What...
It didn't use to be, but there was a snap error as pointed out by nivrad and we decided to redo this section slightly.Evening wrote:
lol what year is it
01:22:433 (82433|4,82433|3,82433|2,82648|3,82862|2,82862|4) - lol what i don't remember this being a fake sv on my diff
don't really like it since it's a false SV on a section that isn't really "unique" in the song but ok loleJinjin wrote:
It didn't use to be, but there was a snap error as pointed out by nivrad and we decided to redo this section slightly.Evening wrote:
lol what year is it
01:22:433 (82433|4,82433|3,82433|2,82648|3,82862|2,82862|4) - lol what i don't remember this being a fake sv on my diff
Went with the SV suggestion from niv
For the "Zen" part, it is just what he was known before and should stay that way to keep some consistency when people are trying to search for his work on GDs (when he did Empress etc.)Soul Evans wrote:
While i do understand you want it to be in the qualified section, however, just saying that ''players can handle it it's fine no need to change'' isn't suppose to be
the case here, other than that as i said it should be having the same SV effect as the others, you say you haven't had players have any problems but i noticed it
without the editor and evening doesn't like it either,
and i am really against this set going for rank with any sort of regrets, no way i am letting this one tiny thing
slide for that matter, even though you see it as ''players can handle it'' this is one of the rarest kinds of maps in the ranked sections which is why i am complete against this.
Also, why is zen's diff called ''zen's insane'' instead of ''evenings insane''? tags show evening which would show all his maps and all but it would be misinforming to players who don't know evenings old name to generally assume that ''zen mapped this'' so i am gonna suggest it to an accurate change, do tell me how you think it shouldn't be the case, your map is gonna hit big within the ranked section and i can already see it achieving top 3 on 2017 maps so the people who don't know who zen is, i think a change to the accurate current naming of him is what is necessary. it's okay to do both, but it's better to stay accurate always to who exactly did the difficulty.
the thing is that it's not intendedjakads wrote:
the entire map is full of fake SVs what're u talking about xdd
imo, I don't think it'll matter that much if there's fake sv there, since the entire map is full of them anyway and the intention was to make players memorize them
If it were in, say, my extra diff, it would be a problem for having it all of a sudden
But because it's in the map by Eveningthe infamous SV gimmick creator lol jk ily, it fits the theme so it should be fine
But if you think it needs some fixing, feel free to req DQ
but please don't I wanna eat pp asap
c'mon it's only like what, 3 days left
doPPelgangbanger plzzzzz
What consistency? there are legit players who thing there is a different ''zen'' than evening, and it's not consistent if you look at it from the point of that it's not his name anymore, and zen's emrpess diff was when he wasn't called evening back then iirc, diff names should be accurate not in this sense if this map is gonna get recognized then give full credibility for the guest mapper, because imo, people get confused.Raveille wrote:
For the "Zen" part, it is just what he was known before and should stay that way to keep some consistency when people are trying to search for his work on GDs (when he did Empress etc.)
You have to realize that when I asked what evening wanted to name his gd as, he wanted it to be zen's insane, not evening's insane. Stop being picky about this.Soul Evans wrote:
What consistency? there are legit players who thing there is a different ''zen'' than evening, and it's not consistent if you look at it from the point of that it's not his name anymore, and zen's emrpess diff was when he wasn't called evening back then iirc, diff names should be accurate not in this sense if this map is gonna get recognized then give full credibility for the guest mapper, because imo, people get confused.Raveille wrote:
For the "Zen" part, it is just what he was known before and should stay that way to keep some consistency when people are trying to search for his work on GDs (when he did Empress etc.)
Thanks for your feedback!ByeForNow wrote:
Hey there,
Firstly, I wanna congratulate you on getting the map qualified!
However, I wanna point out something that caught my attention in 'Zen's Insane' difficulty.
Taking 01:15:576 - 01:16:219 - as a section,
1. 01:15:576 (75576|0,75576|4,75683|5,75683|1) - Why are these notes placed as LNs yet not 01:15:790 (75790|2,75790|6,76005|1,76005|5) - ?
2. 01:15:576 (75576|4,75576|0,75683|1,75683|5) - Why doesn't these notes have the pause-like SVs like 01:15:790 - and 01:16:005 -?
I highly suggest to replace those notes with normal notes for and put in the pause-like SVs for consistency.
Also, after all the intense SVs from section 01:08:505 - 01:15:362 - , 01:15:576 (75576|4,75576|0,75683|1,75683|5) - feels too a little too sudden/out of place to just have a simple 1.00x. Hence in my opinion, it's better to apply the similar pause-like SVs to those notes.
Thanks for your attention, I hope you can carefully consider this.
just say 3timesAnother Lie wrote:
Entrust to Jinjin for more PP rain maps.
Congrats for2nd timedestructing PP system after Maniera.
probablyJinjin wrote:
Thanks for your feedback!ByeForNow wrote:
Hey there,
Firstly, I wanna congratulate you on getting the map qualified!
However, I wanna point out something that caught my attention in 'Zen's Insane' difficulty.
Taking 01:15:576 - 01:16:219 - as a section,
1. 01:15:576 (75576|0,75576|4,75683|5,75683|1) - Why are these notes placed as LNs yet not 01:15:790 (75790|2,75790|6,76005|1,76005|5) - ?
2. 01:15:576 (75576|4,75576|0,75683|1,75683|5) - Why doesn't these notes have the pause-like SVs like 01:15:790 - and 01:16:005 -?
I highly suggest to replace those notes with normal notes for and put in the pause-like SVs for consistency.
Also, after all the intense SVs from section 01:08:505 - 01:15:362 - , 01:15:576 (75576|4,75576|0,75683|1,75683|5) - feels too a little too sudden/out of place to just have a simple 1.00x. Hence in my opinion, it's better to apply the similar pause-like SVs to those notes.
Thanks for your attention, I hope you can carefully consider this.
I looked at your suggestions but the person in charge of this gd (evening) has probably done these patterns / svs for a reason so i won't be giving you a clear response
Keep in mind that this diff has been playtested by many people (and countless times by me too) and I think all the sections are alright
In addition, settled stuff with soul evans through pm!