1. osu! forums
  2. Beatmaps
  3. Ranked/Approved Beatmaps
show more
posted

  • Liqueur

  1. 00:15:879 (7) - There is a guitar sound here not a jazzy sound or whatever which is confusing I suggest you remove it
  2. 00:38:879 (4) - Starts on piano sound and ends on drum end it here on piano (also fits with vocal better) instead 00:39:254 -
  3. 00:39:629 (5) - Not really any mucis here but if you're mapping the vocals make it a slider
  4. 00:39:879 (1,2,3) - I dont like the spacing of this I know its calm vocal but it's very akward to play just space it a bit more not by much but at least so people dont confuse it with 1/4
  5. 00:43:879 (1,2,3) - ^
  6. 00:47:629 (6,7,1) - ^ I keep thinking it is 1/4 :?
  7. 00:49:629 (6,7,1) - ^
  8. 00:50:379 (2) - End here instead 00:50:754 - because right now it ends on no sound
  9. 00:51:379 (4,5,1) - Ok I will stop pointing it out now but I dont like it
  10. 01:45:754 (1) - Ctrl G
  11. 01:51:629 (4) - I know it's intense music but this is mega jump for 240bpm
  12. 02:05:879 (7) - This isnt a jazz sound so it feels kinda weird I'd remove it just because it follows the rhythm better
  13. 02:09:879 (7) - ^
  14. 02:13:879 (7) - ^

    Insane
  15. Same basic rhythm stuff as diff above (example: 00:15:879 (6) - shouldnt be mapped imo)
  16. Copy this 00:41:879 (2) - and paste here 00:42:379 (3) -
  17. 00:53:379 (3,4,5,6) - Overlap with 00:51:879 (4) - sliderend
  18. 02:14:629 (5) - uneven spacing
    ***
  19. Nice map, where is the normal though? Anyways gl with map!
posted
♥love♥love♥love♥this♥map♥
posted
接好
posted
can you change song title "Secret Liqueue -short ver.-" ?



i love this song. :3 rank this please~ ;w;
posted

Misure wrote:

[imouto's Insane]
  1. widescreen support
  2. 00:56:379 (9,1) - 感觉近了 有nc 应该没问题
  3. 01:16:879 (6,7) - 这个距离还是容易读错 要不就NC nc了
  4. 01:27:129 (1) - 168|128怎么样 好啊
  5. 01:43:129 (1) - ^

Regraz wrote:

[imouto's Insane]
00:47:754 Add a note here? k

00:51:129 (2) - Seems unsnaped slider-end? fixed

00:53:379 (3,4,5,6,1) - Still feels this flow is weird. (90% degree large spacing at 6 to 1) it feels not overdone to me, I'll see others' opinions

01:00:254 Add a note? k

01:30:879 (1,2,3) - 90 degree flow with 180 degree turn over on 3, really hard to catch.

01:53:004 (4,1,2,3) - Confusing pattern here. (spacing between 4 and 1 / 1 and 2 and 3)

=======================
Good Luck!

Warpyc wrote:

Insane

[*] Same basic rhythm stuff as diff above (example: 00:15:879 (6) - shouldnt be mapped imo)
[*] Copy this 00:41:879 (2) - and paste here 00:42:379 (3) - sorry, didn't get your point...
[*] 00:53:379 (3,4,5,6) - Overlap with 00:51:879 (4) - sliderend not so obvious in ar9, I think it's fine
[*] 02:14:629 (5) - uneven spacing feels fine to me
***

[*] Nice map, where is the normal though? Anyways gl with map![/list]
Thanks for modding.
posted

  • [Liqueur]
  1. 01:59:129 - 01:59:379 -01:59:629-可以加点东西衬托一下vocal,折返也好,note也好
    [imouto's Insane]
  2. 00:22:379 (4) - 这里的ds是0.31 00:22:212 (2,3) - 这俩都是0.45和0.48 平均一下?
    [Hard]
  3. 01:09:379 (6) - 往返遮挡大丈夫?至少我看到的时候01:08:254 (2) - 还没有完全消失

没什么能说的,非常简洁的图【排列音效什么的】射个星吧,好运
posted
Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥

[Easy]
00:19:879 (2) - 不如删掉
00:35:379 (2) - 这个滑条结尾听起来好奇怪,不如删掉这个,然后前面那个滑条折返
01:21:129 (1) - 改成单点啊
01:21:129 (1,2,3,1) - 节奏改成这样

01:27:379 (1,2) - 对于ez来说太坑爹了,不过我感觉有点无解
01:34:879 (4) - 用长滑条啊,不要折返
01:41:879 (2) - 缩短1/1到 01:42:254结束
01:46:879 (4) - 放错位置了吧
02:11:879 (1,2) - 不要叠

最低难度少用白线到红线这种空拍


[Normal]
00:23:879 (1,2,3) - 有点难打,试试这样

00:35:379 (3,1) - 难度,建议3折返一下之后1ds一下
01:11:629 (3) - 这个要是跟鼓那后面的01:12:879 (4) - 最好也跟鼓(移到01:12:254
如果跟人声就统一一下

[Hard]
00:27:129 (3,2,3) - 叠啊
00:40:254 (2) - 别漏白线啊
01:13:879 (1) - 改成折返好读点
01:30:879 (3) - 音应该在前面的红线上
01:42:754 (5) - 改成1/1滑条我感觉有趣点
居然复制粘贴,节操呢




[一抹多大师's insane]
00:15:879 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - 这里跟萨克斯还是吉他感觉听起来都不对劲啊

00:36:379 (3,4,5,6,7) - 有点难读,建议你这5个摆个几何图形,后面两个叠

01:01:629 (1) - 我感觉不用NC

[人玩?]
01:42:754 (1) - 这里用1/8折返跟那个钢琴啊

卧槽这个真的好听,你们不带我一份我生气了(`ε´ )
posted
顺便你这BG我真是prpr到死了
posted
oops
posted
:cry:

Warpyc wrote:


  • Liqueur

  1. 00:15:879 (7) - There is a guitar sound here not a jazzy sound or whatever which is confusing I suggest you remove it Rearranged nc to fit it better
  2. 00:38:879 (4) - Starts on piano sound and ends on drum end it here on piano (also fits with vocal better) instead 00:39:254 - I'll consider
  3. 00:39:629 (5) - Not really any mucis here but if you're mapping the vocals make it a slider feels fine to me
  4. 00:39:879 (1,2,3) - I dont like the spacing of this I know its calm vocal but it's very akward to play just space it a bit more not by much but at least so people dont confuse it with 1/4 I didn't see misreading in testplays...
  5. 00:43:879 (1,2,3) - ^
  6. 00:47:629 (6,7,1) - ^ I keep thinking it is 1/4 :?
  7. 00:49:629 (6,7,1) - ^
  8. 00:50:379 (2) - End here instead 00:50:754 - because right now it ends on no sound I don't need to follow every sound, right?
  9. 00:51:379 (4,5,1) - Ok I will stop pointing it out now but I dont like it
  10. 01:45:754 (1) - Ctrl G current flows better imo
  11. 01:51:629 (4) - I know it's intense music but this is mega jump for 240bpm not so mega for me ._.
  12. 02:05:879 (7) - This isnt a jazz sound so it feels kinda weird I'd remove it just because it follows the rhythm better rearranged nc
  13. 02:09:879 (7) - ^
  14. 02:13:879 (7) - ^

OblivioN wrote:


  • [Liqueur]
  1. 01:59:129 - 01:59:379 -01:59:629-可以加点东西衬托一下vocal,折返也好,note也好 比较想要一个骤然放空的感觉
    [Hard]
  2. 01:09:379 (6) - 往返遮挡大丈夫?至少我看到的时候01:08:254 (2) - 还没有完全消失 [/color]

没什么能说的,非常简洁的图【排列音效什么的】射个星吧,好运

Mei wrote:

Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥Love you and this map ♥

[Easy]
00:19:879 (2) - 不如删掉 我看挺多用这种节奏的 效果还行
00:35:379 (2) - 这个滑条结尾听起来好奇怪,不如删掉这个,然后前面那个滑条折返 不太好排版啊 考虑一下
01:21:129 (1) - 改成单点啊
01:21:129 (1,2,3,1) - 节奏改成这样 一部分改了

01:27:379 (1,2) - 对于ez来说太坑爹了,不过我感觉有点无解
01:34:879 (4) - 用长滑条啊,不要折返
01:41:879 (2) - 缩短1/1到 01:42:254结束 不好
01:46:879 (4) - 放错位置了吧 改了
02:11:879 (1,2) - 不要叠

最低难度少用白线到红线这种空拍 没辙啊


[Normal]
00:23:879 (1,2,3) - 有点难打,试试这样

00:35:379 (3,1) - 难度,建议3折返一下之后1ds一下
01:11:629 (3) - 这个要是跟鼓那后面的01:12:879 (4) - 最好也跟鼓(移到01:12:254
如果跟人声就统一一下

[Hard]
00:27:129 (3,2,3) - 叠啊 不要
00:40:254 (2) - 别漏白线啊
01:13:879 (1) - 改成折返好读点 不差这点
01:30:879 (3) - 音应该在前面的红线上 跟的人声 音效是自创节奏
01:42:754 (5) - 改成1/1滑条我感觉有趣点 得靠这个梗撑星
居然复制粘贴,节操呢 \:D/

[人玩?]
01:42:754 (1) - 这里用1/8折返跟那个钢琴啊 不如滑条爽

卧槽这个真的好听,你们不带我一份我生气了(`ε´ )
Thanks for modding!
posted
queue

---

[Spread]

I'm a little concerned about the difficulty jump between Normal - Hard

[Easy]

00:35:379 (2,3) - really weird flow; (3) should be further left
00:55:879 (3) - aaa imo this slider is not very pretty ;w;
00:59:879 (3) - the end of this slider should be a normal hitnormal (snare), not a whistle
01:30:879 (5) - this slider should follow the same rhythmic pattern (because the lyric rhythm is the same). Extend it so it starts on the previous red tick
01:46:879 (4) - ^
02:05:379 (2) - ends on a really strong beat, use 2 2/1 hitcircles instead?

[Normal]

01:09:629 (1) - ends on a really strong beat, should be 2 hitcircles

[Hard]

00:21:504 (4,1) - ugly overlap; move (1) to the right?
00:26:379 (2) - spaced way too close to (1); try some ctrl+g strategy?
00:29:504 (6,1) - ugly overlap again
01:09:379 (6,7) - ^ and for better flow this stuff should be to the left of (5)
01:25:879 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - i like this hahaha
01:27:379 (1) - i know it's a very nice blanket but I feel like this should be spaced further away for more emphasis. it could also be because 01:26:754 (7) - ends on a really strong beat that probably should be clicked on instead
01:36:879 (5,6) - ugly overlap, move (6) up
01:43:379 (2) - space further away
01:58:629 (3) - this needs some kind of emphasis, either a whistle or soft-hitfinish or something
02:00:379 (2) - really should be spaced further
02:04:379 (2) - again should be spaced further, try ctrl+g
02:15:129 (5) - make this a two-note stack?

[imouto's Insane]

00:16:379 (3) - whistle on the start of this?
00:17:379 (7) - ^
00:37:129 (1) - space this further for better pacing and readability
00:43:254 (5,7) - ugly overlap :/
01:09:879 (1,3) - (3) can blanket (1) better
01:22:379 (2,3) - ugly overlap, move (3) up and to the right?
02:02:045 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - I strongly disagree with completely covering the slider heads with the slider tracks. It can be unreadable and it used to be unrankable.
02:10:045 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - ^

[Liqueur]

00:38:879 (4) - you missed the beat at 00:39:254 -
00:43:379 (5) - this should be further away from (4)
00:55:254 - add note, or acknowledge this beat in some way
00:56:254 (3) - remove new combo
00:59:254 (5) - really big jump given your 1/1 is spaced quite close together
01:08:254 - missing beat
01:17:879 (1,2) - ugly overlap. I like it better if (2) is placed so that (1) blankets the start of (2)
01:23:504 (8) - the vocal is not on the red tick; it's at 01:23:629 -
01:26:754 (1) - make this a little 1/8 repeat slider so you emphasize the little trill in the melody?
01:38:629 (3,4) - ctrl+g much better flow
01:51:754 (5) - woah! this jump is huge! if anything, the jump should be from (5) to (1), not from (4) to (5).

---

very catchy, GL

-SMIC
posted

SuperMIC wrote:

queue

---

[Spread]

I'm a little concerned about the difficulty jump between Normal - Hard I‘m not sure

[Easy]

00:35:379 (2,3) - really weird flow; (3) should be further left It's still fine
00:55:879 (3) - aaa imo this slider is not very pretty ;w; not so bad imo
00:59:879 (3) - the end of this slider should be a normal hitnormal (snare), not a whistle fixed
01:30:879 (5) - this slider should follow the same rhythmic pattern (because the lyric rhythm is the same). Extend it so it starts on the previous red tick it will be too hard
01:46:879 (4) - ^
02:05:379 (2) - ends on a really strong beat, use 2 2/1 hitcircles instead? for ez slider end is fine

[Normal]

01:09:629 (1) - ends on a really strong beat, should be 2 hitcircles i'll consider

[Hard]

00:21:504 (4,1) - ugly overlap; move (1) to the right? not ugly imo
00:26:379 (2) - spaced way too close to (1); try some ctrl+g strategy? I didn't see misreading in several testplays
00:29:504 (6,1) - ugly overlap again ^
01:09:379 (6,7) - ^ and for better flow this stuff should be to the left of (5) i'll how to fix
01:25:879 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - i like this hahaha
01:27:379 (1) - i know it's a very nice blanket but I feel like this should be spaced further away for more emphasis. it could also be because 01:26:754 (7) - ends on a really strong beat that probably should be clicked on instead nice
01:36:879 (5,6) - ugly overlap, move (6) up
01:43:379 (2) - space further away it's fine
01:58:629 (3) - this needs some kind of emphasis, either a whistle or soft-hitfinish or something added
02:00:379 (2) - really should be spaced further
02:04:379 (2) - again should be spaced further, try ctrl+g
02:15:129 (5) - make this a two-note stack? current flows better

[Liqueur]

00:38:879 (4) - you missed the beat at 00:39:254 - I don't want to follow all beats
00:43:379 (5) - this should be further away from (4) changed rhythm
00:55:254 - add note, or acknowledge this beat in some way no
00:56:254 (3) - remove new combo fixed
00:59:254 (5) - really big jump given your 1/1 is spaced quite close together still readable
01:08:254 - missing beat
01:17:879 (1,2) - ugly overlap. I like it better if (2) is placed so that (1) blankets the start of (2)
01:23:504 (8) - the vocal is not on the red tick; it's at 01:23:629 - but i'm not following vocal
01:26:754 (1) - make this a little 1/8 repeat slider so you emphasize the little trill in the melody? feels not good to me
01:38:629 (3,4) - ctrl+g much better flow not good if you play this
01:51:754 (5) - woah! this jump is huge! if anything, the jump should be from (5) to (1), not from (4) to (5). it's fine

---

very catchy, GL

-SMIC
Thanks for modding!
posted
Thank you for the map!

Does anybody have lyrics of this song? And will be the full version (can't find it, unfortunately).

Thank you for the answer!
posted

Veshurik wrote:

Thank you for the map!

Does anybody have lyrics of this song? And will be the full version (can't find it, unfortunately).

Thank you for the answer!
I didn't found full ver in the OST so I guess it isn't released now.



Edit: I don't know. I just have this image of lyric.
posted
Hope it will release in the future.
So, do you know how can I get the lyrics of this song? I try to find it, but... eh, ineffectually.
posted
[Liqueur]
  1. 00:29:129 (1,2,3) - 也可以这么下节奏http://puu.sh/nohnd/3e551f50b6.jpg 和前面一样音效跟鼓
    大概摆成这样http://puu.sh/nohnd/3e551f50b6.jpg
  2. 00:29:254 (2) - 还有个事就是前面1的镲声应该放这里
  3. 00:38:879 (4) - 我觉得这种滑条在结尾接一个短直滑条会感觉很好,虽然不知道你一开始是什么样
  4. 01:23:129 (7) - 这里的节奏的话 http://puu.sh/noijg/96ac63def5.jpg
  5. 01:34:629 (3,4) - 这里要我就干脆摆3个note 要不像01:50:629 (3,4) - 这样放也ok
  6. 01:45:754 (1) - 我不太喜欢这个形状说实话..柑橘可以直接摆圆弧啊
  7. 01:55:629 (2,3,4) - 把4弄成滑条怎么样 http://puu.sh/noj5D/62936fe4c3.jpg
  8. 01:57:254 (4,1,2,3,4) - 这几个也可以像02:09:379 (3,4,5,6,1) - 这几个这样排

很好听!图做的也不错,和歌的风格挺搭配的 :)
posted
[General]
  1. Nothing to say
[Easy]
  1. 00:41:879 (1) - 間距
  2. 00:55:879 (3) - 好像中間有一點減掉速度
  3. 00:59:879 (3) - 這個急彎滑條在ez還是少用點,一般在最低難度都會用得比較整潔
  4. 01:21:879 (1) - 感覺快擦邊了上面一點
  5. 01:36:379 (1) - 超出螢幕
[Normall]
  1. 01:35:004 (2) - 如果放在大白線跟vocal會比較好拿捏play,這個重音真的聽起來不太明顯,可以再考慮
  2. 01:51:004 (1) - 同上
[Hard] Normal到Hard 有滑條速度的差距,不能差太多 (SV gap),縮到差距0.40~0.50確保安全 (SV改到1.20)
  1. 00:16:629 (2) - 滑條尾沒壓到snap建議改成這樣 :
  2. 00:32:378 (3) - 同上
  3. 01:05:879 (1) - 擺的太上面了會被找碴
  4. 01:25:879 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - 在Hard別用這麼多note的排列,這變成ins擺法了
[Insane]
  1. 01:14:629 (2) - 可以加一個note會玩得比較好
  2. 01:19:879 (1) - 尾端忘了finish
  3. 01:21:629 (3,4,1) - 這疊得太粗糙了建議疊好
  4. 01:27:379 (2,3,1) - 這建議要改一下,擺放間距一樣,但上面節奏距離不一樣很容易被坑,3還是疊在滑條頭上吧
  5. 01:43:379 (2,3,1) - 同上
[Extra] 感覺後面有些nc不需那麼長,一些00:39:879 (6) - 00:47:879 (5) - 和像這種大白線的建議加個NC
  1. 00:20:004 (2,3) - 2到3中間的那節奏音很明顯怎麼不放節奏,另外00:19:879 (1,2) - 聽起來沒什麼感覺要跳這邊突然就大跳了玩的好莫名。
  2. 01:27:379 (2,3,1) - 這間距..
  3. 01:43:379 (2,3,1) - 同上
[Liqueur] 很有藝術的diff,OD調7.5有點太低,HP7.5吧,8有點高。
  1. 01:02:879 (4) - 折返好像卡了一下速度
  2. 01:27:629 (3,1) - 最好是疊起來,因為節奏間距有一段距離
  3. 02:08:379 (5,1) - 這間距沒處理好,要拉開一點,太近 (順便也檢查一下相同部分有沒有漏的)
posted

OblivioN wrote:


  • [imouto's Insane]
  1. 00:22:379 (4) - 这里的ds是0.31 00:22:212 (2,3) - 这俩都是0.45和0.48 平均一下? 是我放歪了

没什么能说的,非常简洁的图【排列音效什么的】射个星吧,好运

Mei wrote:

[一抹多大师's insane]
00:15:879 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - 这里跟萨克斯还是吉他感觉听起来都不对劲啊 萨克斯在白线上都有音啊 我听着没问题

00:36:379 (3,4,5,6,7) - 有点难读,建议你这5个摆个几何图形,后面两个叠 我想保留这个排列 ar弄高了一点

01:01:629 (1) - 我感觉不用NC 是没必要 改掉了

卧槽这个真的好听,你们不带我一份我生气了(`ε´ ) 这人一天就把set搞定了 我也很无奈……

SuperMIC wrote:

[imouto's Insane]

00:16:379 (3) - whistle on the start of this? nice
00:17:379 (7) - ^ no
00:37:129 (1) - space this further for better pacing and readability raised ar and it seems fine now
00:43:254 (5,7) - ugly overlap :/ fine imo
01:09:879 (1,3) - (3) can blanket (1) better 1 will be already disappeared at that time
01:22:379 (2,3) - ugly overlap, move (3) up and to the right? I like current flow
02:02:045 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - I strongly disagree with completely covering the slider heads with the slider tracks. It can be unreadable and it used to be unrankable. It is visible for new default skin now
02:10:045 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - ^

very catchy, GL

-SMIC

smallboat wrote:

[Insane]
  1. 01:21:629 (3,4,1) - 這疊得太粗糙了建議疊好 叠好就变成现在这个样子了
[Extra] 感覺後面有些nc不需那麼長,一些00:39:879 (6) - 00:47:879 (5) - 和像這種大白線的建議加個NC
  1. 00:20:004 (2,3) - 2到3中間的那節奏音很明顯怎麼不放節奏,另外00:19:879 (1,2) - 聽起來沒什麼感覺要跳這邊突然就大跳了玩的好莫名。 但是这里鼓声也很明显 不知道怎么改先塞满了
  2. 01:27:379 (2,3,1) - 這間距.. 这里人声比较强 实际打的时候我看别人不会读错
  3. 01:43:379 (2,3,1) - 同上
Thanks for mod!
posted

X Light wrote:

[Liqueur]
  1. 00:29:129 (1,2,3) - 也可以这么下节奏http://puu.sh/nohnd/3e551f50b6.jpg 和前面一样音效跟鼓 可以跟 但是这里萨克斯太明显了 跟着不爽
    大概摆成这样http://puu.sh/nohnd/3e551f50b6.jpg
  2. 00:29:254 (2) - 还有个事就是前面1的镲声应该放这里那个背景有了 不放也不差很多
  3. 00:38:879 (4) - 我觉得这种滑条在结尾接一个短直滑条会感觉很好,虽然不知道你一开始是什么样 没这个节奏啊 我也觉得很好
  4. 01:23:129 (7) - 这里的节奏的话 http://puu.sh/noijg/96ac63def5.jpg 参照着改了改
  5. 01:34:629 (3,4) - 这里要我就干脆摆3个note 要不像01:50:629 (3,4) - 这样放也ok 嗯 改了
  6. 01:45:754 (1) - 我不太喜欢这个形状说实话..柑橘可以直接摆圆弧啊 我挺喜欢的
  7. 01:55:629 (2,3,4) - 把4弄成滑条怎么样 http://puu.sh/noj5D/62936fe4c3.jpg 不 这里放空和后面两个finish形成对比
  8. 01:57:254 (4,1,2,3,4) - 这几个也可以像02:09:379 (3,4,5,6,1) - 这几个这样排 原地连打更强一点

很好听!图做的也不错,和歌的风格挺搭配的 :)

smallboat wrote:

[General]
[Hard]Normal到Hard 有滑條速度的差距,不能差太多 (SV gap),縮到差距0.40~0.50確保安全 (SV改到1.20) 别的地方改了 kiai实在不好改就还用的1.4
  1. 00:32:378 (3) - 同上 这个就不用了吧 这段鼓点起来了白线节奏听着并不是很违和
  2. 01:25:879 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - 在Hard別用這麼多note的排列,這變成ins擺法了 最后两个note换了滑条
[Liqueur] 很有藝術的diff,OD調7.5有點太低,HP7.5吧,8有點高。od8了 HP8我觉得还可以
  1. 01:02:879 (4) - 折返好像卡了一下速度 是要卡一下
  2. 01:27:629 (3,1) - 最好是疊起來,因為節奏間距有一段距離 最高难度就算了 人声很强可以听出来
  3. 02:08:379 (5,1) - 這間距沒處理好,要拉開一點,太近 (順便也檢查一下相同部分有沒有漏的) 应该只有这里 改了
谢谢mod!
posted
Confirm some issue fixed, and nothing to say to this. Bubbled
show more
Please sign in to reply.