A r M i N wrote:

M4M

Diamond

mapping is not only CTRL+C CTRL+V

that means imo your map is way too symmetrical and very boring to play but the second half is cool

also i would change CS to 4
And AR on 9+ is a MUST

Gold

Also too symmetrical and only copy paste pretty much but i like the second half where you didnt copy paste too much

please set CS to 4 its highly recommended

Bronze

CS 2-3 please
Too much copy paste again
02:17:730 (1,2,3,1) - Hard to read for newcomers

Maybe you are asking why i didnt write that much
imo you cant do much wrong with copy paste and it needs a remap

anyways i hope it helped

Jak64 wrote:

Good map, I don't see many error, is enjoyable, just one thing, can you try with 7168 offset? for me sounds better than 7170/73,
but take my opinion "without the true weight" since I'm not a good modder, just like to take a look at song that I enjoy >.<

Jak64 wrote:

just one thing, can you try with 7168 offset? for me sounds better than 7170/73 Done

Deppyforce wrote:

[Bronze]
you know that a ''normal'' diff must have consistent spacing throughout the whole map because this is 2016 who told you that? as long as you keep your patterns intuitive and relatively easy small spacing changes are totally fine, Normal =/= Easy, remap some pattern that spacing arent constant e.g. 00:25:410 (4,1,2) - 00:33:090 (4,1,2) - 4 -> 1 is 1.4x, but 1 -> 2 is 1.6x You don't even notice there is a spacing change to begin with, and there is a ~1 second break between these 2 sliders, so it's ok.
00:37:890 (1,2,3) - 00:45:570 (1,2,3) - spacing in these 3 notes obviously not constant and? it's fine, the rhythm it's super easy to read and it's not a derpjump (or whatever you guys call 'em, maybe deathjump? I dunno...)
there are more of these pattern (i think) look for them and fix them yourself if you agree with my suggestion, i will stop mentioning them
01:25:890 (4,1) - 01:33:570 (4,1) - stack if you mean stacking the start of 01:25:888 (4) with the end of 01:27:808 (1) then it's not necessary, these two sliders don't show up in the screen at the same time and you don't see any bad looking overlap
02:11:490 (3,1) - 02:13:410 (3,1) - 02:15:330 (3,1) - 02:21:090 (3,1) - 1/4 in normal is too much for the beginners :v (there are more in the 2nd kiai, but will not mention them cuz lazy if these were circles then you might be right, but these are all sliders and it's not difficult to hold-release-hold with this BPM, and the rhythm is not hard to understand since it's pretty much the same as 01:08:608~01:39:328

[Gold & Diamond]
tbh these diffs are too boring. ik copy paste stuff is fine if it fits with the rhythm, but look at the patterns :/ you know, what i mean this is 2016 not 2010 so try to map like 2016 maps so you're suggesting me to do what most of this community does now, putting aside my ideas and what I like to see in a beatmap? you want me to map without using any kind of consistency, placing all my objects in random spots? no, thank you very much (make more interesting patterns, not just copy everything) what the hell are you talking about, if you want to see really boring maps with heavy copypaste check my old maps, which are just garbage not because I used a lot of CTRL+C - CTRL+V, but because the copypaste was most of the time forced: back then I was really lazy and all I cared was to see my maps being ranked, without giving a fuck about the overall quality (ciao Andrea tvb pls don't kill me if you read this), would cause less trouble

1. AR 8 on almost 5 star map? I don't see it fit and it's 2016 but if you wan't to keep it it's ok
2. 00:07:168 (1,2,3,4,5) - this same 8 times in a row? pretty boring imo
3. 00:38:128 (2) - last anchor to x:136 y:140 for better blanket, use same slidershape for the rest of these same kind of recycled parts
4. In all of these parts 00:39:808 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - you leave one beat unmapped in this it's 00:40:768 and for me it sounds hell a lot better with note
5. Overall the thing that you recycle aand recycle aand recycle the same shape (2-8 times/shape) Is a bit boring for me
6. 01:14:368 (1,2,3,4,5) - why this sudden change?? All other were slider-slider-slider-note and this is note-note-slider-slider-note, breaks consistency
7. 01:22:048 (1,2) - same here, and even when the sounding in these notes are same as in sliders this huge jump is also breaking this consistency
8. 01:45:808 (3,5) - overlap
9. 01:50:848 (1,3) - too close
10. 01:56:128 (8,9) - I'd rather make these slider
11. 01:58:048 (8,9) - ^ and so on
12. 02:10:048 (1) - from here on, I like your map
13. Only thing I didn't like here is recycling

Lumin wrote:

Nm here~

I don't really have anything to say about gold because there is just that one thing I don't like and that is recycling.
And that beginning kinda copies Diamond

[Diamond]

1. AR 8 on almost 5 star map? I don't see it fit and it's 2016 but if you wan't to keep it it's ok Alright alright, I decided to use AR 8 because the song is slow at the beginning and there are few objects, but I guess is fine with AR 9 too.
2. 00:07:168 (1,2,3,4,5) - this same 8 times in a row? pretty boring imo Slow/boring start on purpose, the difficulty increases (in all 3 diffs) as the song goes on.
3. 00:38:128 (2) - last anchor to x:136 y:140 for better blanket, use same slidershape for the rest of these same kind of recycled parts I don't like it, sorry.
4. In all of these parts 00:39:808 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - you leave one beat unmapped in this it's 00:40:768 and for me it sounds hell a lot better with note I honestly think it's better without it, it makes a nice rhythm.
5. Overall the thing that you recycle aand recycle aand recycle the same shape (2-8 times/shape) Is a bit boring for me
6. 01:14:368 (1,2,3,4,5) - why this sudden change?? All other were slider-slider-slider-note and this is note-note-slider-slider-note, breaks consistency Actually this is consistent with 00:28:288 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7), with 00:43:648 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7), with 00:59:008 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) and all the other similar patterns: I'll try to keep it simple, you can pretty much divide each bookmark section in 8 minisections of ~2.5 seconds each, the 4th and the 8th are a bit harder (or they're based on a different rhythm/use a different combination of circles and sliders) than the other 6 minisections.
7. 01:22:048 (1,2) - same here, and even when the sounding in these notes are same as in sliders this huge jump is also breaking this consistency ^
8. 01:45:808 (3,5) - overlap Moved the circles a bit up.
9. 01:50:848 (1,3) - too close Hmm I agree, fixed.
10. 01:56:128 (8,9) - I'd rather make these slider I prefer having stacking circles like 01:40:768 (5,6), 01:42:688 (5,6) and so on.
11. 01:58:048 (8,9) - ^ and so on ^
12. 02:10:048 (1) - from here on, I like your map
13. Only thing I didn't like here is recycling

Sorry for a bit short mod

• Tags: lol Warsongs album remix esports ggwp ff20 adc marksman markswoman gun pistol aimbot script hack report Lucian Luciana Purifier Girl Grill Black BasedGod zombie undead Tresh Thresh Trash Wife Waifu Dubstep DUDUDU Darude Sandstorm Dank Meme Twitch please delete everything that isnt to the actuall song related

• ctrl+shift+a will open aimod and aimod will scream at you for breaking DS
  my suggestions how to fix em:
  00:39:808 (3) - ctrl+g
  00:47:488 (3) - ^
  00:55:168 - just move em closer together?
  01:02:848 (3,4) - ^
  
  01:25:888 (4,1) - stack sliderhead with slidertail
  02:13:408 (3,1) - could be cleaner

Mazziv wrote:

hi! m4m from your queue

[Generel]

• Tags: lol Warsongs album remix esports ggwp ff20 adc marksman markswoman gun pistol aimbot script hack report Lucian Luciana Purifier Girl Grill Black BasedGod zombie undead Tresh Thresh Trash Wife Waifu Dubstep DUDUDU Darude Sandstorm Dank Meme Twitch please delete everything that isnt to the actuall song related ok D:

[my elo]

• ctrl+shift+a will open aimod and aimod will scream at you for breaking DS
  my suggestions how to fix em:
  00:39:808 (3) - ctrl+g
  00:47:488 (3) - ^
  00:55:168 - just move em closer together?
  01:02:848 (3,4) - ^
  
  01:25:888 (4,1) - stack sliderhead with slidertail
  02:13:408 (3,1) - could be cleaner

[the elo i want to be in]
02:40:768 (1) - why dont us the spinner end?
this diff looks pretty good tbh

[tiamant. wait isnt that an item?]
looks p good aswell but keep the sliderend for the outro

Didn't fix anything else, I prefer the way my diffs are now but thanks for the suggestions.

you from 2006? because your mapping style literally looks like 2006 mapping lmao

1. I think "Warsongs" composed this music and not "League of Legends".
2. About hitsounds, the default normal hitclap dosen't sound well with the music like on 00:38:608 (3) for Gold and Diamond.
3. Upscale your background to 1366x768.

1. Bronze? But this diff can't be easily fc'd by noobs. (More like Silver)
2. 01:49:408 (2) - Move to 300|292 to give more visibility for flow.
3. 01:53:248 (2) - ^ 212|292 to have consistency with previous
4. 02:02:368 (1,2,3) - Sugesting this pattern:http://s29.postimg.org/7je8jr4fr/img1.jpg same as above reason.

1. Make circle size a little larger, like 4.5. This is too small for a typical Hard/Insane diff. This makes difficulty spread more linear.

1. Nothing moddable, great diff by the way.

Neil Leo wrote:

Hi, M4M? from your queue:

Overall

1. I think "Warsongs" composed this music and not "League of Legends". "Warsongs is an anthology of 11 classic League tunes remixed and amped up for your competitive climb.", so no, you're wrong.
2. About hitsounds, the default normal hitclap dosen't sound well with the music like on 00:38:608 (3) for Gold and Diamond. uh ok, do you have any suggestion on what should I use instead? I honestly think that claps sounds good here.
3. Upscale your background to 1366x768. Ok

Bronze

1. Bronze? But this diff can't be easily fc'd by noobs. (More like Silver) If I rename this Silver, then I should rename Diamond Platinum, but I honestly don't want to, diff names are cool this way.
2. 01:49:408 (2) - Move to 300|292 to give more visibility for flow. It's already fully visible, also I don't like that spacing, I prefer having symmetry.
3. 01:53:248 (2) - ^ 212|292 to have consistency with previous ^
4. 02:02:368 (1,2,3) - Sugesting this pattern:http://s29.postimg.org/7je8jr4fr/img1.jpg same as above reason. I tried to do as you suggested but then I noticed that these sliders are too much on the border of the screen and I don't like it, I also tried to rotate them but still didn't like how they look.

Gold

1. Make circle size a little larger, like 4.5. This is too small for a typical Hard/Insane diff. This makes difficulty spread more linear. With a larger circle size this diff would look messy, so no.

Diamond

1. Nothing moddable, great diff by the way.

That's the best I can mod for this map.

Kisses wrote:

hi from your m4m queue

Where is Challenjour diff?

[Bronze]

1. I think you should add an NC to 00:18:688 (3) and 00:11:008 (3) to keep them consistent with the rest of the map ok
2. 00:59:008 (4,5,6) - Doesnt feel like the same shape to 00:57:088 it's the same though
3. 01:29:728 (4,6) - This looks really ugly to me that they touch this way Fixed
4. 01:37:408 (4,6) - ^ ^
5. 01:54:688 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - This rhythm is somewhat bland and extremely hard to read/play for a beginner, it is your easiest diff after all Extremely hard to read/play? Yo this is 1/1 snapping + overlaps like these are fine in normal diffs, I can agree that the rhythm feels a bit bland but it fits the song.
6. 02:11:968 (1,2) - Can you adjust the DS of to 1.45 and so the blankets can look like this? http://puu.sh/nyXuz/bb4b1f50ae.jpg Sure
   A lot neater than what it is currently; the blankets are inconsistent with some having a really small gap to others just touching the object
   http://puu.sh/nyXyH/3e771ebef1.jpg Thats what all the blankets would look like if you changed the DS to 1.45. The change in DS shouldnt matter too much in terms of reading which is the only reason why DS is impletmented so yh.
7. You have a few objects with DS problems, one object even had a DS of 2.20. You can use AI mod to check them You don't have to strictly follow DS as long as you make your spacing make sense/it's readable/it's not really really hard. (this also apply to easy/normal diffs, yes)

[Gold]

1. 00:23:968 (5) - turn all the (5)s into half sliders. Hitting 50 circles like this in a row is really dull. Nope, already explained in previous mods that I want to differenciate patterns and I want an increasing difficulty over time.
2. 01:10:288 (2,1) - Imo it would be better for these not to stack and have (1) placed somewhere else. Like you did for 01:48:688 (7,1) No, this is consistent with 01:12:208 (2,1), 01:14:128 (2,1) and all the other similar patterns.
3. 01:25:048 (4) - Turn into a 1/4 slider. The flow actually feels aswkward bad if you have 01:25:168 unmapped I don't agree, I think is fine.
4. 01:47:488 (3,4) - Bad flow + the pattern isnt that pretty Yooo this is a crossbow, you don't like them?!? D:
5. 01:48:448 (6) - Why are you not placing an NC anymore like you did for 01:23:488 (1) and other places etc Right, fixed
6. 02:11:008 (4,5,6) - Do this..? http://puu.sh/nyY3P/3b0f82bf6c.jpg Has better flow imo as you arent going down then up so quickly I don't like it.
7. 02:16:648 (4,5,6) - Reducing spacing for 1/4 notes Why? It's not necessary.
8. 02:18:208 (3,4) - This looks better imo http://puu.sh/nyY8I/76653d615f.jpg I don't like it.
9. 02:21:088 (7) - This doesnt match the song here really, I also dont get what you opted to put this here when here is unmapped. There isnt a new insturment at 02:21:088 (7) so wouldnt it be better to keep them both unmapped? or map them both These repeating sliders allow me to do nice things with my custom clap, that is the instrument you're looking for. (this is not overmapping, that is a different thing)

[Diamond]

1. 00:07:168 (1) to 01:04:768 (1) - it might be just me but I couldnt hear half the notes you were mapping; it felt like you were mapping taiko and making your own rhythm Please explain me why making your own rhythm in a beatmap is bad, as long as you don't do it all the time and it doesn't contrast with the song is fine imo. Also, would you prefer me to map this part of the song following strictly the rhythm? That would be really reeeally boring since this is, you know, the hardest diff.
2. 01:25:288 - add a circle here for flow Not needed
3. 02:08:128 (1) - add stream or multiple sliders pls. This wasted potential for an Insane style diff imho. Nope, sorry, a slider like this one really fits here.

Well thats all from me, I didnt repeat some points even though they were in subsequent patterns as I'm sure it was obvious and would take up more space than needed. Anyways GL

1. 
2. This difficulty is super linear in the intro. I understand that it's an easier map, but don't be afraid to try different slider shapes.
3. 00:56:128 (4,3) - I'd say to avoid overlaps like this, because it can be quite difficult for beginners to read. You can try stacking 00:56:128 (4,3) - instead.
4. 01:04:768 (1) - You should instead end this spinner on the white tick.
5. 01:10:528 (1,2,3,1) - Not that there is anything wrong with stacking, but patterns like this can be really confusing for beginners. Especially with the rhythm you are using at that part. Try doing what you did with 01:12:448 (1,2,3) - It's so much easier to read.
6. 01:54:688 (1,2,3,4) - Same thing as I said before. Avoid stacking too much. It is not common to see easier difficulties with patterns like this.
7. 02:21:088 (3,1) - This overlap doesn't look so nice.

1. 00:54:328 (4) - There's not enough going on in the song to have 1/4 slider here. Change this to a single note. This goes for every 1/4 slider that you have placed before the first spinner. I mean, there's nothing wrong with the rhythm, but it's not so necessary to have them.
2. 02:27:928 (4) - I wouldn't place sliders on blue ticks. They feel pretty awkward to play. You should instead start the one white or red ticks.

1. 00:23:608 (4,5) - Just like in your Gold difficulty, there is not enough going on in the song to have these. You only hear a single strum.
2. 00:37:888 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - I don't think that this is the most appropriate rhythm to use. You can try something like this instead:
   
3. 00:53:848 (5,7) - Weird overlap.

_vanity wrote:

Hello! I'm here from your M4M queue.

[Bronze]

1. 
2. This difficulty is super linear in the intro. Done on purpose in all diffs I understand that it's an easier map, but don't be afraid to try different slider shapes.
3. 00:56:128 (4,3) - I'd say to avoid overlaps like this, because it can be quite difficult for beginners to read. You can try stacking 00:56:128 (4,3) - instead.
4. 01:04:768 (1) - You should instead end this spinner on the white tick.
5. 01:10:528 (1,2,3,1) - Not that there is anything wrong with stacking, but patterns like this can be really confusing for beginners. Especially with the rhythm you are using at that part. Try doing what you did with 01:12:448 (1,2,3) - It's so much easier to read.
6. 01:54:688 (1,2,3,4) - Same thing as I said before. Avoid stacking too much. It is not common to see easier difficulties with patterns like this.
7. 02:21:088 (3,1) - This overlap doesn't look so nice. Alright, made a different pattern.

Didn't fix anything else because I disagree with your suggestions, I don't want this diff to be easier, it's already good for a normal.

[Gold]

1. 00:54:328 (4) - There's not enough going on in the song to have 1/4 slider here. Change this to a single note. This goes for every 1/4 slider that you have placed before the first spinner. I mean, there's nothing wrong with the rhythm, but it's not so necessary to have them. Already explained in previous mods that I want an increasing difficulty over time.
2. 02:27:928 (4) - I wouldn't place sliders on blue ticks. They feel pretty awkward to play. You should instead start the one white or red ticks. Done on purpose in order to have more variety to these kiai parts, I also did the same thing here 02:35:608 (4).

[Diamond]

1. 00:23:608 (4,5) - Just like in your Gold difficulty, there is not enough going on in the song to have these. You only hear a single strum. Same as above.
2. 00:37:888 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - I don't think that this is the most appropriate rhythm to use. You can try something like this instead: I don't like it.
   
3. 00:53:848 (5,7) - Weird overlap. Why? Seems fine to me.

[]
As for your hitsounds, I think that they fit the song pretty nicely. Good luck!

Kisses wrote:

Not trying to sound rude or anything but considering you reject 90% of modders suggestions you might as well just stat calling BNs and forget about mods

felys wrote:

hey, da #modreqs

Non credo di riuscire a moddare qualcosa di così 2010 (non in senso negativo, dw), ma volevo solo dire che imo i nomi delle diff van cambiati, dato che se non hai intenzione di aggiungere altre diff lo spread non è.. corretto? Cioè, tenendo come referenza le leghe di LoL ovviamente, potresti partire da gold e arrivare a diamond.

1. I'm pretty sure 'Legaue of Legends' isn't the artist of the original song, but just the publisher.
   But since there's no source of who the composer is.. hmh. Idk what to do about that. s:
   I would put 'Mako' in the artist field and use 'Piercing Light Remix' as the title, but that's just as wrong. xD
   Maybe you should ask riot games for information on that? usually they're ready to help with that~~
2. You should add "Cut Version" in the description or tags to make players aware that it's not the full version

1. CS4 for the easiest diff is a little harsh, even if this is supposed to equal Normal. I'd prefer 3.5
2. This diff should have 100% consistent spacing, because it's the lowest diff in the set. I know that this is a Normal diff and not an Easy, but even N diffs have to meet certain requirements when there is no easier diff present. Consistent spacing is part of that.. I'm not saying that you have to use 1.4DS everywhere, going up to 1.5 or down to 1.3 is sometimes okay (to stay inside of the playfield for example), but patterns like 00:38:848 (2,3) - 00:46:528 (2,3) - are not okay. The change in speed is too much, also the patterns are misleading for beginner players, because the sliderend is closer to the previous object than the head.
   These pattern should be changed to match DS
3. 00:26:368 (1,2,1) - here (1,2) work fine with increased DS, imo, because there's two beats in between and the objects are arranged very similar to previous objects, but (2,1) isn't okay in the lowest diff as it's just as misleading as ^
   You could flip 00:30:208 (1,2,3,4) - if you want to keep the pattern, like this: http://puu.sh/nUHuS.jpg
4. 00:35:968 (2,1) - here DS is definitely too short, the decrease from prev 1.6 to 1. is too high, players will hit (1) too early.
   As I don't quiet agree with the following pattern, I'd suggest to change it like this: http://puu.sh/nUHG1.jpg > http://puu.sh/nUHHd.jpg
   You'd have to adjust the following objects then. s:
5. 00:45:568 (1,2,3,4) - if you changed ^ you should try something similar with this
6. 00:55:168 (3,4) - and 01:02:848 (3,4) - as I said, the DS change here is too much
7. 00:59:968 (6,1) - similar here, just that it's too short.
8. 01:11:968 (3,1) - 01:19:648 (3,1) - I don't agree with the stacks here, because it's breaking DS. I know you've done that before, but here you're introducing 1/4 beats which is usually way too hard for the easiest diff anyway and combining that with stacks it's just over the top.
   You could do a nice blanket instead: http://puu.sh/nUILR.jpg > http://puu.sh/nUIOs.jpg
   http://puu.sh/nUISq.jpg
9. also your NCs are looking a little random in this part? You've used NC on each second downbeat so far, so 01:10:528 (1) - and 01:18:208 (1) - should be removed.
   and NC should be added on 01:43:168 (3) -
10. 01:47:968 (3,1,2) - and 01:51:808 (3,1,2) - flow here is a little awkward and misleading for beginner players, maybe you can come up with something that's easier to follow? (I mean no slidertails closer to the previous object)
    example: http://puu.sh/nUJna.jpg > http://puu.sh/nUJrB.jpg (you'd have to adjust following objects and patterns)
11. 01:54:688 (1) - to 02:01:888 (4) - these are too many clickable objects in a row for the easiest diff, I'd suggest replacing 01:54:688 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - with 1/1 sliders. That would also match the song as it's getting a little stronger with each downbeat
12. 02:13:408 (3,1) - this is an absolute no in E/N diffs, it's not readable. :/ make sure to keep DS here
    and 02:11:488 (3) - 02:13:408 (3) - 02:15:328 (3) - should end on 1/2 to avoid the overlaps. Otherwise this is getting way too complicated, imo.
13. 02:16:528 (2,3) - this should be a slider, even if the rhythm is understood by now it's still hard to click correctly and therefore this should be avoided.
14. 02:18:448 (2,3) - better to unstack this, it's pretty hard to read
    - what I said about first Kiai applies to second, too!

1. hmmh, I don't think it's just me when I say that the beginning is reaaally tiring to play. s: I mean it's basically the same rhythm and only circles until 00:39:328 - ( so 25% of the whole map ). It's even arranged similarly all the time..
   I just think it's a bit of a waste, because the melody has much more potential and can be represented differently, some examples:
   http://puu.sh/nULEs.jpg
   http://puu.sh/nULFb.jpg
   http://puu.sh/nULG1.jpg
   well, would be nice if you can spice this part up a little, so it's a little less repititive.
2. 00:54:328 (4) - 00:56:248 (4) - 00:58:168 (4) - etc - hmmh, they sure add variety, but somehow they feel weird to play. Probably because they end on nothing and then there's also the clap hitsound that dosn't match with anything in the song. Imo would be better if you remove claps and extend sldier by 1/4 to follow the violin, but maybe you can come up with something better?
3. 01:15:448 (6) - and 01:23:128 (6) - should be circle, as there's no sound on the red tick. Alternatively you can replace the following circles with longer slider until the white ticks

Squirrel wrote:

General

1. I'm pretty sure 'Legaue of Legends' isn't the artist of the original song, but just the publisher.
   But since there's no source of who the composer is.. hmh. Idk what to do about that. s: This is the original song, so I guess it makes more sense to change it to Riot Games, I guess?
   
2. You should add "Cut Version" in the description or tags to make players aware that it's not the full version Uh, sure.

Bronze

1. CS4 for the easiest diff is a little harsh, even if this is supposed to equal Normal. I'd prefer 3.5 I like 4 more, the patterns look better.
   
2. This diff should have 100% consistent spacing, because it's the lowest diff in the set. I know that this is a Normal diff and not an Easy, but even N diffs have to meet certain requirements when there is no easier diff present. Bullshit, seriously who told you that? Download this map and check the easiest diff, spacing is not 100% consistent there.
   
3. You've used NC on each second downbeat so far, so 01:10:528 (1) - and 01:18:208 (1) - should be removed and NC should be added on 01:43:168 (3). Ok.
   
4. 01:47:968 (3,1,2) - and 01:51:808 (3,1,2) - flow here is a little awkward and misleading for beginner players, maybe you can come up with something that's easier to follow? (I mean no slidertails closer to the previous object) It's not necessary, it's totally fine.
   
5. 01:54:688 (1) - to 02:01:888 (4) - these are too many clickable objects in a row for the easiest diff, I'd suggest replacing 01:54:688 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - with 1/1 sliders. That would also match the song as it's getting a little stronger with each downbeat Circles fit more here imo.
   
6. 02:13:408 (3,1) - this is an absolute no in E/N diffs, it's not readable. :/ lol, I don't agree sorry.

overall this diff needs some more work to make it okay as the easiest diff. The thing is that you just consider newbies like total retards, also this is a Normal so I don't have to keep everything super easy; if some people find this diff too hard then they just have to play another beatmap with a "standard" (aka generic) Easy. Also, you didn't get my mapping style, which makes me angry and sad at the same time.


Gold

1. 01:15:448 (6) - and 01:23:128 (6) - should be circle, as there's no sound on the red tick. Alternatively you can replace the following circles with longer slider until the white ticks. I don't have to stick 100% to the song, if it fits and I don't go too much overboard I can add more to it.

Also, all the diffs are intentionally slow paced/boring in the beginning and already explained why in previous mods.

Squirrel wrote:

Well, I apologize if me assumingly not understanding your mapping style has made you angry and/or sad.
As I didn't even start playing for real when your latest map got ranked, I'm afraid I never got introduced to this style; feel free to enlighten me?

Mazziv wrote:

http://puu.sh/o0zc6.png im triggerd by this ,,rito'' tag
also use female instead of fem





the diamond diff is just the platinium diff with a bigger spacing

Diasios wrote:

Mazziv wrote:

http://puu.sh/o0zc6.png im triggerd by this ,,rito'' tag
also use female instead of fem





the diamond diff is just the platinium diff with a bigger spacing

huehuehue

I putted fem instead of female because the BG I'm using is actually called "fem Lucian, the Purifier fanart", but I guess female makes more sense anyway.

Also yes, the diamond diff is pretty much the platinum diff with smaller circle size and bigger spacing, I didn't want to add unnecessary streams and make the diff full of jumps, it's not my mapping style, sorry. D:

Mazziv wrote:

well why dont you remove the diamond diff then? i dont really think it makes much different to have it in the set or not :/

Diasios wrote:

Mazziv wrote:

well why dont you remove the diamond diff then? i dont really think it makes much different to have it in the set or not :/

No, why should I? These two diffs are similar, not the same.

Mazziv wrote:

do you think the diamond diff adds value to the mapset when you got a easier version of it already? imo it doesnt :/ but its your decision

Diasios wrote:

Mazziv wrote:

do you think the diamond diff adds value to the mapset when you got a easier version of it already? imo it doesnt :/ but its your decision

I think 5 diffs are better then 3 so yeah, I think it adds value, you have more choice of what to play.
I'm also pretty sure some people may find the spacing in the Diamond diff too difficult/hate the circle size and find the Platinum diff more enjoyable.

Mazziv wrote:

well i suggested to only remove the diamond diff not diamond and the plat diff D:

• 
  Good thing that you're at least using slider velocity multiplier.

1. "But looks in a beatmap is probably comparable to looks irl. You'll always get judged by how you look first. If your map is inconsistent and seems to have random placement it'll sometimes be judged as bad by people that haven't even played it." -BOUYAAA
2. "Consistency in angles used is also kind of important to keep a map good looking. Most of the time it's better to have your angles kept between 5-15° of the x and y axis." -BOUYAAA
3. You seem to be recycling the map i.e. copy pasting it. It's usually not a good thing to do as it becomes very repetitive and boring.
4. Usually low BPM maps are hard to map, especially at 5+ star ratings. Exceptions are maps that have a lot of other notes (Example 1, Example 2).
5. Use more sliders, but don't overdo it. The map startings consist almost only of circles. They are hard to hit, especially if they are on blue ticks.
6. As far as I can see you're using grid snap. Don't use it unless you're trying to make something symmetrical.
7. Map flow usually works when your cursor can move in circular motion most of the time.

BriedisLT wrote:

Keep trying and you might possibly do something playable.