This thread is hilarious.
forum
Mapset and Spread Restructure (Proposed)
posted
Total Posts
614
That's awful...
DeletedUser_2304476
So there can only be one 'ultra' difficulty? Does that mean that map sets like this will no longer be allowed?ztrot wrote:
You can add one Ultra difficulty past an Expert difficulty that does not have to increase linearly in difficulty with the rest of the spread. Keep in mind, that Ultra is a placeholder term, used to reflect a high end difficulty that has not been specified with a name yet. We put that name in place, so you guys know what we are talking about when we want to refer to the high end difficulties of a mapset.
Just why?ztrot wrote:
Secondly, we limited the amount of difficulties of the same level per game mode. Every mapset is limited to one of each difficulty level per game mode. While this appears very limiting at the beginning, the hybrid set rules stay intact. Don't forget that every keycount in osu!mania is considered as individual game mode, too! If you wish to get your mapsets with multiple difficulties of the same level ranked, we advise you to split it off into a new mapset.
well this is fucking retarded
the days of
osu file format v15 are upon us
osu file format v15 are upon us
Who came up with this idea in the first place?
Tho I do agree with allowing one or more "ultra" diffs, but not the linear spread.
Tho I do agree with allowing one or more "ultra" diffs, but not the linear spread.
no plsAnxient wrote:
the days of
osu file format v15 are upon us
UR MUM! Hewl noh, Rito pls fix ResidentSleeper
??Anxient wrote:
the days of
osu file format v15 are upon us
also, in before this thread is inevitably locked to shut the community up ..~
this thread shows the demand gap between staffs and community is quite huge
0 qf map day will soon
0 qf map day will soon
lol, i think you mixed up valentine's day and april fools.
Clearly with every single osu! player ever stating their disapproval, this is stupid.
Well, there are still Light Insanes, Hard+ etc. shouldnt be a problem.mintong89 wrote:
This is ridiculous then how we can balance the gap the hard is too hard or something like that? make more easier? that is not a solution
As if it wasnt hard enough to rank maps in this day and age.
Rip quality mapping.
Absolutely disgusting.
Rip quality mapping.
Absolutely disgusting.
rip osu
worst idea ever
worst idea ever
HEY MOM!!!!!!!! IM MAKING 129073109237901232130971630912739021STAR DIFF NOW!!!!!!!!!!!
WITH 1*EASY 2*NORMAL 3*HARD 4*INSANE 5*EXTRA!!!!!!!!!!!!!
WITH 1*EASY 2*NORMAL 3*HARD 4*INSANE 5*EXTRA!!!!!!!!!!!!!
This sounds purely useless. You're restricting the amount of difficulties for the sake of it.
Len wrote:
HEY MOM!!!!!!!! IM MAKING 129073109237901232130971630912739021STAR DIFF NOW!!!!!!!!!!!
WITH 1*EASY 2*NORMAL 3*HARD 4*INSANE 5*EXTRA!!!!!!!!!!!!!
these rules make light insanes and hard+ extinctCome[Back]Home wrote:
Well, there are still Light Insanes, Hard+ etc. shouldnt be a problem.mintong89 wrote:
This is ridiculous then how we can balance the gap the hard is too hard or something like that? make more easier? that is not a solution
I swear, if this isn't a troll, RIP osu!.
Really hoping this is.
Community poll anyone?
Really hoping this is.
Community poll anyone?
[MJGHD] wrote:
This sounds purely useless. You're restricting the amount of difficulties for the sake of it.
This is a very interesting idea!
You don't get it lol you just can't have a Hard+ with a Hard because they're both Hard.Come[Back]Home wrote:
Well, there are still Light Insanes, Hard+ etc. shouldnt be a problem.mintong89 wrote:
This is ridiculous then how we can balance the gap the hard is too hard or something like that? make more easier? that is not a solution
(Sry if your post was ironic)
Mum? qqL-a-m-e-y [ B ] wrote:
GIDZ - UR MUM
IM DYINGLen wrote:
HEY MOM!!!!!!!! IM MAKING 129073109237901232130971630912739021STAR DIFF NOW!!!!!!!!!!!
WITH 1*EASY 2*NORMAL 3*HARD 4*INSANE 5*EXTRA!!!!!!!!!!!!!
It is unnecessary. >.>
no sense
also, http://www.strawpoll.me/6805738Ascendance wrote:
Spy wrote:
lmfao
This is terrible if difficulty spreads are required for Taiko/CtB/mania mapsets that have no easier diffs including marathons and compilations.
Looks like the future Taiko maps that I worked on will never materialize as single diff mapsets.
Looks like the future Taiko maps that I worked on will never materialize as single diff mapsets.
Hot topic here
For rules regarding approvals, I don't really mind since it means there's more people playing the mapset.
For rules regarding one diff one map, I don't find any problem on it since I already applying this for a long time. But what'd I say is that pattern's difficulty are pretty subjective. I stumbled across many mappers that considers hard to execute patterns as normal patterns. Aren't that means Mapper A's Hard is considered as hard as Mapper B's Normal?
And,
For rules regarding approvals, I don't really mind since it means there's more people playing the mapset.
For rules regarding one diff one map, I don't find any problem on it since I already applying this for a long time. But what'd I say is that pattern's difficulty are pretty subjective. I stumbled across many mappers that considers hard to execute patterns as normal patterns. Aren't that means Mapper A's Hard is considered as hard as Mapper B's Normal?
And,
If you wish to get your mapsets with multiple difficulties of the same level ranked, we advise you to split it off into a new mapset.Are you telling mappers to rank an exactly same song twice or more if he got many styles to express?
LMAOLen wrote:
HEY MOM!!!!!!!! IM MAKING 129073109237901232130971630912739021STAR DIFF NOW!!!!!!!!!!!
WITH 1*EASY 2*NORMAL 3*HARD 4*INSANE 5*EXTRA!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Side wrote:
PLz n0 k1ll m4pp3r sp1r17
I can't agree on the 1diff per IconRizia wrote:
rip osu
worst idea ever
