snowpink526 wrote:

I like this beatmap!
GFRIEND♥

lykzomg wrote:

Hwaiting!

TequilaWolf wrote:

mod

Run Through Time-

00:15:269 (1,2) - consider something like this http://puu.sh/uhPNv/95de21c884.jpg, might fit better I think it's better now.

00:16:207 (3,4,5,6) - spacing for 3->4 is the same as 4->5 and 5->6, but 3->4 is a 1/4 jump. this might confuse players. you can try this http://puu.sh/uhPWu/de9f049b6a.jpg although there are many other ways to do it, as long as you don't have the same spacing for 1/4 and 1/2

00:17:145 (7) - also consider stacking this on 00:16:877 (6) -

00:17:948 (2) - guess you want to place this further away from 00:17:412 (1) - for better emphasis..like this! 00:19:555 (1,2) -

00:26:386 (2,3,4) - really don't hear the 1/8 here, maybe if you really want to, use a 1/8 slider? I sure did hear it :O

00:47:948 (3,4,5) - don't hear it in the song, just a 1/4 slider?

01:19:957 (2,3,4) - maybe reduce spacing? don't think jump is needed here I'll try to think about it more.

01:23:707 (9,1) - for this one 9 should be closer to 8, not 1. for emphasis ^

01:34:019 (2,3,4,5,1) - I think 5->1 should be the biggest jump here because 2345 are all the same sounds but 1 is not ^

02:54:644 (3,4) - too big. 02:54:778 (4,5) - is ok but 3->4 needs to be smaller ^

02:58:930 (5,6,7) - again, I think 5->6->7 should be almost equal spacing ^

#

HabiHolic wrote:

[Run Through Time]
02:08:707 (12,1) - 이거 저만 느끼는건지 모르겠지만. 플로우가 상당히 이상하다고 느꼈습니다. 밑에서 위로 가서 바로 옆쪽으로 가버리는 플로우는 되도록이면 간격이 낮은 상태에서만 사용해주시는것이 좋아요 지금처럼 디스턴스 자체가 넓은 맵에서는 정말 안좋은 요소입니다 저는 위치 스위칭을 권해드릴게요 이 부분은 더 생각해보겠습니다.

1. Adding romanized names of the memembers of this group could help us non-Koreans find the song. I know it's a minor thing, but still. So, add Sowon Yerin Eunha Yuju SinB Umji to the tags?

1. 00:22:234 (2) - is there any way to place this slider higher? It may overlap with the combo number. (This will only occur on 4:3 displays, so it's kinda minor, but still)
2. 00:46:073 - the way vocals and drums peak here makes the 1/1 rhythm feel sort of weak. I guess we really should try to focus on 00:46:073 - this beat. Example.
3. 01:00:270 - this beat is very strong and belongs to a new part of the song. So, mapping it with 00:59:198 (5)'s tail is not the best option. Try to give it a circle/head of a slider instead? Probably this way?
   Note: essentially, I am trying to make the strongest beats clickable to the player as releasing a slider ives far less emphasis than holding it.
   Note2: 01:59:198 (5) - 02:50:627 (5) - same happens here.
   
   Just a couple of things about the rhythm. I liked the general concept.

1. 00:15:270 (1,2,3) - in comaprison with kiais, this moment is relatively slow-paced and using 1/4s here and only here sort of breaks the consistent structure of the set and creates an artificial difficulty spike. I would simplify the part so that sliders are are easier to read and hit. example
2. 00:21:698 - there is a strong beat that gets less emphasis as it is mapped with a slidertail. Why not place a circle there instead? This way it would have a clickable object, requiring players to actually press a note and recieve feedback, hence, making the beat stand out more.
   Note: 00:28:127 - same happens with that beat. Sort of like 00:38:841 (1) - or 00:38:841 (1,1) - those work pretty well.
3. 02:34:287 (5) - probably two circles here? Or just the one for 02:34:555 - so that this beat would recieve enough stress?
   
   Again, just a few beats that I would want you to map. Other than that I enjoyed it.

1. 00:10:984 (6) - just to prevent comboing from being too long a new combo here could help. It will fit with the drums and the combo pattern you use later in the map.
2. 00:18:752 - the strong beat here is left unclickable, while a relatively weaker one on 00:18:484 - is mapped with a sliderhead. The best way to solve this would be to replace the slider with two circles, giving each beat equal emphasis.
   Note: I will not be mentioning this kind of beats again, just look through the map and see if there are more of these or just contact me and we'll talk about it!
3. 01:51:095 (6,7) - probably use a slider here? this way as a sudden 1/8 double may come quite confusing, considerting that it is quite fast.
4. 02:08:305 (8,9,1) - essentially, the pattern implies a very short jump between 8 and 9, which is fine as the song allows that. But having no jump between 9 and 1 is not so fine. Since (1) is stronger, leaving it without a jump gives the map a sort of unnecessary flow break here.Soemthing like this could work perfectly fine and would still feel pretty reasonanle within the difficulty context.
   Note: 02:27:055 (5,6,7) - 02:51:162 (6,7,1) - it reoccurs several times, so you might want tto scan through the difficulty and consider changing similar patterns.
5. 03:09:310 (2) - the 1/8 circle here isn't exactly necessary for a Hard difficulty as the drum beats there areindistinct and the difficulyt is just introducing 1/8s.
   
   Some of the spacings feel inconsistent/unnatural (mostly the ones that are connected with the jumps I've mentioned) and a few of the beats that were left out kind of spoil the overall impression. It could use some work, but it can be made into a really fantastic difficulty.

1. The same issues with clickable/unclickable beats and spacing reoccur here. Let me show a few examples.
   
   1. 00:21:028 (5) - this circle here represents a very minor beat, yet it requires players to actually press a key at the exact moment and be accurate. But 00:20:895 - which is much stronger is mapped with a slidertail. And as you know, a slidertail can be easily dropped-off without much effort. Making stronger beats clickable usually helps.
   2. 00:22:234 (3,4,5) - (5) is just as strong as the previous too, yet the spacing is lower. Here's an easy solution
   4. 00:32:948 (3,4) - sudden decrease in spacing after jumpy patterns might feel a bit forced. Place a small jump here to ease players out of the pattern?
   5. 01:08:305 (4,5,1) - but (1) is actually stronger, why would you decrease spacing instead of increasing it?
      Note: 02:27:055 (5,6,7) - same here.
      
      These are things I do not actually agree with. I've tried to explain why and what could be done to improve them, so you should be able to go through the map and see the changes needed. If not, feel free to PM me and I'll be more than happy to clarify!
   So, my main concern in this case is the way you emphasise stronger bits of music. I think we can discuss that further and come up with a solution that would improve the rhythm!

• 
  At this point, I don't think that repeating the same issues would be much of a help, as I have already explained my concerns and those patterns reoccur in every difficulty in one way or another.
  
  I will however list a few examples.

1. 00:20:225 (3,4) - 00:20:627 (5,6) - in this case 4 and 6 are similar, yet only one of the beats is stressed with a jump.
2. 00:29:064 (5,6) - (5) covers the drum quite well, but (6) doesn't. There is a lud drum unclickable at 00:29:466 - with no other instruments to justify this rhythm choice.
   Note: 00:37:502 (4) - same.
   
   And so it continues.I think you should be able to get the idea and improve the patterns accordingly if you agree.

1. AR is too low, I'd use 9,5 or even 9,7
2. 00:10:984 (1,2,3,4) - the spacing is too high compared to the other similar parts 1,20 will do
3. 00:16:207 (3,4,5,6,7,8) - the spacing isn't intuitive at all, the 1/4 jumps and the 1/2 antijumps would throw anyone off, probably stacking the 1/2s would work or using some kind of NC patterns, anyways I prefer if you rearrange the pattern
4. 00:26:921 (5,6,7) - I don't understand how the jumps work at this diff, I mean 6 isn't a strong beat, so I don't get the spacing from 5 to 6, 7 is stronger than 6
5. 00:29:332 (6) - the tail of this slider should be click'able, since other similar beats are, such as 00:29:064 (5) -
6. 00:28:528 (2,3) - same logic 2 shouldn't be a jump, but 3
7. 00:29:734 (8) - 8 is a jump here, but 00:30:805 (3) - this is not, they have the same clap sound and should have similar spacing IMO
8. 00:37:770 (5,6) - ctrl g the rhythm, the tail of 6 should be click'able, since is the same sound as 4 head
9. 00:51:430 (1) - the NC looks so spammy, I'd remove this one
   
   I think you need to be more consistent with the spacing, like if part A have a jump then the part B with the same sound should have a jump, also the rhythm sometimes is a bit weird, because you leave strong beats at the tail of sliders and weak beats at the head of them.