Hey sheela! Here's the m4m from your queue~
First thing, this song is cool as hell. Thank you for introducing me to this.
[Difficult]
Something i'm noticing is that notes randomly seem to sound early compared to the song, but then this weird offset fixes itself immediatly after. Example: 01:49:492 (2,3) - 2 sounds slightly early and 3 is pretty much perfect.
00:24:533 (1) - Consider 00:25:852 - as a stopping point for this spinner; a distinct sound starts there, and I think it's better for the spinner to end on a sound than nothing (gives a more meaningful finish)
00:59:361 (2,3,4,5) - Consistent spacing doesn't really feel appropriate for this pattern, considering there's usually emphasis placed on a note.
01:05:693 (3,4,5,1) - You could set up this pattern so that the triangle that 3-4-5 makes is the same as the triangle 3-4-1 makes. Would look neater.
01:33:925 (5,1) - Hm, why the considerably smaller spacing than you usually do on downbeats here? Well, I suppose you continue to do it in this measure so I'll assume it's intentional
01:59:386 (8) - Looks like overmap, there's no sound here
02:01:101 (4) - It's weird that this gets more spacing than 02:01:629 (1) - considering 1 is the more powerful sound by far.
02:17:328 (3) - Been thinking about this, but consider giving the sounds mapped to the "woosh sound" (like the one linked here) some kind of hitsound.
02:19:307 (4,5) - Could be a triplet, would keep consistent with you putting a note at the woosh sound
02:22:605 - feels like overmap, but even if it's for emphasis there's nothing to emphasize.
02:40:678 (1) - Deserves some kind of hitsound I'd think
02:44:900 (1) - deserves more of a jump to be consistent with similar jumps in the area
02:49:122 (1,1) - first 1/4 in the diff and it uses the same spacing as the 1/2. I'd make these closer. Maybe use the spacing you use at 03:06:008 (2,1) -
That was a good drop.
03:29:226 (3) - This intense sound has less spacing than 03:29:754 (5) - which doesn't feel right to me
03:56:667 (1) - why NC?
04:21:996 (1) - Ok so I just started noticing that you've been NCing these and I'm kinda confused as to why
04:17:247 (2) - I don't like this extended slider, you're ignoring a vocal and and instrumental sound at 04:17:511 -
05:20:042 (1) - Amazing slider
[Distraction]
OD7? It is 3.86 stars and all. I think it would fit the diff better.
00:24:533 (1,1) - Personally not a huge fan of spinners that end 1/4 before the opening note, but I guess it fits here and for the difficulty.
00:31:393 (2) - silence end?
00:41:947 (2) - ^ You get the idea, I won't keep posting these.
01:29:440 (4,5) - is louder than 01:28:912 (2,3) - so I think it shouldn't have less spacing
01:26:010 (1,2) - blanket ~
01:45:798 (1) - remove NC?
01:51:075 (1,2) - Blanket, if you care to fix it. It's very slightly off.
Some of these triplets feel a lot like overmap, but considering you used them, there must have been a good reason for them, so I'm not going to point them out.
02:57:565 (2,1) - Hm, wouldn't this spacing fit to be the same as 02:49:122 (1,1) - ?
03:04:952 (1,2) - easily fixable blanket (pause at 03:05:612 - for approach circle)
03:28:171 - Should be clickable imo, slider into circle works well
03:25:796 (3,4,1) - inconsistent spacing, and it's weird because 03:25:928 (4) - has more spacing than the downbeat
03:31:865 (4) - NC
03:40:308 (4) - ^
in this area the combos are so short, they're like 3 or 4 long. You could probably extend the comboing to every downbeat, instead of twice per.
04:05:637 (4) - NC
04:47:853 (4) - ^
05:14:765 (3) - NC to be consistent
05:16:876 (3) - ^
Really fun set, I LOVE low SV / BPM jumps because they feel so fun to play. Good luck! Starred C:
First thing, this song is cool as hell. Thank you for introducing me to this.
[Difficult]
Something i'm noticing is that notes randomly seem to sound early compared to the song, but then this weird offset fixes itself immediatly after. Example: 01:49:492 (2,3) - 2 sounds slightly early and 3 is pretty much perfect.
00:24:533 (1) - Consider 00:25:852 - as a stopping point for this spinner; a distinct sound starts there, and I think it's better for the spinner to end on a sound than nothing (gives a more meaningful finish)
00:59:361 (2,3,4,5) - Consistent spacing doesn't really feel appropriate for this pattern, considering there's usually emphasis placed on a note.
01:05:693 (3,4,5,1) - You could set up this pattern so that the triangle that 3-4-5 makes is the same as the triangle 3-4-1 makes. Would look neater.
01:33:925 (5,1) - Hm, why the considerably smaller spacing than you usually do on downbeats here? Well, I suppose you continue to do it in this measure so I'll assume it's intentional
01:59:386 (8) - Looks like overmap, there's no sound here
02:01:101 (4) - It's weird that this gets more spacing than 02:01:629 (1) - considering 1 is the more powerful sound by far.
02:17:328 (3) - Been thinking about this, but consider giving the sounds mapped to the "woosh sound" (like the one linked here) some kind of hitsound.
02:19:307 (4,5) - Could be a triplet, would keep consistent with you putting a note at the woosh sound
02:22:605 - feels like overmap, but even if it's for emphasis there's nothing to emphasize.
02:40:678 (1) - Deserves some kind of hitsound I'd think
02:44:900 (1) - deserves more of a jump to be consistent with similar jumps in the area
02:49:122 (1,1) - first 1/4 in the diff and it uses the same spacing as the 1/2. I'd make these closer. Maybe use the spacing you use at 03:06:008 (2,1) -
That was a good drop.
03:29:226 (3) - This intense sound has less spacing than 03:29:754 (5) - which doesn't feel right to me
03:56:667 (1) - why NC?
04:21:996 (1) - Ok so I just started noticing that you've been NCing these and I'm kinda confused as to why
04:17:247 (2) - I don't like this extended slider, you're ignoring a vocal and and instrumental sound at 04:17:511 -
05:20:042 (1) - Amazing slider
[Distraction]
OD7? It is 3.86 stars and all. I think it would fit the diff better.
00:24:533 (1,1) - Personally not a huge fan of spinners that end 1/4 before the opening note, but I guess it fits here and for the difficulty.
00:31:393 (2) - silence end?
00:41:947 (2) - ^ You get the idea, I won't keep posting these.
01:29:440 (4,5) - is louder than 01:28:912 (2,3) - so I think it shouldn't have less spacing
01:26:010 (1,2) - blanket ~
01:45:798 (1) - remove NC?
01:51:075 (1,2) - Blanket, if you care to fix it. It's very slightly off.
Some of these triplets feel a lot like overmap, but considering you used them, there must have been a good reason for them, so I'm not going to point them out.
02:57:565 (2,1) - Hm, wouldn't this spacing fit to be the same as 02:49:122 (1,1) - ?
03:04:952 (1,2) - easily fixable blanket (pause at 03:05:612 - for approach circle)
03:28:171 - Should be clickable imo, slider into circle works well
03:25:796 (3,4,1) - inconsistent spacing, and it's weird because 03:25:928 (4) - has more spacing than the downbeat
03:31:865 (4) - NC
03:40:308 (4) - ^
in this area the combos are so short, they're like 3 or 4 long. You could probably extend the comboing to every downbeat, instead of twice per.
04:05:637 (4) - NC
04:47:853 (4) - ^
05:14:765 (3) - NC to be consistent
05:16:876 (3) - ^
Really fun set, I LOVE low SV / BPM jumps because they feel so fun to play. Good luck! Starred C: