DragonForce - Above the Winter Moonlight

posted
Total Posts
119
show more
Raiden
Flat out ignored? Not even the mapper responded. Too late anyway, it just got ranked.
HappyRocket88

Loctav wrote:

Keep in mind, that the QAT will not act at all, if you do not report the beatmaps.
Despite it was reported by Nao Tomori, we don't know if a QAT took a look of the mod and decided to not DQ. o:
Yuii-

HappyRocket88 wrote:

Loctav wrote:

Keep in mind, that the QAT will not act at all, if you do not report the beatmaps.
Hm... what if I post the reports here, you might have missed them!

p/5575206/
p/5581871/

Beatmap was reported twice. It was just ignored. Mistakes were made I guess?
Bonsai
Here's a list of overmaps that I've been asked to post, most of these are overmapped triplets in sections where there are a lot of actual 1/4-triplets all around but you managed to miss most of them and leave them empty while overmapping somewhere else instead lol
00:29:187 (4) - 00:59:187 (4) - 01:41:937 (4,6) - 01:51:387 (2) - 01:56:187 (2,6) - 01:58:587 (2) - 02:00:387 (4) - 02:18:387 (2) - 02:25:587 (4) - 02:26:337 (2) - 02:30:837 (5) - 03:01:287 (6) - 03:02:787 (4) - 03:10:587 (2) - 03:15:387 (2) - 03:15:987 (2) - 03:17:787 (2) - 03:19:587 (4) - 04:37:737 (5) - 04:41:637 (7) - 04:45:237 (8) - 04:45:837 (4) - 04:48:237 (4) - 06:00:987 (2) - 06:05:787 (2) - 06:08:187 (2) - 06:09:987 (4) - 06:17:937 (2) - 06:20:037 (4) - 06:42:089 - 06:45:145 (5) - 06:52:089 - 06:55:812 (4) - 07:01:145 (8) - 07:01:812 (2) -
01:08:187 (2,6) - are just really noisy so it's hard to tell whether there are actual 1/4s there or not, but there'd be much more prominent 1/4s at 01:08:487 for example, dunno

00:59:412 (6,7,8) is actually 1/6s
02:27:312 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - dunno what's exactly going on here but 1/3s would be much more close to what's happening than the current stuff

about the one stream discussed on the previous page, 01:42:162 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4) -, this is neither 1/6 nor anything else really, so simplifying that as 1/4 works just fine imo

and some other stuff that I just noticed going through this:
  1. similar to another instance of this that the ignored mod already pointed out ( 02:47:412 (4) -), why are the drums between 01:28:212 (4,1) not mapped when they were mapped right before?
  2. 02:00:912 (1,2,3) - would be nice if this actually emphasized the strong beat of the instrumentals and vocals at 02:01:362 - instead of other minor hits
  3. 02:22:512 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - differentiation between the real strong drumhits and the relatively weak ones here would be cool too
  4. 02:47:712 (1) - vocals and strong drum would land one 1/2 later, would seem much more fitting than this
  5. 04:33:837 (8,1) - iirc you always placed the turning point of streams on the downbeat, whereas here you placed it on the blue tick before the downbeat, imo either way is fine but making it inconsistent
  6. 06:25:312 (4,5) vs 06:25:978 (6,7) - I rate 10/10 for readability
  7. 07:12:866 (1,1) - I mean I find it extremely weird that you prefer doing extended sliders with non-silenced tails when there are very prominent beats in the song, but also these are mistimed, making the sliderticks sound extremely out of place 👌

idk what'll happen with this but I'm just posting it in case, this is just covering rhythmic stuff for the most part but it seems like there is indeed a lot wrong with it xd
Nao Tomori
what will happen is that it's too late to change any of that stuff and it's already ranked
Irya

Nao Tomori wrote:

what will happen is that it's too late to change any of that stuff and it's already ranked
It can get de-ranked, it has happened before.
riktoi
nevermind
Darkside
.
Sotarks
Why is this ranked now, and mapper didn't reply to mods while it was qualified.
And I do agree with them... Idk why no one took care of this map ... zzz
Battle
lol
Topic Starter
CircleChu
So.. hey..
People probably already hate me for not replying and getting this map ranked anyway, but this is actually just luck.. at least for my opinion. I though it would be disqualified for sure. Welp, i wasn`t replying to ukod`s mod because in the he posted it, i went on a trip to another city with my girlfriend for 3 days, and something really shity happend there... I haven`t read all ukod`s mod on my phone, but i got the point that "he is posting huge list of changes and in there end telling me that my map is so shity, that needs to be remaped a lot of times". Sounds really offensive Most of things he pointed out was just about "i don`t like it, change it" This just looks that ukod couldn`t understand what i wanted to do and why. Makes no sense for me. Well yeah, i was mad. What would you expecting about seeing this after 8 month puting much effort to map, finally getting ranked. I wasn`t even actually happy about my first map getting ranked after that. After rank Bonsai posted his mod.. Well, i agree with some points and that would actually help improve it, but mod would be much more appreciated before, on a qualification week. But still, he is posting that i missed a lot of 1/4 tripple sections and i know that. I did that on purpose, because i paid 75% of attention to vocals. Misstiming stuff that Bonsai noticed was mapped before and the fixed by me, because of testplayers opinions. That just ruined whole stucture and general point that i was trying to map. Most of that stuff can be just ignored, because: it plays fine, looks fine, you won`t ever hear it with 100% speed and it`s just sound unnaturally. I don`t know what would happend next, but i don`t really care anymore.. I just feel myself broken, sorry for everyone who feel offended or something about me or my map, i didn`t wanted to do that in any case. Thank you.
ouranhshc
CONGRATS CIRCLE CHU
Sotarks

CircleChu wrote:

So.. hey..
People probably already hate me for not replying and getting this map ranked anyway, but this is actually just luck.. at least for my opinion. I though it would be disqualified for sure. Welp, i wasn`t replying to ukod`s mod because in the he posted it, i went on a trip to another city with my girlfriend for 3 days, and something really shity happend there... I haven`t read all ukod`s mod on my phone, but i got the point that "he is posting huge list of changes and in there end telling me that my map is so shity, that needs to be remaped a lot of times". Sounds really offensive Most of things he pointed out was just about "i don`t like it, change it" This just looks that ukod couldn`t understand what i wanted to do and why. Makes no sense for me. Well yeah, i was mad. What would you expecting about seeing this after 8 month puting much effort to map, finally getting ranked. I wasn`t even actually happy about my first map getting ranked after that. After rank Bonsai posted his mod.. Well, i agree with some points and that would actually help improve it, but mod would be much more appreciated before, on a qualification week. But still, he is posting that i missed a lot of 1/4 tripple sections and i know that. I did that on purpose, because i paid 75% of attention to vocals. Misstiming stuff that Bonsai noticed was mapped before and the fixed by me, because of testplayers opinions. That just ruined whole stucture and general point that i was trying to map. Most of that stuff can be just ignored, because: it plays fine, looks fine, you won`t ever hear it with 100% speed and it`s just sound unnaturally. I don`t know what would happend next, but i don`t really care anymore.. I just feel myself broken, sorry for everyone who feel offended or something about me or my map, i didn`t wanted to do that in any case. Thank you.
The fact is, I did the same error when I wanted to rank my first ranked map "Tenshi" that I think it's rnakable but a fuck up, I regret now. Same for you I think this dragonforce map helped you a lot about improving your mapping style, in my point of view you shouldn't rank this but it's too late now.. I'm pretty sure your 2nd map will be 3 times better than this, it's like you ranked your training map, but I can't blame you for that, I did exactly the same thing.
I'm pretty sure you'll call your map a shitmap with the time passing like I do with mine.
I'm looking forward for your next maps tho.
Ashton
there's no need to call this a "shitmap" even though it has many flaws, if you are discouraged by a map you ranked, why are you even trying to rank more?
_DT3

CanadianBaka wrote:

there's no need to call this a "shitmap" even though it has many flaws, if you are discouraged by a map you ranked, why are you even trying to rank more?
I do agree on the point on the map not really being a shitmap though it has lots of flaws. The second point though would be about trying to improve to not make the same mistakes again imo, but it depends on a mappers attitude
Please sign in to reply.

New reply