SnivehNDraegonz wrote:

m4m

general

01:11:130 - maybe turn volume to 50% no, not appropriate if you compare it to 01:10:241 - or teh outro
03:04:018 (1) - don't see much point in a spinner here ambiance holds out, turn up yo music volume
NUTS' audio preview time conflicts with every diff fixed
No use in having widescreen support without actual storyboarding fixed this

normal

Maybe mute slider ticks with a silent hitsound? Why? Slider ticks go over useful beats like at 00:29:352 (1) -
This object is too far from the previous object. 01:12:796
This object is too far from the previous object. 01:13:574
This object is too far from the previous object. 02:21:685
This object is too far from the previous object. 02:27:019 i was able to fix all except 3. And idk why those 3 are put in ai mod b/c it says they're all 1.3x in the top right. I'll see whats up with this
00:41:796 (4,1) - maybe blanket these? No, curviness of 1 is intended to go wtih that bass kick
00:19:352 (1) - nc
00:33:574 (1) - ^
02:27:352 (1) - ^ No, all of these combos are seperated according to gaps in the melody, seperated by kicks i used nc on. This also regards the next 3 mods
00:19:574 (2) - delete nc
00:33:796 (2) - ^
02:27:574 (1) - ^
00:25:352 (4,1) - imo these sliders overlapping doesn't look very nice Didn't get rid of it but made it look more intentional

hard

imo I think the doubles should be changed to the short slider like in the insane diff
02:51:574 (4) - move to X:163 Y:76 Okay
02:58:685 (4) - move to X:326 Y:209 Done
03:02:241 (4) - move to X:408 Y:155 Yes
00:58:463 (4) - move to X:228 Y:180 hl is broken D:
02:39:130 (4,5) - kinda hard to read applied some spacing
01:22:018 (2) - maybe put kick sliders here instead? no, a slider is appropriate here
00:17:796 (3) - remove nc melody starts at current nc
00:32:018 (3) - ^
01:22:018 (2) - ^
00:40:907 (3) - ^
02:22:907 (2) - ^ All of these are okay, the song doesn't use a usual 1/1 nc pattern because of its unusual melody arrangement. Also see nc comment for normal
02:23:130 (1) - nc
01:24:907 (1) - maybe nc no, did same thing throughout all diffs with green color
00:08:907 (1,2,3,4,5) - might be overmapped, but tbh, you can get away with it nowadays [/color]
01:20:018 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6) - ^ this one goes to the plucks
00:04:796 (4,5) - stack maybe? opps fixed
00:34:685 (5) - maybe move 2nd anchor point to x:223 y:7 to make the first curve look a little better moved it up

Going to edit in ezek mods when I get the time to mod this more

ezek wrote:

m4m thingy

I guess I don't have to ask you why you decided to map a song called "Acorn" :v

r u nuts? yes
Easy

1. 00:04:463 (2) - The sound at the end of this slider (which falls on a downbeat) is too powerful to just leave it as the end of a slider, you should give it a proper emphasis by placing either a circle or make it the beginning of another slider, in other words, make it clickeable. put another circle
2. 00:15:130 (1) - You have been taking the third downbeat before, so I suggest to remove NC here~ I don't see why, this is a very significant beat.
3. 01:07:574 (1) - You have been starting combos with a slider in this particular part of the song and you suddenly start with a circle here, what about using a slider instead? done
4. 01:10:241 (1) - Why did you add NC here? ;w; removed
5. 01:38:685 (1,2) - Emphasizing such small parts of a song with NC doesn't fit on easy diffs since they have short combos~ okay, removed
6. 02:00:018 (5) - You have been making this clappy sound as the beginning of a slider previously, why not here? ;w; good catch, fixed
7. 02:40:907 (1,2) - Switch NC cuz the downbeat is at (2) No, im doing nc every 8 beats, which would be at 02:40:018 - but the slider i nc'ed is closest to that point in time

Normal

1. 00:03:352 (4,1) - The transition from (4) to (1) feels uncomfortable because of the curve you created on the slider. This would feel more natural imo~ Good catch, I kept the slider but it feels natural now
2. 01:10:241 (1,2) - This doesn't feel important enough here to place NC
3. 01:36:685 (2) - Check your spacing on this note Perfected w/o grid snap
4. 01:56:463 (2) - Maybe add a small curve to make a more natural movement towards (3)? No, unneeded. Transitions are already pretty smooth
5. 02:19:574 (1) - Unnecessary NC again Not here, the nc i had to fix was at 02:20:463
6. 02:21:796 (3) - Slant it to the right, it will flow better for both surrounding notes, like this
7. 02:33:796 (1) - why nc? ;w; important beat here

Hard

1. 00:01:796 (1) - This is very high up almost touching the life bar by a bit, idk if you would like to consider moving it a bit down~ Okay, did this
2. 00:04:796 (4,5) - The stack should look like this fixed in last mod
3. 00:10:685 (5) - NC here would be nice :3 Good point, but the emphasis is at 00:10:463
4. 01:00:463 (3,5) - Oh my.. this overlap doesn't look good to the eyes u.u Put 5 to the right
5. 02:39:463 (5,6,1) - This stack feels confusing because the objects on the timeline are not separated by the same amount of time :< FIxed in last mod, and removed a circle now also
6. 02:50:685 (1,2,3,4) - ^ removed spacing but stack stays
7. 02:54:241 (1,2,3,4) - ^ O_O I wasn't expecting to see this again ;w; Think about it, there are more of these but I don't need to point them out~ Here I switch to using a 3/4 pattern for stacking to coincide with the kick pattern, so no change for now but I'll get opinions about 3/4 stacking in hard

Insane

1. 00:35:796 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - Any particular reason for using different distances? Yes, there is larger emphasis on the notes with larger spacing in the music
2. 01:01:130 (3) - Avoid the overlap to be consistent with the pattern (cuz you didn't overlap (1) & (2) and is kinda the same sound) removed
3. 01:10:463 (3) - I can barely notice this slider, consider separating it from the stack ;w; sure, made a small stream
4. 01:14:685 (1) - Why don't you just delete the white point between the red points and let the curve be sharp? The way you have it doesn't look very appealing imo~ i like this here .n.
5. 02:22:093 (3) - This note might be hard to find at first glance~ moved the triangle and made something cool
6. 02:49:796 (5) - The transition to (1) would feel a bit better with a curve like this

did something like this

Nuts

I don't go beyond Insane, but here's something that called my attention

1. 00:16:352 (7,8) - This spacing ;w; There is a spacing decrease coming from the last stream, so compare that spacing to the objects at 00:16:352 (7,8)

Good luck!

squirrelpascals wrote:

A lot of people say "You need experience before ranking things like this." That could be true, but let me ask: If the mapset, especially the highest diff, were the same besides for a creator with and without experience, would that really change this maps rankability? As far as the map itself goes, no. But as far as the creator's arguments for what he did in the mapset, then maybe. That's my opinion though.

Cryptic wrote:

While it may make sense in the editor, it also needs to make sense to a player sight-reading through the map.

Joezapy wrote:

Might be wrong, but wouldn't squirrel already show up when you search for it, on account of your username? So it doesn't need to be in the tags, right?

Joezapy wrote:

Proof

unless you put the same tag in your other maps too let me check

edit: you did not for 'the ghetto' so yeah. I also tried 'relpa' and that worked too

fdsfd wrote:

penis

Joezapy wrote:

fdsfd wrote:

penis

i agree!

Joezapy wrote:

pls revive so i can throw 2 kudosu thx

Mun wrote:

oops i dropped these ⋆ ⋆ ⋆ ⋆ ⋆ ⋆ ⋆ ⋆ ⋆ ⋆