I totally agree with this, I thought it was already a rule. Making a storyboard is as hard as doing a guest difficulty and it can be easier to find someone's masterpiece if their name are in the tags.
Common sense seems more uncommon nowadays.Endaris wrote:
I thought this was common sense.
this is the infamous osu community were talking about. if you dont hand them stuff on a platter they wont take it q:Natsu wrote:
Don't need to add obvious things, tbh.Endaris wrote:
I thought this was common sense.
lol. just add it, no problemHappyRocket88 wrote:
Then mapsets will be DQ'ed just because the storyboarder isn't over tags? nuuuu /w\
Just saying that QAT can adding something to tag without dq, lolHappyRocket88 wrote:
Then mapsets will be DQ'ed just because the storyboarder isn't over tags? nuuuu /w\
Sending someone to jail. Seriously?Hero For Fun wrote:
This is basically like Sending someone to jail for not saying "Hello" when he meet someone.
Disagree.
However, ever though about people who doesn't want credit? may be a minor quantity, but there are.
^ My brain couldnt understand that all.Hero For Fun wrote:
This is basically like Sending someone to jail for not saying "Hello" when he meet someone.
Just rewrite this so that the storyboarder's name is also mentioned.Ranking Criteria wrote:
The information of multiple mapset contributors must be provided in the mapset, if there is any guest mapper. This might be in the creator's words, via a storyboard or via naming the guest difficulties appropriately. You only need to provide information of guest mapper and corresponding guest part. Guest mappers must be added to the tags of a mapset. This helps others to know if the map uploader is the main contributor of the mapset and who else contributed to the given mapset.
Which is why this can't be a rule. Rules should be absolute. This should be a guideline at best. Credits can be made into the first post.Reditum wrote:
There are things that we can't credit, such as if I were to grab a MIDI piano note that I can't really credit to a certain group, but we can give credit where credit is due.
It's really weird how a lot of people, generally in staff positions, seem to always bring up the point "Well they made something but they didn't put much WORK into it."You're twisting my words. I never said people put little work into stuff, I just made a scenario of a possible case where such a thing can happen. When you are making rules, you need to think of every possible scenario and how that scenario will be affected. Based on this you need to weight if it's even worth making a rule, or just a guideline.
I guess we take our requests towards the council now?Loctav wrote:
In order to rework the Ranking Criteria from the fundaments, restructuring and reforming the appearance and bring everyone on the common ground, we decided to put a group of users in charge to work together renewing the compendium of rules and guidelines we use on everyday mapping.
I think the main difference between a SB and a mp3-file or background or something else is that the storyboard got specifically created for the map just like guest difficulties.lolcubes wrote:
If you want to add a SBer into tags, go ahead. Don't force everyone to do it, because it's just not logical to credit this before crediting certain other things which in most cases can't be credited, but have more impact. If it's not possible to credit everyone for their work, then you shouldn't force this as it can only create more inconsistencies and pressure from the rules.
What if a background was made specifically for a beatmap? (there is a legit case here: monthly beatmap contests for example) How is that different?Endaris wrote:
I think the main difference between a SB and a mp3-file or background or something else is that the storyboard got specifically created for the map just like guest difficulties.
As long as guest mappers have to be added to the tags, guest storyboarders should be too.