1. osu!community
  2. Beatmaps
  3. Ranked/Approved Beatmaps
posted
This beatmap was submitted using in-game submission on August 31, 2017 at 2:17:47 PM

Artist: Camellia
Title: chrono diver -fragment- (Camellia's "crossroads of chrono" remix)
Source: beatmania IIDX 22 PENDUAL
Tags: Konami BMS ORIGINAL SOUNDTRACK VOL.2 Naoyuki Sato Master+ folk fantasy dubstep healing drum'n'bass dnb marathon collab toybot ProfessionalBox ProBox byfar -Tochi Kalamitious Storyboarder
BPM: 149
Filesize: 25044kb
Play Time: 05:04
Difficulties Available:
  1. Kairos (6.73 stars, 1150 notes)


Download: Camellia - chrono diver -fragment- (Camellia's "crossroads of chrono" remix)
Information: Scores/Beatmap Listing
---------------

Collab with toybot, ProfessionalBox & byfar
(I mapped 31%, toybot mapped 28%, ProBox mapped 28%, byfar mapped 13% | Parts)

Credits
Timing done by Charles445

Hitsounds used from Lavender's amazing mapset! Check it out here!

Storyboard done by -Tochi & Storyboarder

Special thanks to all the modders who helped improve this map and the BN's who helped pushed it forward (Doormat,
Kibbleru, and Pentori)
posted
so amazing
posted
8=d
posted
update pls i love this map ;w;

it's about time :D
posted
Kairos (6.7 stars, 1159 notes)
  1. 00:15:377 (1,2,3,4) - are these consistent increases? if not, i'd like them to be.
  2. 00:19:923 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1) - poorly represents the dynamics of the piano, this all has to do with spacing.
    1. 00:20:298 (1,2,1,2,1) - does seem like it should be larger.
    2. 00:21:460 (1) - piano has slight delay, so the circle should be distinctly placed
    example (don't have to take it literal, but take the concept)
  3. 00:21:882 (1) - missing beat on 00:22:316 (2), which is awkward but it's compromised by the hitsound. maybe you could place a red tick here to kinda help the hitsound stand out better??
  4. 00:30:689 (2,3,1,2,3) - very nice, i'd give that pattern a good old rub
  5. 01:54:285 (1,2,3,4) - don't you think these should be the same nc as supossed to being split?
  6. 02:39:050 (1,2) - these circles are ugly as fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
  7. 02:42:191 (2) - nc?
  8. 03:05:673 (5,6) - looks fuKd on stack leniency:2
  9. 04:23:500 (1) - liking this meme slider, if i could call it that. doesn't really compliment the music, but doesn't fuck with your gameplay... it's just there to be spicy :)
  10. 04:33:552 (1,2,3,4,1) - great pattern but looking a little difficult to follow with its distance between 04:33:238 (1,2,3). maybe have the end circle of 04:33:395 (3) - stack 04:34:495 (1)? example
  11. 04:43:290 (1) - coolest slider of the map

    your kiai's were a killer and executed very well, have a kd.
posted
http://www.konamistyle.jp/item/73145
https://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=you ... 78qUULjrlo

■DISC 2
No: Genre / title / artist
13: [♪] HEALING DRUM'N'BASS / chrono diver -fragment- (かめりあ's ”crossroads of chrono” remix) / かめりあ



Artist: かめりあ
Romaji Artist: Camellia

ORIGINAL SOUNDTRACK VOL.2 in tags not source!
anime cat blue pixiv bg slider art in tags? Not funny!

Healing drum n and bass in tags! (Because it's genre)
posted
pls don't murder me i don't know what i'm doing
  1. 00:37:400 (1,1) - remove NC
  2. 00:48:003 (2,1) - move NC back to 2
  3. 01:01:353 (3,4) - NC
  4. 01:01:982 (5,6) - ^
  5. 01:02:767 (5) - ^
  6. 01:08:264 (2,3) - ^
  7. 01:11:406 (3,4) - ^
  8. 01:18:631 (3,4) - spacing is just a small amount too large imo, same for 01:28:683 (3,4)
  9. 01:21:929 (1,2) - NC this or remove NC on 01:31:982 (1,2) -
  10. 01:27:112 (1) - move a bit to the right maybe
  11. 01:41:720 (4) - NC
  12. 01:43:919 (1,2,3,4) - remove NC and NC on 01:44:233 (5) -
  13. 01:48:003 (1,2,3) - add NC on 3 and same for everything similar, but i think the time between 2 and 3 might be enough to disregard an NC
  14. 02:06:222 (4,5) - add NC or remove NC on 02:16:275 (1,2,3) -
  15. 02:08:107 (1,2,3,1) - i'd prolly change this a bit cuz the space between 02:08:736 (3,1) - is less than 02:08:421 (2,3) - which goes against the short buildup
  16. 02:11:249 (3) - move a bit closer to 2 maybe
  17. 02:11:877 (1,2) - i think a stack isn't appropriate because of the sound
  18. 02:15:332 (4,5) - no sv change unlike 02:05:280 (1) - ?
  19. 02:16:589 (2,3) - doesn't call for a stack too imo
  20. 02:19:416 (1,1,2) - kinda confusing even with the NC because of polarity, something like this should work
  21. 02:30:411 (3,4,5,6,1) - why stream
  22. 02:55:699 (4,5) - NC
  23. 03:00:254 (1,2) - moving the NC to where 2 is works better imo
  24. 03:14:547 (1,2,3,4,5) - this might be good
  25. 03:37:165 (3) - - NC
  26. 03:51:615 (3,4,5) - ^
  27. 04:00:254 (1,2) - move the NC to 2
  28. 04:01:982 (5,1) - move NC back to 5 cuz of vocals
  29. 04:29:469 (3,4,5) - NC
  30. 04:31:667 (2,3) - ^
  31. 04:31:982 (4,5) - ^
  32. 04:35:437 (3,4) - ^
  33. 04:36:065 (1,2,3) - ^
  34. 04:37:008 (3,4) - ^
  35. 04:37:950 (3,4) - ^
posted
No kudosu for Metadata check lol
posted

Arusamour wrote:

Kairos (6.7 stars, 1159 notes)
  1. 02:42:191 (2) - nc? fixed
  2. 03:05:673 (5,6) - looks fuKd on stack leniency:2 fixed
@KittyAdventure: tags fixed

ill be theo ne to fix all the NC's btw (to other collabers)

revurii wrote:

pls don't murder me i don't know what i'm doing since theres so much NC suggestionss, the ones I take out of this reply will be the ones i apply
  1. 01:02:767 (5) - ^ i dont rlly like how it looks when the end of a connected stream is NC'ed tbh, plus theres no sv change
  2. 01:08:264 (2,3) - ^ yeah asame as above no sv change so i tihkn its fine
  3. 01:11:406 (3,4) - ^
  4. 01:18:631 (3,4) - spacing is just a small amount too large imo, nah its not rlly that large, i htink its fine same for 01:28:683 (3,4) fixed
  5. 01:21:929 (1,2) - NC this or remove NC on 01:31:982 (1,2) - wot? the firsto nes alrdy nced and the 2nd nc is fine cuz pairs
  6. 01:27:112 (1) - move a bit to the right maybe fixed
  7. 01:41:720 (4) - NC nah, same reason for stream aesthetic
  8. 01:43:919 (1,2,3,4) - remove NC and NC on 01:44:233 (5) - first nc is fine cuz it starts on white tick
  9. 01:48:003 (1,2,3) - add NC on 3 and same for everything similar, but i think the time between 2 and 3 might be enough to disregard an NC ya its fine
  10. 02:06:222 (4,5) - add NC or remove NC on 02:16:275 (1,2,3) - first one doesnt need to be nced cuz theres a better NC right after, and the 2nd ones nc is fine
    02:19:416 (1,1,2) - kinda confusing even with the NC because of polarity, something like this should work fixed
  11. 02:55:699 (4,5) - NC nah symmetry makes it fine, plus slow part i like to havel ong combos
  12. 03:00:254 (1,2) - moving the NC to where 2 is works better imo its an intense part, but not too intenst, so i still want to have a followpoint for that slow slider
  13. 03:14:547 (1,2,3,4,5) - this might be good nah, iwant 1/1s on the kicks
  14. 03:37:165 (3) - - NC i think its fine
  15. 03:51:615 (3,4,5) - ^ its fine
  16. 04:00:254 (1,2) - move the NC to 2 nah, the basss rev soudn starts there
  17. 04:01:982 (5,1) - move NC back to 5 cuz of vocals butt he kick starts there tho so xd
  18. 04:29:469 (3,4,5) - NC nah the nc after is fine where it is
  19. 04:31:982 (4,5) - ^ ???
  20. 04:35:437 (3,4) - ^ for this certain pattern i htink its better ot have it be one combo
  21. 04:37:008 (3,4) - ^ its fine cuz the 3 combos r consistent in this section
  22. 04:37:950 (3,4) - ^
nah combo wud b too short
thx for the mods :d byfar probox toybot pls respond asap thx
posted

Arusamour wrote:

Kairos (6.7 stars, 1159 notes)
  1. 00:15:377 (1,2,3,4) - are these consistent increases? if not, i'd like them to be. intended to be otherwise
  2. 00:19:923 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1) - poorly represents the dynamics of the piano, this all has to do with spacing. adjusted patterns slightly
    1. 00:20:298 (1,2,1,2,1) - does seem like it should be larger. w/e
    2. 00:21:460 (1) - piano has slight delay, so the circle should be distinctly placed
    example (don't have to take it literal, but take the concept)
  3. 00:21:882 (1) - missing beat on 00:22:316 (2), which is awkward but it's compromised by the hitsound. maybe you could place a red tick here to kinda help the hitsound stand out better?? ok
  4. 00:30:689 (2,3,1,2,3) - very nice, i'd give that pattern a good old rub
  5. 04:43:290 (1) - coolest slider of the map ty
ty

http://puu.sh/sXe7G/c4c195caa2.osu
posted

Arusamour wrote:

Kairos (6.7 stars, 1159 notes)
  1. 01:54:285 (1,2,3,4) - don't you think these should be the same nc as supossed to being split? // not.. really..
  2. 02:39:050 (1,2) - these circles are ugly as fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff // changed
  3. 04:23:500 (1) - liking this meme slider, if i could call it that. doesn't really compliment the music, but doesn't fuck with your gameplay... it's just there to be spicy :) // xd

    your kiai's were a killer and executed very well, have a kd.

revurii wrote:

pls don't murder me i don't know what i'm doing
  1. 01:41:720 (4) - NC // no, part of the same beat as the slider
  2. 01:43:919 (1,2,3,4) - remove NC and NC on 01:44:233 (5) - // i do it at 01:41:484 (1,2,3,4) -
  3. 01:48:003 (1,2,3) - add NC on 3 and same for everything similar, but i think the time between 2 and 3 might be enough to disregard an NC // why
  4. 02:30:411 (3,4,5,6,1) - why stream
thanks! https://0paste.com/10396.txt
posted

revurii wrote:

02:11:877 (1,2) - i think a stack isn't appropriate because of the sound This is just fine imo
02:16:589 (2,3) - doesn't call for a stack too imo I spaced this one out for better playability

Arusamour wrote:

04:33:552 (1,2,3,4,1) - great pattern but looking a little difficult to follow with its distance between 04:33:238 (1,2,3). maybe have the end circle of 04:33:395 (3) - stack 04:34:495 (1)? example I don't think this is a problem tbh :p
04:43:290 (1) - coolest slider of the map Thanks :)
posted
4th dimension is actually the time tho xd
posted

-kevincela- wrote:

4th dimension is actually the time tho xd
kys
posted
KAIROS IN THE SPACE TIME
posted
so this is what mapping godmode looks like
posted
posted
we need less of histoire and more of herstoire
posted

VINXIS wrote:

we need less of histoire and more of herstoire
did u just assume its gender??
posted

byfar wrote:

VINXIS wrote:

we need less of histoire and more of herstoire
did u just assume its gender??
did you just assume my gender?
Please sign in to reply.