这里是以人声盖过打击声为主，因为是结尾）
·02:36:167 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1) - 这里排列不好看，而且不好打，或者换一种？--先放放,还有人说再摆
·03:22:795 - 这里开始后面61拍
·03:30:167 - 61拍
·03:43:367 (4,5,6,7,8) - 这里改成5连打好点 ---√ 3连
·03:44:224 - 这里补上，不要留空
·04:05:310 (4,5) - 5连打
·04:08:052 (3,4) - 同上
·04:27:424 (4) - 遮挡，不好看

Smile
·00:32:310 - 漏了一个？
·00:40:281 (1) - 00:40:967 - 我觉得滑条做成圈圈好点 ---√
·00:44:052 - 61拍
·01:17:995 - 和insane一样问题
·01:34:624 - 不要漏了红线....好奇怪为什么要蓝线起
·03:26:052 (1) - 距离拉远一点，可以放到下一个滑条上面 ---√
·03:44:224 - 03:44:224 - 这里也是不要空，打起来停的奇怪
·03:48:167 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - 这里和前面一样换成大跳好点
·04:05:310 (4,5,6,7) - 5连
·04:33:424 - 毫无征兆就变了21拍
·05:08:224 (3) - 换25%速度听听节奏，后面的也是一样。（明明前面这里04:59:995 (4,5,6,7) - 节奏就是对了，为什么后面换了一种 ）

加油，GL~

JJburstOwO wrote:

[Smile]
00:51:938 (4,5) - 换滑条 ---√
01:39:852 (4,1) - 这里是不是有点歪？ ---√
01:49:881 (7) - 这是不是改了位置但是sb没改233
01:59:395 (4) - 删掉 ---√
03:26:052 (1) - 放下边一点，03:25:538 (1,1,1) - 间距均匀
04:07:195 (8) - 叠在6 ---√
04:35:738 (4,1,2,3,4,1) - 吓哭

[Insane]
00:30:681 (1) - 摆开点，00:30:167 (4,5) - 隔得挺开
01:13:195 (1) - 这里漏了个音，前面跟vocal跟的很好 这里就显得突兀了
03:56:224 (7) - http://puu.sh/oQ3cP/3f63ae3dc3.png ---√

做的太好了，摸不出什么东西
good luck~

[Crz]Sword wrote:

回摸
[Smile]

1. 00:10:795 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - 总感觉这里的sb怪怪的。。好像慢了一拍
2. 00:26:224 (8) - 拉远点。。00:26:052 (7,8,9) - 让这三个等间距怎么样 ---√
3. 00:31:195 (3) - sb的星星有点歪。。
4. 00:42:338 (1) - sb的星星应该放在这，听了下这里有个重音 ---其实我并不是跟的重音,我跟"叮"来放星
5. 00:51:767 (3) - 这个可以折返，这段折返主体=。=
6. 00:53:995 (1) - sb的星星好像又歪了。。00:54:681 (1) - 这个就很不错啊233
7. 01:15:938 (1) - ^
8. 01:17:652 (7,1) - 可以整合成一个滑条，人声好像也是这样的
9. 01:40:538 (4,1,2) - 感觉好容易都读成1/4，不过应该没问题
   01:41:995 - auto模式开启
10. 01:49:881 (7) - 大概是改位置了结果忘了改sb吗23333
11. 02:07:195 (2,3) - 这段星星轨迹大概都是按照比较舒服的移动来的，那么这里的星星我觉得改成逆时针的弧会更好看一点。
12. 02:09:081 (6) - 这里和后面的1跟的vocal？我觉得可以延长到蓝线
13. 02:31:881 (3) - 强迫症 星星歪了好难受
14. 02:33:767 (4) - 拉开 ---√
15. 03:10:967 (6,1) - 这俩ctrl+G好受许多 ---√
16. 03:26:052 (1) - 往右边挪一些好一点，还是建议这三个1/3等间距跳
    03:53:652 - auto又开启啦
17. 03:53:652 (1) - 星星不大对啊111 往下
18. 04:28:281 (3,4) - 不建议stack，这里都是跳突然stack有些突兀 ---√
19. 04:31:538 (5,6,1) - 感觉要被打包 ---√
20. 美丽

Insane不看啦 懒(