deetz wrote:

quick look, sorry if i misunderstood anything

03:29:605 (2,3) - this rhythm felt a bit weird, as the only dominant instrument in that spot is the drum, but you chose to keep the emphasized drum beats to the tails even though you just extended a slider into one of those emphasized beats

It might seem a bit odd switching from guitar into drum mapping but I think what I have works and plays quite fine, I know having sladerends land on dominant beats is pretty bad but in this case it works alright imo

03:30:776 (2) - seems a bit odd to me to put the guitar hit on a slidertail then start mapping the guitar again

The whole combo inbetween upcoming and previous guitar sounds is pretty much improvised rhythm as I didn't want to stick to drum mapping, once again I think it sounds and plays just fine

03:46:580 (3,4) - sound isn't the same between these two as it was at 03:45:702 (1,2) - , maybe have some movement here

True, I've reworked this pattern once already and thought it would work better playability-wise but changed it once more now, should play and follow music better.

03:53:898 (1) - could increase stream spacing here for more movement as pitch increases :p

Remapped the stream and applied this

03:55:361 (3) - i don't like how this stops the movement but that's just me lol

Hm, I didn't consider this.. will keep it in mind

04:30:922 (5,6) - eh feels a bit random to increase the spacing just for this one

True but I think the pattern plays fine enough even with the distance change inbetween

05:29:898 (1) - would fit more to start the spacing increase here rather than 05:30:483 (1) - imo

Done

07:44:713 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4) - i am very unsure about how readable the 1/4 is compared to the 1/3

Changed

08:41:639 (1) - sliders being a bit too short to come out triggers me a bit tbh :B

I think it's fine, getting the sliderend out further by increasing sv looks like a dumb 9

08:47:493 (4) - consider making it a slider cuz the sound is held

not sure where to end the slider so i kept it like this

really good map :d

l1mi wrote:

01:36:044 (4) - Closer to the note before maybe, you said you would think about it. its visually closer now
04:05:898 (4,1) - Replace it with a slider, easier to hit when you leave the reversed slider. I actually like it the way it is right now, the 1/2 break after the 1/6 slider+circle lets you snap onto the next triplet pretty nicely imo edit : changed it as I changed the 1/6s to 1/4s
06:46:908 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - No indication its not going to be 1/2 again, only way to read this is to look at the approach circles or remember it; dont like it just saying. Visually nearly impossible to show a 3/4 rhythm with circles, this is the best I could get down. People should be fine with not breaking combo there as long as they wont misread it badly as 1/2 jumps. Then again most jumps on this map are longer distance than this so keeping this in mind players should pay more attention to approach circles here.

04:52:434 (1,2,3,4,5) - Something sound offbeat (it was 1/3).

My mistake, fixed

05:22:288 (3) - Dont think this follow the vocal, but it would be good if someone else could check this out as well because im not sure. But for me it sounds as if he sing on only white and red tics. Seems fine to me on bluetick
05:24:629 (3) - The next similar slider seem ok.


Dont know how to use hitsounds but what do you think about adding some here?

06:09:444 (1) - clap has drum clap for finish sound
06:14:127 (1) - clap Has drum whistle as a clap sound
06:18:810 (1) - clap ^
06:23:493 (1) - clap ^
01:25:215 (2) - clap ^

1. What's wrong withy all the red lines before the map even start?
2. 00:39:849 (5) - Add NC as your SV starts to slowly increase from here
3. 00:47:459 (4) - You forgot NC
4. 01:25:215 (2) - Maybe it would be wiser to put the NC here instead of 01:24:922 (1) - to prevent the new SV
5. 01:36:629 (2) - ^ instead of 01:36:556 (1) - it's the slider you want to put attention!
6. 02:06:995 - You miss a pretty strong beat here. I guess it's not that important though but well
7. 03:21:117 (1) - Try to reduce it a bit, it touches the hp bar!
8. 03:21:702 (1,2,1) - I find the rythme a bit unexpeted tbh and the slider doesn't feel catchy at all, not sure how to fix it, but I think it would sound better if you add a reverse on 03:21:702 (1) - to stay constant and not forget the beats
9. 03:37:873 - Would sound really cool if you add a note here as it will call back this triple 03:38:385 (6) -
10. 03:39:556 (2) - NC here?
11. 06:30:219 (3) - The end of the slider is pretty big, reduce the slider to finish on the previous blue tick and add a note at 06:30:511 - ?
12. 03:57:410 - I'dd add a note here and put the spinner on the next blue tick. I usually don't agree with this rhythme but your pattern feels a bit unfinished here (probably cause we can't here that downbeat)
13. 04:06:483 (7) - NC for new SV
14. 06:21:292 (2) - I'd remove to give more impact to 06:20:853 (4,5,6,1) -
15. 06:23:633 (2) - ^
16. 06:51:511 - The way you did is more natural but a note sounds great here though xD
17. 07:43:755 - ah you miss a pretty strong beat once more
18. 08:05:633 - why not mapping it? It's pretty strong and feels pretty natural to map it as far as I'm concerned :c
19. 08:06:511 (1) - I don't know what you think about it, but for this section I'll maybe try to add a few more triples as it feels a bit empty compared to the music that is full of 1/4. I feel the patterns (rhythmically) are more appropriate from 08:10:024 (1) -
20. 08:39:877 (1) - Might be just me but I feel that I'd still prefer a semicircle for more flow!
21. 07:08:999 (5) - Wouldn't it be more logical to put the NC here instead of here 07:09:365 (1) - ?
22. 06:55:536 (1) - NC? to prevent the new SV.

1. 01:24:044 (1) - Was there a reason for switching the NC pattern here ;o.
2. 01:28:434 (7,8) - I think you could really space them out more since they function as circles. It kinda detracts emphasis from 01:28:727 (1) - .
3. 02:43:654 (1) - Can you curve the tail up just a bit? It's looking a bit too burai atm lol.
4. 03:05:020 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,1) - Whoa this is sick.
5. 03:40:434 (5,1) - This felt a bit uncomfortable. I think with how you've set up the repeat slider into the triples, it would be better to increase the spacing here. Maybe stack slider 1 with 03:40:142 (1) - for a change in spacing.
6. 03:45:702 (1,2) - This stack kinda throws me off cuz the rest of this jump pattern plays really well D:.
7. 04:48:776 (1,2,3,4) - Imo the spacing is too large too early on. I think you can space 1>2 and 3>4 a bit closer, but have the spacing increase at a greater rate. It would fit the build up a bit better imo.
8. 06:08:853 (4) - I wish you had done something different here. There's a really nice drum sound on 06:08:999 - that you're missing out on right now ;c.
9. 06:48:438 (8) - I can't hear this note x___x. Might be better to make 7 a slider and 8 and slider-end but ehh I guess the rhythm kinda makes 8 a bit predictable. Anyways what do you think ;o
10. 08:06:511 - This section is really 1/4 intensive. Was hoping to at least see some streams even if not deathstreams lol. It just felt a bit weird that the longest stream here is only 5 notes long. I think you could have added some more 1/4's in here.

1. Holy moly this song is quiet, especially in kiai parts.
   
2. 03:15:483 (1395) - d? Assuming this is mapped based on the guitar solo,the higher sounds starting a bit later sounds nice.
3. 04:34:873 (2017) - 2017!? 2016!!
4. 07:33:682 (397) - YOU HAVE NO IDEA HOW MANY PEOPLE WILL CHOKE AT READING THIS. If you choose to keep, kdkkdkkd can work, otherwise... it'll be a secret that it ends on the same hand...
5. 07:42:219 (461,462,463,464,465,466,467) - kkkdddk flows into the upcoming notes a lot nicer than kkkdkkk.

OzzyOzrock wrote:

This will be tiny. TINY?!

[lolicubes]

1. Holy moly this song is quiet, especially in kiai parts. Not anymore.
   
2. 03:15:483 (1395) - d? Assuming this is mapped based on the guitar solo,the higher sounds starting a bit later sounds nice. Sure.
3. 04:34:873 (2017) - 2017!? 2016!! I am thinking about the future already.
4. 07:33:682 (397) - YOU HAVE NO IDEA HOW MANY PEOPLE WILL CHOKE AT READING THIS. If you choose to keep, kdkkdkkd can work, otherwise... it'll be a secret that it ends on the same hand... I actually doubt it. This part is the same as 07:30:511 (370,371,372,373,374,375,376,377,378,379) - except it has one don less, but the amount of notes is the same. Obviously an extra note tells you something. (also this is meant to perform a hand switch, as when you fully alternate everything this part switches your main hand here)
5. 07:42:219 (461,462,463,464,465,466,467) - kkkdddk flows into the upcoming notes a lot nicer than kkkdkkk. Sounds reasonable.

1. 01:43:215 (5) - Don't like this because it's rhythmically confusing. If you want to follow the guitar it's best to end it at 01:43:507 - , else end it at 01:43:361 - and add a circle at 01:43:434 to complete the drums that are here.
2. 01:50:824 (5,1) - This jump could be a little bigger, to emphasize the music better.
3. 01:50:971 (1,2) - But this jump should be a little smaller, it's too big.
4. 03:21:702 (1,2) - This plays poorly. The guitar is a bit dodgy to follow here. Why not just follow the most heavy beat at 03:21:849 - instead? You remove the first slider and map a circle instead, and then you have the other slider start at 03:21:849 - and end at 03:22:142 - . The nature of the guitar is not that sudden that it needs to be mapped exactly where it lands, else you would have to use 1/12 ticks or something at times.
   For example, you mapped 1/4 here: 03:23:751 (2,3,4,5) - , when the guitar is not. And I call this a better decision overall.
5. 03:36:337 (1) - This clap should probably be something else, something more soft. The crash in the music is at 03:36:190 (10) - , but mapping that there would make this slider sound weird in general.
6. 03:44:532 (1) - Finish fits better.
7. 07:30:658 (2) - This flows badly, this whole section focuses on 1/3 drums and 1/3 in general, and you mapped the vocals here which you didn't map anywhere else in this section like this. Just make 1/3 here as well (add a note).
8. 07:45:438 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1) - Should probably add a few cymbal crashes here, they are so powerful in the music.
9. 07:50:121 (1,2,3,4,5,1) - Same here.
10. 08:41:633 (1) - Maybe drag the final endpoint so they are more symmetrical? Currently they look kinda shabby cause they end too close to their loop.

Kyubey wrote:

I'm not a taiko player, but something concerns me.
your combo is too long I know other longs things, this song is one...
06:59:780 (247,248,249,250) - won't it follow guitar better if you remove 06:59:853 (248) - this note and place one 06:59:999 - here? Well, it works both ways. The guitar is more emphasized where I put the triple, but I guess this works just as good and I like it. Kite, can you please move 06:59:853 (248) - to 06:59:999 - for me please.
07:33:682 (397) - is this note really needed? probably i'm wrong, but this vocal doesn't sounds as something providing a nice platform to place 1/6 triple, which sounds kinda strange in this quiet and calm part, even 07:47:682 (504,505) - this would sound better with 1/6 triple imo There is an obvious drum hit there. Actually, there are many more, however I chose not to map them cause they would be awkward. This one is slightly awkward, but it is there to change the gameplay (for full alt players), so you swap your "main" hand for the rest of this section.

1. 00:48:483 - This part just scared me so hard. I thought there was a bee in my room o m g.
2. 02:11:751 (1) - This NC doesn't seem necessary
3. 02:33:410 (3) - Whistle kinda fits here.
4. 06:22:609 (2) - I don't think the normal-whistle on the slider-body was intentional. It sounds really weird anyways cuz its the default xD.
5. 08:45:438 - Increase volume to 90%? The custom drumwhistle you use here just sounds slightly softer than the ones just before.

1. Offset: 1.641ms	BPM: 140,00
2. Offset: 23.926ms	BPM: 131,00
3. Offset: 24.842ms	BPM: 128,00 - Omit first barline must be ticked.
4. Offset: 25.777ms	BPM: 120,00
5. Offset: 27.777ms	BPM: 110,00
6. Offset: 28.867ms	BPM: 108,00 - Omit first barline must be ticked.
7. Offset: 29.973ms	BPM: 193,00
8. Offset: 33.703ms	BPM: 205,00
9. Offset: 331.068ms	BPM: 200,00
10. Offset: 368.268ms	BPM: 205,00
11. Offset: 448.463ms	BPM: 200,00 - Omit first barline must be ticked.
12. Offset: 449.063ms	BPM: 205,00
13. Offset: 462.950ms	BPM: 205,00 - Omit first barline must be ticked.
14. Offset: 463.096ms	BPM: 205,00

Okoratu wrote:

We irc'd and i found something wrongly snapped and have concerns that the the section from 07:29:048 - to 07:43:097 - is early and the offset should just shift by about +20ms (might be too much but sounds much better)